Plasma cell infiltrates in polyomavirus nephropathy

Deciphering the Complexity of the Immune Cell Landscape in Kidney Allograft Rejection

While the Banff classification dichotomizes kidney allograft rejection based on the localization of the cells in the different compartments of the cortical kidney tissue [schematically interstitium for T cell mediated rejection (TCMR) and glomerular and peritubular capillaries for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR)], there is a growing evidences that subtyping the immune cells can help refine prognosis prediction and treatment tailoring, based on a better understanding of the pathophysiology of kidney allograft rejection. In the last few years, multiplex IF techniques and automatic counting systems as well as transcriptomics studies (bulk, single-cell and spatial techniques) have provided invaluable clues to further decipher the complex puzzle of rejection. In this review, we aim to better describe the inflammatory infiltrates that occur during the course of kidney transplant rejection (active AMR, chronic active AMR and acute and chronic active TCMR). We also discuss minor components of the inflammatory response (mastocytes, eosinophils, neutrophils, follicular dendritic cells). We conclude by discussing whether the over simplistic dichotomy between AMR and TCMR, currently used in clinical routine, remains relevant given the great diversity of immune actors involved in rejections.

Polyomavirus nephropathy: diagnosis, histologic features, and differentiation from acute rejection

Polyomaviruses, particularly BK virus, are ubiquitous latent infections that may reactivate with immunosuppression during kidney transplantation, resulting in polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN). The levels of viruria and viremia serve as tools for screening and making a presumptive diagnosis of PVN, respectively, while a definitive diagnosis requires a kidney biopsy. There are histologic classifications of PVN based on the extent of tubular cell viral infection, interstitial fibrosis, and interstitial inflammation. These classifications correlate to some degree with graft function and loss, aiding in determining treatment efficacy and prognostication. PVN has histologic overlap with acute cell-mediated rejection, making the differential diagnosis challenging, although there are suggestive features for these different causes of graft dysfunction. This article reviews the diagnosis, histologic findings, and classifications of PVN, and discusses how to differentiate viral nephropathy from acute rejection.

The Implications of B-lineage Cells in Kidney Allografts

The majority of cells comprising the inflammatory infiltrates in kidney allografts undergoing acute and/or chronic rejection are typically T cells and monocyte/macrophages with B cells, plasma cells, and eosinophils accounting for <5%. In a significant minority of biopsies, B lineage cells (B cells and/or plasma cells) may be found more abundantly. Although plasma cell infiltrates tend to be more diffuse, B cells tend to aggregate into nodules that may mature into tertiary lymphoid organs. Given the ability to target B cells with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies and plasma cells with proteasome inhibitors and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, it is increasingly important to determine the significance of such infiltrates. Both cell types are potential effectors of rejection, but both also have a tolerizing potential. B cell infiltrates have been associated with steroid resistance and reduced graft survival in some studies but not in others, and their presence should not prompt automatic depletional therapy. Plasma cell-rich infiltrates tend to occur later, may be associated with cell-mediated and/or antibody-mediated rejection, and portend an adverse outcome. Viral infection and malignancy must be ruled out. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the appropriateness of specific therapy when B cells and/or plasma cells are found. No strong therapeutic recommendations can be made at this time.

Colon perforation due to antigenemia-negative cytomegalovirus gastroenteritis after liver transplantation: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a critical complication after solid-organ transplantation. The CMV antigenemia (AG) test is useful for monitoring CMV infection. Although the AG-positivity rate in CMV gastroenteritis is known to be low at onset, almost all cases become positive during the disease course. We treated a patient with transverse colon perforation due to AG-negative CMV gastroenteritis, following a living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

CASE SUMMARY

The patient was a 52-year-old woman with decompensated liver cirrhosis as a result of autoimmune hepatitis who underwent a blood-type compatible LDLT with her second son as the donor. On day 20 after surgery, upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy (GE) revealed multiple gastric ulcers and transverse colon ulcers. The biopsy tissue immunostaining confirmed a diagnosis of CMV gastroenteritis. On day 28 after surgery, an abdominal computed tomography revealed transverse colon perforation, and simple lavage and drainage were performed along with an urgent ileostomy. Although the repeated remission and aggravation of CMV gastroenteritis and acute cellular rejection made the control of immunosuppression difficult, the upper GE eventually revealed an improvement in the gastric ulcers, and the biopsy samples were negative for CMV. The CMV-AG test remained negative, therefore, we had to evaluate the status of the CMV infection on the basis of the clinical symptoms and GE.

