Aminoterminal propeptide of type III procollagen and hyaluronan in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis: markers of fibrosis in primary biliary cirrhosis

Nomogram for predicting advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

We aimed to formulate a novel predictive nomogram to discriminate liver fibrosis stage in patients with chronic liver disease.

METHODS

Nomograms were established based on the results of multivariate analysis. The predictive accuracy of the nomograms was assessed by ROC analysis and calibration. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to determine the clinical benefit of the nomograms.

RESULTS

INR, platelets, and N-terminal propeptide type III collagen (PIIINP) were independent predictors for advanced liver fibrosis (≥ S3) and cirrhosis (S4) in patients with chronic liver disease in the training cohort. In the training set, the areas under the ROCs (AUROCs) of nomogram S3S4, APRI, FIB-4, and GPR for stage ≥ S3 were 0.83, 0.71, 0.68, and 0.74, respectively; the AUROCs of nomogram S4, APRI, FIB-4, and GPR for stage S4 were 0.88, 0.74, 0.78, and 0.79, respectively. The calibrations showed optimal agreement between the prediction by the established nomograms and actual observation. In the validation set, the AUROCs of nomogram S3S4, APRI, FIB-4, and GPR for stage ≥ S3 were 0.86, 0.79, 0.78, and 0.81, respectively; the AUROCs of nomogram S4, APRI, FIB-4, and GPR for stage S4 were 0.88, 0.77, 0.81, and 0.83, respectively. Furthermore, the decision curve analysis suggested that the nomograms represent better clinical benefits in both independent cohorts than APRI, FIB-4, and GPR.

CONCLUSION

The constructed nomograms could be a superior tool for discriminating advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in chronic liver disease.

Plasma N-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen accurately predicts liver fibrosis severity in children with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We examined the diagnostic performance of plasma N-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP) levels, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score for predicting non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and liver fibrosis stage in children/adolescents with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

METHODS

We enrolled 204 children/adolescents with biopsy-proven NAFLD at the "Bambino Gesù" Children's Hospital. We measured plasma PIIINP levels using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit and calculated APRI and FIB-4 scores using standard methods.

RESULTS

Children with NASH had higher plasma PIIINP levels, APRI and FIB-4 scores compared with those without NASH (all P < .001). However, PIIINP levels had much better diagnostic performance and accuracy than APRI and FIB-4 scores for predicting liver fibrosis stage. PIIINP levels correlated with the total NAFLD activity score (NAS) and its constituent components (P < .0001). The risk of either NASH or F ≥ 2 fibrosis progressively increased with increasing PIIINP levels (P < .0001), independent of age, gender, adiposity measures, insulin resistance, NAS score and the patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein-3 rs738409 polymorphism. For every 3.6 ng/mL increase in PIIINP levels, the likelihood of having F ≥ 2 fibrosis increased by ~14-fold (adjusted-odds ratio 14.1, 95% CI 5.50-35.8, P < .0001) after adjustment for the aforementioned risk factors. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.921 (95% CI 0.87-0.97) for F ≥ 2 fibrosis, and 0.993 (95% CI 0.98-1.0) for F3 fibrosis respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike APRI and FIB-4 scores, plasma PIIINP levels are a promising, non-invasive biomarker for diagnosing liver fibrosis stage in children/adolescents with biopsy-proven NAFLD.

Utility of Noninvasive Markers of Fibrosis in Cholestatic Liver Diseases

Methods of liver fibrosis assessment have changed considerably in the last 20 years, and noninvasive markers now have been recognized as major first-line tools in the management of patients with chronic viral hepatitis infection. But what about the efficiency and utility of these surrogate indices for the more uncommon chronic cholestatic liver diseases, namely primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis? This article provides clinicians with a global overview of what is currently known in the field. Both diagnostic and prognostic aspects of noninvasive markers of fibrosis in cholestatic liver diseases are presented and discussed.

Hyaluronic acid as a biomarker of fibrosis in chronic liver diseases of different etiologies

Chronic liver diseases represent a significant public health problem worldwide. The degree of liver fibrosis secondary to these diseases is important, because it is the main predictor of their evolution and prognosis.

Hyaluronic acid is studied as a non-invasive marker of liver fibrosis in chronic liver diseases, in an attempt to avoid the complications of liver puncture biopsy, considered the gold standard in the evaluation of fibrosis. We review the advantages and limitations of hyaluronc acid, a biomarker, used to manage patients with chronic viral hepatitis B or C infection, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, HIV-HCV coinfection, alcoholic liver disease, primary biliary cirrhosis, biliary atresia, hereditary hemochromatosis and cystic fibrosis.

Plasma Pro-C3 (N-terminal type III collagen propeptide) predicts fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Fibrogenesis results in release of certain extracellular matrix protein fragments into the circulation. We evaluated the diagnostic and prognostic performance of two novel serological markers, the precisely cleaved N-terminal propeptide of type III collagen (Pro-C3) and a peptide of helical collagen type III degradation (C3M), in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients.

