Outcomes of split versus reduced-size grafts in pediatric liver transplantation

Current Understanding of Marginal Grafts in Liver Transplantation

End-stage liver disease (ESLD), stemming from a spectrum of chronic liver pathologies including chronic liver failure, acute cirrhosis decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma, imposes a significant global healthcare burden. Liver transplantation (LT) remains the only treatment for ESLD. However, the escalating mortality on transplant waitlists has prompted the utilization of marginal liver grafts in LT procedures. These grafts primarily encompass elderly livers, steatotic livers, livers from donation after circulatory death, split livers and those infected with the hepatitis virus. While the expansion of the donor pool offers promise, it also introduces concomitant risks. These encompass graft failure, biliary and cardiovascular complications, the recurrence of liver disease and reduced patient and graft survival. Consequently, various established strategies, ranging from improved donor-recipient matching to surgical interventions, have emerged to mitigate these risks. This article undertakes a comprehensive assessment of the current landscape, evaluating the viability of diverse marginal liver grafts. Additionally, it synthesizes approaches aimed at enhancing the quality of such marginal liver grafts. The overarching objective is to augment the donor pool and ameliorate the risk factors associated with the shortage of liver grafts.

Are split liver grafts a suitable option in high-risk liver transplant recipients?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To assess the outcomes of split liver transplantation (SLT) in adults and children and evaluate its role in high-risk recipients with a high model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, an urgent indication or requiring retransplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Split liver grafts in general have equivalent long-term survival outcomes to whole grafts despite an increase in biliary complications. Recent success and technical advances have encouraged use of these grafts in high-risk recipients. Split liver grafts can be used successfully in recipients with a high MELD score if there is adequate weight-matching. There are mixed results in urgent indication recipients and for retransplantation such that use in this group of patients remains controversial.

SUMMARY

SLT addresses donor shortages by facilitating the transplant of two recipients from the same donor liver. By using careful donor and recipient selection criteria, SLT can achieve equivalent long-term outcomes to whole grafts. These grafts have been used successfully in recipients with a high MELD score, but should be used selectively in urgent indication recipients and for retransplantation.

Influence of early biliary complications on survival rates after pediatric liver transplantation-A positive outlook

BACKGROUND

Early biliary complications (EBC) constitute a burden after pediatric liver transplantation frequently requiring immediate therapy. We aimed to assess the impact of EBC on short- and long-term patient and graft survival as well as post-transplant morbidity.

METHODS

We analyzed 121 pediatric liver transplantations performed between 1984 and 2019 at the Medical University of Innsbruck for the occurrence of early (<90 days) biliary complications and investigated the influence of EBC on patient and graft survival.

RESULTS

Early biliary complications occurred in 30 (24.8%) out of the 121 pediatric liver transplant recipients. Patient survival at 15 years (89.2% vs. 84.2%, p = .65) and all-cause (82.5% vs. 74.0%) and death-censored graft survival (82.5% vs. 75.1%, p = .71) at 10 years were similar between the EBC and the non-EBC group. The EBC group had a significantly longer ICU (25 vs. 16 days, p < .001) and initial hospital stay (64 vs. 42 days, p = .002). Livers of patients with EBC were characterized by multiple bile ducts (33.3% vs. 13.2%, p = .027), and patients with EBC had a higher risk to develop late biliary complications (OR 2.821 [95% CI 1.049-7.587], p = .044) and bowel obstruction/perforation (OR 4.388 [95% CI 1.503-12.812], p = .007).

CONCLUSION

Early biliary complications after pediatric liver transplantation is frequent. The occurrence of EBC significantly increased post-transplant morbidity without affecting mortality. Multiple bile ducts were the only risk factor for the development of EBC in our cohort.

