Evidence that adenine nucleotides modulate nucleoside-transporter function. Characterization of uridine transport in chromaffin cells and plasma membrane vesicles

María Teresa Miras Portugal: a pioneer in the study of purinoceptors in chromaffin cells

María Teresa Miras Portugal devoted most of her scientific life to the study of purinergic signalling. In an important part of her work, she used a model system: the chromaffin cells of the adrenal medulla. It was in these cells that she identified diadenosine polyphosphates, from which she proceeded to the study of adrenomedullary purinome: nucleotide synthesis and degradation, adenosine transport, nucleotide uptake into chromaffin granules, exocytotic release of nucleotides and autocrine regulation of chromaffin cell function via purinoceptors. This short review will focus on the current state of knowledge of the purinoceptors of adrenal chromaffin cells, a subject to which María Teresa made seminal contributions and which she continued to study until the end of her scientific life.

Adenosine: An immune modulator of inflammatory bowel diseases

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a common and lifelong disabling gastrointestinal disease. Emerging treatments are being developed to target inflammatory cytokines which initiate and perpetuate the immune response. Adenosine is an important modulator of inflammation and its anti-inflammatory effects have been well established in humans as well as in animal models. High extracellular adenosine suppresses and resolves chronic inflammation in IBD models. High extracellular adenosine levels could be achieved by enhanced adenosine absorption and increased de novo synthesis. Increased adenosine concentration leads to activation of the A2a receptor on the cell surface of immune and epithelial cells that would be a potential therapeutic target for chronic intestinal inflammation. Adenosine is transported via concentrative nucleoside transporter and equilibrative nucleoside transporter transporters that are localized in apical and basolateral membranes of intestinal epithelial cells, respectively. Increased extracellular adenosine levels activate the A2a receptor, which would reduce cytokines responsible for chronic inflammation.

Mechanisms of adenosine-induced cytotoxicity and their clinical and physiological implications

Extracellular ATP (ATPo) and adenosine are cytotoxic to several cancer cell lines, suggesting their potential use for anticancer therapy. Adenosine causes cytotoxicity, either when added exogenously or when generated from ATPo hydrolysis, via mechanisms which are not mutually exclusive and which involve, adenosine receptor activation, pyrimidine starvation and/or increases in intracellular S-adenosylhomocysteine: S-adenosylmethionine ratio. Given that adenosine also appears to protect against cytotoxicity via mechanisms including immunity against damage by oxygen free radicals, an understanding of the contribution of adenosine to ATPo-induced cytotoxicity is thus crucial, when considering any potential therapeutic use for these compounds. However, such an understanding has been largely hindered by the fact that many studies have not focused enough on the possibility that both ATPo and adenosine may mediate cytotoxicity in the same system. Such studies can benefit from use a range of ATPo concentrations when assessing the contribution of adenosine to ATPo-induced cytotoxicity. Whilst future molecular and pharmacological studies are needed to establish the nature of the cytotoxic adenosine receptor, it is possible that more than just one adenosine receptor type is involved and that the cytotoxic receptor(s) type is more likely to have a low affinity for adenosine. Activation of the adenosine receptor(s) would thus lead to cytotoxicity only at relatively high adenosine concentrations, while lower adenosine concentrations mediate non-cytotoxic physiological effects.

Molecular biology and regulation of nucleoside and nucleobase transporter proteins in eukaryotes and prokaryotes

The molecular cloning of cDNAs encoding nucleoside transporter proteins has greatly advanced understanding of how nucleoside permeants are translocated across cell membranes. The nucleoside transporter proteins identified thus far have been categorized into five distinct superfamilies. Two of these superfamilies, the equilibrative and concentrative nucleoside transporters, have human members and these will be examined in depth in this review. The human equilibrative nucleoside transporters translocate nucleosides and nucleobases bidirectionally down their concentration gradients and are important in the uptake of anticancer and antiviral nucleoside drugs. The human concentrative nucleoside transporters cotranslocate nucleosides and sodium unidirectionally against the nucleoside concentration gradients and play a vital role in certain tissues. The regulation of nucleoside and nucleobase transporters is being studied more intensely now that more tools are available. This review provides an overview of recent advances in the molecular biology and regulation of the nucleoside and nucleobase transporters.

Tissue-specific changes in RNA synthesis in vivo during anoxia in crucian carp

The overall energy budget for protein synthesis (i.e., transcription plus translation) is thought to consist of fixed and variable components, with RNA synthesis accounting for the former and protein synthesis the latter. During anoxia, the downregulation of protein synthesis (i.e., the variable component), to reduce energetic demand, is an important aspect of survival in crucian carp. The present study examines RNA synthesis during anoxia by labeling with [(3)H]uridine. A novel synthesis rate calculation is presented, which allows for the tissue-specific salvage of uridine, with synthesis rates finally expressed relative to DNA. After 48 h anoxia, the decline (29%) in brain RNA synthesis and increases in the heart and liver (132 and 871%, respectively) support known RNA functions during hypoxic/anoxic survival. This study provides evidence that, in an anoxia-tolerant species, survival mechanisms involving RNA are able to operate because tissue-specific restructuring of the RNA synthesis process enables fixed synthesis costs to be maintained; this may be as vital to survival as exploiting the variable energetic demand of protein synthesis.

