Conversion to tacrolimus once-daily from ciclosporin in stable kidney transplant recipients: a multicenter study

Early Conversion to Tacrolimus Vs Cyclosporine Continuation in Normally Functioning Kidney Allograft: A Single-Center Study

This study evaluated the effectiveness of early pre-emptive conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in kidney transplant patients with normal graft function and in the absence of adverse effects of the initial cyclosporine. A historical cohort study of 166 patients who received deceased-donor kidney transplant between 2011 to 2017 was conducted. All the patients had been treated with cyclosporine (Sandimmune®) during their immediate post-transplantation period. At the time of hospital discharge, the patients were divided into 2 groups: patients with continued cyclosporine (Sandimmune®) treatment (n = 125) and the patients whose treatments converted from cyclosporine to tacrolimus (Prograf®) at discharge (n = 41). The 1-year graft function (p = 0.074), acute rejection (p = 0.566), and graft loss (p = 0.566) were not significantly different between two groups. The patients on tacrolimus had lower levels of cholesterol (p = 0.002) and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.015). The long-term follow-up showed no significant difference in graft loss (p = 0.566). The patients received tacrolimus had higher all-cause mortality within the first year posttransplantation (p = 0.002) as well as long-term follow-up (p = 0.001). The continuation of initial cyclosporine might be a good option when the graft function is acceptable and the adverse effects are absent.

A non-randomized trial of conversion from ciclosporin and tacrolimus to tacrolimus MR4 in stable long-term kidney transplant recipients: Graft function and influences of ABCB1 genotypes

In this non-randomized extension study of a randomized controlled trial we converted 87 stable long-term kidney transplant recipients (KTR) from either ciclosporin (CSA, n = 28) or tacrolimus (TAC, n = 59) to TAC modified release (TAC MR4) to study the characteristics of TAC trough levels after conversion with the primary endpoint graft function after 12 months. TAC MR4 consumption was calculated by level-to-dose ([ng/mL]/[mg/d]) and concentration-to-dose ([mg/kg])/d) ratios. Influences of ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (2677G>T/A, 1236C>T, 3435C>T) on TAC metabolism were studied. Graft function of KTR converted from CSA to TAC MR4 significantly declined over 12 months, and remained unchanged after conversion from TAC to TAC MR4. Conversion from CSA to TAC MR4 resulted in supra therapeutic- and conversion from TAC to TAC MR4 in low trough levels. We could not find associations of ABCB1 genotypes and TAC MR4 trough levels. Adverse events and errors with TAC/TAC MR4 intake were common. In stable long-term KTR conversion from TAC to TAC MR4 is feasible. For conversion from CSA we suggest a rate of 1:40 for a rough estimation of TAC MR4 target doses.

Conversion From Cyclosporine to Once-Daily Tacrolimus on 50:1 mg Basis: A Short-Term Pilot Study

OBJECTIVES

In addition to graft dysfunction, renal transplant recipients on cyclosporine may be switched to tacrolimus to reduce its drug-related secondary clinical effects and undesirable cosmetic side effects. However, the dose level of once-daily tacrolimus for these patients has yet to be established. The objective of this prospective study was to confirm the safety of converting stable renal transplant recipients on cyclosporine to once-daily tacrolimus at a 50:1 mg ratio.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our study enrolled 17 patients receiving cyclosporine who were observed for 3 months. Graft biopsies did not reveal any acute rejection, and the conversion ratio to once-daily tacrolimus was 50:1 mg. Dose adjustments were made to achieve a target tacrolimus trough concentration of 3 to 5 ng/mL at 2 weeks, and graft biopsies were taken after the 3-month observation period.

RESULTS

Dose adjustment was required in 7 recipients (41.2%) within 3 months of conversion. None of the recipients had acute cellular rejection or C4d deposition, and the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate of 38.7 ± 11.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline was significantly improved to 42.0 ± 10.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 at month 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Although recipients of renal transplant can be forced to discontinue cyclosporine administration due to undesirable adverse effects, our study showed that a once-daily dose of tacrolimus may be safe when administered at a conversion ratio of 50:1.

Randomized, Open-Label, Phase IV, Korean Study of Kidney Transplant Patients Converting From Cyclosporine to Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus Plus Standard- or Reduced-Dose Corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

This 24-week, multicenter, randomized, exploratory, comparative, open-label, phase-IV study assessed the safety and efficacy of prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-T) with reduced-dose versus standard-dose corticosteroids in stable kidney transplant recipients in Korea after converting from cyclosporine-based therapy.

