A proposal for scoring marginal liver grafts

Development of a Novel Prognostic Nomogram for High Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score Recipients Following Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation

Background

A high model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score (>30) adversely affects outcomes even if patients receive prompt liver transplantation (LT). Therefore, balanced allocation of donor grafts is indispensable to avoid random combinations of donor and recipient risk factors, which often lead to graft or recipient loss. Predictive models aimed at avoiding donor risk factors in high-MELD score recipients are urgently required to obtain satisfactory outcomes.

Method

Data of patients with MELD score >30 who underwent LT at three transplantation institutes between 2015 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Early allograft dysfunction (EAD), length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and graft loss were recorded. Corresponding independent risk factors were analyzed using stepwise multivariable regression analysis. A prediction model of graft loss was developed, and discrimination and calibration were measured.

Results

After applying the exclusion criteria, 778 patients were enrolled. The incidence of EAD was 34.8% (271/778). Donor graft macrovesicular steatosis, graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR), warm ischemia time (WIT), cold ischemia time (CIT), and ABO blood incompatibility, together with donor serum albumins, were independent predictors of EAD. The incidence of ICU stay over 10 days was 64.7% (503/778). Donor age, recipient's MELD score, Child score, and CIT were independent predictors of ICU stay. The 3-year graft survival rates (GSRs) in the training and validation cohorts were 64.2 and 59.3%, respectively. The independent predictors of graft loss were recipient's Child score, ABO blood type incompatibility, donor serum total bilirubin over 17.1 μmol/L, and cold CIT. A nomogram based on these variables was internally and externally validated and showed good performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 70.8 and 66.0%, respectively). For a recipient with a high MELD score, the avoidance of ABO blood type incompatibility and CIT ≥6 h would achieve a 3-year GSR of up to 78.4%, whereas the presence of the aforementioned risk factors would decrease the GSR to 35.4%.

Conclusion

The long-term prognosis of recipients with MELD scores >30 could be greatly improved by avoiding ABO blood type incompatibility and CIT ≥6 h.

BETTER LIVING DONOR LIVER TRANSPLANTATION PATIENT SURVIVAL COMPARED TO DECEASED DONOR — A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

ABSTRACT Background Deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) is the first choice, but living donor transplantation (LDLT) is an alternative to be considered in special situations, such as lack of donated organs and emergencies. So far, there is no consensus on which transplantation method provides better survival and fewer complications, which is still an open point for discussion. Methods This meta-analysis compared the 1, 3, and 5-year patient and graft survival rates of LDLT and DDLT. We included studies published from April-2009 to June-2021 and adopted the generic model of the inverse of variance for the random effect of hazard ratios. The adequacy of the studies was determined using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale — NOS (WELLS). Results For patient survival analysis, we included a total of 32,258 subjects. We found a statistically significant better survival for the LDLT group at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively: 1.35 HR (95%CI 1.10—1.66, P=0.005), 1.26 HR (95%CI 1.09—1.46, P=0.002) and 1.27 HR (95%CI 1.09—1.48, P=0.002). Our meta-analysis evaluated a total of 21,276 grafts. In the overall analysis, the 1-year survival was improved in favor of the LDLT group (1.36 HR, 95%CI 1.16—1.60, P<0.0001), while the 3-year survival (1.13 HR, 95%CI 0.96—1.33, P<0.13), and 5 (0.99 HR, 95%CI 0.74—1.33, P<0.96), did not differ significantly. Conclusion This metanalysis detected a statistically significant greater 1-, 3- and 5-years patient survival favoring LDLT compared to DDLT as well as a statistically significant difference better 1-year graft survival favoring the LDLT group.

Comparison of results on the use of extended criteria liver doners for transplants in Espírito Santo

INTRODUCTION

liver Transplantation is currently the treatment of choice for several terminal liver diseases. Despite the increase in performed transplants, the waiting lists continue to increase. In order to expand the supply of organs, transplantation teams have started to use previously rejected livers for transplants because of an increased risk of unfavorable outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate the use of livers of expanded criterion donators.

METHODS

retrospective study of medical records. The livers were classified as normal or expanded criteria. The groups were divided in low and high MELD. A multivariate analysis was performed through logistic regression.

RESULTS

there was no statistical difference regarding early, late and global mortality between the groups. Decreased survival was observed in patients with high MELD (higher or equal to 20) when they received grafts from expanded criterion donators. The association between the occurrence of cardiorespiratory arrest and presence of elevated total bilirubin in donators was associated with higher mortality rates in expanded criterion livers.

CONCLUSION

the overall results are similar, but expanded criteria liver donators was associated with higher mortality in patients with high MELD.

Necroptosis in Hepatosteatotic Ischaemia-Reperfusion Injury

While liver transplantation remains the sole treatment option for patients with end-stage liver disease, there are numerous limitations to liver transplantation including the scarcity of donor livers and a rise in livers that are unsuitable to transplant such as those with excess steatosis. Fatty livers are susceptible to ischaemia-reperfusion (IR) injury during transplantation and IR injury results in primary graft non-function, graft failure and mortality. Recent studies have described new cell death pathways which differ from the traditional apoptotic pathway. Necroptosis, a regulated form of cell death, has been associated with hepatic IR injury. Receptor-interacting protein kinase 3 (RIPK3) and mixed-lineage kinase domain-like pseudokinase (MLKL) are thought to be instrumental in the execution of necroptosis. The study of hepatic necroptosis and potential therapeutic approaches to attenuate IR injury will be a key factor in improving our knowledge regarding liver transplantation with fatty donor livers. In this review, we focus on the effect of hepatic steatosis during liver transplantation as well as molecular mechanisms of necroptosis and its involvement during liver IR injury. We also discuss the immune responses triggered during necroptosis and examine the utility of necroptosis inhibitors as potential therapeutic approaches to alleviate IR injury.

Deceased donor liver transplant: Experience from a public sector hospital in India

BACKGROUND

Deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) is an uncommon procedure in India. We present our experience of DDLT from a public sector teaching hospital.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all DDLT was performed from April 2012 till September 2016. Demographics, intraoperative, donor factors, morbidity, and outcome were analyzed.

