Cyclosporine therapy affects aminotransferase activity but not hepatitis C virus RNA levels in chronic hepatitis C

Effects of the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitor Everolimus on Hepatitis C Virus Replication In Vitro and In Vivo

BACKGROUND

The influence of immunosuppressants on hepatitis C virus (HCV) re-infection after liver transplantation, particularly mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, remains unclear. The aim of our study was to analyze the influence of everolimus (EVR) on HCV replication activity in the context of underlying molecular mechanisms, with focus on the pro-myelocytic leukemia protein (PML).

METHODS

HCV viral load was recorded in 40 patients with post-transplant HCV re-infection before and 8 weeks after introduction of EVR. An HCV cell culture replicon system for genotype (GT) 1b, GT2b, and GT3a was used to compare the influence of EVR on HCV replication for the respective genotypes in vitro. Fluorescence-activated cell-sorting analysis was used to test for effects on cell proliferation. PML expression was silenced with the use of small hairpin RNA constructs, and PML expression was quantified by means of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

In patients with HCV, the viral load of GT1a and GT1b was hardly affected by EVR, whereas the viral load was reduced in patients with GT2a (P ≤ .0001) or GT3 infection (P ≤ .05). In vitro EVR impairs HCV replication activity of GT2a and GT3a up to 60% (P ≤ .0005), whereas in GT1b cells, HCV replication activity is increased by 50% (P ≤ .005). Replicon cell viability was not impaired. HCV replication activity is impaired in the absence of PML, which can be reversed by overexpression of PML isoforms. Furthermore, in the absence of PML, the effect of EVR on HCV replication activity is nearly abrogated.

CONCLUSIONS

The mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor EVR influences HCV replication via PML. The herein presented results suggest a genotype-dependent benefit for an EVR-based immunosuppressive regimen in patients with GT2a or GT3 re-infection after liver transplantation.

Reduced fibrosis in recurrent HCV with tacrolimus, azathioprine and steroids versus tacrolimus: randomised trial long term outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Early results of a randomised trial showed reduced fibrosis due to recurrent HCV hepatitis with tacrolimus triple therapy (TT) versus monotherapy (MT) following transplantation for HCV cirrhosis. We evaluated the clinical outcomes after a median 8 years of follow-up, including differences in fibrosis assessed by collagen proportionate area (CPA).

DESIGN

103 consecutive liver transplant recipients with HCV cirrhosis receiving cadaveric grafts were randomised to tacrolimus MT (n=54) or TT (n=49) with daily tacrolimus (0.1 mg/kg divided dose), azathioprine (1 mg/kg) and prednisolone (20 mg), the last tailing off to zero by 6 months. Both groups had serial transjugular biopsies with hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement. Time to reach Ishak stage 4 was the predetermined endpoint. CPA was measured in all biopsies. Factors associated with HCV recurrence were evaluated. Clinical decompensation was the first occurrence of ascites/hydrothorax, variceal bleeding or encephalopathy.

RESULTS

No significant preoperative, peri-operative or postoperative differences between groups were found. During 96 months median follow-up, stage 4 fibrosis was reached in 19 MT/11 TT with slower fibrosis progression in TT (p=0.009). CPA at last biopsy was 12% in MT and 8% in TT patients (p=0.004). 14 MT/ three TT patients reached HVPG≥10 mm Hg (p=0.002); 10 MT/three TT patients, decompensated. Multivariately, allocated MT (p=0.047, OR 3.23, 95% CI 1.01 to 10.3) was independently associated with decompensation: 14 MT/ seven TT died, and five MT/ four TT were retransplanted.

CONCLUSIONS

Long term immunosuppression with tacrolimus, azathioprine and short term prednisolone in HCV cirrhosis recipients resulted in slower progression to severe fibrosis assessed by Ishak stage and CPA, less portal hypertension and decompensation, compared with tacrolimus alone. ISRCTN94834276--Randomised study for immunosuppression regimen in liver transplantation.

NK cells, innate immunity and hepatitis C infection after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation in patients with active hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is followed by almost universal recurrence of viral infection. The control of HCV infection has been characterized largely in terms of the HCV-specific function of T-lymphocytes and the adaptive immune response. Emerging data suggest that components of the innate immune system, including natural killer cells, have a central role in determining the nature of posttransplant HCV infection and the likelihood of response to antiviral therapy. This review examines the emerging evidence implicating innate immunity in the pathogenesis of posttransplant HCV infections and the potential therapeutic implications of these observations.