CONCLUSION

This case report suggests a monitoring method that could be useful for AG-negative CMV gastroenteritis after a solid-organ transplantation.

BK polyomavirus in solid organ transplantation-Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

The present AST-IDCOP guidelines update information on BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection, replication, and disease, which impact kidney transplantation (KT), but rarely non-kidney solid organ transplantation (SOT). As pretransplant risk factors in KT donors and recipients presently do not translate into clinically validated measures regarding organ allocation, antiviral prophylaxis, or screening, all KT recipients should be screened for BKPyV-DNAemia monthly until month 9, and then every 3 months until 2 years posttransplant. Extended screening after 2 years may be considered in pediatric KT. Stepwise immunosuppression reduction is recommended for KT patients with plasma BKPyV-DNAemia of >1000 copies/mL sustained for 3 weeks or increasing to >10 000 copies/mL reflecting probable and presumptive BKPyV-associated nephropathy, respectively. Reducing immunosuppression is also the primary intervention for biopsy-proven BKPyV-associated nephropathy. Hence, allograft biopsy is not required for treating BKPyV-DNAemic patients with baseline renal function. Despite virological rationales, proper randomized clinical trials are lacking to generally recommend treatment by switching from tacrolimus to cyclosporine-A, from mycophenolate to mTOR inhibitors or leflunomide or by the adjunct use of intravenous immunoglobulins, leflunomide, or cidofovir. Fluoroquinolones are not recommended for prophylaxis or therapy. Retransplantation after allograft loss due to BKPyV nephropathy can be successful if BKPyV-DNAemia is definitively cleared, independent of failed allograft nephrectomy.

Clinicopathological features and outcomes of kidney allografts in plasma cell-rich acute rejection: A case series

Plasma cell-rich acute rejection (PCAR) is a rare type of acute rejection in renal transplantation. Despite aggressive immunotherapy, approximately 40-60% of patients develop graft loss within 1 year after an episode of PCAR. However, the reason for this outcome remains obscure. This study retrospectively identified six patients with PCAR diagnosed between 2009 and 2015 at a single university hospital. Clinicopathological data were collected. Five of the six patients were male, and mean age at the onset of PCAR was 49.0 ±14.5 years. None of the patients showed overall poor adherence to medication. Mean time to diagnosis was 302 ±234 days post-transplantation. All patients had preceding or concurrent viral infection. Four patients developed PCAR alone and two patients developed PCAR with antibody-mediated rejection. One of the six patients showed both severe tubulointerstitial and microvascular inflammation (total of Banff tubulitis 't' + interstitial inflammation 'i' + glomerulitis 'g' + peritubular capillaritis 'ptc' scores >10). This patient had progressive worsening of graft function and re-initiated dialysis at 74 months after a PCAR episode. In addition, three of the six patients had long-term recurrence of PCAR. With the recurrence of PCAR, patients with both moderate tubulointerstitial and microvascular inflammation (total of Banff 't' + 'i' + 'g' + 'ptc' scores >6) had progressive worsening of graft function. In summary, the present results suggest that concurrent moderate to severe tubulointerstitial and microvascular inflammation may lead to poor outcomes of graft function after a PCAR episode.

