Improved specificity and sensitivity when using pronase-digested lymphocytes to perform flow-cytometric crossmatch prior to renal transplantation

Abrogating biologics interference in flow cytometric crossmatching

The flow cytometric crossmatch is currently the gold standard for evaluating donor and recipient histocompatibility. The assay however does have limitations and is sensitive to false positive reactions resulting from the presence of non-HLA antibodies or therapy related immune biologics. Such false positive reactions can lead to the inappropriate decline of an acceptable donor organ or unnecessary therapeutic intervention. Here we describe the successful validation of anti-idiotype blocking antibodies in prevention of false positive flow crossmatch results caused by biologic therapy. Blocking antibodies specific for the Fab portion of Rituximab and/or Alemtuzumab were incubated with biologic containing patient serum prior to use in flow cytometric crossmatching. Biologic blocking successfully negated false positive crossmatch results with Rituximab (B cell ave. % change = -97%) or Alemtuzumab (T cell ave. % change = -99%, B cell ave. % change = -95%) infused sera respectively. Simultaneous blocking of these biologics was also successful. A complex case is presented to demonstrate the application of this procedure.

Systematic study of cell isolation from bovine nucleus pulposus: Improving cell yield and experiment reliability

Differences in matrix compositions in human nucleus pulposus (NP) clinical samples demand different cell isolation protocols for optimal results but there is no clear guide about this to date. Sub-optimal protocols may result in low cell yield, limited reliability of results or even failure of experiments. Cell yield, viability and attachment of cells isolated from bovine NP tissue with different protocols were estimated by cell counting, Trypan blue staining and cell culturing respectively. RNA was extracted from isolated cells and quantified by Nanodrop spectrometry and RT-qPCR. Higher collagenase concentration, longer digestion duration and pronase pre-treatment increased the cell yield. Cell viability remained high (<5% dead cells) even after 0.2% collagenase treatment for overnight. NP cells remained to have high ACAN, COL2A1, CDH2, KRT18, and KRT19 expression compared to muscle cells for different cell isolation conditions tested. Digestion by collagenase alone without the use of pronase could isolate cells from human degenerated NP tissue but clusters of cells were observed. We suggest the use of the disappearance of tissue as an indirect measure of cells released. This study provides a guide for researchers to decide the parameters involved in NP cell isolation for optimal outcome.

Sensitive solid-phase detection of donor-specific antibodies as an aid highly relevant to improving allograft outcomes

Transplant recipients who have had sensitizing events such as pregnancies, blood transfusions and previous transplants often develop antibodies directed against human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-molecules of the donor tissue. These pre-formed donor-specific antibodies (DSA) represent a high risk of organ failure as a consequence of antibody-mediated hyper-acute or acute allograft rejection. As a first assay to detect DSA, the complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity assay (CDC) was established more than 40 years ago. However, this assay is characterized by several drawbacks such as a low sensitivity and a high susceptibility to various artificial factors generally not leading to valid and reliable outcomes under several circumstances that are reviewed in this article. Furthermore, only those antibodies that exert complement-fixing activity are detected. As a consequence, novel procedures that act independently of the complement system and that do not represent functional assays were generated in the format of solid phase assays (SPAs) (bead- or ELISA-based). In this article, we review the pros and cons of these sensitive SPA in comparison with the detection of DSA through the use of the traditional methods such as CDC and flow cytometric analyses. Potential drawbacks of the alternative methodological approaches comprising high background reactivity, susceptibility to environmental factors and the possible influence of subjective operators' errors concerning the interpretation of the results are summarized and critically discussed for each method. We provide a forecast on the future role of SPAs reliably excluding highly deleterious DSA, thus leading to an improved graft survival.

Liver transplantation with a strongly positive crossmatch: case study and literature review

A positive crossmatch has been associated with increased risk in liver transplantation. To study the clinical significance of preformed donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies (DSAs) in liver transplantation, we reviewed patients who underwent liver transplantation with a strongly positive flow cytometry crossmatch. DSAs were evaluated with a Luminex solid phase assay. The complement-fixing ability of DSAs was tested with a complement component 1q (C1q) assay. Using an assay correlation between complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch, flow cytometry crossmatch, and DSA results, we reviewed the effects of DSAs on the outcomes of our patients as well as reported cases in the literature. Five of 69 liver recipients had a strongly positive crossmatch: 4 had a positive T cell crossmatch [median channel shift (MCS) = 383.5 ± 38.9], and 5 had a positive B cell crossmatch (MCS = 408.8 ± 52.3). The DSAs were class I only in 1 patient, class I and II in 3 patients, and class II only in 1 patient. Cholestasis, acute rejection, or both were observed in 3 of the 4 patients with a positive T cell crossmatch with an MCS approximately greater than 300. The C1q assay was positive for 3 patients. Two had either persistent cholestasis or early acute rejection. One patient who was treated with preemptive intravenous immunoglobulin had an unremarkable outcome despite a positive C1q result. One of the 2 patients with a negative C1q assay experienced persistent cholestasis and early and recurrent acute rejection; the other had an unremarkable outcome. None of the patients died or lost a graft within the first year of transplantation. Our study suggests that human leukocyte antigen antibody screening, flow cytometry crossmatch MCS levels, DSA mean fluorescent intensity levels, and C1q assays may be useful in assessing the risk of antibody-mediated rejection and timely interventions in liver transplantation.