METHOD

Pro-C3 and C3M were measured by ELISA in plasma from CHC patients (n = 194) from a prior phase II antifibrotic trial (NCT00244751). Plasma samples and paired liver biopsies were obtained at baseline and after 1-year. Patients were stratified according to Ishak stages 2-4. Internal cross-validation was performed by bootstrap analysis.

RESULTS

Pro-C3 levels were significantly higher in CHC patients in Ishak stage 4 compared to stage 2 (P < 0.001) or 3 (P < 0.01). Pro-C3 could significantly distinguish moderate (stage 4) from mild fibrosis (stage 2/3) (AUC = 0.72, P < 0.001). Importantly, an overall significance in Pro-C3 (P = 0.007) levels was observed between the groups of -1, 0, +1 and +2 change in Ishak stage at 12 months. Pro-C3 was significantly increased in group +1 (P = 0.030) and +2 (P = 0.021) compared to group 0. No significant differences were observed for C3M. In multivariate analysis, only baseline Pro-C3, but not FibroTest, had an independent association with fibrosis progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Pro-C3 is a useful test to predict fibrogenesis and monitor disease progression. Moreover, it could differentiate mild from moderate disease. Pro-C3 may become a promising blood parameter be included in future studies for monitoring disease progression and eventually for evaluation of potential antifibrotic therapies.

Review article: the efficacy of biomarkers in chronic fibroproliferative diseases - early diagnosis and prognosis, with liver fibrosis as an exemplar

BACKGROUND

Nearly 45% of all deaths are associated with chronic fibroproliferative diseases, of which the primary characteristic is altered remodelling of the extracellular matrix. A major difficulty in developing anti-fibrotic therapies is the lack of accurate and established techniques to estimate dynamics of fibrosis, regression or progression, in response to therapy.

AIM

One of the most pressing needs in modern clinical chemistry for fibroproliferative disorders is the development of biomarkers for early diagnosis, prognosis, and early efficacy for the benefit of patients and to facilitate improved drug development. The aim of this article was to review the serological biomarkers that may assist in early diagnosis of patients, separate fast from slow- or nonprogressors, and possibly assist in drug development for fibroproliferative diseases, exemplified by liver fibrosis. The lack of success of biochemical markers and the possible reasons for this is discussed in the context of other fields with biomarker success.

METHOD

This is a personal opinion review article.

RESULTS

Biochemical markers, originating from the fibrotic structure, may have increased specificity and sensitivity for disease. Assessment of the tissue turnover balance by measurement of tissue formation and tissue degradation separately by novel technologies may provide value.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel technologies focused on the protein fingerprint in addition to biomarker classification, may increase the quality of biomarker development and provide the much needed biomarkers to further the fibroproliferative field. This is in direct alignment with the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicinal Agencies initiatives of personal health care.

Serum surrogate markers of liver fibrosis in primary biliary cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Hyaluronan, leptin, laminin and collagen IV have been used extensively for the assessment of liver fibrosis. The aim of this study was to assay these markers in the peripheral and hepatic vein blood of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) patients and to study their ability to discriminate early from advanced disease.

METHODS

Sera from 62 PBC patients were compared to 60 controls, 44 chronic Hepatitis C, 38 hepatocellular carcinoma and 34 viral cirrhosis patients. Serum from the hepatic vein of 15 cirrhotic PBC patients and 17 patients with viral cirrhosis was also assayed.

RESULTS

All disease groups had significantly increased levels of hyaluronan and collagen IV, compared to controls, while laminin was significantly increased only in viral cirrhosis. Hyaluronan levels were statistically different between early (54.5 ng/ml; 95%CI 27.3-426.9) and late PBC (154.5 ng/ml; 95%CI 55.3-764.4, p<0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) for the identification of late PBC was 0.74 for hyaluronan, 0.63 for leptin, 0.59 for laminin and 0.70 for collagen IV. Hyaluronan had high sensitivity and NPV in identifying late stages of PBC (96% and 90%, respectively). Short term UDCA had no effect on these markers.

CONCLUSION

No single measurement can differentiate between advanced and early fibrosis in PBC. However serum hyaluronan is a promising single serum marker for longitudinal studies in PBC.

Noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis are highly predictive of liver-related death in a cohort of HCV-infected individuals with and without HIV infection

OBJECTIVES

Noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis correlate with the stage of liver fibrosis, but have not been widely applied to predict liver-related mortality.

METHODS

We assessed the ability of two indices of liver fibrosis, aspartate aminotransferase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and Fib-4, and two markers of extracellular matrix metabolism, hyaluronic acid (HA) and YKL40, to predict liver mortality in a prospective cohort of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected individuals with and without HIV coinfection. These were compared with two established prognostic scores, the Child-Pugh-Turcotte (CPT) and model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores.