Incompatibility between recipient CD47 and donor SIRPα is not a key risk factor for thrombocytopenia or anemia following rat liver xenotransplantation in mice

Liver xenotransplantation (LXT) is greatly impeded by severe thrombocytopenia, anemia, and coagulopathy. Hepatic phagocytic cells are thought to play an important role in LXT-induced thrombocytopenia and anemia. In this study, we investigated whether the lack of recipient CD47-donor SIRPα interaction, which is known to induce xenograft rejection by macrophages, exacerbates platelet and RBC depletion following LXT. We first addressed this question in the absence of anti-donor immune responses using a syngeneic mouse liver transplantation (LT) model. Neither wild-type (WT) nor CD47KO B6 mice developed thrombocytopenia following LT from WT B6 donors. Although a moderate decline in RBCs was detected following LT, there was no significant difference in RBC counts between WT and CD47KO recipients. Because mouse CD47 is cross-reactive with rat SIRPα, we then compared thrombocytopenia and anemia between WT and CD47KO mice following rat LXT. Unlike syngeneic mouse LT, significant thrombocytopenia and anemia were detected following rat LXT. However, the severities of both platelet and RBC depletions were comparable between WT and CD47KO recipients. Furthermore, WT and CD47KO recipients showed a similar extent of early platelet activation. Our results indicate that CD47-SIRPα signaling does not significantly affect the loss of platelets or RBCs following LXT, suggesting that the limited cross-reactivity between recipient CD47 and donor SIRPα is not a significant risk factor for LXT-induced thrombocytopenia and anemia.

Effect of Case Volume on Mortality After Pediatric Liver Transplantation in Korea

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether institutional case-volume affects clinical outcomes after pediatric liver transplantation.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study using the database of Korean National Healthcare Insurance Service. Between January 2007 and December 2016, 521 pediatric liver transplantations were performed at 22 centers in Korea. Centers were categorized according to the average annual number of liver transplantations: >10, 1 to 10, and <1.

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality rates in the high-, medium-, and low-volume centers were 5.8%, 12.5%, and 32.1%, respectively. After adjustment, in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in low-volume centers (adjusted odds ratio, 9.693; 95% confidence interval, 4.636-20.268; P < 0.001) and medium-volume centers (adjusted odds ratio, 3.393; 95% confidence interval, 1.980-5.813; P < 0.001) compared to high-volume centers. Long-term survival for up to 9 years was better in high-volume centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Centers with higher case volume (>10 pediatric liver transplantations/y) had better outcomes after pediatric liver transplantation, including in-hospital mortality and long-term mortality, compared to centers with lower case volume (≤10 liver transplantations/y).

Pediatric Liver Transplantation: Then and Now

This paper reviews the past 50 years of liver transplantation in children from the perspective of patient demographics, perioperative patient management, surgical techniques, immunosuppression and patient outcomes.

Use of fibrinogen and thrombin sponge in pediatric split liver transplantation

Purpose:

To analyze the use of this sponge in pediatric patients undergoing split-liver transplantation.

Methods:

Retrospective study, including 35 pediatric patients undergoing split-liver transplantation, divided into two groups according to the use of the sponge: 18 patients in Group A (no sponge) and 17 in Group B (with sponge).

Results:

The characteristics of recipients and donors were similar. We observed greater number of reoperation due to bleeding in the wound area in Group A (10 patients - 55.5%) than in Group B (3 patients - 17.6%); p = 0.035. The median volume of red blood cells transfused in Group A was significantly higher (73.4 ± 102.38 mL/kg) than that in Group B (35.1 ± 41.67 mL/kg); p = 0.048. Regarding bile leak there was no statistical difference.

Conclusion:

The use of the human fibrinogen and thrombin sponge, required lower volume of red blood cell transfusion and presented lower reoperation rates due to bleeding in the wound area.

PEDIATRIC LIVER TRANSPLANTATION WITH EX-SITU LIVER TRANSECTION AND THE APPLICATION OF THE HUMAN FIBRINOGEN AND THROMBIN SPONGE IN THE WOUND AREA

Background

Surgical strategy to increase the number of liver transplants in the pediatric population is the ex-situ liver transection (reduction or split). However, it is associated with complications such as hemorrhage and leaks. The human fibrinogen and thrombin sponge is useful for improving hemostasis in liver surgery.

Aim

Compare pediatric liver transplants with ex-situ liver transection (reduction or split) with or without the human fibrinogen and thrombin sponge.