RESULTS

During the study period, 305 liver transplants were performed, of which 36 were DDLT (adult 32, pediatric 4; 35 grafts; 1 split). The median age was 42.5 (1-62) years; 78% were men. The median donor age was 28 (1-77) years; 72.2% were men. About 45% of organs were procured from outside of Delhi and 67% of all grafts used were marginal. Three of 38 liver grafts (7.8%) were rejected due to gross steatosis. Commonest indication was cryptogenic cirrhosis (19.4%). The median model for end-stage liver disease sodium and pediatric end-stage liver disease scores were 23.5 (9-40) and 14.5 (9-22), respectively. Median warm and cold ischemia times were 40 (23-56) and 396 (111-750) min, respectively. Major morbidity of grade III and above occurred in 63.8%. In hospital (90 days), mortality was 16.7% and there were two late deaths because of chronic rejection and biliary sepsis. The overall survival was 77.8% at median follow up of 8.6 (1-54) months.

CONCLUSIONS

DDLT can be performed with increasing frequency and safety in a public sector hospital. The perioperative and long-term outcomes are acceptable despite the fact that most organs were extended criteria grafts.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of liver transplantation using grafts from deceased donors aged over 70 years

INTRODUCTION

Due to the current organ shortage, nearly 20% of patients die waiting for a liver transplant (LT). The average donor age is on the rise, and grafts from elderly donors are offered as extended criteria grafts.

METHODS

This is a meta-analysis comparing the outcome differences of adult patients undergoing LT using grafts from <70-year-old donors vs >70-year-old donors. The primary end-points were graft and patient survival. Secondary outcomes were biliary and vascular complications as well as graft function. The odds ratio (OR) is a summary statistic with the corresponding 95% confidence interval; P < .05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Eight nonrandomized comparative studies with 4376 LT recipients were included. About 79.9% and 20.1% of the grafts were from <70-year-old and >70-year-old donors, respectively. Graft survival at 1 year was similar between the two groups (P = .11), but there was better 3-year and 5-year graft survival in the >70-year-old group (P = .006 and P < .0001, respectively). Patient survival was also similar between the groups at 1 year (P = .54), but with better survival at 3-year and 5-year follow-ups (P = .007 and P < .0001, respectively) in the >70-year-old group. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of biliary, vascular, and graft functional-related complications.

CONCLUSION

Liver grafts from selected >70-year-old donors do not pose added organ-specific risks and thus have comparable transplantation outcomes.

NKT cells are important mediators of hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury

Introduction

IRI results from the interruption then reinstatement of an organ's blood supply, and this poses a significant problem in liver transplantation and resectional surgery.

In this paper, we explore the role T cells play in the pathogenesis of this injury.

Materials & methods

We used an in vivo murine model of warm partial hepatic IRI, genetically-modified mice, in vivo antibody depletion, adoptive cell transfer and flow cytometry to determine which lymphocyte subsets contribute to pathology. Injury was assessed by measuring serum alanine aminotransfersase (ALT) and by histological examination of liver tissue sections.

Results

The absence of T cells (CD3εKO) is associated with significant protection from injury (p = 0.010). Through a strategy of antibody depletion it appears that NKT cells (p = 0.0025), rather than conventional T (CD4 + or CD8 +) (p = 0.11) cells that are the key mediators of injury.

Discussion

Our results indicate that tissue-resident NKT cells, but not other lymphocyte populations are responsible for the injury in hepatic IRI. Targeting the activation of NKT cells and/or their effector apparatus would be a novel approach in protecting the liver during transplantation and resection surgery; this may allow us to expand our current criteria for surgery.

•

Hepatic IRI worsens outcome in liver transplantation.

•

T cells are important in hepatic IRI.

•

These are tissue-resident rather than recruited T cells.

•

NKT, but not conventional T or NK cells, are key mediators of hepatic IRI.

•

Targeting NKT activation or their effector apparatus may offer therapeutic potential.

The use of old donors in liver transplantation

The process of ageing has an impact on the entire human body including the organ systems. In transplantation, professionals are daily faced with risk assessment of suitable donor offers , whether to accept a liver graft for a specific recipient. In this context, livers from elderly donors are more frequently accepted for transplantation, to increase the donor pool and compensate the high waiting list mortality. In the current practice it is not unusual to accept 60-year old donor livers for transplantation, as the donor demographics have significantly changed over the years. However, controversy exists regarding the use of livers from donors above 70 or 80 years, particular in combination with other risk factors, e.g. liver steatosis, warm ischaemia or long cold storage. This review focuses first on the impact of ageing on liver morphology and function. Second, we will highlight outcome after transplantation from elderly donors. Finally, we describe further risk factors and donor-recipient selection under the scope of old donor organs and include our institutional experience and policy.

Primary graft dysfunction of the liver: definitions, diagnostic criteria and risk factors

Primary graft dysfunction is a multifactorial syndrome with great impact on liver transplantation outcomes. This review article was based on studies published between January 1980 and June 2015 and retrieved from PubMed database using the following search terms: "primary graft dysfunction", "early allograft dysfunction", "primary non-function" and "liver transplantation". Graft dysfunction describes different grades of graft ischemia-reperfusion injury and can manifest as early allograft dysfunction or primary graft non-function, its most severe form. Donor-, surgery- and recipient-related factors have been associated with this syndrome. Primary graft dysfunction definition, diagnostic criteria and risk factors differ between studies. RESUMO A disfunção primária do enxerto hepático é uma síndrome multifatorial com grande impacto no resultado do transplante de fígado. Foi realizada uma ampla revisão da literatura, consultando a base de dados PubMed, em busca de estudos publicados entre janeiro de 1980 e junho de 2015. Os termos descritivos utilizados foram: "primary graft dysfunction", "early allograft dysfunction", "primary non-function" e "liver transplantation". A disfunção traduz graus diferentes da lesão de isquemia e reperfusão do órgão, e pode se manifestar como disfunção precoce ou, na forma mais grave, pelo não funcionamento primário do enxerto. Fatores relacionados ao doador, ao transplante e ao receptor contribuem para essa síndrome. Existem definições diferentes na literatura quanto ao diagnóstico e aos fatores de risco associados à disfunção primária.

Use of artificial intelligence as an innovative donor-recipient matching model for liver transplantation: results from a multicenter Spanish study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There is an increasing discrepancy between the number of potential liver graft recipients and the number of organs available. Organ allocation should follow the concept of benefit of survival, avoiding human-innate subjectivity. The aim of this study is to use artificial-neural-networks (ANNs) for donor-recipient (D-R) matching in liver transplantation (LT) and to compare its accuracy with validated scores (MELD, D-MELD, DRI, P-SOFT, SOFT, and BAR) of graft survival.

