Barrett's oesophagus

Surgical and Molecular Pathology of Barrett Esophagus

BACKGROUND

Patients with Barrett esophagus (BE) are predisposed to developing dysplasia and cancer. Adenocarcinoma, which is associated with BE, is the most common type of esophageal tumor and, typically, it has an aggressive clinical course and a high rate of mortality.

METHODS

The English-language literature relating to tumor epidemiology, etiology, and the pathogenesis of BE was reviewed and summarized.

RESULTS

The role of pathologists in the diagnosis and pitfalls associated with grading Barrett dysplasia is addressed. Current molecular testing for Barrett neoplasia, as well as testing methods currently in development, is discussed, focusing on relevant tests for diagnosing tumor types, determining prognosis, and assessing therapeutic response.

CONCLUSIONS

Grading is essential for developing appropriate treatment plans, follow-up visits, and therapeutic interventions for each patient. Familiarity with current molecular testing methods will help physicians correctly diagnose the disease and select the most appropriate therapy for each of their patients.

Prediction of Barrett's esophagus among men

OBJECTIVES

Risk factors for Barrett's esophagus include gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms, age, abdominal obesity, and tobacco use. We aimed to develop a tool using these factors to predict the presence of Barrett's esophagus.

METHODS

Male colorectal cancer (CRC) screenees were recruited to undergo upper endoscopy, identifying newly diagnosed cases of Barrett's esophagus. Logistic regression models predicting Barrett's esophagus using GERD symptoms alone and together with abdominal obesity, tobacco use, and age were compared.

RESULTS

Barrett's esophagus was found in 70 (8.5%) of 822 CRC screenees. Mutually adjusting for other covariates, Barrett's esophagus was associated with weekly GERD (odds ratio (OR)=2.33, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.34, 4.05), age (OR per 10 years=1.53, 95% CI=1.05, 2.25), waist-to-hip ratio (OR per 0.10=1.44, 95% CI=0.898, 2.32) and pack-years of cigarette use (OR per 10 pack-years=1.09, 95% CI=1.04, 1.14). A model including those four factors had a greater area under the receiver operating characteristics curve than did a model based on GERD frequency and duration alone (0.72 vs. 0.61, P<0.001), and it had a net reclassification improvement index of 19-25%.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of Barrett's esophagus was substantial in our population of older overweight men. A model based on GERD, age, abdominal obesity, and cigarette use more accurately classified the presence of Barrett's esophagus than did a model based on GERD alone. Following validation of the tool in another population, its use in clinical practice might improve the efficiency of screening for Barrett's esophagus.

The effect of reactive atypia/inflammation on the laser-induced fluorescence diagnosis of non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Differential Normalized Fluorescence (DNF) technique has been used to distinguish high-grade dysplasia from non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. This technology may assist gastroenterologists in targeting biopsies, reducing the number of biopsies using the standard protocol. In the presence of reactive atypia/inflammation, it becomes difficult for the pathologist to differentiate non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus from Barrett's esophagus with low-grade dysplasia. Before DNF technique may be used to guide target biopsies, it is critical to know whether reactive atypia/inflammation in non-dysplastic Barrett's may result in false positives. This study was conducted to determine whether DNF technique is adversely affected by the presence of reactive atypia/inflammation in non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus resulting in false positives.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four hundred ten-nanometer laser light was used to induce autofluorescence of Barrett's mucosa in 49 patients. The clinical study included 37 males and 12 females. This was a blinded retrospective data analysis study. A total of 303 spectra were collected and matched to non-dysplastic Barrett's biopsy results. One hundred seventy-five spectra were collected from areas with a pathology of non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus with reactive atypia/inflammation. One hundred twenty-eight spectra were collected from areas with non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus without reactive changes/inflammation. The spectra were analyzed using the DNF Index at 480 nm and classified as positive or negative using the threshold of -0.75 × 10(-3).

RESULTS

Using DNF technique, 92.6% of non-dysplastic samples with reactive atypia/inflammation were classified correctly (162/175). 92.2% of non-dysplastic samples without reactive atypia/inflammation were classified correctly (118/128). Comparing the ratios of false positives among the two sample groups, there was not a statistically significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Using DNF technique for classification of non-dysplastic Barrett's mucosa does not result in false-positive readings due to reactive atypia/inflammation. Target biopsies guided by DNF technique may drastically reduce the number of pinch biopsies using the standard biopsy protocol.

Barrett's esophagus: A historical perspective, an update on core practicalities and predictions on future evolutions of management

Interpretation of exploding knowledge about Barrett's esophagus is impaired by use of several conflicting definitions. Because any histological type of esophageal columnar metaplasia carries risk for esophageal adenocarcinoma, the diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus should no longer require demonstration of intestinal-type metaplasia. Endoscopic recognition and grading of Barrett's esophagus remains a significant source of ambiguity. Reflux disease is a key factor for development of Barrett's esophagus, but other factors must underlie its development, since it occurs in only a minority of reflux disease patients. Neither antireflux surgery nor proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy has major impacts on cancer risk. Within a year, a major trial should indicate whether low-dose aspirin usefully reduces cancer risk. The best referral centers have transformed the accuracy of screening and surveillance for early curable esophageal adenocarcinoma by use of enhanced and novel endoscopic imaging, visually-guided, rather than blind biopsies and by partnership with expert pathologists. General endoscopists now need to upgrade their skills and equipment so that they can rely mainly on visual targeting of biopsies on mucosal areas of concern in their surveillance practice. General pathologists need to greatly improve their interpretation of biopsies. Endoscopic therapy now achieves very high rates of cure of high-grade dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma with minimal morbidity and risk. Such results will only be achieved by skilled interventional endoscopists. Esophagectomy should now be mainly restricted to patients whose cancer has extended into and beyond the submucosa. Weighing risks and benefits in the management of Barrett's esophagus is difficult, as is the process of adequately informing patients about their specific cancer risk.

Absence of c-Ki-ras gene mutation in malignant and premalignant Barrett's oesophagus

Aims-To establish the prevalence of c-Ki-ras gene mutations in codons 12 and 13 in 28 surgically resected Barrett's adenocarcinomas and 18 associated preneoplastic lesions in Barrett's oesophagus.Methods-Mutations were detected using the polymerase chain reaction followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Human colon carcinoma cell lines with well characterised mutations in codons 12 and 13 were used as positive controls and to test the sensitivity of the method.Results-c-Ki-ras gene mutations were not detected in any of the 28 specimens of Barrett's adenocarcinoma or in the 18 specimens of Barrett's oesophagus (nine non-dysplastic cases, three cases with low and six with high grade dysplasia).Conclusions-These results suggest that the c-Ki-ras gene is not involved in the development of cancer in Barrett's oesophagus.

Analysis of basement membrane structure and inflammation during the development of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the Chinese Chaoshan high risk region

BACKGROUND & AIMS

To investigate relationships between basement membrane structure, inflammation, beta1 integrin expression, activation of ERK/MAPK signaling pathways, and cell proliferation in esophageal mucosa at various stages during the evolution of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Three tissue arrays were made of 228 tissue cores from 428 surgically-resected specimens. The arrays included 26 samples of normal epithelium, 28 with hyperplasia, 18 with dysplasia, 27 with carcinoma in situ and 129 with invasive carcinoma. In addition, 21 cases of hyperplasia, 13 cases of dysplasia and 13 case of carcinoma in situ were obtained by manual microdissection of unfixed frozen tissue. Hematoxylin and eosin stained sections were used to evaluate the epithelium and inflammation. The periodic acid-Schiff stain and an immunohistochemical stain for laminin were used to examine the structure of basement membranes. The expression of beta1 integrin, p-ERK, and Ki67 were evaluated by quantitative immunohistochemistry. RT-PCR and Western blots were also used to detect expression of beta1 integrin.