Granulomatous inflammation in BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy

Evolving BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) is characterized by tubulointerstitial inflammation that closely resembles acute T-cell-mediated allograft rejection if tubulitis is significant. The cellular composition of the inflammation varies during the course of BKPyVAN, and clusters of plasma cells may herald resolution of the infection. Less commonly, BKPyVAN can present with a predominance of histiocytes and granuloma formation. Granulomatous interstitial nephritis is uncommon in biopsies of either native or transplant kidneys. In both settings, this distinctive type of inflammatory response requires a systematic approach with careful clinicopathological assessment to determine its etiology. We present three patients with granulomatous BKPyVAN in the first year post-transplantation. These allograft biopsies at 4, 6, and 12 months post-transplant exemplify spontaneously resolving BKPyVAN, resolving infection after immunosuppression reduction, and early BKPyVAN, respectively. In immunosuppressed patients, BKPyVAN should be added to the relatively broad differential diagnosis of granulomatous tubulointerstitial nephritis.

Histological Evolution of BK Virus-Associated Nephropathy: Importance of Integrating Clinical and Pathological Findings

Long-term clinicopathological studies of BK-associated nephropathy (PyVAN) are not available. We studied 206 biopsies (71 patients), followed 3.09 ± 1.46 years after immunosuppression reduction. The biopsy features (% immunostain for PyV large T ag + staining and inflammation ± acute rejection) were correlated with viral load dynamics and serum creatinine to define the clinicopathological status (PyVCPS). Incidence of acute rejection was 28% in the second biopsy and 50% subsequently (25% mixed T cell-mediated allograft rejection (TCMR) + antibody-mediated allograft rejection (AMR); rejection overall affected 38% of patients (>50% AMR). Graft loss was 15.4% (0.8-5.3 years after PyVAN); 76% had complete viral clearance (mean 28 weeks). The only predictors of graft loss were acute rejection (TCMR p = 0.008, any type p = 0.07), and increased "t" and "ci" in the second biopsy (p = 0.006 and 0.048). Higher peak viremia correlated with poorer viral clearance (p = 0.002). Presumptive and proven PyVAN had similar presentation, evolution, and outcome. Late PyVAN (>2 years, 9.8%) justifies BK viremia evaluation at any point with graft dysfunction and/or biopsy evaluation. This study describes the histological evolution of PyVAN and corresponding clinicopathological correlations. Although the pathological features overall reflect the viral and immunological interactions, the PyVAN course remains difficult to predict based on any single feature. Appropriate clinical management requires repeat biopsies and determination of the PyVCPS at relevant time points, for corresponding personalized immunosuppression adjustment.

BK nephropathy in the native kidneys of patients with organ transplants: Clinical spectrum of BK infection

Nephropathy secondary to BK virus, a member of the Papoviridae family of viruses, has been recognized for some time as an important cause of allograft dysfunction in renal transplant recipients. In recent times, BK nephropathy (BKN) of the native kidneys has being increasingly recognized as a cause of chronic kidney disease in patients with solid organ transplants, bone marrow transplants and in patients with other clinical entities associated with immunosuppression. In such patients renal dysfunction is often attributed to other factors including nephrotoxicity of medications used to prevent rejection of the transplanted organs. Renal biopsy is required for the diagnosis of BKN. Quantitation of the BK viral load in blood and urine are surrogate diagnostic methods. The treatment of BKN is based on reduction of the immunosuppressive medications. Several compounds have shown antiviral activity, but have not consistently shown to have beneficial effects in BKN. In addition to BKN, BK viral infection can cause severe urinary bladder cystitis, ureteritis and urinary tract obstruction as well as manifestations in other organ systems including the central nervous system, the respiratory system, the gastrointestinal system and the hematopoietic system. BK viral infection has also been implicated in tumorigenesis. The spectrum of clinical manifestations from BK infection and infection from other members of the Papoviridae family is widening. Prevention and treatment of BK infection and infections from other Papovaviruses are subjects of intense research.

