Risk factors, Helicobacter pylori and a role for laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer?

Perforated peptic ulcer: use of pre-admission oral glucocorticoids and 30-day mortality

BACKGROUND

Despite evidence that use of glucocorticoids increases the risk of complicated peptic ulcer disease, limited data exist on how use of oral glucocorticoids affects outcome for patients with peptic ulcer perforation.

AIM

To examine 30-day mortality from peptic ulcer perforation among pre-admission oral glucocorticoid users compared with non-users.

METHODS

We identified 2061 patients with a first-time hospital discharge diagnosis of perforated peptic ulcer, using population-based discharge registries in three Danish counties. Data on use of glucocorticoids and other ulcer-related drugs, previous hospitalizations for uncomplicated peptic ulcer disease, and comorbidity were obtained from discharge registries and prescription databases. Follow-up data on mortality were provided by the Danish Civil Registry System.

RESULTS

A total of 228 patients (11.1%) were exposed to glucocorticoids within 60 days of admission. Overall 30-day mortality rate was 25.2%, the corresponding rate among current glucocorticoid users was 39.4%. Compared with 'never users', the adjusted mortality ratio among current users of oral glucocorticoids alone was 2.1 (95% CI: 1.5-3.1). Among current users of oral glucocorticoids in combination with other ulcer-related drugs the mortality ratio was 1.5 (95% CI: 1.1-2.1).

CONCLUSION

Pre-admission use of oral glucocorticoids is associated with up to a twofold increase in 30-day mortality among patients hospitalized with perforated peptic ulcer.

Helicobacter pylori infection and perforated peptic ulcer prevalence of the infection and role of antimicrobial treatment

Although the role of Helicobacter pylori infection on noncomplicated peptic ulcer disease has been definitively established, the precise relationship between the organism and complicated ulcer has hardly been studied. The mean prevalence of H. pylori infection in patients with perforated peptic ulcer is of only about 65-70%, which contrasts with the almost 90-100% figure reported in noncomplicated ulcer disease. However, H. pylori infection rates in various studies range markedly from 0% to 100%, suggesting that differences in variables as number and type of diagnostic methods used to diagnose H. pylori infection, or frequency of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug intake, may be responsible for the low prevalence reported in some studies. Recurrent ulcer disease after peptic ulcer perforation mainly occurs in patients with H. pylori infection, which suggests that the microorganism plays an important role in this complication. All patients with perforated peptic ulcer should be treated by simple closure of the perforation and with therapy aimed at healing of the ulcer and eradicating the H. pylori infection, as disappearance of the organism prevents, or at least decreases, ulcer recurrence and ulcer perforation in patients with H. pylori-associated perforated ulcers after simple closure. Therefore, H. pylori eradicating treatment should be started during the immediate postoperative period. The patients with intractable recurrent symptoms of peptic ulcer despite adequate medical treatment, but without H. pylori infection (e.g. a patient using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), is probably the only remaining indication for elective definitive surgical treatment of peptic ulcer disease.