RESULTS

Quantitative scales were developed to classify basement membrane structure and inflammation. Basement membrane alterations correlated with the degree of epithelial change (chi2 = 501.9, p < 0.01) and with the degree of lymphocytic infiltration in the lamina propria and epithelium (chi2 = 273.4, p < 0.01). There was a significant relationship between the extent of basement membrane alteration and the expression of beta1 integrin, p-ERK, and Ki67.

CONCLUSIONS

The correlations suggest that there is a direct relationship between basement membrane structure and the development of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Effect of proton pump inhibitors on markers of risk for high-grade dysplasia and oesophageal cancer in Barrett's oesophagus

BACKGROUND

It has been shown that the presence on diagnosis of endoscopic macroscopic markers indicates a high-risk group for Barrett's oesophagus.

AIM

To determine whether proton pump inhibitor therapy prior to diagnosis of Barrett's oesophagus influences markers for risk development of subsequent high-grade dysplasia/adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

A review of all patients with Barrett's oesophagus entering a surveillance programme was undertaken. Five hundred and two patients diagnosed with Barrett's oesophagus were assessed on diagnosis for endoscopic macroscopic markers or low-grade dysplasia. Subsequent development of high-grade dysplasia/adenocarcinoma was documented. The relationship between the initiation of proton pump inhibitor therapy prior to the diagnosis of BE and the presence of macroscopic markers or low-grade dysplasia at entry was determined.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients developed high-grade dysplasia/adenocarcinoma during surveillance. Patients who entered without prior proton pump inhibitor therapy were 3.4 times (95% CI: 1.98-5.85) more likely to have a macroscopic marker or low-grade dysplasia than those patients already on a proton pump inhibitor.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of proton pump inhibitor therapy prior to diagnosis of Barrett's oesophagus significantly reduced the presence of markers used to stratify patient risk. Widespread use of proton pump inhibitors will confound surveillance strategies for patients with Barrett's oesophagus based on entry characteristics but is justified because of the lower risk of neoplastic progression.

Current practice compared with the international guidelines: endoscopic surveillance of Barrett's esophagus

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To describe the current practice for the surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus, to compare this practice with the national guidelines published by the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy in 1998 and to identify the factors associated with the compliance to guidelines.

METHOD

To determine the attitudes of French hepatogastroenterologists to screening for Barrett's oesophagus, a postal anonymous questionnaire survey was undertaken. It was sent to 246 hepatogastroenterologists in the Rhone-Alpes area. We defined eight criteria allowed to assess the conformity of practices with the guidelines. We created three topics composed of several criterion. The topics analysed were 'Biopsies', 'Surveillance' and the diagnosis of high grade dysplasia. We studied the factors which could be associated with the compliance with the guidelines.

RESULTS

The response rate was 81.3%. For 58.0% of the gastroenterologists, endoscopic biopsy sampling were made according to French guidelines (four-quadrant biopsies at 2 cm intervals). Agreement was 78.0% regarding the interval of surveillance for no dysplasia (every 2 or 3 years) and 78.5% regarding the low-grade dysplasia (every 6 or 12 months). For the management of high-grade dysplasia, 28.6% actually confirm the diagnosis by a second anatomopathologist and 42.0% treated by proton pump inhibitor during 2 months. Concerning the biopsies, the young gastroenterologists and gastroenterologists practising in university hospitals had a better adherence to the guidelines (Relative Risk: 2.22, 95% CI 1.25-3.95 and 3.74, 95% CI 1.04-13.47, respectively). The other factors of risk were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The endoscopic follow-up is mostly realized in accordance with the national guidelines. However, there is a wide variability in individual current practice.

The effect of antireflux surgery on esophageal carcinogenesis in patients with barrett esophagus: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether patients with Barrett esophagus who undergo antireflux surgery differ from medically treated patients in incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma and probability of disease regression/progression.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Barrett esophagus is a risk factor for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. A question exists as to whether antireflux surgery reduces this risk.

METHODS

Query of PubMed (1966 through October 2005) using predetermined search terms revealed 2011 abstracts, of which 100 full-text articles were reviewed. Twenty-five articles met selection criteria. A review of article references and consultation with experts revealed additional articles for inclusion. Studies that enrolled adults with biopsy-proven Barrett esophagus, specified treatment-type rendered, followed up patients with endoscopic biopsies no less than12 months of instituting therapy, and provided adequate extractable data. The incidence of adenocarcinoma and the proportion of patients developing progression or regression of Barrett esophagus and/or dysplasia were extracted.

RESULTS

In surgical and medical groups, 700 and 996 patients were followed for a total of 2939 and 3711 patient-years, respectively. The incidence rate of esophageal adenocarcinoma was 2.8 (95% confidence interval, 1.2-5.3) per 1000 patient-years among surgically treated patients and 6.3 (3.6-10.1) among medically treated patients (P = 0.034). Heterogeneity in incidence rates in surgically treated patients was observed between controlled studies and case series (P = 0.014). Among controlled studies, incidence rates were 4.8 (1.7-11.1) and 6.5 (2.6-13.8) per 1000 patient-years in surgical and medical patients, respectively (P = 0.320). Probability of progression was 2.9% (1.2-5.5) in surgical patients and 6.8% (2.6-12.1) in medical patients (P = 0.054). Probability of regression was 15.4% (6.1-31.4) in surgical patients and 1.9% (0.4-7.3) in medical patients (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Antireflux surgery is associated with regression of Barrett esophagus and/or dysplasia. However, evidence suggesting that surgery reduces the incidence of adenocarcinoma is largely driven by uncontrolled studies.

Cost utility of screening for Barrett's esophagus with esophageal capsule endoscopy versus conventional upper endoscopy

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Screening for Barrett's esophagus with conventional esophagoduodenoscopy (EGD) is recommended to decrease mortality from esophageal adenocarcinoma. Esophageal capsule endoscopy (ECE) has recently been shown to be accurate in detecting Barrett's esophagus. We aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of screening by ECE with screening by EGD.

METHODS

A Markov model of 50-year-old white men with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux was constructed to compare screening modalities. The model incorporated direct medical costs and indirect costs of lost productivity and followed the patients until age 80 years or death. Outcomes were analyzed from the societal perspective.

RESULTS

EGD screening prevented 60% of cancer deaths at a cost of $11,254 per quality-adjusted life year gained compared with no screening. ECE prevented 53% of cancer deaths and provided 9 fewer quality-adjusted days at greater cost than EGD. If society were only willing to pay $50,000 per quality-adjusted life year gained, then capsule screening would be preferred if the income of the patient and driver were each greater than $280,682. Otherwise, the findings were robust to all sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening for Barrett's esophagus with either EGD or ECE results in similar outcomes, but EGD is the preferred strategy. Both strategies appear cost-effective, and the model does not take into account patient preferences for screening modality or adherence.