Outcome of recurrent hepatitis C virus after liver transplantation in a randomized trial of tacrolimus monotherapy versus triple therapy

Less potent immunosuppression is considered to reduce the severity of hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after liver transplantation. An optimal regimen is unknown. We evaluated tacrolimus monotherapy versus triple therapy in a randomized trial of 103 first transplants for HCV cirrhosis. One hundred three patients who underwent transplantation for HCV were randomized to tacrolimus monotherapy (n = 54) or triple therapy with tacrolimus, azathioprine, and steroids (n = 49), which were tapered to zero by 3 to 6 months. Both groups had serial transjugular biopsies with hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement. The time to reach Ishak stage 4 was the predetermined endpoint. All factors documented in the literature as being associated with HCV recurrence and the allocated treatment were evaluated for reaching stage 4 and HVPG >or= 10 mm Hg. No significant preoperative, perioperative, or postoperative differences, including the frequency of biopsies between groups, were found. During a mean follow-up of 53.5 months, 9 monotherapy patients and 6 triple therapy patients died, and 5 monotherapy patients and 4 triple therapy patients underwent retransplantation. Stage 4 fibrosis was reached in 17 monotherapy patients and 10 triple therapy patients (P = 0.04), with slower fibrosis progression in the triple therapy patients (P = 0.048). Allocated therapy and histological acute hepatitis were independently associated with stage 4 fibrosis. HVPG increased to >or=10 mm Hg more rapidly in monotherapy patients versus triple therapy patients (P = 0.038). In conclusion, long-term maintenance immunosuppression with azathioprine and shorter term prednisolone with tacrolimus in HCV cirrhosis recipients resulted in a slower onset of histologically proven severe fibrosis and portal hypertension in comparison with tacrolimus alone, and this was independent of known factors affecting fibrosis.

Human liver transplantation as a model to study hepatitis C virus pathogenesis

Hepatitis C is a leading etiology of liver cancer and a leading reason for liver transplantation. Although new therapies have improved the rates of sustained response, a large proportion of patients (approximately 50%) fail to respond to antiviral treatment, thus remaining at risk for disease progression. Although chimpanzees have been used to study hepatitis C virus biology and treatments, their cost is quite high, and their use is strictly regulated; indeed, the National Institutes of Health no longer supports the breeding of chimpanzees for study. The development of hepatitis C virus therapies has been hindered by the relative paucity of small animal models for studying hepatitis C virus pathogenesis. This review presents the strengths of human liver transplantation and highlights the advances derived from this model, including insights into viral kinetics and quasispecies, viral receptor binding and entry, and innate and adaptive immunity. Moreover, consideration is given to current and emerging antiviral therapeutic approaches based on translational research results.

A randomized, prospective, pharmacoeconomic trial of neoral 2-hour postdose concentration monitoring versus tacrolimus trough concentration monitoring in de novo liver transplant recipients

Two-hour postdose cyclosporine (C2) monitoring is becoming an accepted method of therapeutic drug monitoring, although it is not known whether C2 monitoring is superior to tacrolimus (FK)-based immunosuppression. The purpose of this trial was to compare the safety, efficacy, and pharmacoeconomics of cyclosporine A (CsA) monitored by C2 levels versus FK monitored by trough levels in de novo liver transplant recipients. After informed consent, 60 de novo liver transplant recipients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either FK (trough, 6-10 ng/mL) or CsA (C2, 600-1200 ng/mL) and corticosteroids. The 2 groups were similar for gender, race, indication for liver disease, and age. At 1 year, patient survival was similar (93% for FK versus 90% for C2). One patient in the FK arm was retransplanted because of recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV). Early acute rejection occurred in 27% of FK-treated patients and 23% of CsA-treated recipients [P = not significant (NS)]. Recurrent HCV occurred in 21% of FK-treated patients and 61% of CsA-treated patient (P = 0.04). The incidence of other infections, new onset diabetes mellitus, requirement for antihypertensives, and requirement for cholesterol medications were similar between the groups. Annual calcineurin inhibitor costs were lower in the C2 arm ($5432 +/- 2091 for C2 versus $8291 +/- 3948 for FK, P = 0.001). Annual pretransplant drug costs ($2292 +/- 2331 for C2 versus $2831 +/- 2358 for FK, P = NS) and 1-year posttransplant drug costs ($17,214 +/- 16,600 for C2 versus $15,151 +/- 11,699 for FK, P = NS) were similar. In conclusion, immunosuppression with CsA, monitored by C2 levels, is safe, effective, and economical in liver transplant recipients and provides immunosuppression at least equivalent to that of FK.

