Oral absorption of tacrolimus in children with intestinal failure due to short or absent small bowel

Drug absorption from oral formulations in patients with short bowel syndrome: a comprehensive update of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Drug absorption is often altered and typically diminished in patients with short bowel syndrome (SBS). It is important to understand the patient's gastrointestinal anatomy, the absorptive capacity of the remaining bowel, and the physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties of the drug to optimize oral pharmacotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

The primary focus was to provide an updated understanding of the absorption of various drugs in patients with short bowel syndrome. Forty-seven studies covering 13 different drug classes were included in the review and study details, patient characteristics, drug characteristics and pharmacokinetic findings were summarized for each drug class.

EXPERT OPINION

Improving and simplifying drug treatment in patients with SBS have high priority, but the patients are multi diseased so knowledge regarding absorption of drugs as e.g. antithrombotic agents, immunosuppressants is urgently needed. Therefore, it is crucial to advance our understanding of the fundamental factors involved in drug absorption, spanning from drug design to pathophysiology. With the growing knowledge in drug design and gastrointestinal pathophysiology, we anticipate the development of computer models that can accurately predict optimal absorption in the future.

Changes of Drug Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Short Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Short bowel syndrome is a clinical condition defined by malabsorption of nutrients and micronutrients, most commonly following extensive intestinal resection. Due to a loss of absorptive surfaces, the absorption of orally administered drugs is also often affected. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the published literature and examine the effects of short bowel syndrome on drug pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Studies were identified through searches of databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and SCOPUS, in addition to hand searches of studies' reference lists. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion, yielding 50 studies involving 37 different drugs in patients with short bowel syndrome.

RESULTS

Evidence of decreased drug absorption was observed in 29 out of 37 drugs, 6 of which lost therapeutic effect, and 14 of which continued to demonstrate clinical benefit through drug monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

The influence of short bowel syndrome on drug absorption appears to be drug-specific and dependent on the location and extent of resection. The presence of a colon in continuity may also influence drug bioavailability as it can contribute significantly to the absorption of drugs (e.g., metoprolol); likewise, drugs that have a wide absorption window or are known to be absorbed in the colon are least likely to be malabsorbed. Individualized dosing may be necessary to achieve therapeutic efficacy, and therapeutic drug monitoring, where available, should be considered in short bowel syndrome patients, especially for drugs with narrow therapeutic indices.

Systematic review of drug bioavailability following gastrointestinal surgery

PURPOSE

Inter- and intraindividual pharmacokinetics variability in humans affects the way in which drugs act on the body. Gastrointestinal surgery has an impact on this variability and significantly alters the kinetics of drugs in post-surgical patients. The way in which pharmacokinetic profiles are modified depends on the type of operative procedure performed. The extent to which the absorption of different groups of drugs is affected varies according to the site and length of intestinal resections.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. Three databases were searched: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. For each drug, potential changes in absorption were described, including recommendations extracted from the results of the studies and collected according to authors' criteria as practical conclusions, and grades of recommendation were determined by levels of evidence using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine scale.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight articles were collected during the selection process after the bibliographic search. The main outcomes for 60 drugs from the various studies were classified according to each type of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Modifications in the digestive tract secondary to gastrointestinal surgery may compromise the bioavailability of drugs. Decreased absorption surface, gastric emptying speed, and gastric pH alteration are factors to be taken into account in the management of pharmacological treatment after surgery. Evidence supported by data in clinical practice is scarce, but after studying the pharmacokinetic profile of some molecules, it is possible to offer recommendations for its adaptation to the patient's clinical situation.