Diagnostic accuracy of magnifying chromoendoscopy with detection of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia using acetic acid in Barrett's esophagus

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopy with systematic randomized biopsies aims to improve the detection of intestinal metaplasia (IM) and dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus (BE). Magnifying chromoendoscopy with alcoholic acetic acid might allow directed biopsies to improve detection of IM and dysplasia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients were studied with magnifying chromoendoscopy (Optical power zoom x 115, alcoholic acetic acid). Endoscopy biopsies were performed on one or several zones of BE chosen randomly, for which the chromoendoscopic pattern was determined according to Guelrud's classification.

RESULTS

Among seventy-two biopsies, the agreement between magnifying chromoendoscopy and histology and the positive predictive value of the association of patterns III and IV for the diagnosis of IM were 72.4%; sensibility and specificity were respectively 95.5% and 42.9%. The diagnostic accuracy was 75%. Among the six biopsies that showed high-grade dysplasia, three were suspected because of two particular patterns: local loss of ridged cerebriform pattern due to the disorganization of the mucosal folds and hypervascularization of the mucosa.

CONCLUSION

Magnifying chromoendoscopy with acetic acid allows targeted biopsies of the IM in BE and may help to detect high-grade dysplasia.

Defining a clinically significant adverse impact of diagnosing Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND

Diagnosing a potentially life-threatening disease may adversely affect patient quality of life (QOL) independent of biologic effects. It is unknown whether the mere diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus (BE) adversely impacts patients' preferences (health-state utility) sufficiently to impair the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic screening for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

GOAL

To calculate the threshold impact on utility incurred by diagnosing BE that would allow screening to remain cost-effective.

STUDY

A Markov model was developed to examine strategies of no screening, and screening with surveillance of BE. Patients were 50-year-old white men with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux followed until 80 years of age or death. The primary outcomes were the threshold decrements in utility incurred by diagnosing BE based on willingness to pay (WTP) of dollar 50,000 and dollar 100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.

RESULTS

For a WTP of dollar 50,000/QALY, the decrement in utility could be as great as 9%, meaning that screening is cost-effective as long as diagnosing BE does not impair QOL by more than 9%. For a WTP of dollar 100,000, the decrement could be as great as 10.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

The decrement in utility caused by diagnosing BE may be substantial without compromising the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic screening.

The cost-effectiveness of biomarkers for predicting the development of oesophageal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The recommended surveillance strategy for oesophageal adenocarcinoma may prevent as few as 50% of cancer deaths. Tissue biomarkers have been proposed to identify high-risk patients.

AIM

To determine performance characteristics of an ideal biomarker, or panel of biomarkers, that would make its use more cost-effective than the current surveillance strategy.

METHODS

We created a Markov model using data from published literature, and performed a cost-utility analysis. The population consisted of 50-year-old Caucasian men with gastro-oesophageal reflux, who were monitored until age 80. We examined strategies of observation only, current practice (dysplasia-guided surveillance), surveillance every 3 months for patients with a positive biomarker (biomarker-guided surveillance), and oesophagectomy immediately for a positive biomarker (biomarker-guided oesophagectomy). The primary outcome was the threshold cost and performance characteristics needed for a biomarker to be more cost-effective than current practice.

RESULTS

Regardless of the cost, the biomarker needs to be at least 95% specific for biomarker-guided oesophagectomy to be cost-effective. For biomarker-guided surveillance to be cost-effective, a $100 biomarker could be 80% sensitive and specific.

CONCLUSIONS

Biomarkers predicting the development of oesophageal adenocarcinoma would need to be fairly accurate and inexpensive to be cost-effective. These results should guide the development of biomarkers for oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus: is there light the end of the metaplastic tunnel?

Metaplastic change of the oesophageal epithelium from normal stratified squamous to columnar-lined with intestinal metaplasia results in an increased risk of development of adenocarcinoma. As a result, endoscopic surveillance has been recommended for the surgically-fit patient. The evidence that these programmes are altering clinical outcome to any major degree, however, is weak. This review highlights some of the areas of controversy and outstanding points that need to be clarified to allow establishment of evidence-based medicine for this condition.

Immunohistochemical analysis of short-segment Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The majority of dysplasias and adenocarcinomas in Barrett's esophagus are closely associated with the specialized columnar epithelium. In this study, we performed an immunohistochemical analysis of columnar metaplasia presenting in short-segment Barrett's esophagus (SSBE).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The endoscopic biopsy specimens obtained from 91 patients were analyzed. Ten were cases of long-segment Barrett's esophagus (LSBE) and 81 had SSBE. Expression of MUC2, MUC5AC, Con A and CD10 was evaluated using immunohistochemical staining.

RESULTS

All samples from LSBE (n = 9) were histologically diagnosed as specialized columnar epithelium. The 81 SSBE samples were divided into gastric fundic-type (n = 26), junctional-type (n = 16) and specialized columnar epithelium (n = 39). In the specialized columnar epithelium of SSBE, there was a predominance of goblet cell-type metaplasia proposed by Watanabe et al. which is characterized by MUC2-positive pyloric epithelium (66.7%). The total percentage of non-goblet cell-type and goblet cell-type was 76.9%. In contrast, 80% of LSBE revealed the large intestinal-type or the large and small intestinal-type. The long oval and villous pit by magnifying endoscope suggests the presence of the specialized columnar epithelium, but the phenotypic classification of Watanabe's criteria was not associated with the endoscopic pit pattern.

CONCLUSION

Intestinal metaplasia in Barrett's esophagus changes immunohistochemically with progress of the disease.

Modification of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor, c-Src, and Bcl-XL protein expression during the progression of Barrett's neoplasia

Oncogenes, growth factors, cell surface receptors, and cell-cycle and apoptotic regulatory proteins have been implicated in the growth regulation and progression of Barrett's-associated neoplasia. Among these, insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1-R) and c-Src are reported to be key regulators of mitogenesis and tumorigenesis. In addition, c-Src may exert its transforming capability by inducing increased expression of IGF1-R on the neoplastic cells. Bcl-X(L), a member of the Bcl-2 family, blocks apoptosis and has been reported to increase in Barrett's-associated neoplasia. To study the modifications in IGF1-R, c-Src, and Bcl-X(L) protein expression during the progression of Barrett's-associated neoplasia, we analyzed 34 resected gastroesophagectomy specimens by immunohistochemistry using antibodies to human IGF1-R, c-Src, and Bcl-X(L). In these cases, we found 22 intestinal (Barrett's) metaplasias (IMs), 25 low-grade dysplasias (LGDs), 28 high-grade dysplasias (HGDs), 34 invasive adenocarcinomas (CAs), and 19 lymph node metastases. High IGF1-R cytoplasmic staining was present in 14 of 19 (74%) node metastases, in 28 of 34 (82%) CAs, in 18 of 28 (64%) HGDs, in 13 of 25 (52%) LGDs, and in 5 of 22 (23%) IMs. Strong and diffuse c-Src expression was identified in 17 of 19 (89%) node metastases, in 29 of 34 (85%) Cas, in 26 of 28 (93%) HGDs, in 18 of 25 (72%) LGDs, and in 9 of 22 (41%) IMs. Bcl-X(L) cytoplasmic staining was evident in 12 of 19 (63%) node metastases, in 20 of 34 (59%) Cas, in 20 of 28 (71%) HGDs, in 15 of 25 (60%) LGDs, and in 6 of 22 (27%) IMs. In 11 cases, c-Src activity was measured by kinase assay and reflected the immunohistochemical results. Our data indicate that expression levels of IGF1-R, c-Src, and Bcl-X(L) proteins are coordinately elevated in Barrett's-associated neoplasia. These findings indicate important roles of these growth regulatory proteins in the malignant progression of Barrett's-associated neoplasia.