METHODS

At baseline, patients were converted from cyclosporine-based to PR-T-based immunosuppression and randomized (1:1) to receive either corticosteroids maintained at prestudy dose (standard-dose group) or tapered from week 4 to 50% of the prestudy dose by week 12 (reduced-dose group). Patients were seen at baseline and weeks 1, 4, 12, and 24. The primary endpoint was change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (Modification-of-Diet-in-Renal-Disease-4) between baseline and week 24. Secondary endpoints included either acute rejection or patient-reported satisfaction with PR-T. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded.

RESULTS

Overall, 150 patients were randomized into a reduced-dose group (n = 73) and a standard-dose group (n = 77). At week 24, mean ± standard deviation for corticosteroid dose was 2.5 ± 0.9 mg and 5.0 ± 1.3 mg, respectively. Mean change in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline to week 24 was +1.5 ± 9.1 mL/min/1.73 m² (P = .1567) and +3.4 ± 10.6 mL/min/1.73 m² (P = .0065), respectively, and not significantly different between groups. There were no acute rejection episodes. Most respondents (>70%) considered PR-T more convenient than cyclosporine. AE incidence was similar between groups. The most common AEs experienced by ≥3% of patients in either treatment group were gastrointestinal events (20.8% and 28.6% of patients receiving reduced- and standard-dose corticosteroids, respectively). Most AEs in both treatment groups were mild or moderate in severity.

CONCLUSION

Renal function was maintained following conversion from cyclosporine to PR-T, irrespective of corticosteroid regimen; PR-T enables reduced corticosteroid dosage.

Clinical experience of conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus prolonged-release in stabilized kidney transplant patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The CONCERTO study results showing the beneficial effects of conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus prolonged-release (tacrolimus PR) in stabilised patients after kidney transplantation, were first published in 2011. This communication describes our first experience of conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus PR in stabilised kidney transplant patients. The aim was to determine whether it could be used in routine clinical practice in the Czech and Slovak Republics.

METHODS

Evaluation was carried out at five transplantation centres in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. In all participating Centres, the drug conversion was conducted according to the ICH/GCP guidelines. A total of 104 patients stabilised after kidney transplantation were converted from maintenance therapy with cyclosporine to treatment with tacrolimus PR. The data were collected 26 weeks after the switch. The primary endpoint was change in kidney graft function measured from the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The effect of conversion on blood pressure, metabolic parameters and cosmetic changes was also recorded. Special attention was paid to the safety and tolerability of treatment with tacrolimus PR.

RESULTS

GFR increased after six months by 10 % (P = 0.040). In addition a significant decrease in serum creatinine and triglycerides level was found together with major reduction in the incidence and severity of gingival hyperplasia and hirsutism. 3% of patients developed new onset of diabetes mellitus. Otherwise, the switch was very well-tolerated, without serious adverse events or acute rejections.

CONCLUSION

Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus PR was shown to be a safe therapeutic alternative with patient benefits.

Determination of cell uptake pathways for tumor inhibitor lysyl oxidase propeptide

The lysyl oxidase propeptide (LOX-PP) is derived from pro-lysyl oxidase (Pro-LOX) by extracellular biosynthetic proteolysis. LOX-PP inhibits breast and prostate cancer xenograft tumor growth and has tumor suppressor activity. Although, several intracellular targets and molecular mechanisms of action of LOX-PP have been identified, LOX-PP uptake pathways have not been reported. Here we demonstrate that the major uptake pathway for recombinant LOX-PP (rLOX-PP) is PI3K-dependent macropinocytosis in PWR-1E, PC3, SCC9, MDA-MB-231 cell lines. A secondary pathway appears to be dynamin- and caveola dependent. The ionic properties of highly basic rLOX-PP provide buffering capacity at both high and low pHs. We suggest that the buffering capacity of rLOX-PP, which serves to limit endosomal acidification, sustains PI3K-dependent macropinocytosis in endosomes which in turn is likely to facilitate LOX-PP endosomal escape into the cytoplasm and its observed interactions with cytoplasmic targets and nuclear uptake.

