Typhlitis: neutropaenic colitis

Nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer: the Cleveland Clinic protocol

Nausea and vomiting are common and distressing symptoms in advanced cancer. Both are multifactorial and cause significant morbidity, nutritional failure, and reduced quality of life. Assessment includes a detailed history, physical examination and investigations for reversible causes. Assessment and management will be influenced by performance status, prognosis, and goals of care. Several drug classes are effective with some having the added benefit of multiple routes of administration. It is our institution's practice to recommend metoclopramide as the first drug with haloperidol as an alternative antiemetic. Dexamethasone should be used for patients with central nervous system metastases or bowel obstruction. If your patient is near death, empiric metoclopramide, haloperidol or chlorpromazine is used without further investigation. For patients with a better prognosis, we exclude reversible causes and use the same first-line antiemetics, metoclopramide and haloperidol. For those who do not respond to first-line single antiemetics, olanzapine is second line and ondansetron is third. Rarely do we use combination therapy or cannabinoids. Olanzapine as a single agent has a distinct advantage over antiemetic combinations. It improves compliance, reduces drug interactions and has several routes of administration. Antiemetics, anticholinergics, octreotide and dexamethasone are used in combination to treat bowel obstruction. In opiod-na'ive patients, we prefer haloperidol, glycopyrrolate and an opioid as the first-line treatment and add or substitute octreotide and dexamethasone in those who do not respond. Non-pharmacologic interventions (mechanical stents and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes) are used when nausea is refractory to medical management or for home-going management to relieve symptoms, reduce drug costs and rehospitalization.

Neutropenic enterocolitis in adults: systematic analysis of evidence quality

OBJECTIVE

Neutropenic enterocolitis is a life-threatening complication occurring most frequently after intensive chemotherapy in acute leukaemias. The literature is heterogeneous and a systematic review is lacking.

METHODS

Following a systematic search we categorised all relevant reports according to their quality and extracted evidence to answer the questions: Which diagnostic criteria are appropriate? What is the incidence of neutropenic enterocolitis? Are there good quality studies supporting specific interventions: Which empiric antimicrobial therapy is recommendable? Is neutropenic enterocolitis without surgical emergency complications an indication for bowel resection?

RESULTS

We found and analysed 145 articles of these reports: 64 were reports of single cases, 30 papers reported of two or three cases, 13 were narrative reviews, 34 were retrospective case series of more than three cases and four were prospective diagnostic studies. There were no prospective trials or case control studies on the therapy of neutropenic enterocolitis. There was no consensus on diagnostic criteria. We discuss the difficulty to define diagnostic criteria without having a disease definition. Histology is mostly not available in the living patients. We suggest applying a combination of clinical and radiological criteria: fever, abdominal pain and any bowel wall thickening >4 mm detected by ultrasonography (US) or computed tomography. We calculated a pooled incidence rate from 21 studies of 5.3% (266/5058; 95% CI: 4.7%-5.9%) in patients hospitalised for haematological malignancies, for high-dose chemotherapy in solid tumours or for aplastic anaemia.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review provides diagnostic criteria for neutropenic enterocolitis, presents a quantitative synthesis on its incidence and discusses its treatment recommendations. Prospective studies are clearly warranted.

Management of neutropenic colitis

Neutropenic colitis is recognized as a rare complication of chemotherapy in haematological malignancies. By contrast, the complication is less well known in relationship to chemotherapy for solid malignancies. There are very few examples reported and this paper adds three further cases and reviews the literature. We emphasize that although some cases of neutropenic colitis may be managed medically, full thickness involvement of the bowel wall may lead to perforation and require surgery. The pathogenesis of this progression is discussed and it is concluded that clinical awareness is important in the diagnosis. The signs of peritonitis or septicaemia are indications for excisional surgery with the formation of a temporary ileostomy.