Percutaneous transfemoral embolization of a spontaneous splenorenal shunt presenting with ischemic graft dysfunction 18months post-transplant

Short-Term Results of Plug-Assisted Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration for Portal Steal from Complicated Portosystemic Shunts in Living-Donor Liver Transplantation

PURPOSE

To investigate the effectiveness of plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration (PARTO) for portal steal from complicated portosystemic shunts (PSSs) in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent LDLT and intraoperative or postoperative PARTO for complicated PSS between January 2020 and December 2021. PARTO was performed when hepatofugal portal flow steal was identified during intraoperative cineportography, and afferent vein embolization was difficult because of multiple afferent veins or incomplete afferent vein embolization. Liver volume, complete obliteration of PSS, technical success, adverse events, and follow-up clinical and laboratory data were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were included, and the technical success rate was 100% with no major adverse events. During the median follow-up of 20.0 months, all patients recovered well with suitable regeneration of the liver without graft dysfunction related to a portal steal. The liver volume significantly increased within 1 month (median, 956 vs 1,198 mL; P < .001). Complete obliteration of a PSS occurred in 36 of 37 (97.3%) patients, and there was no recurrence during follow-up. The Child-Pugh score, serum albumin and total bilirubin levels, and prothrombin time showed significant improvement over serial follow-up. Compared with preprocedural values (14.9 cm/s), follow-up portal flow (median) peaked on the first day (71.2 cm/s, P < .001) and then remained significantly high at 1 week (60.3 cm/s, P < .001) and 1 month (53.1 cm/s, P < .001), in accordance with the graft regeneration.

CONCLUSIONS

PARTO is an effective procedure for the treatment of complicated PSS in LDLT.

Understanding Local Hemodynamic Changes After Liver Transplant: Different Entities or Simply Different Sides to the Same Coin?

Liver transplantation is an extremely complex procedure performed in an extremely complex patient. With a successful technique and acceptable long-term survival, a new challenge arose: overcoming donor shortage. Thus, living donor liver transplant and other techniques were developed. Aiming for donor safety, many liver transplant units attempted to push the viable limits in terms of size, retrieving smaller and smaller grafts for adult recipients. With these smaller grafts came numerous problems, concepts, and definitions. The spotlight is now aimed at the mirage of hemodynamic changes derived from the recipients prior alterations. This article focuses on the numerous hemodynamic syndromes, their definitions, causes, and management and interconnection with each other. The aim is to aid the physician in their recognition and treatment to improve liver transplantation success.

Friend or Foe? Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunts in Cirrhosis-Current Understanding and Future Prospects

Portal hypertension (PHT) in cirrhosis results from increased resistance to splanchnic blood flow secondary to parenchymal and vascular changes within the liver. In an attempt to counteract the increased portal pressure, two mechanisms simultaneously occur: splanchnic vasodilatation and formation of spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS). Long considered to be a compensatory mechanism to decompress the portal venous system, it is now well established that SPSS are not only inefficient in decreasing the portal pressure but also contribute to reduced hepatocyte perfusion and increased splanchnic blood flow and resistance, associated with worsening PHT. Recent studies have described a high prevalence of SPSS in cirrhosis patients, increasing with liver dysfunction, and observed an association between the presence of SPSS and worse clinical outcomes. In cirrhosis patients with preserved liver functions, the presence of SPSS independently increases the risk of hepatic encephalopathy, variceal bleeding, and ascites, and reduces transplant-free survival. Moreover, the presence of SPSS in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting and liver transplant has been shown to variably affect the postprocedural outcome. This article provides an overview of the current understanding of the role of SPSS in the natural history of liver cirrhosis and their status as a therapeutic target and an imaging biomarker to identify patients at higher risk of developing complications of PHT.

Spontaneous portosystemic shunts in liver cirrhosis: new approaches to an old problem

Portal hypertension is the main consequence of liver cirrhosis, leading to severe complications such as variceal hemorrhage, ascites or hepatic encephalopathy. As an attempt to decompress the portal venous system, portal flow is derived into the systemic venous system through spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSSs), bypassing the liver. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the published reports in relation to the prevalence and physiopathology behind the appearance of SPSS in liver cirrhosis, as well as the complications derived from its formation and its management. The role of SPSS embolization is specifically discussed, as SPSSs have been assessed as a therapeutic target, mainly for patients with recurrent/persistent hepatic encephalopathy and preserved liver function. Furthermore, different aspects of the role of SPSS in liver transplantation, as well as in candidates for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt are reviewed. In these settings, SPSS occlusion has been proposed to minimize possible deleterious effects, but results are so far inconclusive.

