1
|
Rajendran L, Lenet T, Shorr R, Abou Khalil J, Bertens KA, Balaa FK, Martel G. Should Cell Salvage Be Used in Liver Resection and Transplantation? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2023; 277:456-468. [PMID: 35861339 PMCID: PMC9891298 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of intraoperative blood cell salvage and autotransfusion (IBSA) use on red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and postoperative outcomes in liver surgery. BACKGROUND Intraoperative RBC transfusions are common in liver surgery and associated with increased morbidity. IBSA can be utilized to minimize allogeneic transfusion. A theoretical risk of cancer dissemination has limited IBSA adoption in oncologic surgery. METHODS Electronic databases were searched from inception until May 2021. All studies comparing IBSA use with control in liver surgery were included. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently, in duplicate. The primary outcome was intraoperative allogeneic RBC transfusion (proportion of patients and volume of blood transfused). Core secondary outcomes included: overall survival and disease-free survival, transfusion-related complications, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization costs. Data from transplant and resection studies were analyzed separately. Random effects models were used for meta-analysis. RESULTS Twenty-one observational studies were included (16 transplant, 5 resection, n=3433 patients). Seventeen studies incorporated oncologic indications. In transplant, IBSA was associated with decreased allogeneic RBC transfusion [mean difference -1.81, 95% confidence interval (-3.22, -0.40), P =0.01, I 2 =86%, very-low certainty]. Few resection studies reported on transfusion for meta-analysis. No significant difference existed in overall survival or disease-free survival in liver transplant [hazard ratio (HR)=1.12 (0.75, 1.68), P =0.59, I 2 =0%; HR=0.93 (0.57, 1.48), P =0.75, I 2 =0%] and liver resection [HR=0.69 (0.45, 1.05), P =0.08, I 2 =0%; HR=0.93 (0.59, 1.45), P =0.74, I 2 =0%]. CONCLUSION IBSA may reduce intraoperative allogeneic RBC transfusion without compromising oncologic outcomes. The current evidence base is limited in size and quality, and high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luckshi Rajendran
- Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tori Lenet
- Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Risa Shorr
- Library Services, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Jad Abou Khalil
- Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Kimberly A. Bertens
- Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Fady K. Balaa
- Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Guillaume Martel
- Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang Z, Li S, Jia Y, Liu M, Yang K, Sui M, Liu D, Liang K. Clinical prognosis of intraoperative blood salvage autotransfusion in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:985281. [PMID: 36330502 PMCID: PMC9622948 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.985281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Intraoperative blood salvage autotransfusion(IBSA) has been widely used in a variety of surgeries, but the use of IBSA in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) is controversial. Numerous studies have reported that IBSA used during LT for HCC is not associated with adverse oncologic outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to estimate the clinical prognosis of IBSA for patients with H+CC undergoing LT. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for articles describing IBSA in HCC patients undergoing LT from the date of inception until May 1, 2022, and a meta-analysis was performed. Study heterogeneity was assessed by I2 test. Publication bias was evaluated by funnel plots, Egger’s and Begg’s test. Results 12 studies enrolling a total of 2253 cases (1374 IBSA and 879 non-IBSA cases) are included in this meta-analysis. The recurrence rate(RR) at 5-year(OR=0.75; 95%CI, 0.59-0.95; P=0.02) and 7-year(OR=0.65; 95%CI, 0.55-0.97; P=0.03) in the IBSA group is slightly lower than non-IBSA group. There are no significant differences in the 1-year RR(OR=0.77; 95% CI, 0.56-1.06; P=0.10), 3-years RR (OR=0.79; 95% CI, 0.62-1.01; P=0.06),1-year overall survival outcome(OS) (OR=0.90; 95% CI, 0.63-1.28; P=0.57), 3-year OS(OR=1.16; 95% CI, 0.83-1.62; P=0.38), 5-year OS(OR=1.04; 95% CI, 0.76-1.40; P=0.82),1-year disease-free survival rate(DFS) (OR=0.80; 95%CI, 0.49-1.30; P=0.36), 3-year DFS(OR=0.99; 95%CI, 0.64-1.55; P=0.98), and 5-year DFS(OR=0.88; 95%CI, 0.60-1.28; P=0.50). Subgroup analysis shows a difference in the use of leukocyte depletion filters group of 5-year RR(OR=0.73; 95%CI, 0.55-0.96; P=0.03). No significant differences are found in other subgroups. Conclusions IBSA provides comparable survival outcomes relative to allogeneic blood transfusion and does not increase the tumor recurrence for HCC patients after LT. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022295479.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheng Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Saixin Li
- Department of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yitong Jia
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Miao Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Kun Yang
- Department of Evidence-Based Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Minghao Sui
- Department of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Dongbin Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Kuo Liang
- Department of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Kuo Liang,
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Effect of Autotransfusion in HCC Surgery on Survival and Recurrence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14194837. [PMID: 36230760 PMCID: PMC9564172 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14194837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Administering patients their own blood during liver surgery would reduce the burden on blood banks and immunologic reactions to foreign blood products. Two methods of autotransfusion are available: scheduled donation before surgery and salvage during surgery (intraoperative blood salvage, IBS). However, concerns over circulating tumor cells dissuade against autotransfusion in patients undergoing liver surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This meta-analysis evaluated available reports on autotransfusion, including the reintroduction of blood collected from the surgical area during a tumor operation. Patients who received blood collected from the surgical site during liver transplantation did not develop more recurrences of HCC and their overall survival was similar to patients who received donor blood products. Patients undergoing liver resection mostly received blood they donated prior to surgery. They showed a better overall survival as well as cancer-free survival after surgery. Randomized controlled trials are needed to better estimate the effects of autotransfusion on patients and studies incorporating autotransfusion of blood collected during liver resection are needed. Abstract Background: The chronic blood shortage has forced clinicians to seek alternatives to allogeneic blood transfusions during surgery. Due to anatomic uniqueness resulting in a vast vasculature, liver surgery can lead to significant blood loss, and an estimated 30% of patients require blood transfusions in major hepatectomy. Allogeneic transfusion harbors the risk of an immunologic reaction. However, the hesitation to reinfuse a patient’s own blood during cancer surgery is reinforced by the potentiality of reintroducing and disseminating tumor cells into an individual undergoing curative treatment. Two methods of autotransfusions are common: autotransfusion after preoperative blood donation and intraoperative blood salvage (IBS). We aim to investigate the effect of autotransfusion on recurrence and survival rates of patients undergoing surgery for HCC. Methods: The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO prior to data extraction. MEDLINE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched for publications on liver surgery and blood salvage (autologous transfusion or intraoperative blood salvage). Comparative studies were included. Outcomes focused on long-term oncologic status and mortality. Hazard ratios (HR) estimated outcomes with a fixed-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I, and certainty of evidence was evaluated with GRADE. Separate analyses were performed for liver transplantation and hepatectomies. Results: Fifteen studies were included in the analysis (nine on transplantation and six on hepatectomies), and they comprised 2052 patients. Overall survival was comparable between patients who received intraoperative blood salvage (IBS) or not for liver transplantation (HR 1.13, 95% CI [0.89, 1.42] p = 0.31). Disease-free survival also was comparable (HR 0.97, 95% CI [0.76, 1.24], p = 0.83). Autotransfusion after prior donation was predominantly used in hepatectomy. Patients who received autotransfusion had a significantly better overall survival than the control (HR 0.71, 95% CI [0.58, 0.88], p = 0.002). Disease-free survival was also significantly higher in patients with autotransfusion (HR 0.88, 95% CI [0.80, 0.96], p = 0.005). Although overall, the certainty of evidence is low and included studies exhibited methodological heterogeneity, the heterogeneity of outcomes was low to moderate. Conclusion: Autotransfusion, including intraoperative blood salvage, does not adversely affect the overall or disease-free survival of patients with HCC undergoing resection or transplantation. The results of this meta-analysis justify a randomized-controlled trial regarding the feasibility and potential benefits of autotransfusion in HCC surgery.