Methods

Was performed a prospective analysis of 21 patients submitted to liver transplantation with ex-situ liver transection with the application of the human fibrinogen and thrombin sponge in the wound area (group A) and retrospective analysis of 59 patients without the sponge (group B).

Results

The characteristics of recipients and donors were similar. There were fewer reoperations due to bleeding in the wound area in group A (14.2%) compared to group B (41.7%, p=0.029). There was no difference in relation to the biliary leak (group A: 17.6%, group B: 5.1%, p=0.14).

Conclusion

There was a lower number of reoperations due to bleeding of the wound area of ​​the hepatic graft when the human fibrinogen and thrombin sponge were used.

Brain death and marginal grafts in liver transplantation

It is well known that most organs for transplantation are currently procured from brain-dead donors; however, the presence of brain death is an important risk factor in liver transplantation. In addition, one of the mechanisms to avoid the shortage of liver grafts for transplant is the use of marginal livers, which may show higher risk of primary non-function or initial poor function. To our knowledge, very few reviews have focused in the field of liver transplantation using brain-dead donors; moreover, reviews that focused on both brain death and marginal grafts in liver transplantation, both being key risk factors in clinical practice, have not been published elsewhere. The present review aims to describe the recent findings and the state-of-the-art knowledge regarding the pathophysiological changes occurring during brain death, their effects on marginal liver grafts and summarize the more controversial topics of this pathology. We also review the therapeutic strategies designed to date to reduce the detrimental effects of brain death in both marginal and optimal livers, attempting to explain why such strategies have not solved the clinical problem of liver transplantation.

Risk factors for early and late biliary complications in pediatric liver transplantation

BC are a common source of morbidity after pediatric LT. Knowledge about risk factors may help to reduce their incidence. Retrospective analysis of BC in 116 pediatric patients (123 LT) (single institution, 05/1990-12/2011, medium follow-up 7.9 yr). One-, five-, and 10-yr survival was 91.1%, no patient died of BC. Prevalence and risk factors for anastomotic and intrahepatic BC were examined. There were 29 BC in 123 LT (23.6%), with three main categories: 10 (8.1%) primary anastomotic strictures, eight (6.5%) anastomotic leaks, and three (2.4%) intrahepatic strictures. Significant risk factors for anastomotic leaks were total operation time (increase 1.26-fold) and early HAT (<30 days post-LT; increase 5.87-fold). Risk factor for primary anastomotic stricture was duct-to-duct choledochal anastomosis (increase 5.96-fold when compared to biliary-enteric anastomosis). Risk factors for intrahepatic strictures were donor age >48 yr (increase 1.09-fold) and MELD score >30 (increase 1.2-fold). To avoid morbidity from anastomotic BC in pediatric LT, the preferred biliary anastomosis appears to be biliary-enteric. Operation time should be kept to a minimum, and HAT must by all means be prevented. Children with a high MELD score or receiving livers from older donors are at increased risk for intrahepatic strictures.

Liver transplantation in children weighing 5 kg or less: analysis of the UNOS database

LT is a major medical and surgical challenge in very small patients. Aim of the study is to determine the outcomes after LT in infants ≤ 5 kg at transplant in a large cohort of patients.

METHODS

Infants ≤ 5 kg who had LT between 10/1987 and 5/2008 were identified from the UNOS database. Risk factors for death and graft loss were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 11,467 children, 570 (5%) were ≤ 5 kg at LT. Mean age and weight at LT were 0.11 ± 0.48 yr, 4.32 ± 0.74 kg, respectively. One- and five-yr patient and graft survival were 77.7%, 72.2% and 66.1%, 57.6%, respectively. The primary cause of death was infection (25.9%). Recipient age was a predictor of graft loss. Patient and graft survival have improved over time. Life support at transplant was identified as a risk factor for both death and graft loss (p < 0.02, p < 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSION

LT recipients ≤5 kg have high mortality and graft loss. Over time, graft survival has improved, although it is still inferior to the overall reported outcomes of pediatric LT. Being on life support at transplant is a significant risk factor for death and graft loss in very small recipients.