BK Virus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplantation: An Approach Proposal and Update on Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Treatment

BK virus belongs to Polyomaviridae family; it causes 95% of nephropathy cases related to polyomavirus, with the other 5% caused by JC virus. Nephropathy jeopardizes graft function, causing a premature failure of the graft in 1%-10% of patients with kidney transplants. Nowadays, antiviral effective treatment is unknown, which is why blood and urine screening of renal transplantation patients has become the most important recommendation to guide the decrease of immunosuppression, and the only proven method to decrease poor outcomes. Different interventions, such as cidofovir, leflunomide, fluoroquinolones, and intravenous immunoglobulin, have been attempted with no improvement at all. This review aims to summarize the most relevant features of BK virus, historical issues, transmission mechanisms, risk factors, and therapeutic interventions.

A Preliminary Study Into the Significance of Intrarenal Reflux in BK Virus Nephropathy After Kidney Transplantation

Background

The BK virus typically colonizes the lower urinary tract and is the causative agent in BK virus nephropathy (BKVN), which can progress to allograft dysfunction and graft loss. Urinary reflux in kidney allografts is induced by vesicoureteral reflux or disturbances in intrarenal reflux (IRR), believed to be associated with BKVN. This study was designed to elucidate the relationship between BKVN and IRR.

Methods

We examined 30 renal transplant recipients histologically diagnosed with BKVN using anti-Simian virus 40 immunohistochemistry and 60 clinically matched control recipients. The BKVN patients were divided into stable (n = 12) and progressive (n = 18) groups according to allograft kidney function 1 year after diagnosis. Histological rejection scores according to the pathological classification of rejection in renal allografts (Banff classification), histological BKVN stages, and histological polyomavirus load levels (pvl) proposed by the Banff working group were evaluated. The IRR was quantified by histological reflux scores defined with retention and reflux of immunostained Tamm-Horsfall protein in renal tubules and glomeruli.

Results

Higher reflux scores were observed in the BKVN group compared with that in the control group. No differences in clinical parameters were observed between the BKVN and control groups. Reflux scores and pvl were significantly higher in the progressive group than in the stable BKVN group with no significant difference in BK stage observed between groups. Reflux scores were found to be significantly correlated with pvl.

Conclusions

Our preliminary study suggested that IRR might be a predisposing and prognostic factor in BKVN.

Clinical and pathological features of kidney transplant patients with concurrent polyomavirus nephropathy and rejection-associated endarteritis

AIM: To describe the clinicopathologic features of concurrent polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) and endarteritis due to rejection in renal allografts.

METHODS: We searched our electronic records database for cases with transplant kidney biopsies demonstrating features of both PVN and acute rejection (AR). PVN was defined by the presence of typical viral cytopathic effect on routine sections and positive polyomavirus SV40 large-T antigen immunohistochemistry. AR was identified by endarteritis (v1 by Banff criteria). All cases were subjected to chart review in order to determine clinical presentation, treatment course and outcomes. Outcomes were recorded with a length of follow-up of at least one year or time to nephrectomy.

RESULTS: Of 94 renal allograft recipients who developed PVN over an 11-year period at our institution, we identified 7 (7.4%) with viral cytopathic changes, SV40 large T antigen staining, and endarteritis in the same biopsy specimen, indicative of concurrent PVN and AR. Four arose after reduction of immunosuppression (IS) (for treatment of PVN in 3 and tuberculosis in 1), and 3 patients had no decrease of IS before developing simultaneous concurrent disease. Treatment consisted of reduced oral IS and leflunomide for PVN, and anti-rejection therapy. Three of 4 patients who developed endarteritis in the setting of reduced IS lost their grafts to rejection. All 3 patients with simultaneous PVN and endarteritis cleared viremia and were stable at 1 year of follow up. Patients with endarteritis and PVN arising in a background of reduced IS had more severe rejection and poorer outcome.

CONCLUSION: Concurrent PVN and endarteritis may be more frequent than is currently appreciated and may occur with or without prior reduction of IS.