Collapse
|
4
|
Frietsch T, Steinbicker AU, Horn A, Metz M, Dietrich G, Weigand MA, Waters JH, Fischer D. Safety of Intraoperative Cell Salvage in Cancer Surgery: An Updated Meta-Analysis of the Current Literature. Transfus Med Hemother 2022; 49:143-157. [PMID: 35813601 PMCID: PMC9210012 DOI: 10.1159/000524538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allogeneic blood transfusions in oncologic surgery are associated with increased recurrence and mortality. Adverse effects on outcome could be reduced or avoided by using intraoperative autologous blood cell salvage (IOCS). However, there are concerns regarding the safety of the autologous IOCS blood. Previous meta-analyses from 2012 and 2020 did not identify increased risk of cancer recurrence after using autologous IOCS blood. The objective of this review was to reassess a greater number of IOCS-treated patients to present an updated and more robust analysis of the current literature. METHODS This systematic review includes full-text articles listed in PubMed, Cochrane, Cochrane Reviews, and Web of Science. We analyzed publications that discussed cell salvage or autotransfusion combined with the following outcomes: cancer recurrence, mortality, survival, allogeneic transfusion rate and requirements, length of hospital stay (LOS). To rate the strength of evidence, a Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) of the underlying evidence was applied. RESULTS In the updated meta-analysis, 7 further observational studies were added to the original 27 observational studies included in the former 2020 analysis. Studies compared either unfiltered (n = 2,311) or filtered (n = 850) IOCS (total n = 3,161) versus non-IOCS use (n = 5,342). Control patients were either treated with autologous predonated blood (n = 484), with allogeneic transfusion (n = 4,113), or did not receive a blood transfusion (n = 745). However, the current literature still contains only observational studies on these topics, and the strength of evidence remains low. The risk of cancer recurrence was reduced in recipients of autologous salvaged blood with or without LDF (odds ratio [OR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-0.90) compared to nontransfused patients or patients with allogeneic transfusion. There was no difference in mortality (OR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.71-1.27) and LOS (mean difference -0.07 days, 95% CI: -0.63 to 0.48) between patients treated with IOCS blood or those in whom IOCS was not used. Due to high heterogeneity, transfusion rates or volumes could not be analyzed. CONCLUSION Randomized controlled trials comparing mortality and cancer recurrence rate of IOCS with or without LDF filtration versus allogeneic blood transfusion were not found. Outcome was similar or better in patients receiving IOCS during cancer surgery compared to patients with allogeneic blood transfusion or nontransfused patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Frietsch
- IAKH − German Interdisciplinary Task Force for Clinical Hemotherapy, Marburg, Germany
| | - Andrea U. Steinbicker
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Audrey Horn
- Department of Anesthesiology Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Matthes Metz
- Department of Biostatistics, GCP-Service International Ltd. & Co. KG, Bremen, Germany
| | - Gerald Dietrich
- Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine, Pain Therapy and Transfusion Medicine, Rottal-Inn-Kliniken, Eggenfelden, Germany
| | - Markus A. Weigand
- Department of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jonathan H. Waters
- Anesthesiology & Bioengineering, Patient Blood Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Dania Fischer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Muaddi H, Abreu P, Ivanics T, Claasen M, Yoon P, Gorgen A, Al-Adra D, Badenoch A, McCluskey S, Ghanekar A, Reichman T, Sapisochin G. The effect of perioperative packed red blood cells transfusion on patient outcomes after liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:370-378. [PMID: 34325968 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.06.425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of packed Red Blood Cell (pRBC) transfusion on oncological outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. We evaluated the impact of pRBC transfusion on HCC recurrence and overall survival (OS) after LT for HCC. METHODS Patients with HCC transplanted between 2000 and 2018 were included and stratified by receipt of pRBC transfusion. Outcomes were HCC recurrence and OS. Propensity score matching was performed to account for confounders. RESULTS Of the 795 patients, 234 (29.4%) did not receive pRBC transfusion. After matching the 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence was 6.6%, 12.5% and 14.8% for no-pRBC transfusion, and 8.6%, 18.8% and 21.3% (p = 0.61) for pRBC transfusion. The OS at 1-, 3-, 5-year was 93.0%, 84.6% and 75.8% vs 92.0%, 79.7% and 73.5% (p = 0.83) for no-pRBC transfusion and pRBC transfusion, respectively. There were no differences in recurrence (HR 1.13, 95%CI 0.71-1.78, p = 0.61) or OS (HR 1.04, 95%CI 0.71-1.54, p = 0.83). CONCLUSION Perioperative administration of pRBC in liver transplant recipients for HCC resulted in a nonsignificant increase of HCC recurrence and death after accounting for confounder. Surgeons should continue to exercise cation and optimize patients iron stores medically preoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hala Muaddi
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Phillipe Abreu
- Department of Surgery, University Health Network-Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Multi-Organ Transplant, University Health Network-Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tommy Ivanics
- Department of Surgery, University Health Network-Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Multi-Organ Transplant, University Health Network-Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marco Claasen
- Department of Surgery, University Health Network-Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Multi-Organ Transplant, University Health Network-Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Yoon
- Department of Surgery, University Health Network-Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Multi-Organ Transplant, University Health Network-Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andre Gorgen
- Department of Surgery, University Health Network-Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Multi-Organ Transplant, University Health Network-Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Al-Adra
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Wisconsin, United States
| | - Adam Badenoch
- Department of Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, South Australia, Australia; Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stuart McCluskey
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anand Ghanekar
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, University Health Network-Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Multi-Organ Transplant, University Health Network-Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Trevor Reichman
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, University Health Network-Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Multi-Organ Transplant, University Health Network-Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, University Health Network-Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Multi-Organ Transplant, University Health Network-Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rajasekaran RB, Palmer AJR, Whitwell D, Cosker TDA, Pigott D, Zsolt O, Booth R, Gibbons MRJP, Carr A. The role of intraoperative cell salvage for musculoskeletal sarcoma surgery. J Bone Oncol 2021; 30:100390. [PMID: 34589408 PMCID: PMC8458974 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2021.100390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 09/04/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Musculoskeletal sarcoma surgery involving the lower limb is associated with significant intraoperative blood loss, with more than 500 ml in 96% of patients. Salvaged blood was processed and re-infused in 94% of patients. An estimated one-fourth of intraoperative blood loss was returned to the patient through (Intraoperative cell salvage) ICS. Cytological analysis of imprints from leucodepletion filters(LDF) and reinfused blood did not reveal evidence of tumour cells.
Background The efficacy and safety of cell salvage for musculoskeletal sarcoma surgery have not been reported, and concerns over re-infusion of tumour cells remain. This study aims to i) describe the intra-operative blood loss and cell salvage reinfusion volumes for lower limb sarcoma and pelvic sarcoma procedures ii) and explore whether there is evidence of tumour cells in reinfused blood. Methods Retrospective analysis of 109 consecutive surgical procedures for biopsy-proven sarcoma or bone metastasis performed between 1 July 2015 and 30 October 2019. Salvaged blood was processed and reinfused when intraoperative blood loss exceeded 500 ml. Primary bone tumour (n = 86(79%)) and metastasis (n = 23(21%) constituted the study group and surgeries were classified under hemipelvectomy (n = 43(39%)), lower limb endoprosthesis replacement (LLE) (n = 50(46%)) and wide excision surgery (WE) (n = 16(15%)). Microscopic examination of imprint cytology of leuco-depletion(LD) filters, and peripheral smear examination was performed for reinfused blood. Results Median (IQR) intra-operative blood loss was 1750 (600–3000) ml for hemipelvectomy, 850 (600–1200) ml for LLE, and 1000 (550–2000) ml for WE. Salvaged blood was re-infused in 102 of 109 (94%) patients. The mean (SD) volume of re-infusion was 445(4 2 5) ml for hemipelvectomy, 206(1 3 1) ml for LLE, and 184(1 0 6) ml for WE. In total, 64 of 109 (59%) patients received an allogeneic red blood transfusion within 72 h of surgery. Cytology analysis of imprints taken from the filtered blood available in 95(87%) patients and peripheral smear examination of reinfused blood available in 32(29%) patients did not reveal evidence of tumour cells on microscopic examination of any samples. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that musculoskeletal sarcoma surgery is associated with significant blood loss, and cell salvage permits reinfusion of autologous blood in most patients. The cytological analysis did not reveal evidence of tumour cells in reinfused blood, consistent with other studies where cell salvage is used for cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raja Bhaskara Rajasekaran
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science (NDORMS), Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
| | - Antony J R Palmer
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science (NDORMS), Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
| | - Duncan Whitwell
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science (NDORMS), Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
| | - Thomas D A Cosker
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science (NDORMS), Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
| | - David Pigott
- Consultant Anaesthetist, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Orosz Zsolt
- Consultant Pathologist, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Robert Booth
- Transfusion Practitioner, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - M R J P Gibbons
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science (NDORMS), Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
| | - Andrew Carr
- Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Maulat C, Boulard P, Muscari F. French editorial from the ACHBPT: blood salvage and autotransfusion during liver transplantation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2021; 10:367-369. [PMID: 34159164 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn-21-182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Maulat
- The Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Paul Boulard
- The Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Fabrice Muscari
- The Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Weller A, Seyfried T, Ahrens N, Baier-Kleinhenz L, Schlitt HJ, Peschel G, Graf BM, Sinner B. Cell Salvage During Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis of Tumor Recurrence Following Irradiation of the Salvaged Blood. Transplant Proc 2021; 53:1639-1644. [PMID: 33994180 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the treatment option for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). OLT is often associated with high blood loss, requiring blood transfusion. Retransfusion of autologous blood is a key part of blood conservation. There are, however, concerns that the retransfusion of salvaged blood might cause the spread of cancer cells and induce metastasis. Irradiation of salvaged blood before retransfusion eliminates viable cancer cells. Here, we analyzed the incidence of tumor recurrence in patients with HCC undergoing OLT who received irradiated cell-salvaged blood during transplant surgery. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing OLT for HCC between 2002 and 2018 at our center. We compared the tumour recurrence in patients who received no retransfusion of autologous blood with patients who received autologous blood with or without preceding irradiation of the blood. RESULTS Fifty-one (40 male, 11 female) patients were included in the analysis; 10 patients developed tumor recurrence within a time period of 2.45 ± 2.0 years. Statistical analysis revealed that there was no significant difference in tumor recurrence between patients who received autologous blood with or without irradiation. CONCLUSION Intraoperative transfusion of cell-salvaged blood did not increase tumor recurrence rates. Cell salvage should be used in liver transplantation of HCC patients as part of a blood conservation strategy. The effect of blood irradiation on tumor recurrence could not be definitively evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid Weller
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Timo Seyfried
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Norbert Ahrens
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Georg Peschel
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Bernhard M Graf
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Barbara Sinner
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allogeneic blood transfusion is avoidable in many oncological interventions by the use of cell salvage or mechanical autotransfusion (MAT). As irradiation is elaborate and expensive, the safety of leucocyte depletion filters (LDF) for autologous blood from the surgical field might be a more acceptable alternative for the prevention of cancer recurrences. A previous meta-analysis could not identify an increased risk of cancer recurrence. The aim of this review article is to provide an update of a previous meta-analysis from 2012 as well as a safety analysis of cell salvage with LDF due to the improved data situation. MATERIAL AND METHODS This systematic review included all studies in PubMed, Cochrane, Cochrane Reviews and Web of Science on cell salvage or autotransfusion combined with outcomes, e.g. cancer recurrence, mortality, survival, blood transfusion, length of hospital stay (LOS) after the use of MAT without irradiation and with or without LDF. The grades of recommendations (GRADE) assessment of underlying evidence was applied. RESULTS A total of seven new observational studies and seven meta-analyses were found that compared unfiltered or filtered cell salvage with autologous predeposition, allogeneic transfusion or without any transfusion. No randomized controlled trials have been completed. A total of 27 observational and cohort studies were included in a meta-analysis. The evidence level was low. The risk of cancer recurrence in recipients of autologous salvaged blood with or without LDF was reduced (odds ratio, OR 0.71, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.58-0.86) as compared to non-transfused subjects, allogeneic or predeposited autologous transfusion. The transfusion rate could not be assessed due to the substantial selection bias and large heterogeneity. Cell salvage does not change mortality and LOS. Leucocyte depletion studies reported a removal rate of cancer cells in the range of 99.6-99.9%. CONCLUSION Randomized controlled trials on a comparison of MAT and allogeneic blood transfusion as well as LDF and irradiation would be desirable but are not available. From observational trials and more than 6300 subjects and various tumors, cell salvage in cancer surgery with or without LDF appears to be sufficiently safe. The efficacy of leucocyte depletion of autologous salvaged blood is equivalent to irradiation. Unavailability of radiation is not a contraindication for cell salvage use in cancer surgery. By usage of leucocyte depleted salvaged autologous blood, the risks of allogeneic transfusion can be avoided.
