Effects of a novel histamine H2-receptor antagonist, lafutidine, on the mucus barrier of human gastric mucosa

Resolvin D2 and Resolvin D1 Differentially Activate Protein Kinases to Counter-Regulate Histamine-Induced [Ca2+]i Increase and Mucin Secretion in Conjunctival Goblet Cells

Resolvin (Rv) D2 and RvD1 are biosynthesized from docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and promote resolution of inflammation in multiple organs and tissues, including the conjunctiva. Histamine is a mediator produced by mast cells in the conjunctiva during the allergic response. We determined the interaction of RvD2 with histamine and its receptor subtypes in cultured conjunctival goblet cells and compared them with RvD1 by measuring intracellular [Ca²⁺] and mucous secretion. Treatment with RvD2 significantly blocked the histamine-induced [Ca²⁺]_i increase as well as secretion. RvD2 and RvD1 counter-regulate different histamine receptor subtypes. RvD2 inhibited the increase in [Ca²⁺]_i induced by the activation of H1, H3, or H4 receptors, whereas RvD1 inhibited H1 and H3 receptors. RvD2 and RvD1 also activate distinct receptor-specific protein kinases to counter-regulate the histamine receptors, probably by phosphorylation. Thus, our data suggest that the counter-regulation of H receptor subtypes by RvD2 and RvD1 to inhibit mucin secretion are separately regulated.

Research progress of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced small intestinal injury

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used widely around the world because of their anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antiplatelet activity. However, long-term application of NSAIDs can lead to complications. Previously, the clinical attention was dedicated to the NSAID-induced upper gastrointestinal complications. Recently, the detection rate of small intestinal damage related to NSAIDs has increased due to the wide use of endoscopes such as capsule endoscopy and double-balloon colonoscopy. Although the majority of patients have no significant symptoms, there are still a small percentage of patients who develop obvious symptoms or complicated ulcers that require therapeutic intervention. Despite significant advances in our understanding of NSAIDs, the treatment modality and regimen for NSAID-induced small intestinal damage have remained relatively unclear. This article will provide a comprehensive overview of NSAID-induced small intestinal damage with regard to the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, risk factors, pathogenesis, and treatment, in order to provide informative evidence for clinical practice.

Effects of pirenzepine on vonoprazan-induced gastric acid inhibition and hypergastrinemia

BACKGROUND

Compared to proton pump inhibitors, vonoprazan exerts a greater inhibitory effect on gastric acid secretion and is useful for treating acid-related diseases, such as gastro-esophageal reflux disease. However, there is a problem that vonoprazan causes hypergastrinemia, which confers a risk of carcinoid tumor. A previous report demonstrated that pirenzepine, an M1 muscarinic receptor antagonist, enhances the acid inhibitory effects while suppressing hypergastrinemia induced by omeprazole. Here, we examined whether pirenzepine enhances the gastric acid inhibitory effects of vonoprazan without further increasing serum gastrin levels.

METHODS

Eleven healthy volunteers were subjected to 24-h intragastric pH monitoring and serum gastrin measurements on day 7 of three different regimens: pirenzepine 75 mg alone, vonoprazan 10 mg alone, and vonoprazan 10 mg plus pirenzepine 75 mg administered in a randomized crossover fashion.

RESULTS

Median pH 4 holding time ratios (range) achieved with pirenzepine 75 mg, vonoprazan 10 mg, and vonoprazan 10 mg plus pirenzepine 75 mg were 6.9% (2.4-32.8%), 88.4% (54.6-100%), and 84.2% (40.3-100%), respectively. Respective serum gastrin levels were 79 (75-210) pg/ml, 310 (110-870) pg/ml, and 170 (140-930) pg/ml. In cases with hypergastrinemia (gastrin ≥ 200 pg/ml) induced by vonoprazan 10 mg alone, concomitant treatment with pirenzepine significantly reduced serum gastrin levels from 370 to 180 pg/ml (P = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

Although pirenzepine does not enhance acid inhibition, it does improve hypergastrinemia induced by vonoprazan to some extent.

Histamine H2-Receptor Antagonists Improve Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug-Induced Intestinal Dysbiosis

Dysbiosis, an imbalance of intestinal flora, can cause serious conditions such as obesity, cancer, and psychoneurological disorders. One cause of dysbiosis is inflammation. Ulcerative enteritis is a side effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). To counteract this side effect, we proposed the concurrent use of histamine H₂ receptor antagonists (H₂RA), and we examined the effect on the intestinal flora. We generated a murine model of NSAID-induced intestinal mucosal injury, and we administered oral H₂RA to the mice. We collected stool samples, compared the composition of intestinal flora using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism, and performed organic acid analysis using high-performance liquid chromatography. The intestinal flora analysis revealed that NSAID [indomethacin (IDM)] administration increased Erysipelotrichaceae and decreased Clostridiales but that both had improved with the concurrent administration of H₂RA. Fecal levels of acetic, propionic, and n-butyric acids increased with IDM administration and decreased with the concurrent administration of H₂RA. Although in NSAID-induced gastroenteritis the proportion of intestinal microorganisms changes, leading to the deterioration of the intestinal environment, concurrent administration of H₂RA can normalize the intestinal flora.