METHODS

64 donor and recipient variables from a set of 1003 LTs from a multicenter study including 11 Spanish centres were included. For each D-R pair, common statistics (simple and multiple regression models) and ANN formulae for two non-complementary probability-models of 3-month graft-survival and -loss were calculated: a positive-survival (NN-CCR) and a negative-loss (NN-MS) model. The NN models were obtained by using the Neural Net Evolutionary Programming (NNEP) algorithm. Additionally, receiver-operating-curves (ROC) were performed to validate ANNs against other scores.

RESULTS

Optimal results for NN-CCR and NN-MS models were obtained, with the best performance in predicting the probability of graft-survival (90.79%) and -loss (71.42%) for each D-R pair, significantly improving results from multiple regressions. ROC curves for 3-months graft-survival and -loss predictions were significantly more accurate for ANN than for other scores in both NN-CCR (AUROC-ANN=0.80 vs. -MELD=0.50; -D-MELD=0.54; -P-SOFT=0.54; -SOFT=0.55; -BAR=0.67 and -DRI=0.42) and NN-MS (AUROC-ANN=0.82 vs. -MELD=0.41; -D-MELD=0.47; -P-SOFT=0.43; -SOFT=0.57, -BAR=0.61 and -DRI=0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

ANNs may be considered a powerful decision-making technology for this dataset, optimizing the principles of justice, efficiency and equity. This may be a useful tool for predicting the 3-month outcome and a potential research area for future D-R matching models.

Use of octogenarian donors for liver transplantation: a survival analysis

Use of very old donors in liver transplantation (LT) is controversial because advanced donor age is associated with a higher risk for graft dysfunction and worse long-term results, especially for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive recipients. This was a retrospective, single-center review of primary, ABO-compatible LT performed between 2001 and 2010. Recipients were stratified in four groups based on donor age (<60 years; 60-69 years; 70-79 years and ≥80 years) and their outcomes were compared. A total of 842 patients were included: 348 (41.3%) with donors <60 years; 176 (20.9%) with donors 60-69 years; 233 (27.7%) with donors 70-79 years and 85 (10.1%) with donors ≥80 years. There was no difference across groups in terms of early (≤30 days) graft loss, and graft survival at 1 and 5 years was 90.5% and 78.6% for grafts <60 years; 88.6% and 81.3% for grafts 60-69 years; 87.6% and 75.1% for grafts 70-79 years and 84.7% and 77.1% for grafts ≥80 years (p = 0.065). In the group ≥80 years, the 5-year graft survival was lower for HCV-positive versus HCV-negative recipients (62.4% vs. 85.6%, p = 0.034). Based on our experience, grafts from donors ≥80 years may provide favorable results but require appropriate selection and allocation policies.

Using old liver grafts for liver transplantation: Where are the limits?

The scarcity of ideal liver grafts for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has led transplant teams to investigate other sources of grafts in order to augment the donor liver pool. One way to get more liver grafts is to use marginal donors, a not well-defined group which includes mainly donors > 60 years, donors with hypernatremia or macrosteatosis > 30%, donors with hepatitis C virus or hepatitis B virus positive serologies, cold ischemia time > 12 h, non-heart-beating donors, and grafts from split-livers or living-related donations. Perhaps the most practical and frequent measure to increase the liver pool, and thus to reduce waiting list mortality, is to use older livers. In the past years the results of OLT with old livers have improved, mainly due to better selection and maintenance of donors, improvements in surgical techniques in donors and recipients, and intra- and post-OLT management. At the present time, sexagenarian livers are generally accepted, but there still exists some controversy regarding the use of septuagenarian and octogenarian liver grafts. The aim of this paper is to briefly review the aging process of the liver and reported experiences using old livers for OLT. Fundamentally, the series of septuagenarian and octogenarian livers will be addressed to see if there is a limit to using these aged grafts.

Graft and viral outcomes in retransplantation for hepatitis C virus recurrence and HCV primary liver transplantation: a case-control study

INTRODUCTION

The use of liver retransplantation (ReLT) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence is controversial because of subsequent viral recurrence after ReLT.

METHODS

Case-control analysis between patients undergoing ReLT for HCV reinfection between 1993 and 2012 (ReLT group: 26 patients) and patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) for HCV infection immediately before and after each ReLT (LT group: 52 patients).

RESULTS

ReLT group had worse hepatocellular function, higher preoperative viral load, higher transfusion requirements, and increased number of postoperative complications than LT group. ReLT patients showed a trend toward worse graft survival compared with LT (five-yr graft survival: 42.3% vs. 64.3%, p = 0.145), but the rate of severe HCV recurrence and infection-free survival (IFS) was similar. The use of donors older than 60 yr led to a lower IFS and graft survival in both groups. Early severe HCV infection rate was similar in both groups, but it affected prognosis in ReLT more markedly than in LT (three-yr graft survival: 0% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

ReLT for HCV reinfection has acceptable results when strict selection policies of donor and recipient are applied. However, early severe recurrence more markedly impairs prognosis in ReLT patients than in LT.

Use of marginal grafts in deceased donor liver transplant: assessment of early outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Orthotopic liver transplantation has become a routinely applied therapy for an expanding group of patients with end-stage liver disease. Shortage of organs has led centers to expand their criteria for the acceptance of marginal donors. There is current debate about the regulation and results of liver transplantation using marginal grafts.

METHODS

The study included data of all patients who received deceased donor liver grafts between March 2007 to December 2011. Patients with acute liver failure, living donor transplantation, split liver transplantation, and retransplantation were excluded. Early allograft dysfunction, primary nonfunction, patient survival, and incidence of surgical complications were measured.

RESULTS

A total of 33 patients were enrolled in this study. There were 20 marginal and 13 nonmarginal grafts. The two groups were well matched regarding age, sex and indication of liver transplantation, model for end-stage liver disease score, technique of transplant, requirement of vascular reconstruction, warm ischemia time, blood loss, mean operative time, etc. In our study, posttransplant peak level of liver enzymes, international normalization ratio, and bilirubin were not statistically significant in the marginal and nonmarginal group. Wound infection occurred in 10 % of marginal compared with 7.7 % of nonmarginal graft recipients (p > 0.05). In the marginal group, the incidences of vascular complications, hepatic artery thrombosis (four), and portal vein thrombosis (one) were not statistically significant compared to the nonmarginal group. Acute rejection was observed in a total of seven patients (21.2 %)-five (25 %) in the marginal group and two (15.4 %) in the nonmarginal graft recipients. Primary nonfunction occurred in three (9.1 %) patients-two (10 %) in the marginal and one (7.7 %) in the nonmarginal group. Average patient survival for the whole group was 91 % at 1 week, 87.8 % at 3 months, and 84.8 % at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Because organ scarcity persists, additional pressure will build to use a greater proportion of the existing donor pool. The study, although small, clearly indicates that marginal livers can assure a normal early functional recovery after transplantation.