Collapse
|
10
|
Ivanics T, Shubert CR, Muaddi H, Claasen MPAW, Yoon P, Hansen BE, McCluskey SA, Sapisochin G. Blood Cell Salvage and Autotransfusion Does Not Worsen Oncologic Outcomes Following Liver Transplantation with Incidental Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:6816-6825. [PMID: 33778907 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09863-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraoperative blood cell salvage and autotransfusion (IBSA) during liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial for concern regarding adversely impacting oncologic outcomes. OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the long-term oncologic outcomes of patients who underwent LT with incidentally discovered HCC who received IBSA compared with those who did not receive IBSA. METHODS Patients undergoing LT (January 2001-October 2018) with incidental HCC on explant pathology were retrospectively identified. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. HCC recurrence and patient survival were compared. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed, and univariable Cox proportional hazard analyses were performed for risks of recurrence and death. RESULTS Overall, 110 patients were identified (IBSA, n = 76 [69.1%]; non-IBSA, n = 34 [30.9%]). Before matching, the groups were similar in terms of demographics, transplant, and tumor characteristics. Overall survival was similar for IBSA and non-IBSA at 1, 3, and 5 years (96.0%, 88.4%, 83.0% vs. 97.1%, 91.1%, 87.8%, respectively; p = 0.79). Similarly, the recurrence rate at 1, 3, and 5 years was not statistically different (IBSA 0%, 1.8%, 1.8% vs. non-IBSA 0%, 3.2%, 3.2%, respectively; p = 0.55). After 1:1 matching (26 IBSA, 26 non-IBSA), Cox proportional hazard analysis demonstrated similar risk of death and recurrence between the groups (IBSA hazard ratio [HR] of death 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-3.05, p = 0.61; and HR of recurrence 2.64, 95% CI 0.28-25.30, p = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS IBSA does not appear to adversely impact oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing LT with incidental HCC. This evidence further supports the need for randomized trials evaluating the impact of IBSA use in LT for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommy Ivanics
- HBP and Multi Organ Transplant Program, Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Christopher R Shubert
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hala Muaddi
- HBP and Multi Organ Transplant Program, Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marco P A W Claasen
- HBP and Multi Organ Transplant Program, Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Yoon
- HBP and Multi Organ Transplant Program, Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bettina E Hansen
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Stuart A McCluskey
- HBP and Multi Organ Transplant Program, Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- HBP and Multi Organ Transplant Program, Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Division of General Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kwon JH, Han S, Jang JS, Lee KW, Ahn JH, Kim K, Jeon S, Gwak MS, Ko JS, Kim GS, Joh JW, Cho D. Decrease in the Risk of Posttransplant Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After the Conversion to Prestorage Leukoreduction for Transfused Red Blood Cells. Transplantation 2021; 105:577-585. [PMID: 32265418 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prestorage leukoreduction has the advantage over poststorage leukoreduction in reducing leukocyte-derived molecules in red blood cells (RBC) unit, which induce immunomodulation. Our institution newly introduced prestorage leukoreduction, instead of conventional poststorage leukoreduction, for liver transplant recipients since March 2012. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the risk of posttransplant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after the conversion of poststorage leukoreduction into prestorage leukoreduction for transfused allogeneic RBCs. METHODS Among 220 patients who underwent living-donor liver transplantation for HCC, 83 of 113 who received only poststorage-leukoreduced RBCs were matched with 83 of 107 who received only prestorage-leukoreduced RBCs using 1:1 propensity score matching based on factors like tumor biology. The primary outcome was overall HCC recurrence. Survival analysis was performed with death as a competing risk event. RESULTS In the matched cohort, recurrence probability at 1, 2, and 5 years posttransplant was 9.6%, 15.6%, and 18.1% in prestorage group and 15.6%, 21.6%, and 33.7% in poststorage group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 0.28-0.97; P = 0.040). Multivariable analysis confirmed a significance of prestorage leukoreduction (HR, 0.29; 0.15-0.59; P < 0.001). Overall death risk was also lower with prestorage leukoreduction (HR, 0.51; 0.26-0.99; P = 0.049). In subgroup analysis for the unmatched cohort, recurrence risk was significantly lower in prestorage group within the patients who underwent surgery 2 years (HR, 0.24; 0.10-0.61; P = 0.002), 1 year (HR, 0.16; 0.03-0.92; P = 0.040), and 6 months (HR, 0.13; 0.02-0.85; P = 0.034), respectively, before and after the conversion to prestorage leukoreduction. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest a potential benefit of prestorage leukoreduction in reducing the risk of HCC recurrence in liver transplant recipients who received allogeneic RBCs during the perioperative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji-Hye Kwon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sangbin Han
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Sung Jang
- Quality Management Team, Blood Service Headquarters, Korean Red Cross, Wonju, Korea
| | - Kyo Won Lee
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joong Hyun Ahn
- Devision of Statistics, Statistics and Data Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyunga Kim
- Devision of Statistics, Statistics and Data Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Suyong Jeon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi Sook Gwak
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Justin S Ko
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gaab Soo Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Won Joh
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Duck Cho
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Links between Inflammation and Postoperative Cancer Recurrence. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10020228. [PMID: 33435255 PMCID: PMC7827039 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite complete resection, cancer recurrence frequently occurs in clinical practice. This indicates that cancer cells had already metastasized from their organ of origin at the time of resection or had circulated throughout the body via the lymphatic and vascular systems. To obtain this potential for metastasis, cancer cells must undergo essential and intrinsic processes that are supported by the tumor microenvironment. Cancer-associated inflammation may be engaged in cancer development, progression, and metastasis. Despite numerous reports detailing the interplays between cancer and its microenvironment via the inflammatory network, the status of cancer-associated inflammation remains difficult to recognize in clinical settings. In the current paper, we reviewed clinical reports on the relevance between inflammation and cancer recurrence after surgical resection, focusing on inflammatory indicators and cancer recurrence predictors according to cancer type and clinical indicators.
