Advanced recipient age (>60 years) alone should not be a contraindication to liver retransplantation

Modern Outcomes After Liver Retransplantation: A Single-center Experience

BACKGROUND

The need for liver retransplantation (reLT) has increased proportionally with greater numbers of liver transplants (LTs) performed, use of marginal donors, degree of recipient preoperative liver dysfunction, and longer survival after LT. However, outcomes following reLT have been historically regarded as poor.

METHODS

To evaluate reLT in modern recipients, we retrospectively examined our single-center experience. Analysis included 1268 patients undergoing single LT and 68 patients undergoing reLT from January 2008 to December 2021.

RESULTS

Pre-LT mechanical ventilation, body mass index at LT, donor-recipient ABO incompatibility, early acute rejection, and length of hospitalization were associated with increased risk of needing reLT following index transplant. Overall and graft survival outcomes in the reLT cohort were equivalent to those after single LT. Mortality after reLT was associated with Kidney Donor Profile Index, national organ sharing at reLT, and LT donor death by anoxia and blood urea nitrogen levels. Survival after reLT was independent of the interval between initial LT and reLT, intraoperative packed red blood cell use, cold ischemia time, and preoperative mechanical ventilation, all previously linked to worse outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that reLT is currently a safer option for patients with liver graft failure, with comparable outcomes to primary LT.

Outcomes of liver retransplantation in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

Liver retransplantation in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) has not been well studied. The aims of this study were to characterize patients with PSC listed for and undergoing retransplantation and to describe the outcomes in these patients. The United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database was used to identify all primary liver transplantations and subsequent relistings and first retransplantations in adults with PSC between 1987 and 2015. A total of 5080 adults underwent primary transplantation for PSC during this period, and of the 1803 who experienced graft failure (GF), 762 were relisted, and 636 underwent retransplantation. Younger patients and patients with GF due to vascular thrombosis or biliary complications were more likely to be relisted, whereas those with Medicaid insurance or GF due to infection were less likely. Both 5-year graft and patient survival after retransplantation were inferior to primary transplantation (P < 0.001). Five-year survival after retransplantation for disease recurrence (REC), however, was similar to primary transplantation (graft survival, P = 0.45; patient survival, P = 0.09) and superior to other indications for retransplantation (graft and patient survival, P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, mechanical ventilation, creatinine, bilirubin, albumin, advanced donor age, and a living donor were associated with poorer outcomes after retransplantation. In conclusion, although survival after liver retransplantation in patients with PSC was overall inferior to primary transplantation, outcomes after retransplantation for PSC REC were similar to primary transplantation at 5 years. Retransplantation may therefore represent a treatment option with the potential for excellent outcomes in patients with REC of PSC in the appropriate clinical circumstances. Liver Transplantation 23 769-780 2017 AASLD.

Variant outcomes of liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus patients in different age categories: impact of the model for end-stage liver disease score

BACKGROUND

Whether the introduction of model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) has an effect on transplant outcome for different age categories remain unclear.

METHODS

We analyzed 49,762 adult hepatitis C virus (HCV) candidates through 1 January 1995 to 31 December 2012 from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Patients were divided into four age categories (18-34, 35-49, 60-64, ≥65 years) in the pre-MELD era and MELD era, respectively.

RESULTS

Waiting list dropouts have decreased in the MELD era for all categories. A reduced trend in survival was observed for 18-34 years patients in the MELD era compared with the pre-MELD era, with 5-year intention-to-treat, overall and graft survival of 56.5%, 57.9%, 56.3% vs. 56.4%, 69.7%, 64.4% (P = 0.604, 0.034, and 0.071, respectively). For other age categories, survival rates were all superior in the MELD era. Cox-regression analysis showed values of hazard ratio for age increased with advanced age (all >1) in the pre-MELD era compared with the reference group (18-34 years), while these hazard ratios were <1 for overall and graft survival in MELD era.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides useful evidence that the introduction of MELD for liver allocation may adversely affect survival of specific HCV patients.

