Technical advances for abdominal wall closure after intestinal and multivisceral transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Abdominal wall closure after intestinal transplantation (ITX) or multivisceral transplantation (MVTX) is challenging because of the loss of abdominal domain and wall elasticity as a result of previous operations and donor-to-recipient weight and height mismatch.

RECENT FINDINGS

We report on abdominal wall closure management in 30 ITX and MVTX recipients. In 60% of patients (n = 18), a primary abdominal closure (PAC) was achieved, in 40% (n = 12) a staged closure (SAC) was necessary. Patients with PAC had undergone less pretransplant operations and required less posttransplant relaparotomies. They were mainly ITX recipients or more abdominal domain because of a longer intestinal remnant. A literature review revealed different strategies to overcome a failed primary closure. They focus on graft reduction or an enlargement of the abdominal domain. The latter includes temporary coverage with prosthetic materials for SAC. Definite abdominal closure is achieved by skin only closure, or by using acellular dermal matrix, rotational flaps, rectus muscle fascia or abdominal wall grafts.

SUMMARY

Abdominal wall reconstruction after ITX/MVTX is commonly demanded and can be conducted by different strategies. The technique should be easy to use in a timely manner and should prevent abdominal infections, intestinal fistulation, incisional hernias, and wound dehiscence.

Simultaneous or sequential combined living donor-intestine transplantation in children

BACKGROUND

Since the report of the first successful living donor combined liver-intestine transplant in pediatric patients, three other cases have been performed. In this article, we describe surgical technique, outcome, and propose a broader application of this procedure using deceased donors.

PATIENTS

Four children of mean age 15.5 months (11-24 months) and weight 9.5 kg (8-10.9 kg) affected by end-stage liver and intestinal failure underwent living donor combined liver-intestine transplant with a left lateral liver and a distal segment of jejunum. In one case, the organs were transplanted simultaneously and in three in staged procedures. In all cases the liver transplant was performed first. The intestine was always transplanted with systemic venous drainage. The biliary anastomosis was a duct-to-duct, a biliodigestive, or a combined one according to the biliary anatomy of the liver graft. The abdomen was routinely closed with a Vicryl mesh followed by a skin graft. A loop graft ileostomy was fashioned for protocol biopsies and taken down within 3 months.

RESULTS

One intestine was lost to generalized ischemia. The child was promptly retransplanted with another living donor graft. All children are alive and well at an average follow-up of 30 months (18-54 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Living donor combined liver-intestine transplant can be performed successfully with excellent early outcome. The in situ splitting technique here described can be applied to obtain grafts for small children from appropriate adult deceased donors.

Combined living donor liver/small bowel transplantation

We are reporting the first known case of sequential combined living donor liver/small bowel transplantation (LDL/SBT). A 2-year-old boy born with gastroschisis and intestinal malrotation lost his entire small bowel and colon shortly after birth. He underwent a living donor small bowel transplant at 1 year of age that was lost 4 months after implantation for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD). He recovered from PTLD but developed total parenteral nutrition (TPN)-induced liver failure. He received a combined left lateral liver and terminal ileum transplant that we chose to perform sequentially due to the presence of preformed antibodies against his mother's tissues. The mother had no complications and a cumulative hospital stay of 7 days. At 9 months postsurgery, the patient is on full enteral nutrition and has suffered neither technical complications nor rejection. The technique described here is reproducible and makes combined living donor LDL/SBT an alternative to combined cadaveric liver-small bowel transplant.

Recent advances and future prospects in intestinal and multi-visceral transplantation

From an experimental procedure, intestinal transplantation (ITx) has evolved over the last 10 yr into a treatment option for patients suffering from short bowel syndrome and who develop life-threatening complications from total parenteral nutrition (TPN) (e.g. liver dysfunction, line sepsis, shortage of venous access, etc.). One-year survival rates are approximately 70% and thus similar to lung Tx. However, the intestine remains the most challenging abdominal organ to transplant. This is because of the severe immune response (mostly rejection) that is produced, and therefore the need for profound immunosuppression with its attendant complications (sepsis, lymphoma, direct drug toxicity). Unlike other organs, graft loss as a result of acute rejection can occur late after transplantation (more than 1 yr post-transplant). With regard to the actual immunosuppressive regimens, considerable experience in patient management is required to optimize outcome of those complex transplants, which are permanently at risk of rejection and infection. ITx remains an unfinished product, and the application of ITx to patients doing well on TPN warrants further research in the understanding of the rejection process, in the development of less toxic and more efficient immunosuppressive protocols, and in the development of immunomodulatory strategies, to better control rejection and thereby reduce the need for immunosuppression.

Size reduction of small bowels from adult cadaveric donors to alleviate the scarcity of pediatric size-matched organs: an anatomical and feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Small bowel transplantation in children weighing less than 10 kg is hindered by the lack of size-matched donors. The ability to create reduced size small bowel grafts from adult cadaveric donors suitable for use in young children has been studied.

METHODS

Volumetric assessment of computed tomography scans were used to evaluate abdominal cavity and small bowel volumes in children. Small bowels were retrieved from adult cadaveric donors and reduced in size.

RESULTS

Computed tomography studies of the abdominal cavity showed that the mean volume available for a small bowel graft was 260 ml in children less than 5 kg (n = 5) and 460 ml in children weighing 5-10 kg (n = 5). Fifteen small bowels were successfully reduced to provide an ileal graft of one meter while keeping the whole length of the superior mesenteric artery and vein after their dissection in the proximal part of the mesentery. The mean volume of the grafts created was 270 ml in seven thin patients (body mass index [BMI] <25), 390 ml in five preobese patients (25< BMI<30), and 490 ml in three obese patients (BMI>30). Mesenteric transillumination in thin donors allowed safe dissection and complete hemostasis. No diameter reduction was required. Technical modifications permitted the creation of two grafts, one ileal and the other jejunal from a single donor. Volumetric and surgical data show that implantation of up to two meters of ileum from a thin adult weighing up to 80 kg is feasible in children weighing less than 10 kg.

CONCLUSION

Size reduction of adult cadaveric small bowels can provide suitable grafts for children of less than 10 kg and could expand the potential pool of donors for these patients.

En block combined reduced-liver and small bowel transplants: from large donors to small children

BACKGROUND

The critical shortage of size-matched donor organs for infants and small children in need of combined liver and intestinal transplantation has lead to long waiting times and a high risk of dying before transplantation. Utilizing grafts from larger donors could alleviate this problem, but using larger composite grafts in small children has been challenging and unsuccessful in the past.

METHODS

We conducted a pilot study for evaluating the results of transplanting into small recipients a composite graft (reduced-size liver and whole small bowel, including duodenum and pancreas head) procured from large donors. Liver size reduction was performed ex situ using the extrahilar approach, which leaves the liver hilum untouched. Straightforward implantation of the graft was performed by simple, two-step vascular anastomoses. The preservation of the donor duodenum in continuity with the combined graft avoided the need for biliary reconstruction, thus preserving maximal bowel length for gut continuity restoration in the recipient.

RESULTS

Two children, weighing 7.6 and 9.8 kg, respectively, underwent transplantation of a composite graft procured from donors weighing 35 kg. Their waiting time (68 and 97 days, respectively) was shorter compared with our previous experience with conventional techniques. Both are currently alive and well, at home and on full enteral feeds, 15 and 11 months after transplantation, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This new technique has extended the range of possible donors for small candidates waiting for combined grafts and was successful in two patients. It should be considered for small recipients in the future.