Evaluation of the highly sensitized transplant recipient

The immune response against alloantigens involves the production of antibodies and development of T-cell immunity. Recipients sensitized to HLA antigens may have antibodies to almost all donors and may not be able to find a suitable kidney transplant donor. Strategies available to enable these patients to obtain a transplant are to give priority to highly sensitized patients, to perform therapy for antibody reduction or to transplant with existing antibodies and to intervene as needed with post-transplant treatment. While sensitization against HLA antigens is the most important cause of immunological transplant failure, other types of alloantigens, many of them expressed selectively in endothelial cells, and autoantigens may also be involved. Molecular typing and solid-phase antibody testing have markedly changed this field in the last few years. Methods for the analysis of HLA antibodies and for the study of T-cell reactivity and sensitization will also be discussed. Virtual cross-matching can now be performed for many patients, resulting in considerable savings in time and effort. Successful application of this approach requires the intervention of highly trained personnel with a good understanding of the limitations of the procedure and with intimate knowledge of the antibody profiles of the patients on the waiting list.

Novel solid phase-based ELISA assays contribute to an improved detection of anti-HLA antibodies and to an increased reliability of pre- and post-transplant crossmatching

Antibodies directed against HLA antigens of a given organ donor represent the dominating reason for hyper-acute or acute allograft rejections. In order to select recipients without donor-specific antibodies, a standard crossmatch (CM) procedure, the complement-dependent cytotoxicity assay (CDC), was developed. This functional assay strongly depends on the availability of isolated vital lymphocytes of a given donor. However, the requirements of the donor’s material may often not be fulfilled, so that the detection of the antibodies directed against HLA molecules is either impaired or becomes completely impossible. To circumvent the disadvantages of the CDC procedure, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based and other solid phase-based ELISA-related techniques have been designed to reliably detect anti-HLA antibodies in recipients. Due to the obvious advantages of these novel technologies, when compared with the classical CDC assay, there is an urgent need to implement them as complementary methods or even as a substitution for the conventional CDC crossmatch that is currently being applied by all tissue typing laboratories.

Biomarkers in transplantation: Prospective, blinded measurement of predictive value for the flow cytometry crossmatch after negative antiglobulin crossmatch in kidney transplantation

This prospective, blinded observational study was conducted to measure the predictive value the of flow cytometric crossmatch for biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death following kidney transplantation. Patients were selected for renal transplantation on the basis of a conventional antihuman globulin cytotoxic T-cell crossmatch. Flow crossmatch was performed simultaneously, but the results were not disclosed to the transplant team. A total of 257 kidney transplant recipients were enrolled in the study; 78 patients experienced biopsy-proven rejection in the first post-transplant year, and 41 patients lost their graft or died during the period of follow-up (mean: 2046 days). Kaplan-Meier estimates of rejection, graft loss, or patient death did not differ between subjects with a positive or negative flow crossmatch. Cox analyses showed no influence of the flow crossmatch on the risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection (P = 0.987). The sensitivity and specificity of the flow crossmatch for prediction of biopsy-proven rejection were 0.128 and 0.883, and the positive and negative post-test probabilities were 0.323 and 0.301, respectively. The magnitude of the channel shift did not influence the multivariate Cox regression model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the flow crossmatch was 0.483 (P = 0.71) and 0.572 (P = 0.38), respectively for the living and cadaver transplant recipients, indicating no discriminative value in this study population. Flow crossmatch appears to have no significant incremental value in predicting biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death following kidney transplantation in patients who have a negative antihuman globulin cytotoxic T-cell crossmatch against their donor.

Pronase treatment facilitates alloantibody flow cytometric and cytotoxic crossmatching in the presence of rituximab

Rituximab (RIT), a murine/human chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against human CD20 is under investigation for its role in transplantation. RIT causes B-cell crossmatches to appear positive. Pronase, a proteolytic enzyme that targets F(c) receptors removes CD20 from B cells. After CD20 is removed, RIT should not bind, making it possible to detect class I or class II antibodies on treated B cells. In this study, we incubated RIT with normal human serum (NHS, negative control) or pooled sera from highly sensitized (>50% panel reactive antibody, HLA+) subjects awaiting renal transplantation (positive control) and then performed B-cell flow cytometric crossmatches using untreated or pronase treated B cells as targets. We observed that untreated B cells incubated with RIT-spiked NHS displayed a significant increase in surface fluorescence compared with NHS without RIT, similar to the fluorescence that occurs with a positive crossmatch. In contrast, when CD20 was cleaved from the B cells with pronase, B cells displayed a negative crossmatch with the RIT-spiked NHS. In addition, there was no change in the crossmatches of pooled high panel reactive antibody (PRA) sera after pronase treatment. RIT could be used without worry about losing the ability to perform transplant immunologic monitoring.