Limited proteolysis and amino acid replacements in the effector region of Thermus thermophilus elongation factor Tu

The interface between Escherichia coli elongation factor Tu and aminoacyl-tRNA

Nineteen of the highly conserved residues of Escherichia coli (E. coli) Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) that form the binding interface with aa-tRNA were mutated to alanine to better understand how modifying the thermodynamic properties of EF-Tu–tRNA interaction can affect the decoding properties of the ribosome. Comparison of ΔΔG^o values for binding EF-Tu to aa-tRNA show that the majority of the interface residues stabilize the ternary complex and their thermodynamic contribution can depend on the tRNA species that is used. Experiments with a very tight binding mutation of tRNA^Tyr indicate that interface amino acids distant from the tRNA mutation can contribute to the specificity. For nearly all of the mutations, the values of ΔΔG^o were identical to those previously determined at the orthologous positions of Thermus thermophilus (T. thermophilus) EF-Tu indicating that the thermodynamic properties of the interface were conserved between distantly related bacteria. Measurement of the rate of GTP hydrolysis on programmed ribosomes revealed that nearly all of the interface mutations were able to function in ribosomal decoding. The only interface mutation with greatly impaired GTPase activity was R223A which is the only one that also forms a direct contact with the ribosome. Finally, the ability of the EF-Tu interface mutants to destabilize the EF-Tu–aa-tRNA interaction on the ribosome after GTP hydrolysis were evaluated by their ability to suppress the hyperstable T1 tRNA^Tyr variant where EF-Tu release is sufficiently slow to limit the rate of peptide bond formation (k_pep) . In general, interface mutations that destabilize EF-Tu binding are also able to stimulate k_pep of T1 tRNA^Tyr, suggesting that the thermodynamic properties of the EF-Tu–aa-tRNA interaction on the ribosome are quite similar to those found in the free ternary complex.

The crystal structure of the ribosome bound to EF-Tu and aminoacyl-tRNA

The ribosome selects a correct transfer RNA (tRNA) for each amino acid added to the polypeptide chain, as directed by messenger RNA. Aminoacyl-tRNA is delivered to the ribosome by elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), which hydrolyzes guanosine triphosphate (GTP) and releases tRNA in response to codon recognition. The signaling pathway that leads to GTP hydrolysis upon codon recognition is critical to accurate decoding. Here we present the crystal structure of the ribosome complexed with EF-Tu and aminoacyl-tRNA, refined to 3.6 angstrom resolution. The structure reveals details of the tRNA distortion that allows aminoacyl-tRNA to interact simultaneously with the decoding center of the 30S subunit and EF-Tu at the factor binding site. A series of conformational changes in EF-Tu and aminoacyl-tRNA suggests a communication pathway between the decoding center and the guanosine triphosphatase center of EF-Tu.

Ribosome-induced changes in elongation factor Tu conformation control GTP hydrolysis

In translation, elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) molecules deliver aminoacyl-tRNAs to the mRNA-programmed ribosome. The GTPase activity of EF-Tu is triggered by ribosome-induced conformational changes of the factor that play a pivotal role in the selection of the cognate aminoacyl-tRNAs. We present a 6.7-A cryo-electron microscopy map of the aminoacyl-tRNA x EF-Tu x GDP x kirromycin-bound Escherichia coli ribosome, together with an atomic model of the complex obtained through molecular dynamics flexible fitting. The model reveals the conformational changes in the conserved GTPase switch regions of EF-Tu that trigger hydrolysis of GTP, along with key interactions, including those between the sarcin-ricin loop and the P loop of EF-Tu, and between the effector loop of EF-Tu and a conserved region of the 16S rRNA. Our data suggest that GTP hydrolysis on EF-Tu is controlled through a hydrophobic gate mechanism.

Recognition of aminoacyl-tRNA: a common molecular mechanism revealed by cryo-EM

The accuracy of ribosomal translation is achieved by an initial selection and a proofreading step, mediated by EF-Tu, which forms a ternary complex with aminoacyl(aa)-tRNA. To study the binding modes of different aa-tRNAs, we compared cryo-EM maps of the kirromycin-stalled ribosome bound with ternary complexes containing Phe-tRNA^Phe, Trp-tRNA^Trp, or Leu-tRNA^LeuI. The three maps suggest a common binding manner of cognate aa-tRNAs in their specific binding with both the ribosome and EF-Tu. All three aa-tRNAs have the same ‘loaded spring' conformation with a kink and twist between the D-stem and anticodon stem. The three complexes are similarly integrated in an interaction network, extending from the anticodon loop through h44 and protein S12 to the EF-Tu-binding CCA end of aa-tRNA, proposed to signal cognate codon–anticodon interaction to the GTPase centre and tune the accuracy of aa-tRNA selection.