Long-term endoscopic surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus. Incidence of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a premalignant condition for which regular endoscopic follow-up is usually advised. We evaluated the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (AC) in patients with BE and the impact of endoscopic surveillance on mortality from AC.

METHODS

A cohort of newly diagnosed BE patients was studied prospectively. Endoscopic and histological surveillance was recommended every 2 yr. Follow-up status was determined from hospital and registry office records and telephone calls to the patients.

RESULTS

From 1987 to 1997, BE was diagnosed in 177 patients. We excluded three with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) at the time of enrollment. Follow-up was complete in 166 patients (135 male, 31 female). The mean length of endoscopic follow-up was 5.5 yr (range 0.5-13.3). Low-grade dysplasia (LGD) was present initially in 16 patients (9.6%) and found during follow-up in another 24 patients. However, in 75% of cases, LGD was not confirmed on later biopsies. HGD was found during surveillance in three patients (1.8%), one with simultaneous AC; two with HGD developed AC later. AC was detected in five male patients during surveillance. The incidence of AC was 1/220 (5/1100) patient-years of total follow-up, or 1/183.6 (5/918) patient-years in subjects undergoing endoscopy. Four AC patients died, and one was alive with advanced-stage tumor. The mean number of endoscopies performed for surveillance, rather than for symptoms, was 2.4 (range 1-10) per patient. During the follow-up years the cohort had a total of 528 examinations and more than 4000 biopsies.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of AC in BE is low, confirming recent data from the literature reporting an overestimation of cancer risk in these patients. In our patient cohort, surveillance involved a large expenditure of effort but did not prevent any cancer deaths. The benefit of surveillance remains uncertain.

Barrett's esophagus: model of neoplastic progression

Human cancer progression is characterized by clonal expansion of cells with accumulated genetic errors. Invasive carcinomas contain all the genetic errors that were acquired during neoplastic progression and then continue to accumulate further abnormalities, leading to tumor heterogeneity. Many investigations of human cancer have given valuable insights in genetic abnormalities important for tumor biology. Early events responsible for neoplastic progression, however, are often impossible to investigate in invasive cancers because the premalignant tissue in which the tumors develop are often overgrown and the premalignant conditions cannot be studied in vivo because they are either not detected owing to lack of symptoms or are removed before cancer develops. Unlike many other premalignant conditions Barrett's esophagus is often associated with symptoms leading to diagnosis at an early stage before cancer develops, and the premalignant epithelium is seldom removed at an early stage of cancer progression. Furthermore, in patients who present with invasive carcinoma the tumor is often surrounded by premalignant epithelium, which is available for further investigations. Therefore Barrett's esophagus is an excellent model in which to study the early events of neoplastic progression. It may not only contribute to a better understanding of the neoplastic process but also provide a base for safer assessment of cancer risk during surveillance for early detection of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Current practice in surveillance strategy for patients with Barrett's oesophagus in the UK

BACKGROUND

Many guidelines exist regarding the surveillance of patients with Barrett's oesophagus. There are limited data, however, with regard to whether practitioners follow these guidelines.

METHODS

We assessed current surveillance practice amongst members of the British Society of Gastroenterology using a simple 11-question anonymous survey, mailed to 300 randomly selected members from the British Society of Gastroenterology Handbook.

RESULTS

Two hundred and three of the 300 (68%) responded, 76% considering that surveillance was worthwhile. In those who considered surveillance to be worthwhile, 83% used sub-selection based on age, the length of Barrett's oesophagus or the presence of ulcer or stricture. Patients with Barrett's oesophagus of < 3 cm (short-segment) were considered to be inappropriate for surveillance by 62%. Forty-one per cent reported following the 'advised' recommendations of four-quadrant biopsies every 2 cm, whereas 44% followed a 'random and suspicious areas only' protocol. Marked variation was reported in the re-endoscope interval for both low- and high-grade dysplasia. Only 55% reported that two experienced pathologists reviewed all biopsies showing high-grade dysplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the existence of multiple guidelines for Barrett's surveillance, clinical practice varies widely in the UK. This may be due to a lack of knowledge or because gastroenterologists remain unconvinced by the quality of the current evidence of its value. These results have implications for studies attempting to collate data from multiple centres.

Barrett's esophagus: Macroscopic markers and the prediction of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Surveillance endoscopy has been advocated for patients with Barrett's esophagus but the cost-effectiveness of this has been questioned. The aim of this study is to identify an optimum surveillance protocol by examining if macroscopic markers at diagnosis predict the development of dysplasia.

METHODS

The sample was 353 patients with Barrett's esophagus undergoing surveillance by a community-based group of gastroenterologists between 1981 and 2001. At diagnosis the presence of macroscopic and microscopic markers was noted. The presence and pattern of dysplasia and development of adenocarcinoma was documented during subsequent surveillance.

RESULTS

Three hundred and fifty-three patients (71% male) underwent regular surveillance over 19 056 patient-months (median 42 months), having a median number of three surveillance endoscopies (range 1-40). Nine patients (seven male) developed adenocarcinoma (1/176 patient years) and four male patients developed high-grade dysplasia (1/397 patient years). Twelve of these 13 patients entered with one or more macroscopic markers: severe esophagitis, nodularity, Barrett's ulcer or stricture. Dysplasia risk was associated with macroscopic markers. Patients who entered with one marker were 6.7 times more likely to develop high-grade dysplasia/adenocarcinoma (HR = 6.7, 95% CI = 1.3, 35). Patients who entered with two or more markers were 14 times more likely to develop high-grade dysplasia/adenocarcinoma (HR = 14.1, 95% CI = 2.02, 102).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of severe esophagitis, Barrett's ulcer, nodularity or stricture at entry indicates a high-risk group for Barrett's esophagus. Cost-effectiveness of surveillance for these patients and those with dysplasia at entry would thus improve.

Cyclo-oxygenase-2 expression in Barrett's oesophageal carcinogenesis: an immunohistochemical study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of Barrett's oesophageal adenocarcinoma is increasing more rapidly than any other malignancy in industrialized countries. Cyclo-oxygenase-2 appears to play an important role in gastrointestinal carcinogenesis. Previous studies on cyclo-oxygenase-2 expression in Barrett's oesophageal carcinogenesis have utilized tissue samples obtained from different patients. We sought a definitive comparison of cyclo-oxygenase-2 expression in the sequence of Barrett's metaplasia-dysplasia-adenocarcinoma within the same patients.

