Ribavirin/interferon-alpha sequential treatment of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Therapeutic management of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Recurrent hepatitis C ranges from minimal damage to cirrhosis developing in a few months or years in a substantial proportion of transplant recipients. Different virus, host and donor factors are involved in the pathogenesis of recurrence, but many are poorly understood. Therapeutic strategies can be utilized in the pre-, peri- or posttransplantation setting. Antiviral therapy using interferon and ribavirin and modifying immunosuppression are the main strategies to prevent progression disease. The efficacy of interferon and ribavirin is limited and side effects, reduction/withdrawal are frequent. Current sustained virological response rates are approximately 28%. An optimal immunosuppression regimen has not been established. The choice of calcineurin inhibitors has not clearly been shown to affect histological hepatitis C virus (HCV) but higher cumulative exposure to corticosteroids to treat acute rejection is associated with more severe recurrence. The manner in which the doses of immunosuppression are modified has more influence on HCV recurrence than the use of a specific drug per se. Debate about the influence of immunosuppressive regimens on HCV recurrence is ongoing. Potential antifibrotic therapy and new agents targeting HCV infection and replication are emerging and are anticipated to be added to our armentarium in battling recurrent HCV post-LT.

Living donor liver transplantation to patients with hepatitis C virus cirrhosis

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an alternative therapeutic option for patients with end-stage hepatitis C virus (HCV) cirrhosis because of the cadaveric organ shortage. HCV infection is now a leading indication for LDLT among adults worldwide, and there is a worse prognosis with HCV recurrence. The antivirus strategy after transplantation, however, is currently under debate. Recent updates on the clinical and therapeutic aspects of living donor liver transplantation for HCV are discussed in the present review.

Interferon-based combination anti-viral therapy for hepatitis C virus after liver transplantation: a review and quantitative analysis

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation (LT) is universal. However, the efficacy, tolerability and safety of combination interferon and ribavirin (IFN-RIB) or peginterferon and ribavirin (PEG-RIB) anti-viral therapies post-LT are uncertain. We performed a comprehensive search of major medical databases (1980-2005) and conference proceedings (1996-2005). The main outcome measure was sustained virological response (SVR, undetectable HCV RNA) at 6 months. Summary estimates were calculated using random-effects models. Twenty-seven IFN-RIB and 21 PEG-RIB studies were included. IFN-RIB was associated with a pooled SVR rate of 24% (95% CI, 20-27%), while PEG-RIB was associated with an SVR rate of 27% (23-31%). Pooled discontinuation rates were 24% (21-27%) with IFN-RIB and 26% (20-32%) with PEG-RIB. The pooled rate of acute graft rejection was 2% (1-3%) with IFN-RIB and 5% (3-7%) with PEG-RIB. IFN-RIB and PEG-RIB therapies in HCV infection post-LT were associated with similar but overall low SVR and were poorly tolerated. The rate of acute rejection was small. The therapeutic advantage of PEG-RIB therapy observed in non-transplant chronic HCV infection appears to be attenuated post-LT. Clinical trials are needed to evaluate reasons for this post-transplant therapeutic disadvantage and to find strategies to ameliorate them.

Management of hepatitis C-infected liver transplant recipients at large North American centres: changes in recent years

Large (>or=45 transplants per year) North American liver transplant centres were surveyed regarding management of hepatitis C virus (HCV). A total of 25/41 (59%) and 28/48 (58%) of centres responded to the surveys in 1998 and 2003, respectively, with 17 centres participating in both surveys. HCV was the most common indication for transplantation. Use of protocol liver biopsies was higher in 2003 and 60% used them to monitor HCV disease. Fewer centres reported modifying primary immunosuppression (IMS) for HCV-positive (vs. non-HCV) patients in 2003 (26%) vs. 1998 (56%). IMS was most frequently tacrolimus-based, but mycophenolate mofetil use increased in 2003 (52% vs. 23% in 1998). In both years, approximately 40% treated allograft rejection differently in HCV-positive recipients, with less use of OKT3 in 2003. Combination anti-HCV therapy for 12 months or more was the treatment of choice and growth factor use was common (68%). HCV-positive recipients were considered candidates for retransplantation but HCV-specific criteria were used in decision-making. Practice of centres changed over time with an increase in HCV transplantation and use of protocol liver biopsies, and a trend towards lesser modification of IMS in HCV-positive recipients. We conclude that there is considerable variability in the management of HCV among transplant programs and over time.