Collapse
|
13
|
Pinto MA, Grezzana-Filho TJM, Chedid AD, Leipnitz I, Prediger JE, Alvares-da-Silva MR, de Araújo A, Zahler S, Lopes BB, Giampaoli ÂZD, Kruel CRP, Chedid MF. Impact of intraoperative blood salvage and autologous transfusion during liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 406:67-74. [PMID: 33025077 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01997-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Intraoperative blood salvage (IBS) with autologous blood transfusion is controversial in liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study evaluated the role of IBS usage in LT for HCC. METHODS In a retrospective cohort study at a single center from 2002 to 2018, the outcomes of LT surgery for HCC were analyzed. Overall survival and disease-free survival of patients who received IBS were compared with those who did not receive IBS. Cancer recurrence, length of hospital stay, post-transplant complications, and blood loss also were evaluated. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate overall mid-term and long-term survival (4 and 6 years, respectively). RESULTS Of the total 163 patients who underwent LT for HCC in the study period, 156 had complete demographic and clinical data and were included in the study. IBS was used in 122 and not used in 34 patients. Ninety-five (60.9%) patients were men, and the mean patient age was 58.5 ± 7.6 years. The overall 1-year, 5-year, and 7-year survival in the IBS group was 84.2%, 67.7%, and 56.8% vs. 85.3%, 67.5%, and 67.5% in the non-IBS group (p = 0.77). The 1-year, 5-year, and 7-year disease-free survival in the IBS group was 81.6%, 66.5%, and 55.4% vs. 85.3%, 64.1%, and 64.1% in the non-IBS group (p = 0.74). For patients without complete HCC necrosis (n = 121), the 1-year, 5-year, and 7-year overall survival rates for those who received IBS (n = 95) were 86.2%, 67.7%, and 49.6% vs. 84.6%, 70.0%, and 70.0% for 26 patients without IBS (p = 0.857). For the same patients, the 1-year, 5-year, and 7-year disease-free survival in the IBS group was 84.0%, 66.8%, and 64.0% vs. 88.0%, 72.8%, and 72.8% in the non-IBS group (p = 0.690). CONCLUSION IBS does not appear to be associated with worse outcomes in patients undergoing LT for HCC, even in the presence of viable HCC in the explant. There seems to be no reason to contraindicate the use of IBS in LT for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelo A Pinto
- Liver Transplant Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Tomaz J M Grezzana-Filho
- Liver Transplant Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Aljamir D Chedid
- Liver Transplant Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Ian Leipnitz
- Liver Transplant Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - João E Prediger
- Liver Transplant Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Mário R Alvares-da-Silva
- Liver Transplant Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Alexandre de Araújo
- Liver Transplant Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Sofia Zahler
- Liver Transplant Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Bruno B Lopes
- Liver Transplant Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Ângelo Z D Giampaoli
- Liver Transplant Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Cleber R P Kruel
- Liver Transplant Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Marcio F Chedid
- Liver Transplant Program, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil. .,Liver and Pancreas Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2350, 6th Floor, Room 600, Porto Alegre, 90035-903, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tse A, Chow O, Matar A, Alzahrani N, Morris D. Strategies for 'bloodless' surgery: the experience of cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal carcinomatosis in Jehovah's Witnesses. ANZ J Surg 2020; 90:1953-1957. [PMID: 32594642 DOI: 10.1111/ans.16101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 04/10/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) can involve significant blood loss which necessitates the transfusion of blood products. This poses a particular challenge in the Jehovah's Witnesses population whose beliefs do not permit the transfusion of blood products or blood-related derivatives. This report describes the experience of one institution performing CRS with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for PC in Jehovah's Witnesses and perioperative management strategies employed to avoid blood transfusion. METHODS A review of literature and prospectively collated data of Jehovah's Witnesses patients who underwent extensive CRS for PC and HIPEC for PC. RESULTS Four patients had CRS and HIPEC for PC. The median PC index score was 11 and complete cytoreduction was achieved in all cases. Primary tumours were ovarian (n = 1), colorectal (n = 2) and neuroendocrine tumour of gastrointestinal origin (n = 1). The median difference between preoperative and postoperative haemoglobin was 38 g/L (23-43 g/L). Strategies included acute normovolumaeic haemodilution and autotransfusion within a closed circuit, autotransfusion from cell salvage and provisions for possible use of a haemoglobin based oxygen carrier. Ancillary measures identified and implemented to minimize transfusion dependence included, but were not limited to, preoperative iron infusion, perioperative acute haemodilution and cell salvage, administration of tranexamic acid, prothrombinex and use of paediatric tubes for venepuncture. CONCLUSION The review suggests CRS and HIPEC for extensive PC can be done safely in circumstances where transfusion of allogenic blood products is not permitted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Tse
- St George Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Surgery, St George Public Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Oliver Chow
- Department of Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amer Matar
- Department of Surgery, St George Public Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nayef Alzahrani
- Department of Surgery, St George Public Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Morris
- St George Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Surgery, St George Public Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kumar N, Tan JH, Ravikumar N, Tan JYH, Milavec H, Agrawal R, Kannan R, Kumar A. Evaluation of the Feasibility of Transfusing Leucocyte Depletion Filter (LDF) Processed Intra-Operative Cell Salvage (IOCS) Blood in Metastatic Spine Tumour Surgery (MSTS): Protocol for a Non Randomised study (Preprint). JMIR Res Protoc 2019. [DOI: 10.2196/16986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
16
|
Chua AW, Chua MJ, Kam PC, Broekhuis D, Karunaratne S, Stalley PD. Anaesthetic challenges for pelvic reconstruction with custom three-dimensional-printed titanium implants: A retrospective cohort study. Anaesth Intensive Care 2019; 47:368-377. [PMID: 31430173 DOI: 10.1177/0310057x19864599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Custom 3D printed titanium implant pelvic reconstructive surgery was implemented as a novel technique at our institutions in the last five years. It provided an option for pelvic bone malignancy patients who were previously deemed unsuitable for re-implantation of irradiated resected bone segments, as well as in revision total hip arthroplasty associated with excessive acetabular bone loss. A retrospective cohort study of the anaesthetic management of patients who underwent pelvic reconstructive surgery using custom 3D printed titanium implants from August 2013 to July 2018 was conducted. Twenty-seven patients were included in the study; 23 patients completed single-stage procedures with a mean (standard deviation) duration of surgery of 7.5 (3.3) hours (median 6.8, range 3.0–15.8 hours), and mean intraoperative blood loss of 5400 (3100) mL (median 6000, range 1400–10,000 mL). Surgery involving the sacrum ( n = 7) was associated with longer intensive care stay, longer total length of hospital stay and, in three cases, unplanned two-stage procedures. The twenty procedures not involving the sacrum were successfully completed in a single stage. The major anaesthetic challenges included massive blood loss, prolonged surgery, interventions to prevent calf compartment syndrome, and perioperative thromboembolism. Preoperative pelvic radiotherapy, malignant tumours, and procedures involving the sacrum were associated with massive intraoperative blood loss and more prolonged surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfred Wy Chua
- Department of Anaesthetics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | | | - Peter Ca Kam
- Department of Anaesthetics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia.,University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Sascha Karunaratne
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre, Sydney Local Health District, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Paul D Stalley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pinto MA, Chedid MF, Sekine L, Schmidt AP, Capra RP, Prediger C, Prediger JE, Grezzana-Filho TJM, Kruel CRP. Intraoperative cell salvage with autologous transfusion in liver transplantation. World J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 11:11-18. [PMID: 30705735 PMCID: PMC6354069 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v11.i1.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2018] [Revised: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 12/30/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver transplant (LT) is the primary treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease. About 25000 LTs are performed annually in the world. The potential for intraoperative bleeding is quite variable. However, massive bleeding is common and requires blood transfusion. Allogeneic blood transfusion has an immunosuppressive effect and an impact on recipient survival, in addition to the risk of transmission of viral infections and transfusion errors, among others. Techniques to prevent excessive bleeding or to use autologous blood have been proposed to minimize the negative effects of allogeneic blood transfusion. Intraoperative reinfusion of autologous blood is possible through previous self-donation or blood collected during the operation. However, LT does not normally allow autologous transfusion by prior self-donation. Hence, using autologous blood collected intraoperatively is the most feasible option. The use of intraoperative blood salvage autotransfusion (IBSA) minimizes the perioperative use of allogeneic blood, preventing negative transfusion effects without negatively impacting other clinical outcomes. The use of IBSA in patients with cancer is still a matter of debate due to the theoretical risk of reinfusion of tumor cells. However, studies have demonstrated the safety of IBSA in several surgical procedures, including LT for hepatocellular carcinoma. Considering the literature available to date, we can state that IBSA should be routinely used in LT, both in patients with cancer and in patients with benign diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelo A Pinto
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre 90035-007, Brazil
| | - Marcio F Chedid
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre 90035-007, Brazil
| | - Leo Sekine
- Division of Hematology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre 90035-007, Brazil
| | - Andre P Schmidt
- Division of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre 90035-007, Brazil
| | - Rodrigo P Capra
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre 90035-007, Brazil
| | - Carolina Prediger
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre 90035-007, Brazil
| | - João E Prediger
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre 90035-007, Brazil
| | - Tomaz JM Grezzana-Filho
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre 90035-007, Brazil
| | - Cleber RP Kruel