Diadenosine polyphosphates inhibit adenosine kinase activity but decrease levels of endogenous adenosine in rat brain

Findings in peripheral tissues that diadenosine polyphosphates (Ap(n)As) activate 5'-nucleotidase activity and inhibit adenosine kinase activity in vitro led us to test the hypothesis that Ap(n)As and analogues thereof, through such actions on purine enzymes, increase brain levels of endogenous adenosine in vivo. Accordingly, we tested Ap(n)As for their effects on the in vitro activities of adenosine kinase, adenosine deaminase, AMP deaminase and 5'-nucleotidase and, following unilateral microinjections in rat striatum, on in vivo levels of endogenous adenosine. Adenosine kinase activity was not affected significantly by 5',5'''-P1,P2-diadenosine pyrophosphate (Ap2A) or by 5',5'''-P1,P3-diadenosine triphosphate (Ap3A), but was inhibited by 5',5'''-P1,P4-diadenosine tetraphosphate (Ap4A), 5',5'''-P1,P5-diadenosine pentaphosphate (Ap5A) and 5',5'''-P1,P6-diadenosine hexaphosphate (Ap6A); apparent IC50 values were 5.0, 3.3 and 500 microM, respectively. Inhibition of adenosine kinase activity by Ap4A and the four metabolically stable analogues of Ap4A tested was uncompetitive. Following unilateral intrastriatal injections, adenosine levels, relative to uninjected contralateral striatum, were decreased significantly (P < 0.05) by 48% with Ap4A and by 37% with AppCH2ppA, a metabolically stable analogue of Ap4A. Striatal levels of adenosine were not affected significantly by Ap5A or Ap6A. Cytosolic, but not particulate 5'-nucleotidase activity was inhibited and AMP deaminase activity was increased by some Ap(n)As. Although adenosine kinase inhibitors increase levels of endogenous adenosine and we showed here that Ap(n)As were potent inhibitors of this enzyme, these particular actions of Ap(n)As were not consistent with their effects on levels of endogenous adenosine.

Bovine adrenal endothelial cells express nucleoside transporters nonregulated by protein kinases A and C

The present investigation characterizes the nucleoside transporters in bovine adrenomedullary endothelial cells and their possible regulation by the action of protein kinases A and C to establish comparisons with the nucleoside transport system in chromaffin cells. The nucleoside transport proved to be a nitrobenzylthioinosine (NBTI)-sensitive facilitated-diffusion system with high affinity for adenosine. These endothelial cells had a high density of nucleoside transporters (660,000 +/- 130,000 transporters/ cell), measured by NBTI binding, and the efficiency was close to 2 adenosine molecules internalized transporter-1.s-1. The stimulation of the cells with bradykinin and P1,P4-di(adenosine-5')tetraphosphate, which raise the intracellular Ca2+ concentration, did not modulate the adenosine transport. When the cells were stimulated with signals coupled to adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate intracellular production, such as norepinephrine and isoproterenol, the adenosine transport was not modified. Furthermore, the treatment of the cells with direct activators of both protein kinases A and C had no effect on adenosine transport, in contrast to that reported in chromaffin cells.

Adenosine transporters

1. In mammals, nucleoside transport is an important determinant of the pharmacokinetics, plasma and tissue concentration, disposition and in vivo biological activity of adenosine as well as nucleoside analogues used in antiviral and anticancer therapies. 2. Two broad types of adenosine transporter exist, facilitated-diffusion carriers and active processes driven by the transmembrane sodium gradient. 3. Facilitated-diffusion adenosine carriers may be sensitive (es) or insensitive (ei) to nanomolar concentrations of the transport inhibitor nitrobenzylthioinosine (NBMPR). Dipyridamole, dilazep and lidoflazine analogues are also more potent inhibitors of the es carrier than the ei transporter in cells other than those derived from rat tissues. 4. The es transporter has a broad substrate specificity (apparent Km for adenosine approximately 25 microM in many cells at 25 degrees C), is a glycoprotein with an average apparent Mr of 57,000 in human erythrocytes that has been purified to near homogeneity and may exist in situ as a dimer. However, there is increasing evidence to suggest the presence of isoforms of the es transporter in different cells and species, based on kinetic and molecular properties. 5. The ei transporter also has a broad substrate specificity with a lower affinity for some nucleoside permeants than the es carrier, is genetically distinct from es but little information exists as to the molecular properties of the protein. 6. Sodium-dependent adenosine transport is present in many cell types and catalysed by four distinct systems, N1-N4, distinguished by substrate specificity, sodium coupling and tissue distribution. 7. Two genes have been identified which encode sodium-dependent adenosine transport proteins, SNST1 from the sodium/glucose cotransporter (SGLT1) gene family and the rat intestinal N2 transporter (cNT1) from a novel gene family including a bacterial nucleoside carrier (NupC). Transcripts of cNT1, which encodes a 648-residue protein, are found in intestine and kidney only. 8. Success in cloning the remaining adenosine transporter genes will improve our understanding of the diversity of nucleoside transport processes, with a view to better targeting of therapeutic nucleoside analogues and protective use of transport inhibitors.