The rat growth hormone proximal silencer contains a novel DNA-binding site for multiple nuclear proteins that represses basal promoter activity

Cloning and characterization of the 5'-flanking region of the canine growth hormone gene

The growth hormone (GH) gene is expressed in a variety of tissues outside the pituitary, including the mammary gland. GH expression in the mammary gland is stimulated by progestins. The local synthesis of mammary GH may provide a highly proliferative environment within the mammary gland that may contribute to the development or progression of mammary tumours. To elucidate the mechanism regulating mammary GH expression, we cloned the 5'-flanking region of the canine GH gene using inverse polymerase chain reaction. Gel-shift experiments showed that several sequences in the 5'-flanking region of the GH gene bind mammary nuclear proteins and may be involved in basal and progesterone-induced mammary GH expression. Sequence analysis and comparison with the GH promoters of human, rat, and mouse genes revealed a number of shared binding sites for transcription factors such as Pit-1, which is involved in pituitary GH expression, and for factors involved in the differentiation of lymphoid cells. Moreover, a putative binding site for the progesterone receptor (PR) was identified in all promoters, indicating that the progestin-induced expression of GH in mammary tissue is most probably a direct effect of activated PRs on the GH gene promoter and that this may occur in various species.

Nuclear factor 1 regulates the distal silencer of the human PIT1/GHF1 gene

Here we report the characterization of 12 kb genomic DNA upstream of the human PIT1/GHF1 promoter. Different regions involved in the modulation of human PIT1/GHF1 gene expression were defined by transient transfection studies. Two regions, one proximal (-7.1/-2. 3) and one distal (-11.8/-10.9), presented an enhancer activity in pituitary cells when placed upstream of the SV40 promoter. The 0.9 kb distal region was analysed further and found to decrease the basal transcriptional activity of the human PIT1/GHF1 minimal promoter, indicating that this region behaves as a silencer for its own promoter. Three Pit-1/GHF-1-binding sites and two ubiquitous nuclear factor 1 (NF-1)-binding sites were identified by DNase I footprinting in the distal regulatory region. Deletion analysis indicated that NF-1 or NF-1-related protein(s) participate in the down-regulation of human PIT1/GHF1 gene expression by interacting with an NF-1-binding site within the distal regulatory region.

Hypothalamic and hypophyseal regulation of growth hormone secretion

1. Regulation of pulsatile secretion of growth hormone (GH) relies on hypothalamic neuronal loops, major transmitters involved in their operation are growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) synthetized mostly in arcuate nucleus (ARC) neurons, and somatostatin (SRIH), synthetized both in hypothalamus periventricular (PVe) and ARC neurons. 2. Neurons synthetizing both peptides can inhibit each other in a reciprocal manner. Other neuropeptides synthetized in ARC neurons, such as galanin, or in ARC interneurons, such as neuropeptide Y (NPY), are able to modulate synthesis and release of GHRH and SRIH into the hypothalamohypophyseal portal system. 3. In addition, the hitherto uncharacterized endogenous ligand of the recently cloned growth hormone releasing peptide receptor, expressed mostly in the ARC, triggers GH release, presumably by actions on ARC interneurons. 4. Thyroid, gonadal, and adrenal steroid hormones also affect the GHRH-SRIH balance; a differential distribution of sex steroid receptors in the ARC and the PVe is likely to account for the different pattern of GH secretion in male and female animals. 5. Growth hormone itself is able to inhibit the amplitude of GH secretory episodes and to increase their frequency, by entering the brain (presumably by receptor-mediated internalization at the level of the choroid plexus) and acting subsequently on ARC neurons. 6. At the pituitary level, major neurotransmitters regulating GH cells act on receptors of the VIP/PACAP/GHRH family and of the somatostatin family, in particular, sst2 and sst3. Those are coupled to accumulation of cAMP as a second messenger. 7. In addition, patch-clamp experiments and measurement of intracellular Ca2+ indicate that GH cells present characteristic, GHRH-dependent, but self-maintained Ca2+ spikes and [Ca2+]i transients, which reflect adaptive mechanisms to constraints of episodic release. 8. Recent data on transcription factors affecting GH gene expression and somatotrope differentiation are also summarized. 9. Regulation and differentiation of somatotropes also depend upon paracrine processes within the pituitary itself and involve growth factors and several neuropeptides, for instance, vasoactive intestinal peptide, angiotensin 2, endothelin, and activin. 10. Finally, characteristic changes occur in the GH secretory pattern under discrete, pathological conditions, such as abnormal growth and dwarfism, diabetes, and acromegaly, as well as during inflammatory processes.