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Medical School of UFRGS, Porto Alegre 90035-007, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zacharias T, Ahlschwede E, Dufour N, Romain F, Theissen-Laval O. Intraoperative cell salvage with autologous transfusion in elective right or repeat hepatectomy: a propensity-score-matched case-control analysis. Can J Surg 2018; 61:105-113. [PMID: 29582746 DOI: 10.1503/cjs.010017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver resection may be associated with substantial blood loss, and cell saver use has been recommended for patients at high risk. We performed a study to compare the allogenic erythrocyte transfusion rate after liver resection between patients who had intraoperative cell salvage with a cell saver device versus patients who did not. Our hypothesis was that cell salvage with autologous transfusion would reduce the allogenic blood transfusion rate. METHODS Cell salvage was used selectively in patients at high risk for intraoperative blood loss based on preoperatively known predictors: right and repeat hepatectomy. Patients who underwent elective right or repeat hepatectomy between Nov. 9, 2007, and Jan. 27, 2016 were considered for the study. Data were retrieved from a liver resection database and were analyzed retrospectively. Patients with cell saver use (since January 2013) constituted the experimental group, and those without cell salvage (2007-2012), the control group. To reduce selection bias, we matched propensity scores. The primary outcome was the allogenic blood transfusion rate within 90 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were the number of transfused erythrocyte units, and rates of overall and infectious complications. RESULTS Ninety-six patients were included in the study, 41 in the cell saver group and 55 in the control group. Of the 96, 64 (67%) could be matched, 32 in either group. The 2 groups were balanced for demographic and clinical variables. The allogenic blood transfusion rate was 28% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.5%-43.7%) in the cell saver group versus 72% (95% CI 56.3%-87.5%) in the control group (p < 0.001). The overall and infectious complication rates were not significantly different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION Intraoperative cell salvage with autologous transfusion in elective right or repeat hepatectomy reduced the allogenic blood transfusion rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Zacharias
- From the Service de chirurgie digestive, hépato-biliaire et endocrinienne, Pôle de Pathologies Digestives et Urologie (Zacharias); and the Pôle Anesthésie et Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôpital Emile Muller, Mulhouse, France (Ahlschwede, Dufour, Romain, Theissen-Laval)
| | - Erich Ahlschwede
- From the Service de chirurgie digestive, hépato-biliaire et endocrinienne, Pôle de Pathologies Digestives et Urologie (Zacharias); and the Pôle Anesthésie et Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôpital Emile Muller, Mulhouse, France (Ahlschwede, Dufour, Romain, Theissen-Laval)
| | - Nicole Dufour
- From the Service de chirurgie digestive, hépato-biliaire et endocrinienne, Pôle de Pathologies Digestives et Urologie (Zacharias); and the Pôle Anesthésie et Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôpital Emile Muller, Mulhouse, France (Ahlschwede, Dufour, Romain, Theissen-Laval)
| | - Florence Romain
- From the Service de chirurgie digestive, hépato-biliaire et endocrinienne, Pôle de Pathologies Digestives et Urologie (Zacharias); and the Pôle Anesthésie et Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôpital Emile Muller, Mulhouse, France (Ahlschwede, Dufour, Romain, Theissen-Laval)
| | - Odile Theissen-Laval
- From the Service de chirurgie digestive, hépato-biliaire et endocrinienne, Pôle de Pathologies Digestives et Urologie (Zacharias); and the Pôle Anesthésie et Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôpital Emile Muller, Mulhouse, France (Ahlschwede, Dufour, Romain, Theissen-Laval)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Koo BN, Kwon MA, Kim SH, Kim JY, Moon YJ, Park SY, Lee EH, Chae MS, Choi SU, Choi JH, Hwang JY. Korean clinical practice guideline for perioperative red blood cell transfusion from Korean Society of Anesthesiologists. Korean J Anesthesiol 2018; 72:91-118. [PMID: 30513567 PMCID: PMC6458508 DOI: 10.4097/kja.d.18.00322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Considering the functional role of red blood cells (RBC) in maintaining oxygen supply to tissues, RBC transfusion can be a life-saving intervention in situations of severe bleeding or anemia. RBC transfusion is often inevitable to address intraoperative massive bleeding; it is a key component in safe perioperative patient management. Unlike general medical resources, packed RBCs (pRBCs) have limited availability because their supply relies entirely on voluntary donations. Additionally, excessive utilization of pRBCs may aggravate prognosis or increase the risk of developing infectious diseases. Appropriate perioperative RBC transfusion is, therefore, crucial for the management of patient safety and medical resource conservation. These concerns motivated us to develop the present clinical practice guideline for evidence-based efficient and safe perioperative RBC transfusion management considering the current clinical landscape. Methods This guideline was obtained after the revision and refinement of exemplary clinical practice guidelines developed in advanced countries. This was followed by rigorous evidence-based reassessment considering the healthcare environment of the country. Results This guideline covers all important aspects of perioperative RBC transfusion, such as preoperative anemia management, appropriate RBC storage period, and leukoreduction (removal of white blood cells using filters), reversal of perioperative bleeding tendency, strategies for perioperative RBC transfusion, appropriate blood management protocols, efforts to reduce blood transfusion requirements, and patient monitoring during a perioperative transfusion. Conclusions This guideline will aid decisions related to RBC transfusion in healthcare settings and minimize patient risk associated with unnecessary pRBC transfusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bon-Nyeo Koo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min A Kwon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Sang-Hyun Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Jong Yeop Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Young-Jin Moon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun Young Park
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun-Ho Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min Suk Chae
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Uk Choi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong-Hyun Choi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Young Hwang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kumar N, Ravikumar N, Tan JYH, Akbary K, Patel RS, Kannan R. Current Status of the Use of Salvaged Blood in Metastatic Spine Tumour Surgery. Neurospine 2018; 15:206-215. [PMID: 30071572 PMCID: PMC6226127 DOI: 10.14245/ns.1836140.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2018] [Accepted: 07/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
To review the current status of salvaged blood transfusion (SBT) in metastatic spine tumour surgery (MSTS), with regard to its safety and efficacy, contraindications, and adverse effects. We also aimed to establish that the safety and adverse event profile of SBT is comparable and at least equal to that of allogeneic blood transfusion. MEDLINE and Scopus were used to search for relevant articles, based on keywords such as "cancer surgery," "salvaged blood," and "circulating tumor cells." We found 159 articles, of which 55 were relevant; 20 of those were excluded because they used other blood conservation techniques in addition to cell salvage. Five articles were manually selected from reference lists. In total, 40 articles were reviewed. There is sufficient evidence of the clinical safety of using salvaged blood in oncological surgery. SBT decreases the risk of postoperative infections and tumour recurrence. However, there are some limitations regarding its clinical applications, as it cannot be employed in cases of sepsis. In this review, we established that earlier studies supported the use of salvaged blood from a cell saver in conjunction with a leukocyte depletion filter (LDF). Furthermore, we highlight the recent emergence of sufficient evidence supporting the use of intraoperative cell salvage without an LDF in MSTS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naresh Kumar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Nivetha Ravikumar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Joel Yong Hao Tan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Kutbuddin Akbary
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Ravish Shammi Patel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Rajesh Kannan
- Department of Anaesthesiology, National University Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kumar N, Zaw AS, Kantharajanna SB, Khoo BL, Lim CT, Thiery JP. Metastatic efficiency of tumour cells can be impaired by intraoperative cell salvage process: truth or conjecture? Transfus Med 2017; 27 Suppl 5:327-334. [PMID: 28833768 DOI: 10.1111/tme.12453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2017] [Revised: 06/17/2017] [Accepted: 07/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
The use of salvaged blood in oncological surgery has been a matter of controversy over the years. This is due to the concern of systemic dissemination of reinfused tumour cells. Recent literature, across disciplines, has shed considerable light on its safety in terms of tumour recurrence, progression and overall survival rates. This clinical safety demonstrates the apparent metastatic inefficiency of reinfused tumour cells. The proof of this concept comes from various studies that have shown that salvaged blood has no tumour cells, or has a significantly lower count as compared to the patient's original circulatory tumour load. Recently, we took a step further and found that the tumour cells in the salvaged blood lose the capacity to replicate. In this review, we revisited the safety of salvaged blood from the point of view of metastatic potential. We have presented basic and applied science evidence regarding the innocuous nature of tumour cells that have been subjected to the cell salvage process. The understanding of the metastatic efficiency or the lack of it in tumour cells subjected to salvage process is key to allay the concerns conventionally associated with the use of salvaged blood in tumour surgery. Based on the available literature, we surmise that the prevalent apprehensions on the usage of salvaged blood are ill-founded and further substantiate why tumour cells in the salvaged blood could be regarded as cells with non-metastatic potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Kumar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - A S Zaw
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - S B Kantharajanna
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - B L Khoo
- BioSystems and Micromechanics (BioSyM) Inter-Disciplinary Research Group, Singapore MIT Alliance for Research and Technology (SMART), National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - C T Lim
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - J P Thiery
- BioSystems and Micromechanics (BioSyM) Inter-Disciplinary Research Group, Singapore MIT Alliance for Research and Technology (SMART), National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zaw AS, Bangalore Kantharajanna S, Kumar N. Is Autologous Salvaged Blood a Viable Option for Patient Blood Management in Oncologic Surgery? Transfus Med Rev 2017; 31:56-61. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2016.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2015] [Revised: 06/03/2016] [Accepted: 06/16/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
23
|
Zubair AC, Torp K, Eichbaum Q. How we provide blood transfusion support in two large US liver transplant programs. Transfusion 2016; 56:1938-43. [PMID: 27338113 DOI: 10.1111/trf.13710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2016] [Revised: 05/15/2016] [Accepted: 05/16/2016] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Abba C Zubair
- Transfusion Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Klaus Torp
- Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Quentin Eichbaum
- Transfusion Medicine, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Safety of the Use of Blood Salvage and Autotransfusion During Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Ann Surg 2016; 264:339-43. [DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|
25
|
Intraoperative cell salvage in metastatic spine tumour surgery reduces potential for reinfusion of viable cancer cells. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2016; 25:4008-4015. [DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4478-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2015] [Revised: 02/22/2016] [Accepted: 02/23/2016] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
|
26
|
Gaudino M, Lau C, Cammertoni F, Vargiu V, Gambardella I, Massetti M, Girardi LN. Surgical Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma With Cavoatrial Involvement: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 101:1213-21. [DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2015] [Revised: 09/08/2015] [Accepted: 10/01/2015] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
27
|
Araujo RLC, Pantanali CA, Haddad L, Filho JAR, D’Albuquerque LAC, Andraus W. Does autologous blood transfusion during liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma increase risk of recurrence? World J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 8:161-168. [PMID: 26981190 PMCID: PMC4770170 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i2.161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2015] [Revised: 10/10/2015] [Accepted: 12/02/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To analyze outcomes in patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and received autologous intraoperative blood salvage (IBS).