Clostridium difficile-Associated Colitis Post-Transplant Is Not Associated with Elevation of Tacrolimus Concentrations

BACKGROUND

Diarrhea is a common condition after solid organ transplant (SOT); Clostridium difficile-associated colitis (CDAC) is one of the most common infections after SOT. We documented previously that some types of enteritis are associated with an elevation of tacrolimus (TAC) trough concentrations by interfering with the drug's complex metabolism.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Tacrolimus concentrations of 25 SOT recipients including 12 renal and 13 liver recipients before, during, and after CDAC were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Median age of the 25 patients was 54 y (range, 36-71), there were 15 males and 10 females. Clostridium difficile-associated colitis developed at a median of 55 d (range 2-4551) post-SOT. Median TAC concentrations prior to the outbreak of CDAC were 6.9 ng/mL (range, <1.5-17.2), 5.6 ng/mL (range, <1.5-13.2) during diarrhea, and 7.4 ng/mL (range, <1.5-24.3) after resolution of diarrhea (p > 0.05, NS). Treatment of CDAC consisted of metronidazole for 14 d in all cases. All patients recovered from CDAC but seven patients had CDAC relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to other types of infectious diarrhea such as rotavirus enteritis and cryptosporidiosis, CDAC is not associated with an increase in TAC concentrations. This is because C. difficile causes primarily colitis as opposed to other organisms, which are associated with enteritis.

Modigraf administration through jejunostomy in liver transplant recipient: case report

We report our experience with a 61-year-old patient with alcoholic and hepatitis C cirrhosis who underwent liver transplantation. On the 3rd postoperative day he presented a mediastinitis secondary to esophageal perforation produced by a Linton tube. An esophagectomy with jejunostomy was performed. Tacrolimus granules for oral suspension (Modigraf) were administered through the jejunostomy. This case report highlights the use of Modigraf and the absence of secondary effects. We observed biochemical parameters during the jejunostomy period. We discuss the administration strategy applied and whether tacrolimus granules for oral suspension by jejunostomy affect the bioavailability and its side effects.

Tacrolimus trough levels before, during and after jejunostomy in a liver transplant patient: a case report

Although the feasibility of oral tacrolimus administration in the presence of jejunostomy has already been reported, few studies monitoring tacrolimus trough blood levels have been analyzed in detail, either during or after a jejunostomy closure. We report on our experience with a 34-year-old patient who underwent liver transplantations, with a proximal jejunostomy constructed a few days prior to the second transplantation. He was administered tacrolimus by a predominantly oral route, and less frequently received it by jejunostomy. The aim of this paper is to discuss this administration strategy and whether a different method could have been more suitable. This case report highlights that during the jejunostomy period, the tacrolimus doses that were required to maintain trough concentrations within the therapeutic range were four times higher than those administered after the closure of the jejunostomy. We observed an increase in the Dose-Normalized Trough Concentration (DNTC) values when tacrolimus was administered for 4 consecutive days by jejunostomy as compared to oral administration, indicating that the relative bioavailability of tacrolimus increased. Moreover, when returning to oral administration, the subsequent DNTC value was halved, highlighting a reduction in the tacrolimus bioavailability. Thus, in such a case, administration by jejunostomy could be more appropriate.

Nonsurgical care of intestinal and multivisceral transplant recipients: a review for the intensivist

Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation has evolved from an experimental procedure to the treatment of choice for patients with irreversible intestinal failure and serious complications related to long-term parenteral nutrition. Increased numbers of transplant recipients and improved survival rates have led to an increased prevalence of this patient population in intensive care units. Management of intestinal and multivisceral transplant recipients is uniquely challenging because of complications arising from the high incidence of transplant rejection and its treatment. Long-term comorbidities, such as diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney failure, and neurological sequelae, also develop in this patient population as survival improves. This article is intended for intensivists who provide care to critically ill recipients of intestinal and multivisceral transplants. As perioperative care of intestinal/multivisceral transplant recipients has been described elsewhere, this review focuses on common nonsurgical complications with which one should be familiar in order to provide optimal care. The article is both a review of the current literature on multivisceral and isolated intestinal transplantation as well as a reflection of our own experience at the University of Miami.