METHODS

Paraffin-embedded oesophago-gastrectomy specimens from 20 patients, containing successive stages of Barrett's metaplasia, high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma, were analysed for cyclo-oxygenase-2 expression by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Cyclo-oxygenase-2 was constitutively expressed in the basal layers of cells in the adjacent normal squamous oesophageal epithelium, but a higher cyclo-oxygenase-2 expression was observed in Barrett's metaplasia. A further increase in cyclo-oxygenase-2 expression was detected in high-grade dysplasia, but cyclo-oxygenase-2 was decreased in adenocarcinoma tissue, regardless of its stage or level of differentiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyclo-oxygenase-2 expression is progressively increased when squamous oesophageal epithelium develops into Barrett's metaplastic epithelium and then into high-grade dysplasia, but appears to decrease when adenocarcinoma develops. These findings may be significant for an effective chemo-prevention strategy with selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors.

Cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for progression of Barrett's metaplasia to esophageal carcinoma

Barrett's metaplasia is found in approximately 12% to 18% of patients undergoing upper endoscopy for symptoms of reflux. Barrett's metaplasia is a premalignant condition and remains the number one risk factor for developing esophageal adenocarcinoma. There has been an increase in the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in the past two decades, making it the most rapidly rising cancer in the United States and Western Europe. This article describes the progression from Barrett's metaplasia to esophageal adenocarcinoma and predictors for the development of adenocarcinoma in Barrett's metaplasia. Barrett's metaplasia represents a histological mosaic, with dysplastic tissue adjacent to non-dysplastic tissue. The histologic changes leading to adenocarcinoma are accompanied by alterations at the molecular level, including the accumulation of gene mutations and changes in gene expression. The determination of the molecular events that occur in the transition from normal esophageal squamous mucosa to dysplasia and to esophageal adenocarcinoma have lead to a better understanding of the process of the transformation to adenocarcinoma. This knowledge will lead to better biomarkers to diagnose and assess cancer risk.

Endoscopic ambulatory surgery centers in the academic medical center. We can do it too!

A freestanding ambulatory surgery center (ASC) at an academic institution is an exception rather than the rule. It is a major challenge to the concept of the traditional academic medical center. Advantages and disadvantages are discussed, as well as the detailed planning process beginning with a well executed feasibility study, the hiring of consultants, and financing of the facility. Construction, opening of the facility and operation are not different from other ACSs. However, the integration of teaching and research presents new opportunities. Lessons learned and advice to others are detailed on how the ASC benefitted one specific institution and how it may add value and revenue to other academic medical centers.

Role of molecular biology in the follow-up of patients who have Barrett's esophagus

At present, the follow-up of patients who have Barrett's esophagus (BE) should occur within the setting of an endoscopic biopsy surveillance program and with the frequency of surveillance as proposed by the American College of Gastroenterology. In the future, patients who have BE will be further stratified according to their risk for progression to invasive carcinoma. This stratification will permit the development of more rational surveillance programs. Models that incorporate epidemiologic risk factors, reflux symptoms, and endoscopic and histologic findings will likely include panels of biomarkers for further stratification of patients as low, intermediate, or high risk. Therefore, the challenge over the next decade will be to define the role of molecular markers in endoscopic surveillance strategies and to identify additional clinically relevant molecular markers for prognosis as intermediate markers for chemoprevention and as molecular targets for novel gene therapies.

Advantages and disadvantages of population screening for cancer and surveillance of at-risk groups

Despite improvements in diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, the prognosis of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies has remained poor. In essence, this poor outcome is related to the majority of patients presenting at an already advanced stage of disease at the time of diagnosis. Unfortunately, however, mass screening and surveillance programmes aimed at early detection and treatment in the population at large are in most countries considered to be cost-ineffective. Moreover, even with regard to established risk groups, there is considerable debate over whether current surveillance strategies are beneficial to these patients in terms of a reduction in cancer-related mortality. This chapter addresses various aspects of screening and surveillance. In the first part, general issues are discussed, whereas the second part focuses particularly on disease entities frequently encountered in gastrointestinal practice.

Continued (5-year) followup of a randomized clinical study comparing antireflux surgery and omeprazole in gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of antireflux surgery (ARS) and proton pump inhibitor therapy in the control of gastroesophageal reflux disease is well established. A direct comparison between these therapies is warranted to assess the benefits of respective therapies.

STUDY DESIGN

There were 310 patients with erosive esophagitis enrolled in the trial. There were 155 patients randomized to continuous omeprazole therapy and 155 to open antireflux surgery, of whom 144 later had an operation. Because of various withdrawals during the study course, 122 patients originally having an antireflux operation completed the 5-year followup; the corresponding figure in the omeprazole group was 133. Symptoms, endoscopy, and quality-of-life questionnaires were used to document clinical outcomes. Treatment failure was defined to occur if at least one of the following criteria were fulfilled: Moderate or severe heartburn or acid regurgitation during the last 7 days before the respective visit; Esophagitis of at least grade 2; Moderate or severe dysphagia or odynophagia symptoms reported in combination with mild heartburn or regurgitation; If randomized to surgery and subsequently required omeprazole for more than 8 weeks to control symptoms, or having a reoperation; If randomized to omeprazole and considered by the responsible physician to require antireflux surgery to control symptoms; If randomized to omeprazole and the patient, for any reason, preferred antireflux surgery during the course of the study. Treatment failure was the primary outcomes variable.

RESULTS

When the time to treatment failure was analyzed by use of the intention to treat approach, applying the life table analysis technique, a highly significant difference between the two strategies was revealed (p < 0.001), with more treatment failures in patients who originally were randomized to omeprazole treatment. The protocol also allowed dose adjustment in patients allocated to omeprazole therapy to either 40 or 60 mg daily in case of symptom recurrence. The curves subsequently describing the failure rates still remained separated in favor of surgery, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.088). Quality of life assessment revealed values within normal ranges in both therapy arms during the 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized multicenter trial with a 5-year followup, we found antireflux surgery to be more effective than omeprazole in controlling gastroesophageal reflux disease as measured by the treatment failure rates. But if the dose of omeprazole was adjusted in case of relapse, the two therapeutic strategies reached levels of efficacy that were not statistically different.

Cytokeratin immunoreactivity patterns in the diagnosis of short-segment Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The origin of intestinal metaplasia in short segments of columnar mucosa at the esophagogastric junction has clinical importance but can be difficult to determine at endoscopy. Cytokeratin (CK) 7 and 20 patterns are specific for long-segment Barrett's esophagus; however, their utility in short-segment Barrett's esophagus has not been assessed.

METHODS

Endoscopic biopsy specimens from patients with long-segment Barrett's esophagus (n = 49), suspected short-segment Barrett's esophagus (n = 43), and gastric intestinal metaplasia (n = 26) were immunostained for CK7 and CK20. Comprehensive clinical data were obtained, including age, gender, and hiatal hernia and Helicobacter pylori status.

RESULTS

A Barrett's CK7/20 pattern was present in 48 (98%) of 49 patients with long-segment Barrett's esophagus, 35 (82%) of 43 with suspected short-segment Barrett's esophagus, and 0 (0%) of 26 patients with gastric intestinal metaplasia. Patients with suspected short-segment Barrett's esophagus with a Barrett's CK7/20 pattern were clinically similar to those with long-segment Barrett's esophagus. In contrast, patients with suspected short-segment Barrett's esophagus with no Barrett's CK7/20 pattern were clinically similar to those with gastric intestinal metaplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

A Barrett's CK7/20 pattern identifies a subset of patients with suspected short-segment Barrett's esophagus who have a patient profile similar to that seen in long-segment Barrett's esophagus. A Barrett's CK7/20 pattern is an objective marker of Barrett's mucosa that in conjunction with appropriate clinical and endoscopic data can be used by clinicians to better define patients with short-segment Barrett's esophagus.

