Retrospective review of primary melanomas excised at Waikato Hospital, New Zealand, 2002?2003

Timeliness of diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous melanoma with dermatology, general practice, plastics surgery collaboration - are we meeting standards?

Introduction Melanoma is a serious type of skin cancer with a high burden in New Zealand. MelNet Quality Statements (2021) guide the timeliness of investigations and management for melanoma patients, who might experience long delays waiting for treatment. Aim To assess compliance of melanoma diagnosis and treatment timeliness with the MelNet Quality Statements at Waikato Hospital and in primary care for melanoma and melanoma in situ (MIS). Methods This is a retrospective clinical audit of patients referred via the Suspected Skin Cancer (SSC) teledermatology pathway between June 2020 and June 2022, and histologically confirmed as having melanoma or MIS. Time intervals between elements of service were analysed. Results For 43 melanomas and 105 MIS, compliance with MelNet Quality Statements across all melanoma services was poor, except for teledermatology response rates (100% compliance). From referral to first cancer treatment (Statement 2.1.1), compliance was 50% in general practice and 7.7% in Waikato Hospital. From teledermatologist response to biopsy (Statement 2.1.3), compliance was 65.2% in general practice and 7.7% in hospital plastics department. Histopathological reporting delays were also identified. Discussion Long delays for melanoma care in hospital likely reflect system failures (such as inadequate funding and human resources) and the increasing burden of skin cancer. In contrast, primary care provided quicker diagnostic biopsies and surgical treatments for melanoma.

Better, sooner, more convenient: a successful teledermoscopy service

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

A virtual lesion clinic (VLC) using store-and-forward teledermoscopy was introduced to reduce waiting times and improve access for skin lesion assessment by dermatologists. We aimed to review the efficiency and patient acceptance of a new community-based teledermoscopy service by comparing it to hospital-based face-to-face (FTF) skin lesion clinics.

METHODS

A prospective study compared patient flow through a community-based VLC and a tertiary hospital FTF dermatology clinic. Surveys were sent to patients and their referring doctors after attendance. Waiting times, diagnosis, outcomes, financial costs, patient acceptability and convenience were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 300 patients were assessed; 200 were seen in the VLC and 100 in the conventional FTF clinic. Of the 200 patients seen in the VLC, 88% did not require a subsequent FTF clinic assessment to establish the diagnosis. Mean waiting times for first assessment were reduced by two thirds (from 114 days to 39 days) in those seen by the VLC compared to FTF. Financial analysis demonstrated cost savings of 14%. Surveyed patients were highly satisfied and confident in the VLC service.

CONCLUSIONS

A community-based teledermoscopy service may allow improved management of outpatient referrals while providing a better, quicker and more convenient service. It may also provide cost savings, as teledermoscopy assessment can be cheaper than traditional assessment.