Approach to recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplantation

Hepatitis C-associated liver failure is the most common indication for liver transplantation. Histologic evidence of recurrence is apparent in approximately 50% of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected recipients in the first postoperative year. Approximately 10% of HCV-infected recipients will die or lose their allograft due to hepatitis C-associated allograft failure. HCV-infected recipients who undergo retransplantation have 5-year patient and graft survival rates that are broadly similar to those for transplant recipients who are not HCV infected. Although the choice of calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil, or both has not been clearly shown to affect histologic recurrence of hepatitis C, higher cumulative exposure to corticosteroids is associated with increased mortality and more severe histologic recurrence. In contrast to treatment of non-HCV-infected recipients, treatment of HCV-infected transplant recipients for acute cellular rejection is associated with attenuated patient survival. Steroid-resistant rejection with or without the use of T-cell-depleting therapies is associated with a greater than fivefold increased risk of mortality in HCV-infected liver transplant recipients. Pegylated interferon with or without ribavirin should be considered for treatment of recipients with histologically apparent recurrence of hepatitis C before total bilirubin exceeds 3 mg/dL. The role of hepatitis C immunoglobulin and new immunosuppressive agents in the management of hepatitis C after transplant continues to evolve.

Recurrent hepatitis C post-transplantation: where are we now and where do we go from here? A report from the Canadian transplant hepatology workshop

Approximately 400 liver transplants are performed in Canada every year and close to 6000 per year in the United States. Forty per cent to 45% of all liver transplants are performed for patients with underlying hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease. These patients have a different natural history, new complication risks and different treatment efficacy than nontransplant HCV patients. Every effort must be made to identify those patients at highest risk for progressive liver disease post-transplant. Recurrent HCV is an Achilles' heel to transplant hepatology. The true natural history of this disease is only starting to unravel and many questions remain unanswered on the optimal management of these patients after liver transplantation. The present report summarizes the literature and ongoing research needs that are specific to HCV-related liver transplantation.

Cyclosporine suppresses hepatitis C virus in vitro and increases the chance of a sustained virological response after liver transplantation

Cyclosporine is an immunosuppressive agent widely used in the management of liver transplant recipients. Cyclosporine has been shown to have antiviral activities against HIV, herpes simplex, and vaccinia viruses. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of Cyclosporine in viral clearance in the liver transplant recipients during therapy with combination of interferon and ribavirin, and to determine the anti-viral potential of Cyclosporine in vitro. Immunosuppression consisted of either Cyclosporine or Tacrolimus-based therapy. Both groups received therapy with interferon and ribavirin for 48 weeks when evidence of progressive histologic disease was determined. We found that subjects on Cyclosporine-based immunosuppression (n = 56) had a higher sustained virological response of 46% compared to 27% in the patients on Tacrolimus-based therapy (n = 59, P = 0.03). In vitro studies were performed to evaluate the antiviral effect of Cyclosporine in the replicon system. These studies showed that Cyclosporine inhibits hepatitis C viral replication in a dose-dependent manner. Combination of Cyclosporine with interferon showed additive effect, and its function is independent of interferon signaling pathways. In conclusion, Cyclosporine may offer an advantage to Tacrolimus in those patients undergoing interferon-based therapy and should be studied in a prospective randomized trial.

Impact of cyclosporine on the development of immunosuppressive therapy in liver transplantation

Over the last 20 years, immunosuppression protocols in liver transplant patients have been based on calcineurin inhibitors, such as cyclosporine (CsA). Currently, there are three outstanding clinical issues related to the use of CsA in the liver transplant setting that merit further attention: (1) dose adjustment according to 2-hour postdose (instead of trough) concentrations to improve efficacy and safety, (2) possible synergistic effect between CsA and antiviral treatments for recurrent posttransplant hepatitis C infection, and (3) preliminary results showing favorable outcomes after liver transplantation in HIV-positive patients receiving antiviral therapy.

Long-term outcome of liver transplants for chronic hepatitis C: a 10-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Recurrence of hepatitis C (HCV) infection after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in HCV-positive patients is almost universal. Severity of graft hepatitis increases during the long-term follow-up, and up to 30% of patients develop severe graft hepatitis and cirrhosis. However, there are still no clear predictors for severe recurrence. The aim of this study was to examine the 10-year outcome and risk factors for graft failure caused by HCV recurrence.

METHODS

In a prospective analysis, 234 OLTs in 209 HCV-positive patients with a median age of 53 years were analyzed. Immunosuppression was based on cyclosporine A or tacrolimus in different protocols. Predictors for outcome were genotype, viremia, donor variables, recipient demographics, postoperative immunosuppression, and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibilities.

