Candidosis: diagnostic tools in the laboratory

Evaluation of three serological tests for detection of anti-candidal antibodies in diagnosis of invasive candidiasis

Immunoblot detection of antibody against 47 KD cytoplasmic antigen of Candida albicans was evaluated in diagnosis of invasive candidiasis and compared to whole cell agglutination and gel diffusion tests for detection of anticandidal antibody in 64 patients. The patients included 17 with culture proved candidemia, 34 with significant candiduria (more than 10,000 colony forming units per ml of urine) and 13 with nonsignificant candiduria. Antibody against 47 KD antigen was found to be the best indicator for diagnosis of invasive candidiasis even in patients with malignancy. The sensitivity of this procedure was 82.4%, specificity 86.7%, positive predictive value 77.8%, negative predictive value 89.7% and efficacy 85.1%. The gel diffusion procedure lacked in sensitivity whereas whole cell agglutination lacked in specificity. Detection of antibody against 47 KD antigen proved to be a valuable adjunct in the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis.

Diagnosis of invasive mycoses in severely immunosuppressed patients

In compromised patients, invasive mycoses are being observed at an increasing frequency and with a broadening spectrum of causative fungi. The rapid and definitive diagnosis of such opportunistic mycoses requires the synoptical consideration of predisposing clinical conditions, of culture isolates, and of the results of nonculture techniques. At present, the latter comprise the monitoring of specific antibodies and of fungal antigens, and the microscopical examination of suspected biopsies. The validity of the individual techniques (e.g., the monitoring of antibodies or antigens) varies with individual mycoses. Alternative methods for monitoring fungal metabolites or nucleic acids are still in the developmental stage. Particularly the amplification of DNA by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has a high diagnostic potential. However, at present, it is uncertain whether PCR allows the necessary distinction between colonization and truly invasive infection, and whether PCR can be simplified sufficiently to allow the continuous surveillance of high-risk patients.