The location and frequency of intestinal metaplasia at the esophagogastric junction in 223 consecutive autopsies: implications for patient treatment and preventive strategies in Barrett's esophagus

The frequency of intestinal metaplasia at the esophagogastric junction is as high as 36% in endoscopy studies; the majority of cases (approximately 67%) occur in short segments of esophageal columnar mucosa. The validity of these studies has been questioned, however, because of heterogenous underlying diseases prompting endoscopy. To determine the frequency and origin of intestinal metaplasia at the esophagogastric junction, we histologically evaluated the entire esophagogastric junction for the presence of intestinal metaplasia using Alcian blue/periodic acid-Schiff mucin stains in 223 consecutive autopsies. Precise localization of the Z line in relation to the esophagogastric junction and tongues of esophageal columnar-appearing mucosa were noted in each case. Mean patient age was 47 years; 69% of patients were male, and 63% were white. Twenty five of 223 cases (11%) had intestinal metaplasia at the esophagogastric junction. Only 2 of 25 cases (8%) had intestinal metaplasia in the esophagus; the remaining 23 cases (92%) had intestinal metaplasia in the gastric cardia. Male gender, advanced age, white ethnic origin, and short tongues of esophageal columnar mucosa were not associated with gastric cardia intestinal metaplasia. An association of distal gastric intestinal metaplasia (P < .01) and chronic gastritis (P < .01) with gastric cardia intestinal metaplasia suggests a role for Helicobacter pylori infection in this process. The frequency of intestinal metaplasia at the esophagogastric junction in an unselected autopsy population is low (11%) even after exhaustive histologic evaluation using Alcian blue mucin stains. Furthermore, intestinal metaplasia is confined to the gastric cardia in more than 90% of cases with no association to male gender, white ethnic origin, advanced age, or the presence of short segments of esophageal columnar-appearing mucosa at endoscopy. These results demonstrate that caution is warranted when applying the findings of endoscopy studies to the development of preventive and screening strategies aimed at identifying Barrett's esophagus in an asymptomatic general population.

Safety of a systematic endoscopic biopsy protocol in patients with Barrett's esophagus

OBJECTIVE

Widespread implementation of rigorous, systematic endoscopic biopsy protocols for patients with Barrett's esophagus may be hindered by concerns about their safety. This report describes the safety experience of a large series of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus who underwent such procedures.

METHODS

Patients in the Seattle Barrett's Esophagus Project undergo biopsy surveillance in a research-based clinical setting, using large channel endoscopes and "jumbo" biopsy forceps. After visual inspection, multiple biopsies are obtained from lesions and at 1- to 2-cm intervals throughout the Barrett's esophageal segment.

RESULTS

From 1983 to 1997, 1,458 consecutive endoscopies were performed on 705 patients and 50,833 biopsies (average, 35; maximum, 120 per procedure) were taken. Procedures lasted from 15 to 90 min during which one to two biopsies were obtained per minute. Eleven patients experienced 18 significant adverse events, five of which led to overnight hospitalizations: two for bleeding attributed to concomitant esophageal stricture dilation; two for cardiac dysrhythmias; and one for respiratory arrest. Events managed in outpatient settings included chest pain during seven endoscopies (all accounted for by two patients), chest or epigastric pain developing after five endoscopies, and one tonsillar abrasion. All patients recovered completely, and no deaths, perforations, aspiration, or esophageal stricturing resulted from the procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

A rigorous, systematic endoscopic biopsy protocol in patients with Barrett's esophagus does not produce esophageal perforation or bleeding when performed by an experienced team of physicians, nurses, and technicians.

Classical Barrett esophagus contrasted with Barrett-type epithelium at normal-appearing esophagogastric junction. Central Finland Endoscopy Study Group

BACKGROUND

Incomplete intestinal metaplasia or specialized columnar epithelium (SCE) is the histologic hallmark of Barrett esophagus (BE), but it may also occur at a normal-appearing gastroesophageal junction without BE. We studied whether differences occur between BE patients and those with SCE at the squamocolumnar junction but without BE (abbreviated JSCE), in terms of endoscopic and histologic signs of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and Helicobacter pylori gastritis.

METHODS

A total of 1059 consecutive patients referred for endoscopy in one hospital district in Finland were enrolled in the study. Biopsy specimens (at least two from each site) were obtained from the gastric antrum and the corpus of the stomach and from the esophagogastric junction and distal esophagus.

RESULTS

Classical BE was detected in 25 (2%) and JSCE in 99 (9%) patients. Dysplasia in the metaplastic mucosa was observed in six BE patients but in none of the JSCE patients (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis the independent risk factors for BE were endoscopic erosive esophagitis (odds ratio (OR), 6.08; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.50-14.82), male sex (OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.20-7.65), and age (OR, 1.02 per year; 95% CI, 1.00-1.06). The independent risk factors for JSCE were endoscopic erosive esophagitis (OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.08-3.29) and age (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.05) but not H. pylori infection (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 0.83-2.97) or chronic gastritis (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.44-1.75). In univariate analysis, however, JSCE was associated with antral-predominant atrophic gastritis (77% H. pylori-positive). Unlike in JSCE patients, male sex strongly predominated among BE patients (P = 0.01). The mean ages of BE and JSCE patients did not differ.

CONCLUSIONS

Both BE and JSCE without BE increase in prevalence with age, and both associate with endoscopic erosive esophagitis but not with H. pylori gastritis. However, because of the marked sex disparity, JSCE cannot be a direct precursor of BE, and some factors other than GERD alone also play a role in the pathogenesis of BE. Compared with BE, dysplasia is a rare finding in JSCE, and endoscopic surveillance with biopsy specimens from JSCE patients without dysplasia is not recommended.

Prospective multivariate analysis of clinical, endoscopic, and histological factors predictive of the development of Barrett's multifocal high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was a prospective follow-up of Barrett's esophagus to determine what clinical, endoscopic, and histological features at the time of initial diagnosis are predictive of the development of Barrett's adenocarcinoma or multifocal high-grade dysplasia (HGD).

METHODS

Newly diagnosed Barrett's esophagus patients were prospectively followed with a standardized endoscopic and bioptic surveillance protocol. Features examined by chi2 and stepwise logistic regression analyses as potential predictors the development of multifocal HGD or adenocarcinoma included age, length of Barrett's segment, hiatal hernia size, severity of dysplasia at diagnosis, severity of dysplasia during surveillance, and type of long-term medical treatment.

RESULTS

One hundred-eight Barrett's patients have had follow-up ranging from 12 months to 101 months (mean +/- SD, 39.9+/-20.8 months), for a total of 361.8 patient-years. Overall, five patients developed multifocal HGD and five developed adenocarcinoma. The incidence of adenocarcinoma as well as multifocal HGD was 1 per 71.9 patient-years. Chi2 analysis showed progression to Barrett's multifocal HGD/adenocarcinoma was associated with hiatal hernia (p = 0.02), the length of Barrett's (p = 0.001), the presence of dysplasia at diagnoses (p < 0.001) or anytime during surveillance (p < 0.001). Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed progression to multifocal HGD or adenocarcinoma was significantly and independently associated with presence of dysplasia at diagnosis (p < 0.0001) or anytime during follow-up (p < 0.03), hiatal hernia size (p < 0.02, for hernia > or =3 cm), and length of Barrett's (p = 0.009, >2 cm).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic and histological features of Barrett's esophagus patients at initial diagnosis are predictive of risk of progression to cancer.