Effect of donor-recipient age matching in living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The use of a marginal donor, such as an elderly donor, in liver transplantation has been increasing in response to organ disparity; however, major risk factors for graft and patient survivals have been reported.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 559 patients who underwent living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) at our hospital from May 2003 to June 2013. Elderly donors were defined as those >50 years old, and elderly recipients were defined as those >60 years old. We evaluated the differences in survival according to donor and recipient ages. Furthermore, we compared post-transplantation outcomes according to donor-recipient age matching.

RESULTS

The overall 5-year survival rate of the recipients was significantly lower in the elderly donor group than in the younger donor group (84.6% vs 58.2%; P < .001). However, no significant difference in survival rate was observed according to recipient age (P = .908). The survival rate of elderly recipients who received a graft from an elderly donor was significantly lower than those of the other groups (P < .001-.037). The mortality rate was significantly different among the groups (P < .001), and among the causes of death, surgical complications were most frequent cause in the elderly donor group (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

LDLT with the use of elderly donors >50 years of age could result in higher mortality rates than using younger donors. As such, elderly donor livers ideally should be matched with young recipients and attention concentrated on the surgical complications.

Optimizing repeat liver transplant graft utility through strategic matching of donor and recipient characteristics

Repeat liver transplantation (LT) is controversial because of inferior outcomes versus primary LT. A minimum 1-year expected post-re-LT survival of 50% has been proposed. We aimed to identify combinations of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), donor risk index (DRI), and recipient characteristics achieving this graft survival threshold. We identified re-LT recipients listed in the United States from March 2002 to January 2010 with > 90 days between primary LT and listing for re-LT. Using Cox regression, we estimated the expected probability of 1-year graft survival and identified combinations of MELD, DRI, and recipient characteristics attaining >50% expected 1-year graft survival. Re-LT recipients (n = 1418) had a median MELD of 26 and median age of 52 years. Expected 1-year graft survival exceeded 50% regardless of MELD or DRI in Caucasian recipients who were not infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) of all ages and Caucasian HCV-infected recipients <50 years old. As age increased in HCV-infected Caucasian and non-HCV-infected African American recipients, lower MELD scores or lower DRI grafts were needed to attain the graft survival threshold. As MELD scores increased in HCV-infected African American recipients, lower-DRI livers were required to achieve the graft survival threshold. Use of high-DRI livers (>1.44) in HCV-infected recipients with a MELD score > 26 at re-LT failed to achieve the graft survival threshold with recipient age ≥ 60 years (any race), as well as at age ≥ 50 years for Caucasians and at age < 50 years for African Americans. Strategic donor selection can achieve >50% expected 1-year graft survival even in high-risk re-LT recipients (HCV infected, older age, African American race, high MELD scores). Low-risk transplant recipients (age < 50 years, non-HCV-infected) can achieve the survival threshold with varying DRI and MELD scores.

Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation: current trends and future directions

Purpose of review

Important trends are being observed in pancreas transplantation in the USA. We will describe recent trends in simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK) transplantation related to immunosuppression, treatment of rejection, and transplantation for patients of advanced age and C-peptide positive diabetes.

Recent findings

Rates of pancreas transplantation have declined, despite improved pancreatic graft outcomes. Regarding immunosuppression, trends in SPK transplantation include T-cell depletion induction therapy, waning mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor use and steroid use in greater than 50% of pancreas transplant recipients with few patients undergoing late steroid weaning. Rejection of the pancreas may be discordant with the kidney after SPK and there is a greater appreciation of antibody-mediated rejection of the pancreas allograft. De-novo donor-specific antibody without graft dysfunction remains an active area of study, and the treatment for this condition is unclear. SPKs are being performed with greater frequency in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and in patients of advanced age, with exemplary results.

Summary

The current state of the art in SPK transplantation is yielding superb and improving results.

Hepatic retransplant: what have we learned?