METHODS: Consecutive HCC patients who underwent LT were studied retrospectively and analyzed according to the use of IBS or not. Demographic and surgical data were collected from a departmental prospective maintained database. Statistical analyses were performed using the Fisher’s exact test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test to examine covariate differences between patients who underwent IBS and those who did not. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were developed to evaluate recurrence and death, and survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test.
RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2012, 158 consecutive patients who underwent LT in the same medical center and by the same surgical team were identified. Among these patients, 122 (77.2%) were in the IBS group and 36 (22.8%) in the non-IBS group. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) at 5 years were 59.7% and 83.3%, respectively. No differences in OS (P = 0.51) or RFS (P = 0.953) were detected between the IBS and non-IBS groups. On multivariate analysis for OS, degree of tumor differentiation remained as the only independent predictor. Regarding patients who received IBS, no differences were detected in OS or RFS (P = 0.055 and P = 0.512, respectively) according to the volume infused, even when outcomes at 90 d or longer were analyzed separately (P = 0.518 for both outcomes).
CONCLUSION: No differences in RFS or OS were detected according to IBS use. Trials addressing this question are justified and should be designed to detect small differences in long-term outcomes.
Collapse
|
28
|
Kırnap M, Tezcaner T, Ayvazoğlu Soy HE, Akdur A, Yıldırım S, Torgay A, Moray G, Haberal M. Efficacy of cell saver use in living-donor liver transplant. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2016; 13 Suppl 1:315-7. [PMID: 25894181 DOI: 10.6002/ect.mesot2014.p153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Liver transplant currently is the best treatment option for end-stage liver disease. During liver transplant, there is major blood loss due to surgery and primary disease. By using a cell saver, the need for blood transfusion is markedly reduced. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of cell saver use on morbidity and mortality in living-donor liver transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 178 living-donor liver transplants, performed from 2005 to 2013 in our center. Child-Turcotte-Pugh A patients, deceased-donor liver transplants, and liver transplants performed for fulminant hepatic failure were not included in this study. Intraoperative blood transfusion was done in all patients to keep hemoglobin level between 10 and 12 g/dL. Cell saver was used in all liver transplants except in patients with malignancy, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C. RESULTS We included 126 patients in the study. Cell saver was used in 84 liver transplants (66%). In 42 patients (34%), liver transplant was performed without a cell saver. In living-donor liver transplant with cell saver use, 10 mL/kg blood (range, 2-50 mL/kg blood) was transfused from the cell saver; in addition, 5 to 10 mL/kg allogeneic blood was transfused. In living-donor liver transplant without cell saver, 20 to 25 mL/kg allogeneic blood was transfused. CONCLUSIONS During liver transplant, major blood transfusion is needed because of surgery and primary disease. Cell saver use markedly decreases the need for allogeneic blood transfusion and avoids adverse events of massive transfusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahir Kırnap
- From the Department of General Surgery, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Fahrner R, Dondorf F, Ardelt M, Dittmar Y, Settmacher U, Rauchfuß F. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma - factors influencing outcome and disease-free survival. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:12071-12082. [PMID: 26576092 PMCID: PMC4641125 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i42.12071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2015] [Revised: 08/04/2015] [Accepted: 09/14/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Liver transplantation can be a curative treatment in selected patients. However, there are several factors that influence disease-free survival after transplantation. This review addresses the pre-, intra- and postoperative factors that influence the risk of tumor recurrence after liver transplantation.
Collapse
|
30
|
Are we ready for the use of intraoperative salvaged blood in metastatic spine tumour surgery? EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2015; 25:3997-4007. [PMID: 26188770 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4112-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2015] [Revised: 07/04/2015] [Accepted: 07/05/2015] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the feasibility of using intraoperative cell salvage (IOCS) in combination with leucocyte depletion filter (LDF) in eliminating tumour cells from blood salvaged during metastatic spine tumour surgery (MSTS). This is with the view to pave the path for use of IOCS-LDF in MSTS and musculoskeletal oncological surgery. METHODS Sixty consecutive patients with known primary epithelial tumour, who were offered surgery for metastatic spine disease at our university hospital, were recruited. Blood samples were collected at three different stages during surgery: from operative field prior to IOCS processing, after IOCS processing and after IOCS-LDF processing. Three separate samples (5 ml each) were taken at each stage. Samples were examined by cell block technique using immunohistochemical monoclonal antibodies to identify tumour cells of epithelial origin in the samples. RESULTS Of 60 patients, ten were excluded for not fulfilling the inclusion criteria leaving 50 patients. Malignant tumour cells were detected in the samples from operative field prior to IOCS processing in 24 patients and in the samples from the transfusion bag post-IOCS processing in 4 patients. No viable malignant cells were detectable in any of the blood samples after passage through both IOCS and LDF. CONCLUSIONS The findings support the notion that IOCS-LDF combination works effectively in eliminating tumour cells from salvaged blood so this technique can possibly be applied in MSTS and even musculoskeletal oncological surgery. This concept can then be extended to other oncological surgeries in general with further appropriate clinical studies.
Collapse
|
31
|
Kumar N, Ahmed Q, Lee VKM, Chen Y, Zaw AS, Goy R, Agrawal RV, Dhewar AN, Wong HK. Can There be a Place for Intraoperative Salvaged Blood in Spine Tumor Surgery? Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21:2436-43. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3569-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2014] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|
32
|
Use of intraoperative cell-salvage for autologous blood transfusions in metastatic spine tumour surgery: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15:e33-41. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70245-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
|
33
|
Cata JP, Wang H, Gottumukkala V, Reuben J, Sessler DI. Inflammatory response, immunosuppression, and cancer recurrence after perioperative blood transfusions. Br J Anaesth 2013; 110:690-701. [PMID: 23599512 DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 306] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Debate on appropriate triggers for transfusion of allogeneic blood products and their effects on short- and long-term survival in surgical and critically ill patients continue with no definitive evidence or decisive resolution. Although transfusion-related immune modulation (TRIM) is well established, its influence on immune competence in the recipient and its effects on cancer recurrence after a curative resection remains controversial. An association between perioperative transfusion of allogeneic blood products and risk for recurrence has been shown in colorectal cancer in randomized trials; whether the same is true for other types of cancer remains to be determined. This article focuses on the laboratory, animal, and clinical evidence to date on the mechanistic understanding of inflammatory and immune-modulatory effects of blood products and their significance for recurrence in the cancer surgical patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Cata
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Centre, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 409, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Chen Y, Tai BC, Nayak D, Kumar N, Chua KH, Lim JW, Goy RWL, Wong HK. Blood loss in spinal tumour surgery and surgery for metastatic spinal disease: a meta-analysis. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B:683-8. [PMID: 23632682 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.95b5.31270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
There is currently no consensus about the mean volume of blood lost during spinal tumour surgery and surgery for metastatic spinal disease. We conducted a systematic review of papers published in the English language between 31 January 1992 and 31 January 2012. Only papers that clearly presented blood loss data in spinal surgery for metastatic disease were included. The random effects model was used to obtain the pooled estimate of mean blood loss. We selected 18 papers, including six case series, ten retrospective reviews and two prospective studies. Altogether, there were 760 patients who had undergone spinal tumour surgery and surgery for metastatic spinal disease. The pooled estimate of peri-operative blood loss was 2180 ml (95% confidence interval 1805 to 2554) with catastrophic blood loss as high as 5000 ml, which is rare. Aside from two studies that reported large amounts of mean blood loss (> 5500 ml), the resulting funnel plot suggested an absence of publication bias. This was confirmed by Egger's test, which did not show any small-study effects (p = 0.119). However, there was strong evidence of heterogeneity between studies (I(2) = 90%; p < 0.001). Spinal surgery for metastatic disease is associated with significant blood loss and the possibility of catastrophic blood loss. There is a need to establish standardised methods of calculating and reporting this blood loss. Analysis should include assessment by area of the spine, primary pathology and nature of surgery so that the amount of blood loss can be predicted. Consideration should be given to autotransfusion in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Chen
- National University Health System, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, 1E Kent Ridge Road, 119228, Singapore
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Zhai B, Sun XY. Controversy over the use of intraoperative blood salvage autotransfusion during liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma patients. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19:3371-3374. [PMID: 23801828 PMCID: PMC3683674 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i22.3371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2013] [Revised: 04/26/2013] [Accepted: 05/10/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Intraoperative blood salvage autotransfusion (IBSA) is used in various surgical procedures. However, because of the risk of reinfusion of salvaged blood contaminated by tumor cells, the use of IBSA in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) is controversial. The critical points include whether tumor cells can be cleared by IBSA, whether IBSA increases the risk of recurrence or metastasis, and what are the indications for IBSA. Moreover, is it warranted to take the risk of tumor dissemination by using IBSA to avoid allogeneic blood transfusion? Do the remaining tumor cells after additional filtration by leukocyte depletion filters still possess potential tumorigenicity? Does IBSA always work well? We have reviewed the literature and tried to address these questions. The available data indicate that IBSA is safe in LT for HCC, but randomized, controlled and prospective trials are urgently required to clarify the uncertainty.