New insights into the interactions of the translation initiation factor 2 from archaea with guanine nucleotides and initiator tRNA

Heterotrimeric a/eIF2alphabetagamma (archaeal homologue of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 with alpha, beta and gamma subunits) delivers charged initiator tRNA (tRNAi) to the small ribosomal subunit. In this work, we determined the structures of aIF2gamma from the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus in the nucleotide-free and GDP-bound forms. Comparison of the free, GDP and Gpp(NH)p-Mg2+ forms of aIF2gamma revealed a sequence of conformational changes upon GDP and GTP binding. Our results show that the affinity of GDP to the G domain of the gamma subunit is higher than that of Gpp(NH)p. In analyzing a pyrophosphate molecule binding to domain II of the gamma subunit, we found a cleft that is very suitable for the acceptor stem of tRNA accommodation. It allows the suggestion of an alternative position for Met-tRNA i Met on the alphagamma intersubunit dimer, at variance with a recently published one. In the model reported here, the acceptor stem of the tRNAi is approximately perpendicular to that of tRNA in the ternary complex elongation factor Tu-Gpp(NH)p-tRNA. According to our analysis, the elbow and T stem of Met-tRNA i Met in this position should make extensive contact with the alpha subunit of aIF2. Thus, this model is in good agreement with experimental data showing that the alpha subunit of aIF2 is necessary for the stable interaction of aIF2gamma with Met-tRNA i Met.

Structural Basis of the Action of Pulvomycin and GE2270 A on Elongation Factor Tu,

Pulvomycin inhibits protein synthesis by preventing the formation of the ternary complex between elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) x GTP and aa-tRNA. In this work, the crystal structure of Thermus thermophilus EF-Tu x pulvomycin in complex with the GTP analogue guanylyl imino diphosphate (GDPNP) at 1.4 A resolution reveals an antibiotic binding site extending from the domain 1-3 interface to domain 2, overlapping the domain 1-2-3 junction. Pulvomycin binding interferes with the binding of the 3'-aminoacyl group, the acceptor stem, and 5' end of tRNA. Only part of pulvomycin overlaps the binding site of GE2270 A, a domain 2-bound antibiotic of a structure unrelated to pulvomycin, which also hinders aa-tRNA binding. The structure of the T. thermophilus EF-Tu x GDPNP x GE2270 A complex at 1.6 A resolution shows that GE2270 A interferes with the binding of the 3'-aminoacyl group and part of the acceptor stem of aa-tRNA but not with the 5' end. Both compounds, pulvomycin more markedly, hinder the correct positioning of domain 1 over domains 2 and 3 that characterizes the active form of EF-Tu, while they affect the domain 1 switch regions that control the EF-Tu x GDP/GTP transitions in different ways. This work reveals how two antibiotics with different structures and binding modes can employ a similar mechanism of action.

Enacyloxin IIa pinpoints a binding pocket of elongation factor Tu for development of novel antibiotics

Elongation factor (EF-) Tu.GTP is the carrier of aminoacyl-tRNA to the programmed ribosome. Enacyloxin IIa inhibits bacterial protein synthesis by hindering the release of EF-Tu.GDP from the ribosome. The crystal structure of the Escherichia coli EF-Tu.guanylyl iminodiphosphate (GDPNP).enacyloxin IIa complex at 2.3 A resolution presented here reveals the location of the antibiotic at the interface of domains 1 and 3. The binding site overlaps that of kirromycin, an antibiotic with a structure that is unrelated to enacyloxin IIa but that also inhibits EF-Tu.GDP release. As one of the major differences, the enacyloxin IIa tail borders a hydrophobic pocket that is occupied by the longer tail of kirromycin, explaining the higher binding affinity of the latter. EF-Tu.GDPNP.enacyloxin IIa shows a disordered effector region that in the Phe-tRNAPhe.EF-Tu (Thermus aquaticus).GDPNP.enacyloxin IIa complex, solved at 3.1 A resolution, is stabilized by the interaction with tRNA. This work clarifies the structural background of the action of enacyloxin IIa and compares its properties with those of kirromycin, opening new perspectives for structure-guided design of novel antibiotics.