RESULTS

Actuarial 5-, and 10-year patient survival was 75.8% and 68.8%. Eighteen of 209 (8.7%) patients died because of HCV recurrence, which was responsible for 35.9% of the total 53 deaths. Significant risk factors for HCV-related graft failure in an univariate analysis were multiple steroid pulses, use of OKT3, and donor age greater than 40. However, in a multivariate analysis, multiple rejection treatments with steroids and OKT3 treatment proved to be significantly associated with HCV-related graft loss.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of causes leading to graft failure in patients with HCV showed that HCV recurrence is responsible for one of three deaths in HCV-positive patients. Rejection treatment contributed significantly to an enhanced risk for HCV-related graft loss. New antiviral treatments, as well as adapted immunosuppressive protocols, will be necessary to further improve the outcome of HCV-positive patients after liver transplantation.

Liver biopsy, viral kinetics, and the impact of viremia on severity of hepatitis C virus recurrence

1. Nearly all recipients who are chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) at the time of liver transplantation will have HCV RNA detectable postoperatively. 2. HCV replication can begin as early as the first postoperative week. 3. HCV levels fall significantly during the anhepatic phase of liver transplantation and continue to fall during the first 12-24 hours posttransplantation. 4. Serum HCV RNA levels typically increase rapidly from the second week posttransplantation and peak by the fourth postoperative month. HCV RNA levels at one year posttransplantation are 10-20 fold greater than pretransplant levels. 5. Corticosteroid treatment for acute cellular rejection is associated with large increases in HCV RNA levels. 6. HCV RNA levels do not appear to vary with choice of calcineurin inhibitor. 7. Early HCV RNA levels are predictive of subsequent histological severity of recurrence. 8. A correlation between early levels of viremia and subsequent allograft injury suggests that initiation of antiviral therapy early in the posttransplant course might be desirable.

A pilot study of the combination of cyclosporin A and interferon alfacon-1 for the treatment of hepatitis C in previous nonresponder patients

GOALS

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of interferon and cyclosporine for the treatment of hepatitis C in previous nonresponder patients.

BACKGROUND

Preliminary data indicated that adding the immunosuppressive agent cyclosporin A to interferon might improve response rates in patients with hepatitis C.

STUDY

Ten previous virologic nonresponders with genotype 1 infection were included. Treatment consisted of interferon alfacon-1, 15 microg/d, and cyclosporine, 100 mg twice daily, for 4 weeks. The dose of interferon alfacon-1 was then decreased to 15 microg three times weekly, and cyclosporine was reduced to 50 mg twice daily. Therapy was continued for 48 weeks unless viremia persisted at week 24.

RESULTS

Three of 10 subjects had an on-treatment virologic response, although one had a breakthrough with recurrent viremia during treatment and two relapsed after therapy was completed. On treatment responders had significantly higher trough cyclosporine levels at week 4 compared with nonresponders (P = 0.025). Serum creatinine levels remained stable, and no patient developed diabetes. Triglyceride levels increased during treatment. Cyclosporine was dose reduced in two patients for hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

Selected patients with hepatitis C tolerated therapy, including cyclosporine without severe or irreversible toxicity. Despite an association between higher cyclosporine levels and on-treatment response, the combination of cyclosporine and interferon was ineffective in producing a sustained response in previous nonresponder patients.

Selected drug complications and treatment conflicts in the presence of coexistent diseases

The presence of different coexistent systemic diseases often times complicates the selection of the appropriate treatment of an underlying rheumatologic condition. In this article, some controversial treatment conflicts that are frequently encountered in the daily practice of rheumatology are clarified and guidelines for the best available therapeutic options are provided.

Hepatitis viruses under immunosuppressive agents

Clinical and experimental studies have shown that T cell-mediated immune mechanisms are involved in the pathogenesis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus infection. Immunosuppressants may impair T cell function and thereby reduce immune-mediated hepatocytolysis and virus clearance. In addition, corticosteroid may activate the glucocorticoid responsive element in the HBV genome to enhance HBV replication and gene expression. These combined effects result in an increase of viraemia in association with a decrease of serum aminotransferase and hepatic necroinflammation. In acute infection, use of immunosuppressants will increase the incidence of chronic evolution. In chronic infection, withdrawal of immunosuppressants will be followed by a clinical flare due to a rebound of immune attack to hepatocytes with increased viral load. This may lead to a subsequent decrease of the viraemia. Therefore, short-term use of immunosuppressant before antiviral therapy may be beneficial in the treatment of chronic viral hepatitis. However, the clinical rebound may be extremely severe and lead to hepatitis failure; thus, the patients should be monitored closely upon tapering and after the withdrawal of immunosuppressants. Long-term use of immunosuppressants in patients with hepatitis virus infection is usually deleterious, particularly in patients after organ transplantation. These findings suggest that clinicians should be cautious in the use of immunosuppressants in patients with hepatitis virus infection.