Postoperative kidney injury does not decrease survival after liver transplantation

PURPOSE

To explore the effect of acute kidney injury (AKI) on long-term survival after conventional orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) without venovenous bypass (VVB).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was carried out on 153 patients with end-stage liver diseases transplanted by the Department of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation of the University of Pernambuco, from August, 1999 to December, 2009. The Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and log-rank test were applied to explore the association between AKI and long-term patient survival, and multivariate analyses were applied to control the effect of other variables.

RESULTS

Over the 12.8-year follow-up, 58.8% patients were alive with a median follow-up of 4.5-year. Patient 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year survival were 74.5%, 70.6%, 67.9% and 60.1%; respectively. Early postoperative mortality was poorer amongst patients who developed AKI (5.4% vs. 20%, p=0.010), but long-term 5-year survival did not significantly differed between groups (51.4% vs. 65.3%; p=0.077). After multivariate analyses, AKI was not significantly related to long-term survival and only the intraoperative transfusion of red blood cells was significantly related to this outcome (non-adjusted Exp[b]=1.072; p=0.045).

CONCLUSION

The occurrence of postoperative acute kidney injury did not independently decrease patient survival after orthotopic liver transplantation without venovenous bypass in this data from northeast Brazil.

Donor-recipient matching: myths and realities

Liver transplant outcomes keep improving, with refinements of surgical technique, immunosuppression and post-transplant care. However, these excellent results and the limited number of organs available have led to an increasing number of potential recipients with end-stage liver disease worldwide. Deaths on waiting lists have led liver transplant teams maximize every organ offered and used in terms of pre and post-transplant benefit. Donor-recipient (D-R) matching could be defined as the technique to check D-R pairs adequately associated by the presence of the constituents of some patterns from donor and patient variables. D-R matching has been strongly analysed and policies in donor allocation have tried to maximize organ utilization whilst still protecting individual interests. However, D-R matching has been written through trial and error and the development of each new score has been followed by strong discrepancies and controversies. Current allocation systems are based on isolated or combined donor or recipient characteristics. This review intends to analyze current knowledge about D-R matching methods, focusing on three main categories: patient-based policies, donor-based policies and combined donor-recipient systems. All of them lay on three mainstays that support three different concepts of D-R matching: prioritarianism (favouring the worst-off), utilitarianism (maximising total benefit) and social benefit (cost-effectiveness). All of them, with their pros and cons, offer an exciting controversial topic to be discussed. All of them together define D-R matching today, turning into myth what we considered a reality in the past.

Orthotopic liver transplantation without venovenous bypass using the conventional and piggyback techniques

INTRODUCTION

Orthotopic liver transplantation is a widely used procedure for the treatment of irreversible liver diseases for which there is no possibility of medical treatment. When this procedure is performed by the conventional technique, the retrohepatic vena cava is removed along with the native liver. The inferior vena cava (IVC) remains clamped until the revascularization of the graft, and in this period there is a reduction in the venous return, which may induce a fall by up to 50% in the cardiac output with hemodynamic instability and a fall in renal perfusion pressure. The use of a portal-femoral-axillary venovenous bypass system, in which the blood from the femoral and portal veins returns to the heart via the axillary vein propelled by a centrifugal pump, is intended to minimize the effects of the IVC clamping. In the piggyback (PB) technique, the native liver is removed and the IVC of the recipient is preserved and only partially clamped. We have employed both techniques without the use of venovenous bypass for 10 years. The objective of this study was to compare the results obtained from the use of the two techniques.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of 195 patients transplanted between 1999 and 2008: 125 by the conventional technique and 70, the PB technique. The intraoperative parameters were analyzed (surgical time, ischemia time, use of blood products, and diuresis), as well as intensive care support (duration of stay in intensive care unit and use of vasoactive drugs), period of intubation, length of hospital stay, renal function, graft function, postoperative complications, retransplantation, and patient survival.

RESULTS

The PB group showed a reduction in surgical time, warm ischemia time, the use of packed red blood cells concentrates, and fresh frozen plasma, as well as mortality at 30 days (P<.05). There were no differences in relation to cold ischemia time, intraoperative diuresis; length of stay and use of vasoactive drugs in the intensive care unit; the period of intubation; the duration of hospital stay; the renal function; the graft function; the need for reoperation; the incidence of sepsis, biliary complications, vascular complications; need for retransplantation; and 1-year mortality. The cumulative survival rate at 1 year was significantly better among the PB patients.

CONCLUSION

Orthotopic liver transplantation can be performed without venovenous bypass with good results, using either the conventional technique or the PB technique. Provided that there is no technical contraindication and a long ischemia period is not foreseen, the PB technique should be the technique of choice.

Liver transplantation with donors over the expected lifespan in the model for end-staged liver disease era: is Mother Nature punishing us?

BACKGROUND

The lack of sufficient donors to satisfy the waiting list requirements has prompted many to expand the acceptance criteria. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our liver transplantation (LT) experience with donors beyond the average lifespan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2008 to December 2009, we received 75 liver offers involving donors ≥ 75 years of age. Donor and recipient data were analysed by both uni- and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model analyses.

RESULTS

We performed 32 adult liver transplants (43%). Half of the patients received organs through rescue allocations. Seven recipients (22%) developed initial poor function. Two had primary graft non-function (PNF). Four recipients were re-transplanted (two PNF and two ischaemic-type bile lesions). One- and 3-year cumulative survival was 62 and 51% respectively. PNF, lab model for end-staged liver disease (MELD), post-LT haemodialysis, post-LT re-operations and post-LT sepsis were significant predictors by univariate analysis. Only PNF reached multivariate significance (P = 0.0307). Rescue offer allocation reached significance as a predictor of PNF by general linear model forward analysis. One- and 3-year 'MELD based allocation' (n = 16) vs 'rescue allocation' (n = 16) survival rates were 44 and 29% vs 82 and 76% respectively (P = 0.0197).

CONCLUSIONS

Although grafts from donors ≥ 75 years allow for an expansion of the donor pool, long-term recipient survival is inferior to that encountered with younger donors. Acceptable results could be obtained by identifying 'preferred' recipients for rescue allocations.