Regulation of Translation of the Head Protein of T4 Bacteriophage by Specific Binding of EF-Tu to a Leader Sequence

Recent evidence indicates that translation elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) has a role in the cell in addition to its well established role in translation. The translation factor binds to a specific region called the Gol region close to the N terminus of the T4 bacteriophage major head protein as the head protein emerges from the ribosome. This binding was discovered because EF-Tu bound to Gol peptide is the specific substrate of the Lit protease that cleaves the EF-Tu between amino acid residues Gly59 and lle60, blocking phage development. These experiments raised the question of why the Gol region of the incipient head protein binds to EF-Tu, as binding to incipient proteins is not expected from the canonical role of EF-Tu. Here, we use gol-lacZ translational fusions to show that cleavage of EF-Tu in the complex with Gol peptide can block translation of a lacZ reporter gene fused translationally downstream of the Gol peptide that activated the cleavage. We propose a model to explain how binding of EF-Tu to the emerging Gol peptide could cause translation to pause temporarily and allow time for the leader polypeptide to bind to the GroEL chaperonin before translation continues, allowing cotranslation of the head protein with its insertion into the GroEL chaperonin chamber, and preventing premature synthesis and precipitation of the head protein. Cleavage of EF-Tu in the complex would block translation of the head protein and therefore development of the infecting phage. Experiments are presented that confirm two predictions of this model. Considering the evolutionary conservation of the components of this system, this novel regulatory mechanism could be used in other situations, both in bacteria and eukaryotes, where proteins are cotranslated with their insertion into cellular structures.

Elongation factors in protein biosynthesis

Translation elongation factors are the workhorses of protein synthesis on the ribosome. They assist in elongating the nascent polypeptide chain by one amino acid at a time. The general biochemical outline of the translation elongation cycle is well preserved in all biological kingdoms. Recently, there has been structural insight into the effects of antibiotics on elongation. These structures provide a scaffold for understanding the biological function of elongation factors before high-resolution structures of such factors in complex with ribosomes are obtained. Very recent structures of the yeast translocation factor and its complex with the antifungal drug sordarin reveal an unexpected conformational flexibility that might be crucial to the mechanism of translocation.

The large subunit of initiation factor aIF2 is a close structural homologue of elongation factors

The heterotrimeric factor e/aIF2 plays a central role in eukaryotic/archaeal initiation of translation. By delivering the initiator methionyl-tRNA to the ribosome, e/aIF2 ensures specificity of initiation codon selection. The three subunits of aIF2 from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus abyssi could be overproduced in Escherichia coli. The beta and gamma subunits each contain a tightly bound zinc. The large gamma subunit is shown to form the structural core for trimer assembly. The crystal structures of aIF2gamma, free or complexed to GDP-Mg(2+) or GDPNP-Mg(2+), were resolved at resolutions better than 2 A. aIF2gamma displays marked similarities to elongation factors. A distinctive feature of e/aIF2gamma is a subdomain containing a zinc-binding knuckle. Examination of the nucleotide-complexed aIF2gamma structures suggests mechanisms of action and tRNA binding properties similar to those of an elongation factor. Implications for the mechanism of translation initiation in both eukarya and archaea are discussed. In particular, positioning of the initiator tRNA in the ribosomal A site during the search for the initiation codon is envisaged.

Elongation factor G with effector loop from elongation factor Tu is inactive in translocation

Elongation factors Tu and G (EF-Tu and EF-G) alternately interact with the ribosome during the elongation phase of protein biosynthesis. The function of both factors depends on GTP binding, and the factors are ascribed to a superfamily of G-proteins. All G-proteins contain the effector loop, a structural element that is important for the protein's interaction with its target molecule. In this study the effector loop of EF-G was replaced by the loop taken from EF-Tu. The EF-G with EF-Tu loop has markedly decreased GTPase activity and did not catalyze translocation. We conclude that these loops are not functionally interchangeable since the factors interact with different states of the ribosome.

Regulation of GTPases in the bacterial translation machinery

Several GTPases participate in bacterial protein biosynthesis. Initiation factor 2 controls the formation of the ribosomal initiation complex and places initiator fMet-tRNAfMet in the ribosomal P-site. Elongation factors Tu and G are responsible for codon-specific binding of the aminoacyl-tRNA to the A-site, and peptidyl-tRNA to the P-site, respectively, during the elongation phase of protein biosynthesis. Release factor 3, a GTPase which is not ubiquitous, is involved in termination and release of the nascent polypeptide. Other translation factors, including initiation factors 1 and 3, elongation factor Ts, release factors 1 and 2, and ribosomal release factor do not belong to the family of GTP/GDP binding proteins. The guanosine nucleotide binding domains of the GTPases involved in translation are structurally related to the Galpha subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins and to the proteins of the Ras family. We have identified and sequenced all genes coding for translation factors in the extreme thermophile Thermus thermophilus. The proteins were overproduced in Escherichia coli, purified, biochemically characterised and used for crystallisation and structural analysis. Further biochemical investigations were aimed at gaining insight into the molecular mechanism underlying the regulation of the GTPase activity of the translation factors, and to elucidate the role of their ribosomal binding sites in this process.