Beneficial effect of belatacept on health-related quality of life and perceived side effects: results from the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT trials

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes are increasingly incorporated in drug evaluation trials. Whether new immunosuppressive drugs result in an improved health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and a reduced side effect experiences remains unknown. Moreover, the relationship between HRQoL and kidney function has never been investigated in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

Using the BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT trials, we investigated the following: (a) evolution of HRQoL, assessed by the Medical Outcomes Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in the first 3 years (baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months) after kidney transplantation; (b) association among kidney function (chronic kidney disease stage), HRQoL, and patient-reported side effects (Modified Transplant Symptom Occurrence and Symptom Distress Scale-59R; BENEFIT trial only); and (c) impact of belatacept and cyclosporine on side effect experience and HRQoL.

RESULTS

In the BENEFIT trial, all subjects reported clinically meaningful improvements compared with baseline and returned to general population scores, both for physical composite score (PCS) and mental composite score Short Form (36) Health Survey at 12 to 36 months after transplantation. In the BENEFIT-EXT trial, this was observed for PCS only. Belatacept-treated patients reported better absolute PCSs compared with cyclosporine-treated patients. The differences were small but statistically significant at all times. Belatacept-treated patients tended to experience less side effects compared with cyclosporine-treated patients, except for dry skin. Worsening kidney function was associated with a significant decrease in HRQoL.

CONCLUSION

Worsening in kidney function was associated with lower HRQoL. Compared with cyclosporine, belatacept was associated with improved HRQoL, suggesting that use of non-nephrotoxic immunosuppressants may affect the patient's side effect experience and improve their HRQoL.

Effects of calcineurin inhibitors on paraoxonase and arylesterase activity after a kidney transplant

OBJECTIVES

Cardiovascular disease is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney failure, before and after a kidney transplant. Oxidation of lipoproteins that contain apolipoprotein B may contribute to the initiation of atherosclerosis. Paraoxonase may prevent cardiovascular disease. We compared the effects of different calcineurin inhibitors on risk factors for cardiovascular disease in kidney transplant recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 16 kidney transplant recipients, treatment included tacrolimus in 8 patients and cyclosporine in 8 patients. Hemoglobin, glucose, renal function, lipid parameters, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, homocysteine, malondialdehyde, paraoxonase activity, and arylesterase activity were measured before transplant and at 1, 6, and 12 months after the transplant.

RESULTS

The levels of homocysteine and malondialdehyde did not change significantly in patients who received either tacrolimus or cyclosporine. The high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was decreased (tacrolimus group, 1 mo) and increased (cyclosporine group, 6 and 12 mo) after the kidney transplant. Paraoxonase activity was increased (tacrolimus group, 1 mo). Arylesterase activity was increased (tacrolimus group, 1, 6, and 12 mo; cyclosporine group, 1 and 6 mo). The percentage of change in arylesterase activity was higher at 12 months in the tacrolimus than in the cyclosporine group.

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus may be more effective than cyclosporine in improving risk factors for cardiovascular disease after kidney transplant.

Oral mucosal health in liver transplant recipients and controls

Immunosuppressive drugs and other medications may predispose patients to oral diseases. Data on oral mucosal health in recipients of liver transplantation (LT) are limited. We, therefore, recruited 84 LT recipients (64 with chronic liver disease and 20 with acute liver failure) for clinical oral examinations in a cross-sectional, case-control study. Their oral health had been clinically examined before transplantation. The prevalence of oral mucosal lesions (OMLs) was assessed in groups with different etiologies of liver disease and in groups with different immunosuppressive medications, and these groups were compared to controls selected from a nationwide survey in Finland (n = 252). Risk factors for OMLs were evaluated with logistic regression. OMLs were more frequent in LT recipients versus controls (43% versus 15%, P < 0.001), and the use of steroids raised the prevalence to 53%. Drug-induced gingival overgrowth was the single most common type of lesion, and its prevalence was significantly higher for patients using cyclosporine A (CSA; 29%) versus patients using tacrolimus (TAC; 5%, P = 0.007); the prevalence was even higher with the simultaneous use of calcium channel blockers and CSA (47%) or TAC (8%, P = 0.002). Lesions with malignant potential such as drug-induced lichenoid reactions, oral lichen planus-like lesions, leukoplakias, and ulcers occurred in 13% of the patients with chronic liver disease and in 6% of the controls. Every third patient with chronic liver disease had reduced salivary flow, and more than half of all patients were positive for Candida; this risk was higher with steroids. In conclusion, the high frequency of OMLs among LT recipients can be explained not only by immunosuppressive drugs but also by other medications. Because dry mouth affects oral health and OMLs may have the potential for malignant transformation, annual oral examinations are indicated.