Intragraft Blood Dendritic Cell Antigen-1-Positive Myeloid Dendritic Cells Increase during BK Polyomavirus-Associated Nephropathy

Although both polyomavirus infection and T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) are characterized by tubulointerstitial inflammation in the renal allograft, these conditions are treated with opposing therapeutic regimens. To gain more insight into the differences between antiviral and alloimmune responses, we performed a case-control study, in which we immunophenotyped the inflammatory infiltrates in renal biopsy specimens with BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) and specimens with TCMR. Compared with TCMR, BKPyVAN was diagnosed later after transplantation; therefore, BKPyVAN specimens showed more chronic damage than TCMR specimens showed. However, TCMR and BKPyVAN specimens had comparable levels of tubulointerstitial inflammation. Adjustment for confounders in various multivariable models revealed more blood dendritic cell antigen-1(+) (BDCA-1(+)) myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs) present during BKPyVAN (odds ratio, 2.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 5.16; P=0.04) than during TCMR. Double immunostaining for SV40 and BDCA-1 showed that, during BKPyVAN, BDCA-1(+) mDCs localized in proximity to the polyomavirus-infected tubular epithelial cells. We ensured that time of biopsy after transplantation was not a confounding factor by including additional specimens with late TCMR and protocol biopsy specimens matched for biopsy time. These additional specimens showed amounts of BDCA-1(+) mDCs comparable with amounts in the early TCMR specimens. These results suggest that BDCA-1(+) mDCs, known to be involved in the antiviral immune response during various viral infections, might have a pivotal role during BKPyVAN infection in the grafted kidney.

BK Virus-Associated Nephropathy with Plasma Cell-Rich Infiltrates Treated by Bortezomib-Based Regimen

BK virus infection accompanied with plasma cell-rich infiltrates is a dilemma in renal transplant recipients. One young female patient diagnosed as BK virus-associated nephropathy with plasma cell-rich infiltrates at 16 months after renal transplant was treated with bortezomib and a sequential immuno-suppressive protocol of tacrolimus combined with leflunomide. After a short period of reduction, her serum creatinine increased slowly with stable BK viruria. The patient underwent repeat biopsy. The histologic changes showed a decrease in plasma cells and CD20+ cells in the allograft, but the other mononuclear cells showed no difference from the first biopsy. The immunosuppressive protocol was converted to tacrolimus combined with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium. Her serum creatinine decreased gradually during 6 months of follow-up. We speculate that bortezomib can be used in BK virus-associated nephropathy accompanied with plasma cell-rich infiltrates, and this effect might be mediated through a decrease of plasma cells and CD20+ cells in the allograft. The dosage and time of therapy need to be explored in the future; additional studies of large samples are needed.

Polyclonal gammopathy after BKV infection in HSCT recipient: a novel trigger for plasma cells replication?

Background

BK polyomavirus infects most of the general population. However, its clinical manifestations are almost exclusively seen in immunocompromised patients, particularly in kidney and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients.

Case presentation

A 15-y-old female suffering from common B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The patient had reactivation of BKPyV infection and developed an haemorrhagic cystitis. Three months after transplant, BKPyV viremia and viruria increased and she developed a severe nephropathy associated to a polyclonal gammopathy with high levels of isolated IgM.

Conclusion

This case report describes a rare and unexpected polyclonal gammopathy developed during a polyomavirus-associated nephropathy confirmed by immunohistochemical and laboratory analyses.

Renal Infections

This review discusses the various gross and histologic findings seen in renal infections due to bacteria, viruses, fungi, and mycobacteria. It is crucially important to separate infectious processes in the kidney from other inflammatory or neoplastic processes, as this will have a major impact on therapy. We describe the diagnostic features of renal infections with a specific focus on the differential diagnosis and other processes that may mimic infection. The topics discussed include acute bacterial pyelonephritis, chronic bacterial pyelonephritis, xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis, malacoplakia, viral infections in the kidney, fungal pyelonephritis and mycobacterial infection of the kidney.