Translational regulation by modifications of the elongation factor Tu

EF-Tu from E. coli, one of the superfamily of GTPase switch proteins, plays a central role in the fast and accurate delivery of aminoacyl-tRNAs to the translating ribosome. An overview is given about the regulatory effects of methylation, phosphorylation and phage-induced cleavage of EF-Tu on its function. During exponential growth, EF-Tu becomes monomethylated at Lys56 which is converted to Me2Lys upon entering the stationary phase. Lys56 is in the GTPase switch-1 region (residues 49-62), a strongly conserved site involved in interactions with the nucleotide and the 5' end of tRNA. Methylation was found to attenuate GTP hydrolysis and may thus enhance translational accuracy. In vivo 5-10% of EF-Tu is phosphorylated at Thr382 by a ribosome-associated kinase. In EF-Tu-GTP, Thr382 in domain 3 has a strategic position in the interface with domain 1; it is hydrogen-bonded to Glu117 that takes part in the switch-2 mechanism, and is close to the T-stem binding site of the tRNA, in a region known for many kirromycin-resistance mutations. Phosphorylation is enhanced by EF-Ts, but inhibited by kirromycin. In reverse, phosphorylated EF-Tu has an increased affinity for EF-Ts, does not bind kirromycin and can no longer bind aminoacyi tRNA. The in vivo role of this reversible modification is still a matter of speculation. T4 infection of E. coli may trigger a phase-exclusion mechanism by activation of Lit, a host-encoded proteinase. As a result, EF-Tu is cleaved site-specifically between Gly59-Ile60 in the switch-1 region. Translation was found to drop beyond a minimum level. Interestingly, the identical sequence in the related EF-G appeared to remain fully intact. Although the Lit cleavage-mechanism may eventually lead to programmed cell death, the very efficient prevention of phage multiplication may be caused by a novel mechanism of in cis inhibition of late T4 mRNA translation.

Specific peptide-activated proteolytic cleavage of Escherichia coli elongation factor Tu

Phage exclusion is a form of programmed cell death in prokaryotes in which death is triggered by infection with phage, a seemingly altruistic response that limits multiplication of the phage and its spread through the population. One of the best-characterized examples of phage exclusion is the exclusion of T-even phages such as T4 by the e14-encoded Lit protein in many Escherichia coli K-12 strains. In this exclusion system, transcription and translation of a short region of the major head coat protein gene late in phage infection activates proteolysis of translation elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), blocking translation and multiplication of the phage. The cleavage occurs between Gly-59 and Ile-60 in the nucleotide-binding domain. In the present work, we show that a 29-residue synthetic peptide spanning the activating region of the major head coat protein can activate the cleavage of GDP-bound EF-Tu in a purified system containing only purified EF-Tu and purified Lit protein. Lit behaves as a bona fide enzyme in this system, cleaving EF-Tu to completion when present at substoichiometric amounts. Two mutant peptides with amino acid changes that reduce the activation of cleavage of EF-Tu in vivo were also greatly reduced in their ability to activate EF-Tu cleavage in vitro but were still able to activate cleavage at a high concentration. Elongation factor G, which has the same sequence at the cleavage site and a nucleotide-binding domain similar to EF-Tu, was not cleaved by this system, and neither was heat-inactivated EF-Tu, suggesting that the structural context of the cleavage site may be important for specificity. This system apparently represents an activation mechanism for proteolysis that targets one of nature's most evolutionarily conserved proteins for site-specific cleavage.

The ternary complex of EF-Tu and its role in protein biosynthesis

The past year has seen a breakthrough in our structural understanding of how aminoacyl-tRNAs are selected and transported to the ribosomal A-site in order to decode genetic information contained in messenger RNA. All aminoacyl-tRNAs are recognized by the elongation factor EF-Tu in prokaryotes or EF-1alpha in eukaryotes. The recent determination of the structure of the ternary complex of aminoacyl-tRNA, EF-Tu and a GTP analogue shows how the CCA end of all aminoacyl-tRNA structures can be accommodated in a specific binding site on EF-Tu-GTP, and how part of the T-helix can be recognized by EF-Tu in a non-sequence-specific way. Furthermore, the structure of the ternary complex shows striking structural similarity to the structure of another prokaryotic elongation factor, EF-G, the tRNA translocase, in its GDP or empty form. This observation has led to the proposal of a general macromolecular mimicry of RNA and protein, which predicts elements of RNA-like structures will occur in other translation factors, such as initiation factors and release factors, that interact with similar sites on the ribosome.