Significance of Fas and retinoblastoma protein expression during the progression of Barrett's metaplasia to adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a premalignant lesion characterized by replacement of normal squamous epithelium with columnar epithelium. This lesion can progress to dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. Recently, the Fas receptor and retinoblastoma (Rb) protein have been described as important mediators of apoptosis and tumor suppression, respectively. This study was undertaken to examine their expression during the progression of metaplasia to adenocarcinoma in BE.

METHODS

In a review of 56 adenocarcinomas arising in BE, the specimen blocks were examined using the immunohistochemical avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex technique. For each specimen, areas of normal epithelium were compared with areas of metaplasia, dysplasia, or carcinoma (when present). Monoclonal mouse anti-human antibodies were used to identify Rb protein (Rb-Ab5, 1/50 dilution; Oncogene Science) and the 40-50-kDa cell membrane Fas protein (APO-1/Fas, 1/5 dilution; DAKO Corp.).

RESULTS

Loss of Rb staining was observed as the metaplasia progressed to dysplasia and carcinoma, indicating accumulation of unstainable aberrant protein. Conversely, Fas protein staining was undetectable or weak in normal or metaplastic epithelium, increasing in the areas of high-grade dysplasia and carcinoma. These differences were statistically significant (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The accumulation of abnormal Rb protein during the progression of Barrett's metaplasia to carcinoma leads to unsuppressed tumor growth. Fas overexpression may represent a cellular attempt to balance the uncontrolled tumor proliferation by promoting apoptosis.

Surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus in the UK

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic screening for Barrett's oesophagus is being offered without evidence of efficacy Barrett's oesophagus is not an ideal candidate for a screening programme, as the natural history is unclear, uncertainties surround the indication for intervention and the treatment is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates.

METHODS

To determine the practices that clinicians employ in the management of Barrett's oesophagus in the UK, postal questionnaires were sent in May 1997 to 297 randomly selected members of the British Society of Gastroenterology asking for details of their current practice.

RESULTS

Of 152 respondents, 106 (70 per cent) performed surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus; 46 (30 per cent) did not carry out screening. There was no difference in the practices carried out by physicians or surgeons, teaching or acute general hospital clinicians, or those with an upper gastrointestinal interest. There was a wide disparity in screening interval: just over half (52 per cent) screen at yearly intervals. Only nine (8 per cent) took four quadrant biopsies per 2 cm of Barrett's oesophagus. Nearly half (49 per cent) manage mild dysplasia by increasing the frequency of endoscopy; only seven (7 per cent) prescribed patients a proton pump inhibiting agent. Faced with severe dysplasia, 33 (31 per cent) offered surgery immediately; 22 (21 per cent) simply followed the patient by endoscopy. Those not choosing to perform screening most frequently cited lack of evidence of efficacy as the reason behind their decision.

CONCLUSION

There is wide variation in surveillance practices for Barrett's oesophagus. Some methods are ineffectual. The recommendations made by the Barrett's Oesophagus Working Party in 1991 are not followed, possibly because they are not practical. New workable guidelines based on available evidence and a consensus of expert opinion should be established; this was suggested by 38 per cent of respondents who performed screening.

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and Barrett's esophagus: a population-based study

OBJECTIVE

We described incidence rates of esophageal adenocarcinoma in Denmark in a 20-yr period and determined the proportion of patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma who had a previous diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus, making them potential candidates for endoscopic surveillance.

METHODS

Rates of esophageal and gastric cancers were collected from the Danish Cancer registry for the period 1970-1991. The registry was used to identify all cases of esophageal adenocarcinoma in the period 1987-1992. Medical records were retrieved and details concerning previous diagnosis of reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus were recorded.

RESULTS

The age- and gender-adjusted incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma increased eightfold, from 0.3/10(5)/yr in 1970 to 2.3/10(5)/yr in 1990. This increase could not be explained by changes in classification or diagnostic routines. Medical data were retrieved for 524 of the 578 cases of esophageal adenocarcinoma reported during the period 1987-1992. A history of reflux symptoms or a diagnosis compatible with reflux was reported in 113 of 524 patients. A total of 119 patients (23%) had previously been investigated for dyspepsia or reflux symptoms, most often by endoscopy. A previous diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus was found in only 1.3% of the cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of esophageal adenocarcinoma in Denmark has increased eightfold over a 20-yr period, and this increase is not explained by changes in classification or diagnostic routines. More than 98% of esophageal adenocarcinomas were found in patients who could not have entered endoscopic surveillance, as Barrett's esophagus had not been diagnosed before the cancer diagnosis. Endoscopic surveillance to detect dysplasia may be an option for the individual patient with Barrett's esophagus, but these screening programs are not likely to reduce the death rate from esophageal adenocarcinomas in the general population.

Barrett's Esophagus and Barrett's Associated Neoplasia: Etiology and Pathologic Features

BACKGROUND: The incidence of Barrett's esophagus (BE) has been increasing in recent years. Patients with BE have 30- to 125-fold increased risk of developing adenocarcinoma. New techniques allowing early diagnosis, in addition to the identification of markers capable of predicting tumor progression, are needed. METHODS: The authors discuss the diagnostic features of BE and BE-associated neoplasia. RESULTS: BE can exhibit different types of metaplastic mucosa, but only the specialized (intestinal) mucosa has the potential to progress to dysplasia and carcinoma. The problems associated with diagnosing BE and with predicting the behavior of this condition are outlined. CONCLUSIONS: Studies are underway to identify molecular markers capable of predicting which BE patient will progress to carcinoma. Brush cytology and flow cytometry may become useful tools in the early detection of this disease.

Effectiveness and patient satisfaction with nurse-directed treatment of Barrett's esophagus

OBJECTIVE

Using clinical practice guidelines, a registered nurse adjusted antireflux medications, evaluated esophageal biopsy reports, determined the interval between surveillance endoscopies, and provided education for patients with Barrett's esophagus. No previous reports have assessed the effectiveness or patient satisfaction associated with registered nurse-provided primary care. Because estimates of the incidence of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma vary widely, we also prospectively followed a cohort of patients with Barrett's esophagus.

METHODS

Charts were reviewed to determine the frequency of variation from guidelines, the annual incidence of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma, and frequency of reflux symptoms. Patients were mailed a questionnaire to assess satisfaction with their medical care and with the nurse.

RESULTS

Variation by the nurse from the guidelines on surveillance endoscopy (1.9%) and the treatment of reflux (1.3%) was rare. Most patients were very satisfied (score of 6 on 0-6-point Likert scale) with overall medical care (88%), and patient education (76%), and most patients did not think that increased physician involvement would improve their care (93%). Ninety-seven percent of patients had control of reflux symptoms. Two patients with long segment Barrett's esophagus (n = 67) developed high grade dysplasia over 323 patient-yr of follow-up (1 of 162 patient-yr for an annual incidence of 0.6%). No patients with short segment Barrett's esophagus (n = 56) developed high grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma over 172 patient-years of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The registered nurse in our clinical setting effectively administered clinical practice guidelines for the management of Barrett's esophagus without clinically significant morbidity or patient dissatisfaction. Before these results can be generalized to other settings, further studies will need to be performed.