Collapse
|
36
|
Paolo F, Marialuisa B, Stefania B, Helmut G, Moira M, Cristiana C, Carlo O. Blood loss, predictors of bleeding, transfusion practice and strategies of blood cell salvaging during liver transplantation. World J Hepatol 2013; 5:1-15. [PMID: 23383361 PMCID: PMC3562721 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v5.i1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2012] [Accepted: 01/19/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Blood loss during liver transplantation (OLTx) is a common consequence of pre-existing abnormalities of the hemostatic system, portal hypertension with multiple collateral vessels, portal vein thrombosis, previous abdominal surgery, splenomegaly, and poor “functional” recovery of the new liver. The intrinsic coagulopathic features of end stage cirrhosis along with surgical technical difficulties make transfusion-free liver transplantation a major challenge, and, despite the improvements in understanding of intraoperative coagulation profiles and strategies to control blood loss, the requirements for blood or blood products remains high. The impact of blood transfusion has been shown to be significant and independent of other well-known predictors of posttransplant-outcome. Negative effects on immunomodulation and an increased risk of postoperative complications and mortality have been repeatedly demonstrated. Isovolemic hemodilution, the extensive utilization of thromboelastogram and the use of autotransfusion devices are among the commonly adopted procedures to limit the amount of blood transfusion. The use of intraoperative blood salvage and autologous blood transfusion should still be considered an important method to reduce the need for allogenic blood and the associated complications. In this article we report on the common preoperative and intraoperative factors contributing to blood loss, intraoperative transfusion practices, anesthesiologic and surgical strategies to prevent blood loss, and on intraoperative blood salvaging techniques and autologous blood transfusion. Even though the advances in surgical technique and anesthetic management, as well as a better understanding of the risk factors, have resulted in a steady decrease in intraoperative bleeding, most patients still bleed extensively. Blood transfusion therapy is still a critical feature during OLTx and various studies have shown a large variability in the use of blood products among different centers and even among individual anesthesiologists within the same center. Unfortunately, despite the large number of OLTx performed each year, there is still paucity of large randomized, multicentre, and controlled studies which indicate how to prevent bleeding, the transfusion needs and thresholds, and the “evidence based” perioperative strategies to reduce the amount of transfusion.
Collapse
|
37
|
Lerut J, Julliard O, Ciccarelli O, Lannoy V, Gofette P. Hepatocellular cancer and liver transplantation: a Western experience. Recent Results Cancer Res 2013; 190:127-144. [PMID: 22941018 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16037-0_9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Orthotopic liver transplantation is the preferred treatment option in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma developing in chronic liver disease. Unfortunately, based on classical transplantation criteria (Milan criteria), only a minority of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma are candidate to orthotopic liver transplantation. Major improvements in treatment strategy and surgical technique including the use of neoadjuvant locoregional therapies and progresses of post-transplant immunosuppressive treatment have contributed to safely expand transplantation criteria preserving acceptable surgical morbidity-mortality and good oncologic outcome. Further extension of transplantation criteria may have advantages including an increase in the number of transplant candidates and improvement of the prognosis of the disease and also disadvantages including an increase of surgical morbidity and deterioration of global oncologic outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma. In the future, identification of imaging or molecular prognostic markers could help to better define transplantation criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Lerut
- Department of Imaging - Interventional Radiology, Université catholique de Louvain-UCL, Brussels, Belgium.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Muscari F, Guinard JP, Kamar N, Peron JM, Otal P, Suc B. Impact of preoperative α-fetoprotein level on disease-free survival after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Surg 2012; 36:1824-31. [PMID: 22532309 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1587-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative α-fetoprotein (AFP) levels may have an influence on disease-free survival (DFS) of patients after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) located on a cirrhotic liver. METHODS Between 2000 and 2009, two groups were distinguished according to preoperative AFP level: normal-level group (<10 ng/ml) and increased-level group (>10 ng/ml). The increased-level group was further divided into three levels of preoperative AFP: 10-150, 150-500, and ≥ 500 ng/ml. DFS and recurrence rates were compared. All patients underwent transplantation using the preoperative 5/5 criteria. RESULTS Of the 122 patients in this study, 63 had normal and 59 had increased preoperative AFP. There were no differences between the two groups concerning perioperative or pathologic data. Those with an increased preoperative AFP level had a significantly shorter 5-year DFS, and their recurrence rate was higher than that of the normal AFP group. The 5-year DFS and recurrence rates were 71 and 4 %, respectively, for those with normal AFP; 57 and 10 %, respectively, for those with AFP 10-150 ng/ml; 46 and 24 %, respectively, for those with AFP 150-500 ng/ml; and 28 and 62 %, respectively, for those with AFP ≥ 500 ng/ml. CONCLUSIONS This study shows the prognostic value of preoperative AFP levels on DFS after a liver transplant for HCC in a population of patients undergoing transplantation with the same preoperative criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrice Muscari
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, 1 Avenue Jean Poulhès, 31059, Toulouse Cedex, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kim JM, Kim GS, Joh JW, Suh KS, Park JB, Ko JS, Kwon CHD, Yi NJ, Gwak MS, Lee KW, Kim SJ, Lee SK. Long-term results for living donor liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma using intraoperative blood salvage with leukocyte depletion filter. Transpl Int 2012. [DOI: 10.1111/tri.12001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jong Man Kim
- Department of Surgery; Samsung Medical Center; Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine; Seoul; Korea
| | - Gaab Soo Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine; Samsung Medical Center; Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine; Seoul; Korea
| | - Jae-Won Joh
- Department of Surgery; Samsung Medical Center; Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine; Seoul; Korea
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery; Seoul National University College of Medicine; Seoul; Korea
| | - Jae Berm Park
- Department of Surgery; Samsung Medical Center; Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine; Seoul; Korea
| | - Justin Sangwook Ko
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine; Samsung Medical Center; Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine; Seoul; Korea
| | - Choon Hyuck David Kwon
- Department of Surgery; Samsung Medical Center; Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine; Seoul; Korea
| | - Nam-Joon Yi
- Department of Surgery; Seoul National University College of Medicine; Seoul; Korea
| | - Mi Sook Gwak
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine; Samsung Medical Center; Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine; Seoul; Korea
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery; Seoul National University College of Medicine; Seoul; Korea
| | - Sung Joo Kim
- Department of Surgery; Samsung Medical Center; Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine; Seoul; Korea
| | - Suk-Koo Lee
- Department of Surgery; Samsung Medical Center; Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine; Seoul; Korea
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Should intraoperative cell-salvaged blood be used in patients with suspected or known malignancy? Can J Anaesth 2012; 59:1058-70. [PMID: 22996966 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-012-9781-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2012] [Accepted: 08/23/2012] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) is used as an alternative to allogeneic blood transfusion in an attempt to avoid or minimize the risks associated with allogeneic blood. Intraoperative cell salvage is generally avoided in surgeries where malignancy is confirmed or suspected due to concern for potential metastasis or cancer recurrence. The application of post-processing methods for ICS is hypothesized to eliminate this potential risk. The purpose of this narrative review is to examine the in vitro experimental evidence as it pertains to the removal of tumour cells from ICS blood and to review the clinical studies where ICS blood has been used in patients with malignancy. SOURCE A search of the English literature for relevant articles published from 1973 to 2012 was undertaken using MEDLINE and Cochrane databases. Bibliographies were cross-referenced to locate further studies. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS Leukoreduction filters are an effective method for removal of malignant cells from ICS blood. Small non-randomized clinical studies to date do not show evidence of an increased rate of metastasis or cancer recurrence. Although a theoretical risk of disease recurrence persists, the decision to use autologous ICS blood must be weighed against the known risks of allogeneic blood transfusion. CONCLUSION Transfusion of autologous blood harvested via ICS should be considered a viable option for reduction or avoidance of allogeneic product during many oncologic surgeries and may be a lifesaving option for those patients who refuse allogeneic blood products.