Liver transplantation in children using organs from young paediatric donors

Nowadays, most paediatric liver transplant recipients receive a split or other technical variant graft from adult deceased or live donors, because of a lack of available age- and size matched paediatric donors. Few data are available, especially for liver grafts obtained from very young children (<6 years). We analysed all paediatric liver transplantations between 1989 and 2009. Recipients were divided into five groups (1-5) depending on donor age (<1, ≥1 to <6, ≥6 to <16, ≥16 to <45, ≥45 years). Overall, 413 paediatric liver transplantations from deceased donors were performed; 1- and 5-year graft survival rates were 75%, 80%, 78%, 81%, 74% and 75%, 64%, 70%, 67%, 46%, and 1- and 5-year patient survival rates were 88%, 91%, 90%, 89%, 78% and 88%, 84%, 84%, 83%, 63% for groups 1-5, respectively, without significant difference. Eight children received organs from donors younger than 1 year and 45 children received organs from donors between 1 and 6 years of age. Overall, vascular complications occurred in 13.2% of patients receiving organs from donors younger than 6 years. Analysis of our data revealed that the usage of liver grafts from donors younger than 6 years is a safe procedure. The outcome was comparable with grafts from older donors with excellent graft and patient survival, even for donors younger than 1 year.

The European experience

This mini-review on European experiences with tackling the problem of organ shortage for transplantation was based on a literature review of predominantly European publications dealing with the issue of organ donation from deceased donors. The authors tried to identify the most significant factors that have demonstrated to impact on donation rates from deceased donors and subsequent transplant successes. These factors include legislative measures (national laws and European Directives), optimization of the donation process, use of expanded criteria donors, innovative preservation and surgical techniques, organizational efforts, and improved allocation algorithms.

Biliary strictures in pediatric liver transplant recipients - early diagnosis and treatment results in excellent graft outcomes

Biliary complications in pediatric LT are important causes of morbidity and graft loss. We examined our recent pediatric LT experience to determine the outcome of post-LT biliary complications and their relationship to graft type. All initially isolated LTs performed at our institution between January 1, 2000 and August 20, 2007 were reviewed. Recipient data, donor type, graft survival, and biliary complications data were examined. Of 66 LTs, 32 patients received whole organ grafts, and 34 received partial grafts; 11 split, seven reduced size, and 16 live donors. Seventy-seven percent of patients had biliary reconstruction using a RYH. Overall, 17 (26%) developed biliary complications, and 15 were diagnosed within six months post-LT. Live donor and split allografts had more biliary complications than reduced size or whole allografts (50% and 36% vs. 0% and 16%, respectively). Seventy-one percent responded to percutaneous or endoscopic treatment. Five failed initial non-operative management and required reoperation (one retransplantation). These data suggest that biliary strictures occur most frequently in live donor and split allografts and that non-operative therapy is highly successful. Partial grafts are essential in pediatric LT, and a high clinical suspicion for biliary complications combined with aggressive and early diagnosis and therapy rarely results in graft loss.

Biliary strictures and hepatic artery flow abnormalities in split liver transplants

The aim of this study was to examine the role of HA flow abnormalities in the development of biliary strictures following split liver transplants. Data was obtained from a prospective data base of all patients undergoing split liver transplants from 2000-2008 with a follow up time of at least six months. Forty-six transplants were performed in 44 patients. Fourteen of 46 developed strictures of whom four were intrahepatic and 10 anastomotic. Nine of 14 with strictures had either hepatic artery thromobosis (HAT, four) or abnormalities of HA flow identified by routine Doppler ultrasound (5) compared with two of 32 without strictures (p < 0.02, (one temporary loss of flow and one HA aneurysm). There were no differences between the stricture and non stricture group with regard to age or weight at transplant, donor age, cold and warm ischemia times or intraoperative portal vein flow though there was a significant decrease in intraoperative HA flow in the stricture group. In conclusion, both HAT and hepatic artery flow abnormalities are associated with biliary strictures in the majority of split liver transplants. However, unrecognised abnormalities in HA flow and or other factors are likely to contribute.