The histopathology and biologic prognostic factors of Barrett's esophagus: a review

In Barrett's esophagus, stratified squamous mucosa of the lower third of the esophagus is replaced by columnar mucosa, as a complication of chronic gastroesophageal reflux. The presence of Barrett's esophagus appears to be a major factor in the progression to adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the esophagus. Therefore it is crucial to identify the subset of patients at risk for the development of adenocarcinoma. Dysplasia is an important histologic feature to evaluate because it identifies those patients who require follow-up. The diagnosis of biopsies with lesser degrees of abnormalities, however, makes microscopic evaluation less helpful in identifying patients who need more frequent endoscopic biopsy surveillance. DNA ploidy and the use of monoclonal antibodies, such as suppressor gene product p53, oncogene cerbB-2, and Ki-67, have added dramatically to our understanding of the biology of Barrett's metaplasia and have given us objective indicators to predict the presence of an increased risk of developing cancer.

Barrett's esophagus

The columnar replacement of squamous epithelium in the lower esophagus is the result of gastroesophageal reflux. Whether the squamous cells are replaced or undergo metaplasia is still conjectural. This neoepithelium is unstable in the presence of continued reflux and prone to complications of stricture, ulceration, and adenocarcinoma. Considerable evidence supports the hypothesis that duodenal contents play a role in the development of Barrett's esophagus and its complications. The increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus is of concern in the Western World. Surveillance programs in some centers have been successful in early diagnosis, and excellent survival periods have been reported following resection in these cases. Both medical and surgical antireflux treatment is successful in symptom relief, but even in the absence of symptoms, reflux may continue. Surgery offers better overall results than proton pump inhibition of gastric acid and has been more popular since less aggressive (minimally invasive) techniques have been popularized. Mucosal ablation and antireflux measures by medicine or surgery are still in the experimental stages but hold considerable promise for the future.

Epidemiology and molecular biology of Barrett's adenocarcinoma

In the United States, the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma has risen faster than any other malignancy in recent years, and now represents the most common histologic type of esophageal cancer observed in major institutions. The precise etiology of this malignancy, and the epidermiologic variables responsible for its dramatically rising incidence, remains obscure. Elucidation of the molecular biology of malignant transformation in Barrett's esophagus may improve the management of patients with advanced esophageal adenocarcinomas. Furthermore, appreciation of the molecular events associated with esophageal adenocarcinomas. Furthermore, appreciation of the molecular events associated with esophageal adenocarcinogenesis may facilitate early detection of occult carcinomas, and enable therapeutic interventions designed to prevent these otherwise highly lethal neoplasms.

Review: Barrett's oesophagus in Taiwan

Barrett's oesophagus is the eponym applied to the columnar epithelium-lined lower oesophagus which is acquired as a complication of chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux (GER). Various complications seen in the Barrett's oesophagus, such as peptic ulcer, stricture, adenocarcinoma are named as Barrett's ulcer, Barrett's stricture-and Barrett's carcinoma, respectively. It is now generally accepted that Barrett's oesophagus is an acquired condition resulting from chronic repetitive GER. The frequency of Barrett's oesophagus seems to be higher in Caucasian than in Oriental or Negro populations. There is a tendency towards increasing prevalence rates all over the world, including Taiwan, due to the Westernization of diet, rapid growth in the elderly population, obesity etc. Almost 6% of the patients who manifest heartburn in GI clinics in Taiwan now suffer from GER, which is almost similar to the 7% reported by Nabel, (USA) in 1976. During the last 30 years, the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma has increased rapidly. Patients with Barrett's oesophagus have an increased risk of developing oesophageal adenocarcinoma and should be kept under surveillance. Regular follow-up, at least twice a year or preferably, every 2-3 months, for those patients with SCE using endoscopic surveillance and biopsy for those with severe dysphasia (oesophageal columnar intraepithelial neoplasia) in the surrounding area to detect Barrett's oesophagus cancer, is very important.

Esophageal manifestations of rheumatic disorders

This study was performed to review information on functional and anatomic esophageal manifestations in patients with rheumatic disorders and to outline their pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment in light of the current medical, endoscopic, and surgical advances. A MEDLINE search of English-language articles published between 1985 and 1995, reviews of the bibliographies of textbooks, and a manual search of the reference lists of relevant articles formed the data sources, all combined with our own clinical experience. Primary research and review articles addressing the pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and complications of esophageal disease occurring in a rheumatic context were selected, with emphasis on recently developed medical, endoscopic, and surgical methods for diagnosis and management. Study design and quality were assessed, with particular attention paid to methods and aims. Relevant data on frequency, clinical presentation, and relationship to underlying rheumatic disorder, prognosis, and clinical management were analyzed. Esophageal manifestations are common in patients with rheumatic diseases and range in nature and severity from functional myopathic or neuropathic esophageal dysmotility to extrinsic lumenal compression and esophageal mucosal damage from gastroesophageal acid reflux or opportunistic infection. The primary symptoms of heartburn, dysphagia, odynophagia, chest pain, and bleeding may be directly related to the underlying rheumatic disease or may be the unwanted effects of therapy with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, immunosuppressants, or disease-modifying agents. Easily over-looked in the context of a multisystemic disease, these esophageal symptoms may be amenable to simple treatments, but frequently require a thorough assessment by modern, sophisticated diagnostic tools. In many instances, functional and structural involvement of the esophagus in patients with rheumatic disorders requires a high index of suspicion for an early diagnosis, correct assessment, intensive surveillance, and aggressive therapy to avoid end-organ damage and decline in quality of life. Significant recent advances in the understanding of esophageal pathophysiology, the development of diagnostic techniques, progress in diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy, and minimally invasive surgery allow early detection and effective long-term therapy for esophageal dysfunction associated with rheumatic diseases.

Gastric acid and pepsin secretion in patients with Barrett's esophagus and appropriate controls

The objective of this study was to determine whether gastric secretion of acid and pepsin is different in the subset of esophagitis patients who also have Barrett's esophagus. Basal and stimulated gastric secretions were studied for 1 hr in the unstimulated state and 1 hr after pentagastrin 6 microg/kg subcutaneous injection. Because Barrett's patients are predominantly male, the 30 patients were matched with patients who had esophagitis, but not Barrett's, for sex (26 men, 4 women) and age as well as for background gastrointestinal disease (duodenal ulcer in 10, no ulcer disease in 17 and Zollinger-Ellison hypersecretors in 3). Patients with Barrett's weighed more than controls (P < 0.05). Acid and pepsin output in the basal and stimulated state were no different in Barrett's and their appropriately matched controls. Overnight fasting residue--volume, pH, acid and pepsin concentrations, and bile content--were also alike. The severity of esophagitis or prevalence of esophageal ulcer or stricture was not different between those with and without Barrett's and in neither was the grade of esophagitis related to acid or pepsin output. It is concluded that Barrett's esophagus patients do not have gastric secretions different from appropriately matched controls with esophagitis alone. When present, esophagitis due to reflux in Barrett's epithelium should be treated on its merits by appropriate reduction of acid exposure.