Organ donation following fatal organophosphate poisoning

Successful Liver Transplantation from a Deceased Donor After Ethylene Glycol Ingestion: A Case Report and Review of the Literature of Organ Donation from Poisoned Donors

Despite the increase in deceased organ donation over the past ten years, the gap between patients awaiting transplant and available organs continues to widen. Deceased donors secondary to acute fatal poisonings represent less than 1% of all organ donors. Organs from poisoned donors have largely been discarded due to concerns of toxin transmission and poor organ function as well as the paucity of data that exists regarding this donor population. Here, we report a case of a 40-year-old male who underwent successful liver re-transplantation from a donor who died following ethylene glycol ingestion. To our knowledge this case report is the first to describe successful re-transplantation from an ethylene glycol-poisoned donor. We also provide a comprehensive review of the literature describing organ donation from poisoned donors.

Liver Procurement from Poisoned Donors: A Survival Study

OBJECTIVES

Although transplant teams understand the effects of donor characteristics on liver transplant outcomes, few studies have investigated the quality of livers obtained from poisoned donors. The aim of this study was to compare livers procured from poisoned donors with a matched control group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Liver transplant outcomes from poisoned donors and from donors with trauma-induced death (as the control group) were compared using data of an Organ Procurement Unit from 2000 to 2013. Procured livers were evaluated via histology findings before transplant. Recipient characteristics were assessed in both groups, and immediate and medium-term (up to 5 years after transplant) survival rates were compared with the use of Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Over a 13-year organ donation program, 1485 livers from brain dead patients were donated. Among them, 115 poisoned donors were evaluated for liver grafts; of these, 74 successful liver transplants were performed. In the poisoned donors, the incidence of reversed cardiac arrest was 54.1%. Likewise, acute kidney injury was detected in 14.9% of the patients, and 16.2% needed urgent dialysis either for clearance of the toxic agents or for treatment of acute kidney injury. No significant differences were observed in 1- to 5-year survival rates, and log-rank test also showed a significance level of 0.83.

CONCLUSIONS

Proper case selection strategies can be implemented to expand the donor pool, including use of poisoned donors. Hence, poisoning is not a contra-indication for a referral, which could lead to decreased mortality for patients requiring a liver transplant.

Pesticide-Poisoned Patients: Can They Be Used as Potential Organ Donors?

INTRODUCTION

The gap between the number of patients on transplant waiting lists and patients receiving transplants is growing. Use of organs from donors who have died following pesticide exposure remains controversial. This study reviews the literature related to transplantation from this group.

METHODS

A literature search was undertaken on PubMed using the following keywords: 'insecticide', 'pesticide', 'rodenticide', 'organophosphate', 'carbamate', 'paraquat', 'poisoning', 'toxicity', 'overdose', 'intoxication', 'ingestion', 'organ donation or procurement', 'transplant', 'allograft transplant', and 'expanded criteria organ donation'; 21 specific pesticides/insecticides were also added to the search; the indexes for EAPCCT/NACCT meeting abstracts 2008-2017 were also searched. Identified publications were reviewed and if described human donation/transplantation of ≥ 1 solid organ(s), the following was extracted: (i) compound(s) ingested; (ii) donor demographics; (iii) organ(s) transplanted; and (iv) graft function at follow-up.

RESULTS

Ten papers were identified describing 20 fatalities (1999-2017) related to the following pesticide exposures: organophosphate, 8 cases; aldicarb, 4; paraquat, 3; parathion, 1; malathion, 1; carbofuran/carbamate, 1; carbamate, 1; and brodifacoum, 1 and no further cases were identified from EAPCCT/NACCT abstracts. Donors were aged 12-50 (25.9 ± 11.9) years. Forty-four organs were transplanted: 28 kidneys, 7 livers, 6 corneas, and 3 hearts. Forty recipients had outcome reported: 3 (7.5%) patients died, 3 (7.5%) had graft failure/dysfunction and 34 (85.0%) had good graft function. Overall survival with good function was 96%, 71%, 83%, and 67% for kidneys, livers, corneas and hearts respectively.

CONCLUSION

Review of the published literature suggests that solid organ donation following exposure to a pesticide is associated with good short-to-medium-term graft organ function following transplantation, particularly for transplanted kidneys and corneas.