RESULTS

A total of 303 subjects, of whom 207 were HIV positive at study entry, were followed up for a mean period of 3.1 years. There were 33 deaths due to liver disease. The ability of each test and score to predict 3-year liver mortality was expressed as the area under the receiver operator curve. The area under the receiver operator curve 95% confidence intervals were: HA 0.92 (0.86-0.96), CPT 0.91 (0.79-0.96), APRI 0.88 (0.80-0.93), Fib-4 0.87 (0.77-0.92), MELD 0.84 (71-0.91). In multivariate analyses HA, APRI, and fib-4 were independent predictors of mortality when included in models with MELD or CPT.

CONCLUSION

Noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis are highly predictive of liver outcome in HCV-infected individuals with and without HIV coinfection. These markers seem to have a prognostic value independent of CPT and MELD.

Circulating markers of liver fibrosis progression

INTRODUCTION

Fibrogenesis is a typical reaction of the liver to injury. In the case of overstimulation of fibrogenesis clinically significant fibrosis and, eventually, cirrhosis occur. Treatment of liver cirrhosis is limited, therefore it is important to screen and monitor patients at risk of cirrhosis. Noninvasive parameters are ideal for this purpose due to their risk profile and repeatability.

METHODS

Systematic review of literature.

RESULTS

Among large number of proposed biomarkers, there is a distinct difference between two groups or classes. Class I biomarkers are associated with the process of fibrogenesis, their presence in the serum is the result of the increased turnover of extracellular matrix. Class II biomarkers and their combinations are mostly markers of liver function or structural damage. We have identified 27 Class I and 13 Class II biomarkers that have been proposed in the literature. We have evaluated in detail those which reached limited clinical application.

CONCLUSION

General clinical acceptance of these biomarkers is low because of various drawbacks. Simple and readily available biomarkers have low accuracy in predicting liver fibrosis and more advanced markers have low cost-benefit ratio. Therefore liver biopsy remains the "gold standard" for diagnosis of fibrosis. However potential noninvasive alternatives exist and their implementation could be valuable.

Evaluation of liver fibrosis: a concise review

The diagnosis of liver fibrosis has traditionally relied on liver biopsy. However, recent studies have suggested that there can be up to a 33 % error in the diagnosis of cirrhosis. In this article, we review the current status of liver biopsy as a gold standard for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and discuss the radiological and serum tests that have been proposed as potential adjuncts or alternatives to biopsies. Indirect markers of liver fibrosis which reflect alterations in liver function and or inflammation are discussed as well as more direct markers of liver fibrosis. The limitations of utilization of these markers for both cross-sectional diagnosis of fibrosis and monitoring disease progression or regression are discussed.

Quantitative testing of liver function compared to prognostic scores in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis

AIM

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a slowly progressive liver disease which can lead to cirrhosis. We investigated if quantitative tests of liver function (QTLF) and serum levels of a surrogate marker of hepatic fibrogenesis (PIIINP) provide information in addition to established prognostic scores.

METHODS

In 34 PBC patients PIIINP, PBC-relevant parameters, histological staging and QTLF at entry and at 2 years were determined and compared with the Christensen (CPS I, CPS II) and Mayo prognosis score. QTLF included aminopyrine breath test, galactose elimination capacity, sorbitol and indocyanine green clearance.

RESULTS

Bilirubin, serum IgM and PIIINP were elevated at both time points, whereas albumin and prothrombin time remained normal. Clinical findings (ascites, cirrhosis, central cholestasis) and histological staging worsened after 2 years, as did the CPS II. However, QTLF, PIIINP, CPS I and the Mayo score revealed no significant changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Only CPS II changed after 2 years, whereas CPS I and the Mayo score remained unaltered. QTLF and PIIINP did not provide any further information on progression of PBC, suggesting that QTLF cannot predict prognosis of PBC patients in a two-year interval and that CPS II is superior to CPS I and the Mayo score in short-term studies for PBC.

Hepatic fibrosis: are any of the serum markers useful?

There is a clinical need for noninvasive measurement of liver fibrosis both to diagnose significant liver fibrosis and to monitor the effects of therapy on fibrogenesis and fibrolysis. Multiple clinical markers have been evaluated over the years, and as our understanding of the molecular process of liver scarring has advanced, newer markers have appeared. Serum markers include extracellular matrix proteins such as the N-terminal propeptide of collagen III, hyaluronan, YKL-40, laminin, metalloproteinases, and their inhibitors. Use of multiple markers has led to 90% sensitivity in diagnosing cirrhosis, but specificity is variable at about 60%. Automated systems to measure these markers are under development and are being evaluated for their ability to monitor fibrosis during and after therapy in multiple liver diseases, including hepatitis B and C. Although no individual fibrosis marker is clinically applicable today, we foresee a future in which monitoring fibrosis markers will replace sequential liver biopsy as a standard of care.