Improving donor identification with the Donor Action programme

Improving Donation Outcomes: Hospital Development and the Rapid Assessment of Hospital Procurement Barriers in Donation

Context

Deficiencies in the donation process continue to contribute to the shortage of organs available for transplant. Continuous quality improvement of hospitals' donation processes is needed to identify and correct the problems.

Objective

To test the Rapid Assessment of Hospital Procurement Barriers in Donation (RAPiD), a direct observation technique with a focused ethnographic strategy, for assessing hospitals' donation processes and identifying areas in need of continuous quality improvement interventions.

Design

A pre-post assessment of hospitals' barriers to patient identification and referral, and family consent to donation.

Setting and Participants

Seventeen hospitals within the catchment area of a Northeastern organ procurement organization were assessed by using the RAPiD method. Hospital administrators, health care providers, and staff (N = 537) were interviewed as part of the assessments.

Intervention

Interventions, including on-site training and education, and the use of in-house coordinators, were specifically tailored to each hospital's unique set of barriers to donation. The interventions were delivered to the hospitals in the form of recommendations. The participating organ procurement organization was responsible for implementation of the interventions.

Results

The RAPiD hospital evaluations revealed gaps in respondents' knowledge of organ donation, brain death, and referral criteria; a reluctance to declare brain death; and a rocky relationship between the hospitals and the organ procurement organization. As a result of the interventions, 9 hospitals' environments for organ donation improved, 7 showed no change, and 1 was worse.

Glasgow Coma Scale 7 or Less Surveillance Program for Brain Death Identification in Argentina: Epidemiology and Outcome

BACKGROUND

In Argentina, the rate of cadaveric organ donation per million inhabitants has recently increased to 10.5 (it was previously <7).

PURPOSE

To overcome this challenge, the National Institute for Organ Donation and Transplantation (INCUCAI) created a proactive donor detection plan performed by intensive care unit (ICU) physicians (hospital transplantation coordinators) from 90 selected hospitals across the country.

METHODS

A prospective, observational study of patients in severe coma status was conducted from September 2003 to December 2005. We enrolled hospitalized patients who displayed a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 7 or less and who were admitted to ICUs. Data included demographics, etiology of coma, cardiac arrest, brain death, discharge or derivation, and positive/negative donation.

RESULTS

Among 9841 enrolled patients, we excluded 498 who were discharged to another hospital or had unknown outcomes, leaving 9343 for analysis including 64% males and 36% females of overall mean age 50 +/- 19 years (adults) and 5 +/- 4 years (children). Herein, we have highlighted the high risk of death during the first 2 days in the ICU of patients with GCS 7 or less. Gunshot to the head-injured patients and those with hemorrhagic strokes were less likely to survive. In this study, cardiac arrest events and organ donors (OD) GCS 7 or less ratios emerged as quality control markers of ICU care, unraveling problems of potential donor maintenance or inadequate policies.

CONCLUSIONS

The GCS 7 or less surveillance program seemed to be a valuable tool for identifying organ donors and potentially treatable events, such as the high rate of cardiac arrest observed in this study.

Organ donations and unused potential donations in traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid haemorrhage and intracerebral haemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

To obtain insight into the occurrence of brain death and the potential for brain dead and controlled non-heart-beating organ donors (CNHB) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) in a large neurosurgical serving area (2.1 million inhabitants).

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of data concerning patients with TBI, SAH and ICH who died during the course of ICU treatment during 1999-2003.

SETTING

A 16-bed neuro-intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

Patients with TBI, SAH or ICH who died during the course of ICU treatment.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

The number of ICU deaths in patients with TBI, SAH and ICH declined from 111 in 1999 to 64 in 2003. In total, 476 deaths occurred. Of these, 177 patients were not included in the analysis. Two hundred ninety-nine (299) ventilated patients had two or more absent brainstem reflexes (ABSR) and a Glasgow Coma Score of 3-4 at the moment of treatment withdrawal and formed the potential for organ donation; 61 of these patients were treated until full brain death. Organs of 57 patients could be harvested. We analysed the reasons that organs were not procured in the 242 remaining patients. The most important reasons were family refusal (32%), medical contraindications (14%), and the treating physician not considering potential organ donation (20%). The missed potential is 162/299 (54%).

CONCLUSIONS

The number of actual and potential organ donors is declining, but a considerable number of potential CNHB donors exists. Refusal by relatives is the most important reason for failure to procure organs.

Opting-out systems: no guarantee for higher donation rates

There are considerable differences in the number of organ donations between countries. It is assumed that opting-out systems have a significantly positive impact on the national organ donation rate. The aim of our study was to establish whether different consent systems explain the difference in organ donation rates between countries when taking into account the difference in relevant mortality rates. For this study, we compared data on donation and relevant mortality rates for 10 different countries as well as information on the existing consent systems. This international comparative study shows that there is a strong correlation between mortality rates and donation rates (Spearman's rho = 0.81 (P < 0.01). International comparative legal research has shown that the differences between decision systems are marginal. When the national organ donation rates are corrected for mortality rates, these findings are confirmed: the donor efficiency rate shows that opting-out systems do not automatically guarantee higher donation rates than opting-in systems.