Collapse
|
41
|
Waters JH, Yazer M, Chen YF, Kloke J. Blood salvage and cancer surgery: a meta-analysis of available studies. Transfusion 2012; 52:2167-73. [PMID: 22321196 DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03555.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraoperative blood salvage (IBS) is a technique that is frequently used in major blood loss surgery. Classically, it is avoided during cancer surgery where a fear exists of entraining cancer cells into the shed blood. In this study, all reports of this practice were collected to determine if this fear is warranted. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS A literature search was performed including the search phrases "blood salvage,""intraoperative blood salvage,""cell salvage,""cell saver,""cell saving,""autotransfusion," and "autologous transfusion." Data extracted from suitable papers included the authors' names, publication year, cancer type, exclusion criteria, sample size, length of follow-up, and the mean patient age. The primary endpoint of this meta-analysis was a comparison of the odds ratio (OR) for cancer recurrence or the development of metastases. RESULTS Eleven studies were included in the analysis. The pooled summary of the OR was 0.65 (95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.98; p = 0.0391) using a random-effects model. Measures of heterogeneity, Q-statistics (p= 0.1615) and I(2) (30.90%), did not indicate a high degree of between-study variability. CONCLUSIONS While significant variability existed between studies, this meta-analysis suggests that outcomes after the use of IBS are not inferior to traditional intraoperative allogeneic transfusion. An adequately powered prospective, randomized trial of IBS use is required to determine its true risk during cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan H Waters
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Foltys D, Zimmermann T, Heise M, Kaths M, Lautem A, Wisser G, Weiler N, Hoppe-Lotichius M, Hansen T, Otto G. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma--is there a risk of recurrence caused by intraoperative blood salvage autotransfusion? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011; 47:182-7. [PMID: 21986299 DOI: 10.1159/000330746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2011] [Accepted: 06/28/2011] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS The use of intraoperative blood salvage autotransfusion (IBSA) during surgical approaches may contribute to tumour cell dissemination. Therefore, IBSA should be avoided in cases of malignancy. However, the risks of IBSA might be acceptable in liver transplantation (LT) for selected small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS In total, 136 recipients of LT with histologically proven HCC in the explanted liver were included in this analysis. With regard to tumour recurrence, 40 patients receiving IBSA despite HCC (IBSA group) were compared to 96 patients without IBSA (non-IBSA group). RESULTS Milan criteria as assessed in the explanted liver were fulfilled in 24 of 40 IBSA patients and 58 of 96 non-IBSA patients (p = 0.85). Five of 40 patients in the IBSA group and 18 of 96 patients in the non-IBSA group experienced tumour recurrence (p = 0.29). In spite the theoretical risk of tumour cell dissemination, the recurrence rate was not increased in the IBSA group. CONCLUSION Our results indicate that IBSA does not modify the risk of HCC recurrence. Therefore, in highly selected HCC patients undergoing LT, the use of IBSA appears to be justified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Foltys
- Department of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ferraris VA, Brown JR, Despotis GJ, Hammon JW, Reece TB, Saha SP, Song HK, Clough ER, Shore-Lesserson LJ, Goodnough LT, Mazer CD, Shander A, Stafford-Smith M, Waters J, Baker RA, Dickinson TA, FitzGerald DJ, Likosky DS, Shann KG. 2011 update to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists blood conservation clinical practice guidelines. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 91:944-82. [PMID: 21353044 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.11.078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 859] [Impact Index Per Article: 66.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2010] [Revised: 11/20/2010] [Accepted: 11/29/2010] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Practice guidelines reflect published literature. Because of the ever changing literature base, it is necessary to update and revise guideline recommendations from time to time. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons recommends review and possible update of previously published guidelines at least every three years. This summary is an update of the blood conservation guideline published in 2007. METHODS The search methods used in the current version differ compared to the previously published guideline. Literature searches were conducted using standardized MeSH terms from the National Library of Medicine PUBMED database list of search terms. The following terms comprised the standard baseline search terms for all topics and were connected with the logical 'OR' connector--Extracorporeal circulation (MeSH number E04.292), cardiovascular surgical procedures (MeSH number E04.100), and vascular diseases (MeSH number C14.907). Use of these broad search terms allowed specific topics to be added to the search with the logical 'AND' connector. RESULTS In this 2011 guideline update, areas of major revision include: 1) management of dual anti-platelet therapy before operation, 2) use of drugs that augment red blood cell volume or limit blood loss, 3) use of blood derivatives including fresh frozen plasma, Factor XIII, leukoreduced red blood cells, platelet plasmapheresis, recombinant Factor VII, antithrombin III, and Factor IX concentrates, 4) changes in management of blood salvage, 5) use of minimally invasive procedures to limit perioperative bleeding and blood transfusion, 6) recommendations for blood conservation related to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and cardiopulmonary perfusion, 7) use of topical hemostatic agents, and 8) new insights into the value of team interventions in blood management. CONCLUSIONS Much has changed since the previously published 2007 STS blood management guidelines and this document contains new and revised recommendations.
Collapse
|
44
|
|
45
|
|
46
|
|
47
|
Dionigi G, Boni L, Rovera F, Rausei S, Cuffari S, Cantone G, Bacuzzi A, Dionigi R. Effect of perioperative blood transfusion on clinical outcomes in hepatic surgery for cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15:3976-83. [PMID: 19705491 PMCID: PMC2731946 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.15.3976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Allogeneic blood transfusion during liver resection for malignancies has been associated with an increased incidence of different types of complications: infectious complications, tumor recurrence, decreased survival. Even if there is clear evidence of transfusion-induced immunosuppression, it is difficult to demonstrate that transfusion is the only determinant factor that decisively affects the outcome. In any case there are several motivations to reduce the practice of blood transfusion. The advantages and drawbacks of different transfusion alternatives are reviewed here, emphasizing that surgeons and anesthetists who practice in centers with a high volume of liver resections, should be familiar with all the possible alternatives.
Collapse
|
48
|
Catling S, Williams S, Freites O, Rees M, Davies C, Hopkins L. Use of a leucocyte filter to remove tumour cells from intra-operative cell salvage blood. Anaesthesia 2008; 63:1332-8. [PMID: 19032302 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05637.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
SUMMARY The intra-operative blood loss of 50 consecutive gynae-oncology patients undergoing surgery for endometrial, cervical or ovarian cancer was cell salvaged and filtered. In each case blood samples were taken from the effluent tumour vein, a central venous line, the cell saver reservoir, the cell salvage re-transfusion bag after processing but before filtration and from the cell salvage re-transfusion bag after processing and filtration. Samples were examined using immunohistochemical monoclonal antibody markers for epithelial cell lines. Viable, nucleated malignant cells were detected in 2/50 central venous samples, 34/50 reservoir samples and 31/50 unfiltered cell salvaged samples. After passage through a Pall RS leucocyte depletion filter no remaining viable, nucleated malignant cells were detected in any sample. The clinical risks of cell salvage in these circumstances should be reviewed in the light of the risks of allogeneic blood transfusion.
Collapse
|
49
|
Adelola OA, Ahmed I, Fenton JE. Management of Jehovah's Witnesses in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 2008; 29:270-8. [PMID: 18598840 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2007.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2006] [Revised: 08/09/2007] [Accepted: 08/20/2007] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
It is imperative that surgeons should have some knowledge and understanding of the beliefs of Jehovah's Witnesses to respect the patient's wishes and effectively minimize and manage blood loss. The objective of this review was to provide a management strategy for Jehovah's Witness patients undergoing otolaryngology, head and neck surgery, because there is paucity of information regarding this within our literature. A systematic review of medical literature was conducted. Articles were identified using MEDLINE (1966-2007). The search strategy used Medical Subject Heading terms Jehovah's Witnesses, Beliefs, Ethical and Legal issues, Blood transfusion alternatives, ENT, Head and Neck surgery in Jehovah' witnesses. There is a broad range of nonblood surgical management strategies available in other specialities, making major surgery possible within this population. This review suggests recommendations in elective surgery, trauma, and emergencies.
Collapse
|
50
|
Intraoperative blood salvage during liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: efficiency of leukocyte depletion filters in the removal of tumor cells. Transplantation 2008; 85:863-9. [PMID: 18360269 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e3181671f2e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraoperative blood salvage (IBS) reduces homologous transfusion in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), but may carry with it the risk of reinfusing tumor cells in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The use of leukocyte depletion filters (LDFs) for the removal of tumor cells is rarely reported in clinical OLT. The aims of this study were to evaluate the frequency of tumor cell contamination in surgical field during OLT for HCC recipients and to investigate the efficiency of additional LDFs for eliminating tumor cells from IBS. METHODS Thirty-two HCC patients with preoperatively elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) underwent OLT. The blood from the surgical field was collected and processed by an autotransfusion device (Cell Saver 5), followed by 2 consecutive LDF filtrations. The HCC cells in IBS samples and filtered samples were determined using a nested RT-PCR technique to detect the AFP mRNA. RESULTS The shed blood samples from 20 (62.5%) of the 32 HCC patients were contaminated with HCC cells and 15 of them remained positive after Cell Saver processing. Patients within the Milan or UCSF criteria were less likely to have HCC cell contamination and the contaminated HCC cells were more likely to be removed by the Cell Saver in these patients as compared to other patients (P<0.01). After filtration through an additional LDF, most cases (13/15) became negative except for those with ruptured tumors (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that blood filtration with the LDF can efficiently remove tumor cells and the use of an additional LDF after use of the Cell Saver could markedly reduce the risk of tumor cell reintroduction during the OLT in HCC recipients with nonruptured tumors.
Collapse
|