Cryptosporidium enteritis in solid organ transplant recipients: multicenter retrospective evaluation of 10 cases reveals an association with elevated tacrolimus concentrations

BACKGROUND

Cryptosporidial enteritis, a diarrheal infection of the small intestine caused by the apicomplexan protozoa Cryptosporidium, is infrequently recognized in transplant recipients from developed countries.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all cases of cryptosporidiosis in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients at 2 centers from January 2001 to October 2010 was performed and compared with transplant recipients with community-onset Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). A literature search was performed with regard to reported cases of cryptosporidiosis in SOT recipients.

RESULTS

Eight renal, 1 liver, and 1 lung transplant recipient were diagnosed with cryptosporidiosis at median 46.0 months (interquartile range [IQR] 25.2-62.8) following SOT. Symptoms existed for a median 14 days (IQR 10.5-14.8) before diagnosis. For the 9 patients receiving tacrolimus (TAC), mean TAC levels increased from 6.3 ± 1.1 to 21.3 ± 9.2 ng/mL (P = 0.0007) and median serum creatinine increased temporarily from 1.3 (IQR 1.1-1.7) to 2.4 (IQR 2.0-4.6) mg/dL (P = 0.008). By comparison, 8 SOT recipients (6 kidney, 2 liver) hospitalized with community-onset CDI had a mean TAC level of 10.8 ± 2.8 ng/dL during disease compared with 9.2 ± 2.3 ng/mL at baseline (P = 0.07) and had no change in median creatinine. All patients recovered from Cryptosporidium enteritis after receiving various chemotherapeutic regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Cryptosporidiosis should be recognized as an important cause of diarrhea after SOT and is associated with elevated TAC levels and acute kidney injury. Increased TAC levels may reflect altered drug metabolism in the small intestine.

Long-term outcome of living related renal transplantation in a patient with short bowel syndrome

Short-bowel syndrome (SBS) is defined as the malabsorptive state that occurs after extensive resection of the small intestine. In patients with SBS, oral administration of drugs usually becomes difficult because of the severity of intestinal failure. We describe a successful living related renal transplantation (LRRTx) in an 18-year-old male with SBS. Shortly after birth, the patient developed necrotizing enterocolitis requiring massive resection of the small intestine, which resulted in SBS. At seven years of age, the patient developed proteinuria and was diagnosed as focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). His kidney function was gradually deteriorated toward the end-stage renal failure. The patient received LRRTx at age of 18 years. To evaluate the absorption capacity of the patient, we investigated pharmacokinetics of calcineurine inhibitors (tacrolimus and cyclosporine). The drug concentration, which is sufficient to provide effective immunosuppression, was achieved with cyclosporine, but not with tacrolimus. The patient therefore received a triple immunosuppressive therapy with oral cyclosporine, methyl-prednisolone and mycophenolate mofetil. To prevent both recurrent FSGS and rejection, we repeatedly analyzed the trough level and the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine after LRRTx. The patient was successfully treated with oral immunosuppression for over 5 years, without hemodialysis. To our knowledge, this is the first report showing the long-term outcome of LRRTx treated with oral cyclosporine in a patient with SBS.

Immunosuppression in infants with short bowel syndrome undergoing isolated liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Little data exist on immunosuppressive drug absorption in children with short bowel syndrome and intestinal failure associated liver disease (SBS-IFALD).

AIM

To evaluate the absorption of immunosuppressive medications in children with SBS-IFALD undergoing isolated liver transplantation (iLTx).

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed in children with SBS-IFALD undergoing LTx and comparison made with weight, age-matched children undergoing iLTX (extra-hepatic biliary atresia (EHBA) and normal intestinal length and function).