Overview: Liver disease and transplantation

Australia has had a proud and enviable record of seminal contributions to hepatology, with many contributors. Thus, any attempt to summarize these contributions ab initio in a brief review article is a significant challenge, primarily because it is so easy to overlook or underestimate particular aspects. In this article, I have confined my comments primarily to the areas where the contributions have had a significant global impact and have clearly been recognized internationally. This means that many worthwhile Australian additions will be omitted if there was less apparent international impact. The first significant interest in liver disease in Australia was from the Melbourne group at the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI) and Royal Melbourne Hospital, leading to seminal contributions to the description, diagnosis, aetiopathogenesis and therapy of autoimmune hepatitis and primary biliary cirrhosis. Others from Royal Prince Alfred Hospital in Sydney contributed substantially to the effects of immunosuppression of autoimmune hepatitis and to early descriptions of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Other areas where Australians have contributed significantly include steatohepatitis, iron metabolism (and in particular hemochromatosis), viral hepatitis (both at the molecular and clinical level), portal hypertension, and transplant immunology. The remarkable contribution of Professor Dame Sheila Sherlock to Australian hepatology is also summarized.

Pediatric liver transplantation

In previous decades, pediatric liver transplantation has become a state-of-the-art operation with excellent success and limited mortality. Graft and patient survival have continued to improve as a result of improvements in medical, surgical and anesthetic management, organ availability, immunosuppression, and identification and treatment of postoperative complications. The utilization of split-liver grafts and living-related donors has provided more organs for pediatric patients. Newer immunosuppression regimens, including induction therapy, have had a significant impact on graft and patient survival. Future developments of pediatric liver transplantation will deal with long-term follow-up, with prevention of immunosuppression-related complications and promotion of as normal growth as possible. This review describes the state-of-the-art in pediatric liver transplantation.

Split-liver transplantation: an underused resource in liver transplantation

Split-liver transplantation is an efficient tool to increase the number of liver grafts available for transplantation. More than 15 years after its introduction only the classical splitting technique has reached broad application. Consequently children are benefiting most from this possibility. Full-right full-left splitting for two adult recipients has been shown to work but is hampered mainly by the dangers of small-for-size transplantation. A solution to this last problem would completely change the scope of split-liver transplantation. Organ allocation systems and collaboration between centers play a crucial role in the chances to let suitable patients profit from this valuable source of extra grafts.

The marginal liver donor--an update

The number of patients awaiting liver transplantation keeps steadily rising with no corresponding rise in suitable grafts for transplantation. There also is an increasing trend of patients dying or being taken off waiting lists because of deterioration while waiting for a transplant. Over the preceding years the use of marginal grafts in liver transplantation has been driven by the critical shortage of donor organs and by emerging data that their use has resulted in a favourable outcome. This review revisits the factors defining marginality of a graft, and the issues faced by transplant units in making the decision to use such a graft. It also looks at the innovations in transplantation geared towards increasing the donor pool and the resulting issues of matching marginal grafts to suitable recipients.

Living-related versus deceased donor pediatric liver transplantation: a multivariate analysis of technical and immunological complications in 235 recipients

Timely access to a living donor (LD) reduced pretransplant mortality in pediatric liver transplantation (LT). We hypothesized that this strategy may provide better posttransplant outcome. Between July 1993 and April 2002, 235 children received a primary LT from a LD (n = 100) or a deceased donor (DD) (n = 135). Demographic, surgical and immunological variables were compared, and respective impact on posttransplant complications was studied using a multivariate analysis. Five-year patient survival rates were 92% and 85% for groups LD and DD, respectively (p = 0.181), the corresponding graft survival rates being 89% and 77% (p = 0.033). At multivariate analysis: (1) type of donor (DD) was correlated with higher rate of artery thrombosis (p < 0.012); (2) biliary complication rate at 5 years was 29% and 23% for groups LD and DD, respectively (p = 0.451); (3) lower acute rejection incidence could be correlated with type of donor (DD) (p = 0.001), and immunosuppressive therapy (tacrolimus) (p < 0.001). We conclude that (1) according to the multivariate analysis, LT with LD provided similar patient and graft outcome, when compared to DD; (2) a higher rate of artery thrombosis and a lower rate of rejection were observed in group DD; (3) this study confirms the efficacy of tacrolimus for immunoprophylaxis, whatever the type of organ donor is.