Preditores de injúria renal aguda em pacientes submetidos ao transplante ortotópico de fígado convencional sem desvio venovenoso

RADICAL: Injúria renal aguda é uma das complicações mais comuns do transplante ortotópico de fígado. A ausência de critério universal para sua definição nestas condições dificulta as comparações entre os estudos. A técnica convencional para o transplante consiste na excisão total da veia cava inferior retro-hepática durante a hepatectomia nativa. Controvérsias sobre o efeito da técnica convencional sem desvio venovenoso na função renal continuam. OBJETIVO: Estimar a incidência e os fatores de risco de injúria renal aguda entre os receptores de transplante ortotópico de fígado convencional sem desvio venovenoso. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados 375 pacientes submetidos a transplante ortotópico de fígado. Foram analisadas as variáveis pré, intra e pós-operatórias em 153 pacientes submetidos a transplante ortotópico de fígado convencional sem desvio venovenoso. O critério para a injúria renal aguda foi valor da creatinina sérica > 1,5 mg/dl ou débito urinário < 500 ml/24h dentro dos primeiros três dias pós-transplante. Foi realizada análise univariada e multivariada por regressão logística. RESULTADOS: Todos os transplantes foram realizados com enxerto de doador falecido. Sessenta pacientes (39,2%) apresentaram injúria renal aguda. Idade, índice de massa corpórea, escore de Child-Turcotte-Pugh, ureia, hipertensão arterial sistêmica e creatinina sérica pré-operatória apresentaram maiores valores no grupo injúria renal aguda. Durante o período intraoperatório, o grupo injúria renal aguda apresentou mais síndrome de reperfusão, transfusão de concentrado de hemácias, plasma fresco e plaquetas. No pós-operatório, o tempo de permanência em ventilação mecânica e creatinina pós-operatória também foram variáveis, com diferenças significativas para o grupo injúria renal aguda. Após regressão logística, a síndrome de reperfusão, a classe C do Child-Turcotte-Pugh e a creatinina sérica pós-operatória apresentaram diferenças. CONCLUSÃO: Injúria renal aguda após transplante ortotópico de fígado convencional sem desvio venovenoso é uma desordem comum, mas apresenta bom prognóstico. Síndrome de reperfusão, creatinina sérica no pós-operatório e Child C são fatores associados a injúria renal aguda pós-transplante ortotópico de fígado convencional sem desvio venovenoso.

Outcome of liver transplantation using donors older than 60 years of age

The impact of donor age on liver transplantation has been analyzed in several studies with contradictory results. Our aim was to evaluate graft survival and complications in the first year after liver transplantations with livers from older donors.

METHODS

Prospective analysis of 149 consecutive primary liver transplantations performed between 2000 and 2005. Transplantations were divided into two groups according to donor age: group A, <60 yr old (n=102); and group B, ≥60 yr old (n=47).

RESULTS

Chronic and acute rejection, vascular complications, and infections were not statistically different between the groups. Anastomotic biliary strictures were similar in the two groups, but non-anastomotic biliary strictures (NABS) were clearly more frequent in the older donor group (17% vs. 4.9%; OR 3.9; p=0.025). NABS with no arterial complication was diagnosed in 10.6% of cases in group B vs. 1% in group A (OR=12; p=0.012). Graft survival in the first year was 86.67% in the younger group of donors and 71.43% in the older group (p<0.05), but patient survival was not different.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of grafts from donors≥60 yr decreased graft survival after liver transplantation and was related to a higher frequency of non-anastomotic biliary strictures.

Rescue policy for discarded liver grafts: a single-centre experience of transplanting livers 'that nobody wants'

BACKGROUND

There is a worldwide need to expand the donor liver pool. We report a consecutive series of elective candidates for liver transplantation (LT) who received 'livers that nobody wants' (LNWs) in Argentina.

METHODS

Between 2006 and 2009, outcomes for patients who received LNWs were analysed and compared with outcomes for a control group. To be defined as an LNW, an organ is required to fulfil two criteria. Firstly, each liver must be officially offered and refused more than 30 times; secondly, the liver must be refused by at least 50% of the LT programmes in our country before our programme can accept it. Principal endpoints were primary graft non-function (PNF), mortality, and graft and patient survival.

RESULTS

We transplanted 26 LNWs that had been discarded by a median of 12 centres. A total of 2666 reasons for refusal had been registered. These included poor donor status (n= 1980), followed by LT centre (n= 398) or recipient (n= 288) conditions. Incidences of PNF (3.8% vs. 4.0%), in-hospital mortality (3.8% vs. 8.0%), 1-year patient (84% vs. 84%) and graft (84% vs. 80%) survival were equal in the LNW and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Transplantable livers are unnecessarily discarded by the transplant community. External and internal supervision of the activity of each LT programme is urgently needed to guarantee high standards of excellence.

Incidence and clinical relevance of bacterial contamination in preservation solution for liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative infection is considered one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation. We prospectively studied the incidence and significance of infections in preservation solutions for liver transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From March 2007 to March 2008, we cultured the University of Wisconsin preservation solution for 60 consecutive liver transplantations. Fluid samples were obtained at the beginning and at the end of the back table procedure. Our posttransplant infection prophylactic protocol consisted of ampicillin and cefotaxime for 48 hours.

RESULTS

Cultures were positive in 59 patients (98.4%). Seventy-five percent of the isolates were superficial saprophytic flora (SSF; Staphylococcus coagulase negative, Streptococcus viridans, and Corynebacterium), nevertheless in 15 cases (25.1%) we isolated high virulence pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella, Escherichia coli, Enterobacter, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa). There were neither anaerobic nor fungal isolates. Sixteen patients (36%) from the group with SSF developed postoperative fever, including 12 with negative posttransplant cultures, while 4 patients showed positive cultures for various microorganisms distinct from those isolated from the preservation solution. Five patients (30%) with high virulence pathogens in the preservation solution developed posttransplant fever, although no pathogen was isolated.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive cultures of preservation fluids were observed in 98% of patients, although most of them (75%) were SSF. Microorganisms isolated from posttransplant cultures did not match the ones obtained from the preservation solution. Our results did not support routine culturing of the preservation solution provided that one administrator an adequate posttransplant antibiotic prophylactic regimen.