RESULTS

Seven children with SBS-IFALD undergoing iLTx (median residual bowel length, 60 cm, range 40-80) were compared with 15 children undergoing LTx for EHBA. SBS-IFALD children had significantly lower trough tacrolimus levels at three months (5.8 vs. 7.9 ng/mL, p<0.05) and six months (5.0 vs. 8.0 ng/mL, p<0.05), but equivalent levels at 12 months after iLTx. The median calculated dose-normalized concentrations indicated that systemic availability of tacrolimus was comparable in two groups at 3, 6, 12 months (33.1 vs. 23.3; 42.4 vs. 36; 51 vs. 52.9) despite the differences in enteral function. The incidence of acute rejection was 1/7 (SBS-IFALD) and 10/15 (EHBA) group (p = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

Children with SBS-IFALD demonstrated adequate absorption of oral tacrolimus without significant acute rejection rate after iLTx suggesting that modification of immunosuppression is not necessary.

Buccal vs. nasogastric tube administration of tacrolimus after pediatric liver transplantation

Tacrolimus is an important drug for immunosuppression after liver transplantation. Bioavailability of enterally administered tacrolimus is poor, and further reduced by gastric residuals or by enteral nutrition. Buccal administration might be an alternative route especially in children. Tacrolimus trough levels (TTLs) obtained after buccal administration of tacrolimus after liver transplantation have not been reported. The aim of this study was to determine whether buccal administration of tacrolimus is feasible and to compare TTLs after nasogastric tube (NGT) administration with buccal administration. TTLs after NGT or buccal administration during the first week after pediatric liver transplantation were analyzed from 28 cadaveric liver transplants in 23 pediatric recipients between June 2002 and March 2004. Each level was scored within, under or above the target range. Buccal administration was well tolerated in all patients. A total of 149 TTLs were obtained of which nine were excluded because of incomplete information on target levels. Overall 27% of TTLs was adequate. The percentage of levels under, within and above the target range were comparable in both groups (chi-square test; p = 0.64). Both groups had a decrease in percentages within the target range on day 3 and 4 after liver transplantation with a subsequent rise. Buccal tacrolimus administration is feasible. Similar TTLs are achieved compared with NGT tacrolimus administration during the first week after pediatric liver transplantation.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation

The aim of this review is to analyse critically the recent literature on the clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in solid organ transplant recipients. Dosage and target concentration recommendations for tacrolimus vary from centre to centre, and large pharmacokinetic variability makes it difficult to predict what concentration will be achieved with a particular dose or dosage change. Therapeutic ranges have not been based on statistical approaches. The majority of pharmacokinetic studies have involved intense blood sampling in small homogeneous groups in the immediate post-transplant period. Most have used nonspecific immunoassays and provide little information on pharmacokinetic variability. Demographic investigations seeking correlations between pharmacokinetic parameters and patient factors have generally looked at one covariate at a time and have involved small patient numbers. Factors reported to influence the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus include the patient group studied, hepatic dysfunction, hepatitis C status, time after transplantation, patient age, donor liver characteristics, recipient race, haematocrit and albumin concentrations, diurnal rhythm, food administration, corticosteroid dosage, diarrhoea and cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzyme and P-glycoprotein expression. Population analyses are adding to our understanding of the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus, but such investigations are still in their infancy. A significant proportion of model variability remains unexplained. Population modelling and Bayesian forecasting may be improved if CYP isoenzymes and/or P-glycoprotein expression could be considered as covariates. Reports have been conflicting as to whether low tacrolimus trough concentrations are related to rejection. Several studies have demonstrated a correlation between high trough concentrations and toxicity, particularly nephrotoxicity. The best predictor of pharmacological effect may be drug concentrations in the transplanted organ itself. Researchers have started to question current reliance on trough measurement during therapeutic drug monitoring, with instances of toxicity and rejection occurring when trough concentrations are within 'acceptable' ranges. The correlation between blood concentration and drug exposure can be improved by use of non-trough timepoints. However, controversy exists as to whether this will provide any great benefit, given the added complexity in monitoring. Investigators are now attempting to quantify the pharmacological effects of tacrolimus on immune cells through assays that measure in vivo calcineurin inhibition and markers of immunosuppression such as cytokine concentration. To date, no studies have correlated pharmacodynamic marker assay results with immunosuppressive efficacy, as determined by allograft outcome, or investigated the relationship between calcineurin inhibition and drug adverse effects. Little is known about the magnitude of the pharmacodynamic variability of tacrolimus.