Significance of measured intraoperative portal vein flows after thrombendvenectomy in deceased donor liver transplantations with portal vein thrombosis

Adequate portal vein (PV) flow in liver transplantation is essential for a good outcome, and it may be compromised in patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT). This study evaluated the impact of intraoperatively measured PV flow after PV thrombendvenectomy on outcomes after deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). The study included 77 patients over a 16-year period who underwent PV thrombendvenectomy with complete flow data. Patients were classified into 2 groups: high PV flow (>1300 mL/minute; n = 55) and low PV flow (≤1300 mL/minute; n = 22). Postoperative complications and graft survival were analyzed according to the PV flow. The 2 groups were similar in demographic characteristics. Low PV flow was associated with higher cumulative rates of biliary strictures (P = 0.02) and lower 1-, 2-, and 5-year graft survival (89%, 85%, and 68% versus 64%, 55%, and 38%, respectively; P = 0.002). There was no difference in the incidence of postoperative PVT between the groups (1.8% versus 9.1%; P = 0.19). No biliary leaks or hepatic artery thromboses were reported in either group. By multivariate analyses, age >60 years (hazard ratio [HR], 3.04, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-6.82; P = 0.007) and low portal flow (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.15-4.65; P = 0.02) were associated with worse survival. In conclusion, PV flow <1300 mL/minute after PV thrombendvenectomy for PVT during DDLT was associated with higher rates of biliary strictures and worse graft survival. Consideration should be given to identifying reasons for low flow and performing maneuvers to increase PV flow when intraoperative PV flows are <1300 mL/minute. Liver Transplantation 23 1032-1039 2017 AASLD.

Radiologic evaluation of portal steal phenomenon in recipients of liver transplantation

It is important to maintain adequate portal flow and to prevent the detrimental effect of portosystemic shunt in recipients following liver transplantation. The purpose of this article is to present a comprehensive review of portosystemic shunts and to illustrate such phenomenon demonstrated on radiologic studies such as Doppler ultrasound, computed tomography, and portogram. It is important for radiologists to be aware of such phenomenon not only in preoperative evaluation of the recipients but also in postoperative screening to detect recurrence of the phenomenon.

Spontaneous Splenorenal Shunt in Liver Transplantation: Results of Left Renal Vein Ligation Versus Renoportal Anastomosis

BACKGROUND

Management of portal inflow to the graft in patients with spontaneous splenorenal shunts (SRS) is a matter of concern especially in case of large varices (more than 1 cm). In case of portal vein (PV) thrombosis (PVT), renoportal anastomosis (RPA) directly diverts the splanchnic and renal venous blood assuring a good portal inflow to the graft. Disconnection of the portacaval shunt by left renal vein ligation (LRVL) is another option but requires a patent PV. The indication of primary RPA rather than LRVL in patients with small native PV, especially in case of large graft, should be questioned in these complex cases of liver transplantation.

METHODS

From 1998 to 2012, 17 patients with RPA and 15 patients with LRVL were transplanted in our center. We compared these 2 techniques for short- and long-term results.

RESULTS

The rate of preliver transplantation PVT (76% vs 27%) and graft weight (1538 ± 383 g vs 1293 ± 216 g) was significantly higher in the RPA group. Renoportal anastomosis was performed in 4 cases of small but patent PV. Three-month mortality, morbidity, and massive ascitis were similar. No patient was retransplanted. One year after transplantation, PV diameter was still larger in RPA group. Three-year survival was similar (RPA: 79% vs LRVL: 53%, P = 0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

In cirrhotic patients transplanted with large splenorenal shunts, RPA and LRVL reach similar survivals. In case of complete PVT and failure of thrombectomy, the RPA offers satisfactory long-term results.

Vascular steal of the portal vein after orthotopic liver transplant: intraoperative sonographic diagnosis

Spontaneous splenorenal shunts (SSRSs) are portosystemic connections between the splenic vein and the left renal vein (LRV) that develop commonly in patients with portal hypertension. (1) They reportedly occur in 18% to 19% of patients evaluated for a liver transplant. (2),(3) As the liver become more cirrhotic, a major steal phenomenon may occur, whereby blood is shunted from the high-resistance venous bed of the liver to the lower systemic pressure of the LRV. (4) Not infrequently, an SSRS will go undetected during orthotopic liver transplantation because dissection is limited to the right upper quadrant. The importance of these shunts may be underappreciated preoperatively by the radiologist. Usually, if small, these shunts will involute without incident when the lower-resistance allograft is implanted. (5),(6) Larger varices, those greater than 10 mm at the level of transition into the LRV, are more likely to steal blood from the liver, causing allograft failure and possibly death. (4),(7),(8) It is therefore important to document on preoperative imaging the size and location of portosystemic varices in any patient being evaluated for liver transplantation. We present a case in which intraoperative sonography showed a large SSRS that impaired hepatic portal inflow after transplantation, ultimately resulting in the patient's death.