Effects of antihypertensive drugs on coronary artery disease risk: a meta-analysis

Dyslipidemia induced by drugs used for the prevention and treatment of vascular diseases

Dyslipidemia is a major vascular risk factor. Interestingly, several agents used for the prevention and treatment of vascular diseases have an adverse effect on the lipid profile. In addition, agents belonging to the same class (e.g. beta blockers) can have significantly different actions on lipid levels. We summarize the effects of drugs used for the prevention and treatment of vascular diseases on the lipid profile. These effects should be considered when selecting a specific agent, particularly in high-risk patients.

Vasodilating beta-adrenoceptor blockers as cardiovascular therapeutics

beta-Adrenoceptor blocking agents (beta-blockers) have been established as therapeutics for treatment of patients with hypertension, ischemic heart diseases, chronic heart failure, arrhythmias, and glaucoma. However, their clinical use is limited because some patients are adversely affected by their side effects. The discovery of cardioselective (beta(1)-selective) blockers has overcome some of the problems. Current retrospective studies have revealed that vasodilating beta-blockers (so-called beta-blockers of the third generation) have advantages over the conventional type of beta-blockers in terms of minimizing the adverse effects and improving the disease-derived dysfunction, thus enhancing the quality of life variables. Some of the possible advantages include improvement of insulin resistance, decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in association with increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, attenuation of bronchial asthma attack and respiratory dysfunction, alleviation of coronary vasospasm provocation, peripheral circulatory disturbances, and erectile dysfunction, and better patient compliance. Release of nitric oxide, antioxidant action, beta(2)-adrenoceptor activation, Ca(2+) entry blockade, and other mechanisms underlying the vasodilating action may be responsible for the beneficial therapeutic effects of these agents.

The association between antihypertensive drug therapies and plasma lipid levels in the general population

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between different antihypertensive drug regimens and plasma lipid levels in the general population.

METHODS

The Monitoring Project on Cardiovascular Risk Factors was conducted from 1987 to 1991 as a cross-sectional study in The Netherlands. Antihypertensive drug-users and untreated hypertensives were selected. After exclusion of users of cholesterol-lowering drugs 2997 subjects remained for the analysis. The plasma lipid concentrations of the users and non-users of antihypertensives were compared by multiple linear regression.

RESULTS

In the univariate analysis patients using beta-blockers had lower high-density lipoprotein (HDL) concentrations (1.13 mmol/l, P < 0.05) and higher cholesterol ratios (5.74, P < 0.05) than untreated hypertensives (Total cholesterol = 6.07 mmol/l, HDL = 1.20 mmol/l and ratio = 5.44). Patients using diuretics had higher total cholesterol levels (6.34 mmol/l) and higher HDL levels (1.26 mmol/l) compared to untreated hypertensives. After adjustment for possible confounders these differences were smaller and no longer statistically significant. After adjustment we found a significant lower HDL cholesterol (mean difference of -0.10 mmol/l, P < 0.05) for users of a combination of a beta-blocker and a diuretic.

CONCLUSIONS

Although randomised, controlled trials have demonstrated that antihypertensive drugs may influence plasma lipid levels we observed no substantial association for single antihypertensive drug therapy in the general population. The combination of a diuretic and a beta-blocker was associated with a worse lipid profile.

Drug-Induced lipid changes: a review of the unintended effects of some commonly used drugs on serum lipid levels

Many drugs besides lipid-lowering drugs affect serum lipid levels in either a potentially harmful or beneficial way, and may therefore increase or decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease. Diuretics, beta-blocking agents, progestogens, combined oral contraceptives containing 'second generation' progestogens, danazol, immunosuppressive agents, protease inhibitors and enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants adversely affect the lipid profile. They increase total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides by up to 40, 50 and 300%, respectively, and decrease high density lipoprotein cholesterol by a maximum of 50%. Conversely, alpha-blocking agents, estrogens, hormone replacement therapy, combined oral contraceptives containing 'third generation' progestogens, selective estrogen receptor modulators, growth hormone and valproic acid show mostly beneficial effects on the lipd profile. Some drugs, for example, isotretinoin, acitretin and antipsychotics, mainly elevate triglyceride levels. Adverse or beneficial effects on serum cholesterol levels do not always translate into a higher or lower, respectively, incidence of cardiovascular disease. because these drugs may influence cardiovascular risk through multiple pathways. In some cases, excessive cholesterol levels occur, for example, with protease inhibitor therapy, and several cases of pancreatitis attributable to drug-induced hypertriglyceridaemia have been reported. Some general guidelines on the management of drug-induced dyslipidaemia can be given. Replacement of the dyslipidaemia-inducing drug by an equivalent alternative therapy is preferred. However, such alternatives are often difficult to find. If there is no equivalent alternative and treatment with the dyslipidaemia-inducing drug must be initiated, monitoring of serum lipid levels is important. If drug use is expected to be long term, the existing guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemia in the general population can be applied to drug-induced dyslipidaemia. In cases of extreme hyperlipidaemia, medication use should be reassessed.

Beta-blockers in the management of hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: is there a role?

It has been conclusively established that treatment of hypertension in patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus will significantly reduce the incidence of stroke, heart failure and progression of diabetic complications. Beta-blockers are effective antihypertensive agents which, in long term studies, have proven beneficial in reducing important clinical end-points. However nonselective beta-blockers may have a negative effect on lipid profiles and contribute to hypoglycaemic unawareness, thus preventing their use in some patients with diabetes mellitus. The development of newer and more selective beta-blockers has overcome many of these problems. In addition, some of the newer agents have novel properties such as release of nitric oxide, which theoretically would make them more attractive in patients with diabetes mellitus. Overall, the adverse metabolic effects of beta-blockers do not appear to be important in clinical practice and these agents should no longer be contraindicated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Their proven cardiovascular benefits would seem to easily tip the balance in favour of their use.

Efficacy of ramipril in therapy-resistant hypertension

In an open, 48-week study the antihypertensive efficacy of ramipril when administered as add-on therapy to existing triple antihypertensive treatment (diuretics, beta-blockers, vasodilators) was investigated in 56 patients (24 females, 32 males) with therapy-resistant hypertension. The main variable (sitting diastolic blood pressure) decreased from 112 mmHg at baseline to 91 mmHg at week 8 (p < 0.01) and remained stable thereafter until the end of the trial. The systolic blood pressure in the sitting position decreased from 175 mmHg at baseline to 146 mmHg at week 8 (p < 0.01) and also remained stable thereafter until the end of the trial. Ramipril doses between week 8 and the end of the trial were not changed in 82% of patients. 45% of patients were treated with 5 mg ramipril/day, 33% with 10 mg/day and 22% with 20 mg/day at the end of the study. Addition of ramipril allowed a reduction in the doses of concurrrent therapy, especially in relation to beta-blockers (p < 0.02) and vasodilators (p < 0.01). The safety was good--no serious adverse events were observed. Ramipril is, therefore, a suitable drug for the patients with therapy-resistant hypertension allowing reduction of the doses of concomitant medication.