The role of marginal donors in liver transplantation. The Hungarian experience

A májátültetések számát korlátozza a beültetésre alkalmas donorszervek mennyisége. A szervhiány megoldására az egyik lehetőség az úgynevezett marginális donorok (extended donor criteria) elfogadása a májátültetési programban. Célkitűzés: A magyar májátültetési program szervdonációs jellemzőinek vizsgálata, különös tekintettel a marginális donorokra. Módszer: Donor- és recipiensadatok retrospektív feldolgozása 2003. január és 2008. december között. A marginálisdonor-kritériumrendszert nemzetközi ajánlások alapján állítottuk fel. Eredmények: A vizsgált periódus alatt összesen 1078 donort jelentettek a klinikán. Nyolcszázharmincöt esetben (77,4%) alkalmatlannak ítélték a donormájat a transzplantációra, 243 esetben (22,6%) volt beültetésre alkalmas a donormáj. A beültetett májgraftok közül 40 (16%) származott marginális, 203 (84%) nem marginális donorból. Marginális májgraftok beültetése esetén nem volt különbség a beteg- és grafttúlélésben, a posztoperatív graftfunkciót jelző paraméterekben és az általános szövődmények gyakoriságában. A korai hepatitis C-rekurrencia gyakoribb volt marginális graft beültetése esetén. Következtetések: A májátültetésre váró betegek száma hazánkban is folyamatosan növekszik. Marginális májgraftok alkalmazása esetén a betegek morbiditása és mortalitása nem különbözik számottevően a standard donorokból származó májgraftok beültetése után tapasztalt eredményektől. Hepatitis C-vírus esetén nem javasolt marginális májgraft beültetése. A donorok felső életkori határának kiterjesztése megfontolandó.

[The application of MELD score in patients submitted to liver transplantation: a retrospective analysis of survival and the predictive factors in the short and long term]

BACKGROUND

The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) was developed to predict short-term mortality in patients with cirrhosis. There are few reports studying the correlation between MELD and long-term posttransplantation survival.

AIM

To assess the value of pretransplant MELD in the prediction of posttransplant survival.

METHODS

The adult patients (age >18 years) who underwent liver transplantation were examined in a retrospective longitudinal cohort of patients, through the prospective data base. We excluded acute liver failure, retransplantation and reduced or split-livers. The liver donors were evaluated according to: age, sex, weight, creatinine, bilirubin, sodium, aspartate aminotransferase, personal antecedents, brain death cause, steatosis, expanded criteria donor number and index donor risk. The recipients' data were: sex, age, weight, chronic hepatic disease, Child-Turcotte-Pugh points, pretransplant and initial MELD score, pretransplant creatinine clearance, sodium, cold and warm ischemia times, hospital length of stay, blood requirements, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT >1,000 UI/L = liver dysfunction). The Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test was used for the univariable analyses of posttransplant patient survival. For the multivariable analyses the Cox proportional hazard regression method with the stepwise procedure was used with stratifying sodium and MELD as variables. ROC curve was used to define area under the curve for MELD and Child-Turcotte-Pugh.

RESULTS

A total of 232 patients with 10 years follow up were available. The MELD cutoff was 20 and Child-Turcotte-Pugh cutoff was 11.5. For MELD score > or =20, the risk factors for death were: red cell requirements, liver dysfunction and donor's sodium. For the patients with hyponatremia the risk factors were: negative delta-MELD score, red cell requirements, liver dysfunction and donor's sodium. The regression univariated analyses came up with the following risk factors for death: score MELD > or = 25, blood requirements, recipient creatinine clearance pretransplant and age donor > or =50. After stepwise analyses, only red cell requirement was predictive. Patients with MELD score < 25 had a 68.86%, 50,44% and 41,50% chance for 1, 5 and 10-year survival and > or =25 were 39.13%, 29.81% and 22.36% respectively. Patients without hyponatremia were 65.16%, 50.28% and 41,98% and with hyponatremia 44.44%, 34.28% and 28.57% respectively. Patients with IDR > or =1.7 showed 53.7%, 27.71% and 13.85% and index donor risk <1.7 was 63.62%, 51.4% and 44.08%, respectively. Age donor > 50 years showed 38.4%, 26.21% and 13.1% and age donor < or =50 years showed 65.58%, 26.21% and 13.1%. Association with delta-MELD score did not show any significant difference. Expanded criteria donors were associated with primary non-function and severe liver dysfunction. Predictive factors for death were blood requirements, hyponatremia, liver dysfunction and donor's sodium.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion MELD over 25, recipient's hyponatremia, blood requirements, donor's sodium were associated with poor survival.

Donor livers with steatosis are safe to use in hepatitis C virus-positive recipients

Whether donor graft steatosis affects liver function and influences survival after liver transplantation is still open to debate. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of donor graft steatosis on long-term liver histology after liver transplantation. One hundred sixteen consecutive liver transplants were performed in 56 hepatitis C virus-positive (HCV+) patients and 60 HCV- patients who had protocol liver biopsies at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after liver transplantation. Liver biopsies were obtained from all grafts. No steatosis was seen in 50.9% of the biopsies taken at the back table before implantation, whereas steatosis was mild in 39.6% of the samples and moderate/severe in 9.5% of the samples. In the 56 HCV+ recipients, fibrosis stage 3 was seen in 22.2% and stage 4 was seen in 2.2% of 45 biopsies at 36 months after liver transplantation. There was no correlation between donor graft steatosis and fibrosis after liver transplantation, regardless of the etiology of liver disease. No difference in 36-month survival after liver transplantation was seen, regardless of whether the etiology of the patient's liver disease was HCV-related or non-HCV-related (80.3% versus 75%; P = 0.4) and whether the steatosis in the graft was reportedly absent, mild, or moderate/severe (79.7% versus 73.9% versus 81.1%; P = 0.7). In conclusion, nearly one-quarter of HCV+ recipients have precirrhosis/cirrhosis 3 years after liver transplantation. Steatotic grafts do not seem to exacerbate the progression of fibrosis in HCV+ recipients, nor do they seem to negatively affect 3-year patient survival.

Prognostic evaluation of the donor risk index among a prospective cohort of Italian patients undergoing liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIM

The definition of an extended criteria donor for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) remains controversial. The donor risk index (DRI) has become the main tool to define the marginality of hepatic grafts in the United States. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the prognostic ability of DRI among a cohort of Italian patients undergoing OLT.

METHODS

From December 2006 to March 2008, we prospectively calculated DRI in all consecutive cadaveric grafts. Recipient inclusion criteria were: adult patients with chronic liver disease enlisted for primary OLT. The primary end point was the incidence of primary graft dysfunction (PDF), namely, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >2000 U/mL and prothrombin time <40% on postoperative days 2-7.