Hepatic retransplant accounts for 5% to 15% of liver transplants in most series and is associated with significantly increased hospital costs and inferior patient survival when compared with primary liver transplant. Early retransplants are usually due to primary graft nonfunction or vascular thrombosis, whereas later retransplants are most commonly necessitated by chronic rejection or recurrent primary liver disease. Hepatic retransplant remains the sole option for survival in many patients facing allograft failure after liver transplant. With improved techniques to match retransplant candidates with appropriate donor grafts, it is hoped that the outcomes of retransplant will continue to improve in future.

An analysis of pancreas transplantation outcomes based on age groupings--an update of the UNOS database

INTRODUCTION

Previously, increasing age has been a part of the exclusion criteria used when determining eligibility for a pancreas transplant. However, the analysis of pancreas transplantation outcomes based on age groupings has largely been based on single-center reports.

METHODS

A UNOS database review of all adult pancreas and kidney-pancreas transplants between 1996 and 2012 was performed. Patients were divided into groups based on age categories: 18-29 (n = 1823), 30-39 (n = 7624), 40-49 (n = 7967), 50-59 (n = 3160), and ≥60 (n = 280). We compared survival outcomes and demographic variables between each age grouping.

RESULTS

Of the 20 854 pancreas transplants, 3440 of the recipients were 50 yr of age or above. Graft survival was consistently the greatest in adults 40-49 yr of age. Graft survival was least in adults age 18-29 at one-, three-, and five-yr intervals. At 10- and 15-yr intervals, graft survival was the poorest in adults >60 yr old. Patient survival and age were found to be inversely proportional; as the patient population's age increased, survival decreased.

CONCLUSION

Pancreas transplants performed in patients of increasing age demonstrate decreased patient and graft survival when compared to pancreas transplants in patients <50 yr of age.

Liver physiology and liver diseases in the elderly

The liver experiences various changes with aging that could affect clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with liver diseases. Both liver volume and blood flow decrease significantly with age. These changes and decreased cytochrome P450 activity can affect drug metabolism, increasing susceptibility to drug-induced liver injury. Immune responses against pathogens or neoplastic cells are lower in the elderly, although these individuals may be predisposed to autoimmunity through impairment of dendritic cell maturation and reduction of regulatory T cells. These changes in immune functions could alter the pathogenesis of viral hepatitis and autoimmune liver diseases, as well as the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Moreover, elderly patients have significantly decreased reserve functions of various organs, reducing their tolerability to treatments for liver diseases. Collectively, aged patients show various changes of the liver and other organs that could affect the clinical characteristics and management of liver diseases in these patients.

Impact of recipient age on whole organ pancreas transplantation

AIM

The goal of this study was to assess the impact of recipient age on post-transplant outcome.

METHODS

All pancreas transplants performed at Indiana University between 2003 and 2011 were reviewed. Demographic data were compared using standard chi-square and ANOVA testing. Standard Cox regression survival analysis was performed using a direct entry method for covariates.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 405) were divided by decade: <30 yr (n = 37), 30-39 (n = 109), 40-49 (n = 156), 50-59 (n = 85), and ≥ 60 yr of age (n = 18). Group demographics did not differ except for median ischemia time, which was between 7.0 and 8.5 h (p = 0.02). Early graft loss and one yr graft and patient survival were similar between the groups. Long-term patient survival demonstrated a trend toward decreased five-yr survival with increasing recipient age (p = NS). Graft survival at five yr by Cox regression was the lowest for the <30 yr group (74%), while all other groups were similar around 80% (p = NS).

CONCLUSION

No statistically significant differences in pancreas transplant outcomes were demonstrated when recipients were stratified by recipient age. These results suggest that older recipients can successfully undergo pancreas transplantation and expect five-yr outcomes similar to those seen in younger recipients.

A retrospective case-control study of intraoperative cardiac dysfunction in elderly patients (≥60 years) undergoing live donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The age range of patients accepted for the orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has widened. Concerns have arisen, therefore, about the ability of the hearts of elderly patients to manage these stressful conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate the preoperative echocardiographic findings and the intraoperative cardiac dysfunction among elderly cirrhotic recipients undergoing live donor OLT.