Two- to three-fold increase in blood tacrolimus (FK506) levels during diarrhea in liver-transplanted children

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis and treatment of diarrhea in liver transplant recipients often pose a challenge owing to the variety of infectious and non-infectious causes. However, diagnosis is principally focused on ruling out an infectious etiology. Tacrolimus, an immunosuppressive agent generally used after liver transplantation, is absorbed mainly from the duodenum through the upper jejunum. It can be assumed that metabolism of the drug will be influenced by diarrhea.

METHODS

Four liver transplant recipients who developed an episode of acute gastroenteritis. Infectious etiology was confirmed; trough tacrolimus levels were measured before, during and after gastroenteritis.

RESULTS

All patients presented a two- to three-fold increase in blood tacrolimus levels after the onset of gastroenteritis.

CONCLUSIONS

Until the role played by the intestine in the metabolism of tacrolimus is fully understood, it is prudent to recommend early dose reduction of tacrolimus and careful monitoring of trough levels during diarrheal disorders of any nature in pediatric liver-transplanted patients.

The management of patients with the short bowel syndrome

The surgeon is invariably the primary specialist involved in managing patients with short bowel syndrome. Because of this they will play an important role in co-ordinating the management of these patients. The principal aims at the initial surgery are to preserve life, then to preserve gut length, and maintain its continuity. In the immediate postoperative period, there needs to be a balance between keeping the patient alive through the use of TPN and antisecretory agents and promoting gut adaptation with the use of oral nutrition. If the gut fails to adapt during this period, then the patient may require therapy with more specific agents to promote gut adaptation such as growth factors and glutamine. If following this, the patient still has a short gut syndrome, then the principal options remain either long term TPN, or intestinal transplantation which remains a difficult and challenging procedure with a high mortality and morbidity due to rejection.

Oral administration of tacrolimus in the presence of jejunostomy after liver transplantation

The feasibility of oral administration of tacrolimus in the presence of an intestinal stoma after liver transplantation (LTx) has not been adequately demonstrated. A 10-month-old girl underwent LTx with biliary reconstruction using a Roux-en Y loop. She developed intestinal perforation and underwent a jejunostomy at 40-50 cm distal to the jejunojejunostomy of the Roux-en Y loop on day 8 post-LTx. Tacrolimus was given twice daily via a nasogastric tube or orally; the initial dose of tacrolimus was 0.10 mg/kg/day. Until the time of intestinal perforation, the trough level of tacrolimus ranged from 13.0 to 19.6 ng/mL. The dose-normalized trough concentration (DNTC) of tacrolimus ranged from 130 to 196 ng.kg.day per mg.mL (control: 80-145 ng.kg.day per mg.mL). For a 2-week period when the patient was septic, the tacrolimus dose was reduced to 0.05 mg/kg/day, with a subsequent trough level of 3.6-5.1 ng/mL (DNTC: 72-102 ng.kg.day per mg.mL). After 3 weeks, the dose was increased to 0.175 mg/kg/day with the disappearance of infection; the trough level ranged from 8.5 to 9.7 ng/mL with a peak level of 26.3 ng/mL (DNTC: 48.5-55.4 ng.kg.day per mg.mL). After the initiation of oral feeding, the dose was slightly increased to 0.20 mg/kg/day with the trough level ranging from 8.1 to 9.8 ng/mL (DNTC: 40.5-49 ng.kg.day per mg.mL). After closure of the jejunostomy, the dose of tacrolimus was reduced to 0.075 mg/kg/day to maintain the same trough level (7.9-9.1 ng/mL) and the DNTC ranged from 105 to 121 ng.kg.day per mg.mL. In conclusion, oral administration of tacrolimus may achieve the therapeutic level, even in the presence of jejunostomy after LTx, although the bioavailability is decreased.