RESULTS

We enrolled 74 donor-recipient pairs fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Donor characteristics included DRI 1.7 (range, 0.9-3.0); age 57 years (range, 18-81); ultrasound signs of steatosis in 22 donors (30%); and ischemia time was 536 minutes (range, 290-690). Recipient characteristics are: age 55 years (range, 27-68); hepatocellular carcinoma in 36 subjects (49%); MELD was 16 (range, 7-39); and Child-Pugh score was 8 (range, 6-14). In terms of the primary end points, the DRI did not provide a significant PDF predictor (P = .84). Among all evaluated donor and recipient variables, the following were related to the incidence of graft PDF: donor age (P = .07), ultrasound signs of steatosis (P = .02), donor AST (P = .05), cell saver infusion (P = .07), and warm (P = .04) and cold ischemia (P = .07) times.

CONCLUSION

The preliminary data of this study showed a poor correlation between DRI and PDF incidence after OLT.

Impact of cumulative risk factors for expanded criteria donors on early survival after liver transplantation

There are various options to help overcome the organ shortage, including performing transplants using grafts from marginal donors with characteristics previously described as unacceptable because of the high risk of graft failure. Nowadays, expanded criteria donors for liver transplantation (OLT) is a strategy used routinely by many teams. Some donor features have been suggested to jeopardize initial function or survival; when these features are aggregated, they may impact prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of donor risk factors on early patient survival and retransplantation. Donor risk factors were considered to be older than 60 years, body mass index > 30, serum sodium level > 155 mEq/L, cold ischemia time > 12 hours, and intensive care unit stay > 4 days. We prospectively recorded data from 139 patients who underwent 152 OLT from March 2003 to May 2007. Patients were classified into four groups: I, no risk factors; II, one risk factor; III, two risk factors; IV, three or more risk factors. Retransplantation or OLT due to acute liver failure was considered to be an exclusion criterion. Early overall survival rate was 83.76%; 12 retransplantations were required (10.25%). Comparing the four groups, patient survivals (P = .41) and retransplantation rates (P = .518) were similar. In conclusion, cumulative risk factors showed no impact on early (30-day) recipient survival and or on the necessity of retransplantation after OLT.

Marginal grafts increase early mortality in liver transplantation

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE

Expanded donor criteria (marginal) grafts are an important solution for organ shortage. Nevertheless, they raise an ethical dilemma because they may increase the risk of transplant failure. This study compares the outcomes from marginal and non-marginal graft transplantation in 103 cases of liver transplantation due to chronic hepatic failure.

DESIGN AND SETTING

One hundred and three consecutive liver transplantations to treat chronic liver disease performed in the Liver Transplantation Service of Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo between January 2001 and March 2006 were retrospectively analyzed.

METHODS

We estimated graft quality according to a validated scoring system. We assessed the pre-transplantation liver disease category using the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), as low MELD (< 20) or high MELD (>or= 20). The parameters for marginal and non-marginal graft comparison were the one-week, one-month and one-year recipient survival rates, serum liver enzyme peak, post-transplantation hospital stay and incidence of surgical complications and retransplantation. The significance level was 0.05.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the groups regarding post-transplantation hospital stay, serum liver enzyme levels and surgical complications. In contrast, marginal grafts decreased overall recipient survival one month after transplantation. Furthermore, low-MELD recipients of non-marginal grafts showed better one-week and one-month survival than did high-MELD recipients of marginal livers. After the first month, patient survival was comparable in all groups up to one year.

CONCLUSION

The use of marginal graft increases early mortality in liver transplantation, particularly among high-MELD recipients.

Critical use of extended criteria donor liver grafts in adult-to-adult whole liver transplantation: a single-center experience

This study presents our experience with the use of extended criteria donor (ECD) liver grafts. One hundred fifteen liver transplants were divided into 2 groups: standard (S) and nonstandard (NS). Fifty-eight patients in group S received a liver procured from an ideal donor, whereas 57 patients in group NS received an organ from an ECD. On the basis of the number of risk factors, patients were divided into 3 subgroups: the S group with 58 receiving a standard graft, the NS1 group with 44 receiving a graft with 1 or 2 risk factors, and the NS2 group with 13 receiving a graft with 3 to 4 risk factors. Patient survival was not different at 6, 12, and 24 months (P > 0.05), whereas graft survival was different (P = 0.0079). Both patient survival and graft survival were influenced by the cumulative number of risk factors. The univariate analysis of the donor risk factors detected hemodynamic factors as predictive of graft failure (P = 0.024) and death (P = 0.018). In the multivariate analysis, which was adjusted for recipient age and donor and recipient gender, hemodynamic risk factors and Model for End-Stage Liver. Disease score in the recipient were the only variables independently associated with graft failure (P = 0.006, P = 0.012, negatively). Finally, we observed a reduction of dropout from the list to 9% from 14.1% (P = 0.04) and of mortality on the list to 32.55% from 41.01% (P = 0.11). Critical use of ECD liver grafts allowed recipients in the waiting list to have a greater chance of being transplanted.

Use of severely steatotic grafts in liver transplantation: a matched case-control study

BACKGROUND

Although there is a worldwide need to expand the pool of available liver grafts, cadaveric livers with severe steatosis (>60%) are discarded for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) by most centers.

METHODS

We analyzed patients receiving liver grafts with severe steatosis between January 2002 and September 2006. These patients were matched 1:2 with control patients without severe steatosis according to status the waiting list, recipient age, recipient body mass index (BMI), and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score. Primary end points were the incidence of primary graft nonfunction (PNF), and graft and patient survival. Secondary end points included primary graft dysfunction (PDF), the incidence of postoperative complications, and histologic assessment of steatosis in follow-up biopsies. We also conducted a survey on the use of grafts with severe steatosis among leading European liver transplant centers.

RESULTS

During the study period, 62 patients dropped out of the waiting list and 45 of them died due to progression of disease. Of 118 patients who received transplants 20 (17%) received a graft with severe steatosis during this period. The median degree of total liver steatosis was 90% (R = 65%-100%) for the steatotic group. The steatotic (n = 20) and matched control group (n = 40) were comparable in terms of recipient age, BMI, MELD score, and cold ischemia time. The steatotic group had a significantly higher rate of PDF and/or renal failure. Although the median intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay were not significantly different between both groups, the proportion of patients with long-term ICU (> or =21 days) and hospital (> or =40 days) stay was significantly higher for patients with a severely steatotic graft. Sixty-day mortality (5% vs. 5%) and 3-year patient survival rate (83% vs. 84%) were comparable between the control and severe steatosis group. Postoperative histologic assessment demonstrated that the median total amount of liver steatosis decreased significantly (median: 90% to 15%, P < 0.001). Our survey showed that all but one of the European centers currently reject liver grafts with severe steatosis for any recipient.