Pathology of resolving polyomavirus-associated nephropathy

Control of polyomavirus BK (BKV) is achieved by reducing immunosuppression allowing an effective BKV-specific T-cell response. The morphology of resolving BKV-associated nephropathy (PyVAN) has not been systematically investigated. Ninety-nine surveillance biopsies of 35 patients with BKV viremia treated exclusively by immunosuppression reduction were scored according to Banff criteria and grouped relative to BKV viremia as pre-, increasing, decreasing and post-BKV viremia. Thirty-four of 35 patients (97%) cleared BKV viremia after a median of 9 months posttransplantation. The tubulitis score, extent of tubules with intraepithelial lymphocytes, and interstitial inflammation significantly increased from the time of increasing to decreasing viremia. Tubulointerstitial inflammation, to a lower extent, persisted after clearance. The number of SV40+ tubules correlated with the BKV load in plasma, but SV40 immunohistochemistry was frequently negative (60%). During decreasing viremia, 31% of PyVAN cases were plasma cell-rich and 40% showed tubular HLA-DR expression. Compared to baseline 1 month posttransplantation, allograft function remained stable or improved in 29/35 patients (83%) after a median follow-up of 48 months. Within 1 year after clearance of BKV viremia, clinical rejection occurred in 2/35 patients (6%). Our data suggest that resolving PyVAN is typically characterized by a self-limiting acute interstitial nephritis, morphologically indistinguishable from interstitial rejection.

BK viremia and polyomavirus nephropathy in 352 kidney transplants; risk factors and potential role of mTOR inhibition

Background

Polyomavirus BK nephropathy (PyVAN) remains an important cause of early graft dysfunction and graft loss in kidney transplantation.

Methods

In this retrospective, single centre cohort study we studied the incidence and outcome of BK viral infection in 352 patients transplanted in 2008–2011.

Results

During follow-up viral replication was detected in 48 patients (13.6%); 22 patients (6.2%) had biopsy proven PyVAN.

In multivariate logistic regression analyses risk factors for BK-viremia were lack of enrolment into randomized controlled trials (RCTs), biopsy proven acute rejections, cytomegaly virus (CMV) serostatus of both donor and recipient and previous transplantation.

In patients without PyVAN reduction or switch of immunosuppression was associated with rapid viral clearance and stable graft function. In contrast, in most patients with PyVAN graft function deteriorated and 5 patients prematurely lost their allograft. Switch of immunosuppression to a low dose cyclosporine plus mTOR inhibitor based regimen in patients with PyVAN was safe, well tolerated and tended to be associated with a better short-term outcome in terms of graft function compared to reduction of existing immunosuppression alone.

Conclusions

With the lack of licensed anti-polyoma viral drugs reduction or conversion of immunosuppression remains the mainstay of therapy in patients with PyVAN. The combination of low dose cyclosporine plus mTOR inhibition appears to be safe and warrants further investigation.

Pathology of resolving polyomavirus-associated nephropathy

Control of polyomavirus BK (BKV) is achieved by reducing immunosuppression allowing an effective BKV-specific T-cell response. The morphology of resolving BKV-associated nephropathy (PyVAN) has not been systematically investigated. Ninety-nine surveillance biopsies of 35 patients with BKV viremia treated exclusively by immunosuppression reduction were scored according to Banff criteria and grouped relative to BKV viremia as pre-, increasing, decreasing and post-BKV viremia. Thirty-four of 35 patients (97%) cleared BKV viremia after a median of 9 months posttransplantation. The tubulitis score, extent of tubules with intraepithelial lymphocytes, and interstitial inflammation significantly increased from the time of increasing to decreasing viremia. Tubulointerstitial inflammation, to a lower extent, persisted after clearance. The number of SV40+ tubules correlated with the BKV load in plasma, but SV40 immunohistochemistry was frequently negative (60%). During decreasing viremia, 31% of PyVAN cases were plasma cell-rich and 40% showed tubular HLA-DR expression. Compared to baseline 1 month posttransplantation, allograft function remained stable or improved in 29/35 patients (83%) after a median follow-up of 48 months. Within 1 year after clearance of BKV viremia, clinical rejection occurred in 2/35 patients (6%). Our data suggest that resolving PyVAN is typically characterized by a self-limiting acute interstitial nephritis, morphologically indistinguishable from interstitial rejection.