The rat growth hormone and human cellular retinol binding protein 1 genes share homologous NF1-like binding sites that exert either positive or negative influences on gene expression in vitro

High levels of expression for the rat growth hormone (rGH) gene are restricted to the somatotroph cells of the anterior pituitary. Previously, we have shown that rGH cell-specific repression results in part from the recognition of negatively acting silencers by a number of nuclear proteins that repress basal promoter activity. Examination of these silencers revealed the presence of binding sites for proteins that belong to the NF1 family of transcription factors. Indeed, proteins from this family were shown to bind the rGH proximal silencer (designated silencer-1) in in vitro assays. Furthermore, this silencer site is capable of repressing chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene expression driven by an heterologous promoter (that of the mouse p12 gene), even in pituitary cells. Recently, we identified in the 5' untranslated region of the gene encoding human cellular retinol binding protein 1 (hCRBP1) a negative regulatory element (Fp1) that also bears an NF1 binding site very similar to that of rGH silencer-1. However, although deletion of Fp1 in the hCRBP1 gene yielded increased CAT activity, pointing toward a negative regulatory function exerted by this element, its insertion upstream of the p12 basal promoter results in an impressive positive stimulation of CAT gene expression. By exploiting NaDodSO4 gel protein fractionation and renaturation, we identified a 40-kD nuclear protein (designated Bp1) present in GH4C1 cells that binds very strongly to rGH silencer-1 but only weakly to hCRBP1 Fp1. Similarly, we also detected a 29-kD nuclear factor (designated Bp2) that recognizes exclusively the Fp1 element as its target site, therefore suggesting that different, but likely related, proteins bind these homologous elements to either activate or repress gene transcription. Although they bind DNA through the recognition of the NF1-like target sequence contained on these elements, competition and supershift experiments in electrophoretic mobility shift assays provided evidence that neither of these proteins belong to the NF1 family.

Expression of a 74-kDa nuclear factor 1 (NF1) protein is induced in mouse mammary gland involution. Involution-enhanced occupation of a twin NF1 binding element in the testosterone-repressed prostate message-2/clusterin promoter

Testosterone repressed prostate message-2 (TRPM-2)/clusterin gene expression is rapidly induced in early involution of the mouse mammary gland, after weaning, and in the rat ventral prostate, after castration. A search for involution-enhanced DNaseI footprints in the proximal mouse TRPM-2/clusterin gene promoter led to the identification and characterization (by DNase I footprinting and EMSA) of a twin nuclear factor 1 (NF1) binding element at -356/-309, relative to the proposed transcription start site; nuclear extracts from 2-day involuting mouse mammary gland showed an enhanced footprint over the proximal NF1 element; extracts from involuting prostate showed enhanced occupancy of both NF1 binding elements. Subsequent EMSA and Western analysis led to the detection of a 74-kDa NF1 protein whose expression is triggered in early involution in the mouse mammary gland; such an induced protein is not found in the involuting rat ventral prostate. This protein was not found in lactation where three other NF1 proteins of 114, 68, and 46 kDa were detected. Reiteration of the epithelial cell apoptosis associated with early mammary gland involution, in vitro, in a primary cell culture system, triggered the appearance of the 74-kDa NF1. Overlaying the cells with laminin-rich extracellular matrix suppressed the apoptosis and the expression of the 74-kDa NF1 and, in the presence of lactogenic hormones, initiated milk protein gene expression and the expression of two of the lactation-associated NF1 proteins (68 and 46 kDa). This study, thus, identifies for the first time the occurrence of a switch in expression of different members of the family of NF1 transcription factors as mammary epithelial cells move from the differentiated to the involution/apoptotic state, and it is likely that the involution-specific 74-kDa NF1 accounts for the enhanced NF1 footprint detected on the TRPM-2/clusterin promoter with extracts of mouse mammary gland.