CONCLUSION

Due to the urgent need of liver grafts, severely steatotic grafts should be no longer discarded for OLT. Maximal effort must be spent when dealing with these high-risk organs but the use of severely steatotic grafts may save the lives of many patients who would die on the waiting list.

Liver transplantation using suboptimal grafts: impact of donor harvesting technique

In recent years, an increasing number of suboptimal grafts has been used to reduce the gap between the supply and demand of organs for liver transplantation (LT). In this randomized prospective study, we tested the impact of donor harvesting technique on the posttransplantation outcome of suboptimal donor livers. A modified double perfusion (MDP) technique (aortic and portal cooling with tourniquet clamping of splenomesenteric vein inflow) was compared with the single aortic perfusion (SAP) technique. Between February and November 2005, 35 suboptimal grafts were randomly assigned to either technique (18 MDP livers and 17 SAP livers). Donor and recipient variables were comparable in the 2 study groups. The SAP group had significantly higher blood transaminases and bilirubin levels after LT. The prevalence of graft primary dysfunction (PDF) was also significantly higher (P=0.01) in the SAP group (35%) than in the MDP group (5%). In 5 cases, all in the SAP group (P=0.02), early re-LT (<30 days) was needed. The 6-month patient and graft survival rates were significantly higher in the MDP (100% in both cases) than in the SAP group (68% and 58%, respectively). The study was stopped in November 2005, when the interim analysis revealed such markedly significant differences between the two groups. In conclusion, the present study showed a very low prevalence of PDF, death, and re-LT after transplantation with suboptimal liver when a MDP technique was used to harvest the donor graft.

Extended donor criteria have no negative impact on early outcome after liver transplantation: a single-center multivariate analysis

The organ shortage has driven many transplant centers to accept extended donor criteria and to modify graft allocation policies. This study was designed to analyze the impact of applying extended donor criteria (EDC) in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Between December 2001 and December 2004, we performed 165 primary cadaveric whole OLTs. Up to three EDC, that is, ventilation >7 days; aminotransferases (ALT or AST) >3 x normal; bilirubin >3 mg/dL; anti-HBc or HBs Ag positivity; donor age >65 years; liver steatosis >40%; donor body mass index >30; cold ischemia time >14 hours; peak serum Na(+) >165 mmol/L; history of extrahepatic malignancy; or previous drug abuse were present in 55% of all grafts. Both univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that EDC status had no effect on graft or patient survival, the necessity for retransplantation, the length of intensive care/intermediate care unit stay, mechanical ventilation, complications, or posttransplant laboratory findings. Recipient age of >/=55 years was the only independent prognostic factor for survival, regardless of EDC. These findings suggested that the use of grafts from EDC donors are safe and expand the donor pool.

Development and validation of a model predicting graft survival after liver transplantation

This study aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive model that predicts survival after liver transplantation based on pretransplant donor and recipient characteristics. Complete data were available from the United Network for Organ Sharing for 20,301 persons who underwent liver transplantation in the United States between 1994 and 2003. Proportional-hazards regression was used to identify the donor and recipient characteristics that best predicted survival and incorporate these characteristics in a multivariate model. A data-splitting approach was used to compare survival predicted by the model to the observed survival in samples not used in the derivation of the model. A model was derived using 4 donor characteristics (age, cold ischemia time, gender, and race/ethnicity) and 9 recipient characteristics (age, body max index, model for end-stage liver disease score, United Network for Organ Sharing priority status, gender, race/ethnicity, diabetes mellitus, cause of liver disease, and serum albumin) that adequately predicted survival after liver transplantation in patients without hepatitis C virus, and a slightly different model was used for patients with hepatitis C virus. The models illustrate that variations in both pretransplant donor and recipient characteristics have a large effect on posttransplant survival. In conclusion, the models presented here can be used to derive scores that are proportional to the excess risk of graft loss after liver transplantation for potential donors, recipients, or donor/recipient combinations. The models may be used to inform liver transplant candidates and their doctors what posttransplant survival would be expected when a given donor is offered and may be particularly helpful for marginal or high-risk donors.

Liver transplantation using donors with Gilbert syndrome

Serum bilirubin level is an essential factor included in the first step in evaluating living liver donor candidates. Our evaluation strategy was examined in living donors with possible Gilbert's syndrome (GS). When donor candidates had hyperbilirubinemia (>1.5 mg/dl), but otherwise normal liver function tests, their genomic DNA was isolated from leukocytes. They were diagnosed with GS when they had mutations of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1 typical to GS. The donors and recipients were divided into two groups: GS donors and their recipients (n = 6, each) and non-GS donors and their recipients (n = 65). All GS donors and their recipients had an unremarkable postoperative course. Total bilirubin levels of the recipients of GS donors were higher than those of recipients of non-GS donors. Living donor liver transplantation is safe for both donors with GS and their recipients.

Optimal utilization of donor grafts with extended criteria: a single-center experience in over 1000 liver transplants

OBJECTIVE

Severely limited organ resources mandate maximum utilization of donor allografts for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). This work aimed to identify factors that impact survival outcomes for extended criteria donors (ECD) and developed an ECD scoring system to facilitate graft-recipient matching and optimize utilization of ECDs.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of over 1000 primary adult OLTs at UCLA. Extended criteria (EC) considered included donor age (>55 years), donor hospital stay (>5 days), cold ischemia time (>10 hours), and warm ischemia time (>40 minutes). One point was assigned for each extended criterion. Cox proportional hazard regression model was used for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of 1153 allografts considered in the study, 568 organs exhibited no extended criteria (0 score), while 429, 135 and 21 donor allografts exhibited an EC score of 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Overall 1-year patient survival rates were 88%, 82%, 77% and 48% for recipients with EC scores of 0, 1, 2 and 3 respectively (P < 0.001). Adjusting for recipient age and urgency at the time of transplantation, multivariate analysis identified an ascending mortality risk ratio of 1.4 and 1.8 compared to a score of 0 for an EC score of 1, and 2 (P < 0.01) respectively. In contrast, an EC score of 3 was associated with a mortality risk ratio of 4.5 (P < 0.001). Further, advanced recipient age linearly increased the death hazard ratio, while an urgent recipient status increased the risk ratio of death by 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended criteria donors can be scored using readily available parameters. Optimizing perioperative variables and matching ECD allografts to appropriately selected recipients are crucial to maintain acceptable outcomes and represent a preferable alternative to both high waiting list mortality and to a potentially futile transplant that utilizes an ECD for a critically ill recipient.