BK polyomavirus in solid organ transplantation

The human BK polyomavirus (BKV) is the major cause of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PyVAN) putting 1-15% of kidney transplant patients at risk of premature allograft failure, but is less common in other solid organ transplants. Because effective antiviral therapies are lacking, screening kidney transplant patients for BKV replication in urine and blood has become the key recommendation to guide the reduction of immunosuppression in patients with BKV viremia. This intervention allows for expanding BKV-specific cellular immune responses, curtailing of BKV replication in the graft, and clearance of BKV viremia in 70-90% patients. Postintervention rejection episodes occur in 8-12%, most of which are corticosteroid responsive. Late diagnosis is faced with irreversible functional decline, poor treatment response, and graft loss. Adjunct therapies such as cidofovir, leflunomide and intravenous immunoglobulins have been used, but the benefit is not documented in trials. Retransplantation after PyVAN is largely successful, but requires close monitoring for recurrent BKV viremia.

Predominance of TH2 cells and plasma cells in polyoma virus nephropathy: a role for humoral immunity?

The differential diagnosis of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and BK-virus nephropathy (BKVN) in renal transplant biopsies is notoriously difficult. Therefore, attempts were made to differentiate between the two by characterizing the immune cell infiltrate. Using immunohistochemistry, the distribution of immune cell (sub)populations such as CD4(+) T helper (TH), TH1, TH2, CD8(+) cytotoxic T cells, regulatory T cells, B cells, plasma cells and follicular dendritic cells was determined in a total of 38 renal biopsy specimens. In addition, the expression of the HLA class I antigen presentation machinery (APM) components was investigated. In general, the frequency of T cells was higher than B cells, and TH cells outnumbered cytotoxic T cells with a predominance of TH2 over TH1 cells. In BKVN, a significantly higher number of plasma cells was observed (P = .028), and interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy was more pronounced in BKVN (P = .007) compared to TCMR. The expression of components of the HLA class I APM was not affected by the infection with BK virus compared to TCMR. These findings indicate a TH2 shift in renal transplants in the context of alloreactive and virus-induced inflammation maybe as a consequence of immunosuppression, which usually targets T cell reaction. The predominance of plasma cells might underline an important role of humoral immunity in BKVN. Moreover, BK virus does not seem to modulate the expression of HLA class I APM as a strategy of immune evasion.

Rotavirus infection in adult small intestine allografts: a clinicopathological study of a cohort of 23 patients

Rotavirus enteritis (RVE) is increasingly recognized as a cause of small bowel allograft dysfunction but its significance in adult patients is unknown. We have studied 23 adult small bowel transplant patients aged 19.8-59 years (mean = 38.2 years), who were presented with diarrhea and tested positive for rotavirus by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methods. Serial follow-up biopsies, as well as clinical data, are documented and analyzed. These patients were followed up for an average of 168 days (range 33-534 days). Mean time of rotavirus diagnosis from transplant day was 794 days (range 38-2907 days). Self-limited diarrhea lasting 6-13 days (mean = 9 days) was the main presentation. Sixteen (69.6%) patients developed acute cellular rejection either concurrently with (i.e. six patients) or after (10 patients) RVE, often characterized by prominent mucosal plasmacytosis at an average of 22 days (range 0-94 days) from the day RVE was diagnosed. One-third of patients with acute rejection (i.e. five out of 16) required muromonab-CD3 rescue therapy. Two patients experienced graft loss (one from chronic rejection, another from sepsis). Rotavirus infection is a cause of diarrhea in adult small bowel transplant patients. The infection appeared to trigger cellular rejection that was associated with mucosal plasmacytosis, and sometimes required aggressive rescue therapy.