METHODS

In this retrospective case-control study we evaluated clinical data, echocardiography, and intraoperative right-sided heart hemodynamic measurements from 2007 and 2009 among 56 recipients aged at least 60 years who were matched for gender and the severity of cirrhosis. Intraoperative cardiac dysfunction was defined as a decreased left ventricular stroke work index despite an increase in right ventricular end diastolic volume index (RVEDVI) or pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP). We compared measurements at predetermined times during the anhepatic and neohepatic periods with those at baseline.

RESULTS

Older recipients (mean, 63 years; range, 60-69) showed significantly reduced early diastolic annular velocity (E'), early maximal ventricular filling velocity (E)/late filling velocity (A) ratio, and increased A on echocardiography versus younger recipients (mean 48 years; range, 31-56). We observed negative correlation between age and E' (r = -0.44; P < .001) and a positive correlation between age and E/E' (r = 0.31; P < .01). The incidence of intraoperative cardiac dysfunction did not differ between case and control groups with an increase of RVEDVI (11.4% vs 10.6%) or PAOP (27.2% vs 25.0%) during the anhepatic and neohepatic periods. A higher proportion of older recipients needed inotropic agents during OLT (60.7% vs 39.3%; P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

OLT patients of ar least 60 years of age may not show a greater incidence of cardiac dysfunction during OLT versus younger ones, although older recipients showed reduced diastolic function and more frequently required inotropic support.

Retransplantation in patients with hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection recurs universally after liver transplantation (LT) and fibrosis progression is accelerated in the graft. Retransplantation (RT) is the only therapeutic option to achieve long-term survival in patients with decompensated cirrhosis after LT. Patient and graft survival rates after RT are inferior to those after primary LT. It is generally accepted that severe hepatitis C recurrence (cholestatic hepatitis) and forms with rapid fibrosis progression have a poor survival after RT. However, it is not clear whether rapid fibrosis progression in the first graft will be followed by the same rate of fibrosis progression in the second graft. The use of prognostic scores as screening tools has shown an improvement in survival in HCV-infected patients after RT, reaching similar survival rates as those obtained in non HCV-infected patients. Moreover, these scores can identify candidates with a high risk of mortality in whom the use of a new organ would be unreasonable. Prevention of severe hepatitis C recurrence could be the first step to avoid RT. Thus, antiviral treatment on the waiting list (if possible) and early identification and treatment of patients with severe hepatitis C recurrence may be a good strategy to avoid RT. In addition, active management of factors which can accelerate fibrosis progression (donor age, post-transplant diabetes, high dose of corticosteroids) might reduce the incidence of severe forms of hepatitis C recurrence.

Pre-emptive antiviral therapy in living donor liver transplantation for hepatitis C: observation based on a single-center experience

Reports of large series in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) are scarce. Between 1996 and 2008, 105 LDLTs were performed at the University of Tokyo for HCV. Rapid induction of antiviral treatment with interferon (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) was attempted per protocol regardless of the clinical presentation of recurrent HCV (pre-emptive treatment approach). Treatment was continued for 12 months after serum HCV-RNA became negative (ETR: end-of-treatment response) and judged as a sustained viral response (SVR) after another 6 months of negative results without treatment. A fixed treatment period was not defined unless an ETR was achieved (no-stopping approach). Flexible dose adjustments were allowed. Ninety-five patients were eligible for pre-emptive therapy. Forty-three (45%) patients experienced an ETR, and 32 (34%) achieved SVR. Nonadherence to full-dose INF and RBV had little impact on the viral response. Evaluation using the Kaplan-Meier method to incorporate the cumulative time-dependent nature of the no-stopping approach estimated SVR rate at 53% by the fifth year. Survival rate at 5 years was 79% for the HCV recipients and did not differ significantly from our non-HCV series. In LDLT for HCV, pre-emptive IFN-RBV-based treatment with the application of no-stopping approach is feasible and effective.