Site-specific methylation of the rat prolactin and growth hormone promoters correlates with gene expression

The methylation patterns of the rat prolactin (rPRL) (positions -440 to -20) and growth hormone (rGH) (positions -360 to -110) promoters were analyzed by bisulfite genomic sequencing. Two normal tissues, the anterior pituitary and the liver, and three rat pituitary GH3 cell lines that differ considerably in their abilities to express both genes were tested. High levels of rPRL gene expression were correlated with hypomethylation of the CpG dinucleotides located at positions -277 and -97, near or within positive cis-acting regulatory elements. For the nine CpG sites analyzed in the rGH promoter, an overall hypomethylation-expression coupling was also observed for the anterior pituitary, the liver, and two of the cell lines. The effect of DNA methylation was tested by measuring the transient expression of the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene driven by a regionally methylated rPRL promoter. CpG methylation resulted in a decrease in the activity of the rPRL promoter which was proportional to the number of modified CpG sites. The extent of the inhibition was also found to be dependent on the position of methylated sites. Taken together, these data suggest that site-specific methylation may modulate the action of transcription factors that dictate the tissue-specific expression of the rPRL and rGH genes in vivo.

Control of growth hormone synthesis

A large body of research, primarily in the rodent and human species, has elucidated many of the details regarding the control of GH synthesis and release. Cell type-specific transcriptional control has been identified as the main mechanism of the somatotroph-specific expression of GH. The recent detailed analysis in rodents and humans of a highly specific transcriptional activator protein, PIT-1, has opened several new areas of study. This is especially true for research in the farm animal species, where PIT-1 has been cloned and its binding elements on the GH gene are being investigated in a number of economically important species. Genetic and biochemical analyses of PIT-1 and other GH regulators have shown the central role of PIT-1 not only in the cell-autonomous stimulation of GH gene transcription, but also in the participation of PIT-1 in the response at the GH gene to exogenous hormones such as RA and TH. PIT-1 has been implicated in the proliferative development of the pituitary itself, in the maintenance of anterior pituitary cell types once cell types are defined, and in the mechanism by which the hypothalamic signal for GH release is transduced. However, PIT-1 by itself does not activate the GH gene, so that additional unknown factors exist that need to be identified to fully understand the cell type-specific activation of the GH gene. In addition, GH gene regulatory elements acting through well-characterized systems such as TH have seemingly different effects; the specific context of the regulatory elements relative to the promoter elements appear to be crucial. These contextual details of GH gene regulation are not well understood for any species and need to be further studied to be able to make predictions for particular elements and regulatory mechanisms across species. The regulation of the pulsatile secretion of GH by GHRH and SRIH is reasonably well understood after the cloning and analysis of the two releasing factors and their receptors. Modification or manipulation of the pathways involved in the regulation of GH secretion is a potential means of enhancing the lean tissue growth of meat animals. However, further understanding of the systems controlling the in vivo release of GH is needed before such manipulations are likely to be productive. Several other research questions regarding the control of GH expression and release remain to be answered. What is the biochemical connection between exogenous signal transduction (i.e., GRH/GHRH-R, TR, ER, RAR) and PIT-1 at the GH gene? Are there additional coactivators or repressors of GH that respond to cAMP levels? Do ubiquitous regulatory factors such as GHF-3 and Zn-15, identified thus far only in the rat, exist in humans or livestock? Zn-15 is expected to be found in many mammalian species, because its recognition sequence between the PIT-1 binding sites is highly conserved across mammals (Figure 2). What is the mechanism causing GH levels to drop during aging? Does PIT-1 expression decrease during the lifespan of animals? Is it possible to increase GH gene expression within target tissues by directing the expression of PIT-1 to these tissues via transgenesis, or are other factors limiting in peripheral tissues so that the lack of PIT-1 expression is not the deciding factor? Finally, is there genetic variation in the expression of GHRH and/or SRIH or in their respective receptors? These questions are relevant to and could be investigated in several of the livestock species.