Proton pump inhibitor usage and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-associated small intestinal injury: How to balance risks and benefits

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used in the treatment of acid-related diseases and can effectively prevent upper gastrointestinal damage associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). However, recent studies have shown that PPIs cannot protect from NSAIDs-associated small bowel injury, and may even aggravate intestinal injury by altering the intestinal flora. This article will discuss the risks associated with the combined use of NSAIDs and PPIs, as well as how to balance risks and benefits of PPIs treatment, and provide a brief review of strategies for the prevention of NSAIDs-associated small bowel injury.

Comparison of effect of an increased dosage of vonoprazan versus vonoprazan plus lafutidine on gastric acid inhibition and serum gastrin

BACKGROUND

Vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, elicits potent acid inhibition and hypergastrinemia at a dose of 20 mg. Its recommended maintenance dose for gastro-esophageal reflux disease is 10 mg, which is sometimes insufficient for preventing nocturnal acid breakthrough (NAB). Concomitant use of a histamine 2 receptor antagonist (H₂RA) is effective for NAB. However, further acid inhibition by addition of H2RA has concern of hypergastrinemia again. Lafutidine (H2RA) is known to stimulate somatostatin release.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to compare the levels of acid inhibition and serum gastrin attained by addition of lafutidine to vonoprazan 10 mg with levels after a dose increase of vonoprazan from 10 to 20 mg.

METHODS

Thirteen healthy volunteers underwent 24-h intragastric pH monitoring and serum gastrin measurements on day 7 of three different regimens: vonoprazan 10 mg, vonoprazan 10 mg plus lafutidine 10 mg, and vonoprazan 20 mg.

RESULTS

Median pH 4 holding time ratios (range) by vonoprazan 10 mg, vonoprazan 10 mg plus lafutidine 10 mg, and vonoprazan 20 mg were 82% (47-88%), 88% (76-93%), and 99% (95-100%) while those at nighttime from 10 p.m. to 8 a.m. were 94% (29-100%), 100% (95-100%), and 100%, respectively. The incidences of NAB with vonoprazan 10 mg, vonoprazan plus lafutidine, and vonoprazan 20 mg were 38, 8, and 0%, respectively. Respective serum gastrin levels were 420 (173-508), 323 (196-521), and 504 (400-812) pg/ml.

CONCLUSION

Addition of lafutidine 10 mg to vonoprazan 10 mg achieved sufficient acid inhibition, especially at nighttime, without further increase of serum gastrin levels.

Changes in the mucus barrier during cisplatin-induced intestinal mucositis in rats

AIM

Gastrointestinal mucositis is a frequent complication of antineoplastic chemotherapy, but the effects of chemotherapy on mucosal defense mechanisms remain poorly understood. We studied the effects of cisplatin on mucin, one of the principal defense factors of the gastrointestinal mucosa, and evaluated the efficacy of two different types of H2-receptor antagonists against cisplatin-induced mucositis.

METHODS

Cisplatin (6 mg/kg) was administered intravenously to rats (day 0). The rats were sacrificed 1, 3, 7, and 11 days after treatment, and their stomach, jejunum, ileum, and colon were removed. Immunoreactivity of the mucosa was compared with the use of anti-mucin monoclonal antibody. To evaluate the efficacy of H2-receptor antagonists, either famotidine (3 mg/kg) or lafutidine (30 mg/kg) was given orally once daily on days 0, 1, and 2. Histological and biochemical findings were compared among the groups to assess effects on cisplatin-induced injury.

RESULTS

Cisplatin significantly altered the immunoreactivity and content of mucin in the small intestinal mucosa, especially in the ileum. Lafutidine protected against cisplatin-induced mucosal injury and attenuated decreased mucin accumulation.

CONCLUSION

Cisplatin appears to alter the mucus barrier function in the intestinal mucosa. Lafutidine might effectively prevent chemotherapy-induced mucositis by activating intestinal mucus cells.

Possible involvement of host defense mechanism in the suppression of rat acute reflux esophagitis by the particular histamine H2 receptor antagonist lafutidine

AIMS

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is considered to be caused primarily by gastric juice refluxed into the esophagus. Here, we investigated the possible involvement of host defense mechanisms in the development of acute reflux esophagitis using lafutidine, a histamine H(2) receptor antagonist (H(2)RA) with proven gastric mucosal protective effects.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The ligation of both the pylorus and the forestomach of SD rats under anesthesia caused hemorrhagic lesions in the esophageal mucosa at 6 h. Lesion formation was significantly inhibited by treatment with H(2)RAs, including the conventional H(2)RAs famotidine and cimetidine as well as lafutidine. The maximum suppressive abilities of these agents were similar to that of the proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole. Interestingly, unlike famotidine, lafutidine at low doses significantly suppressed esophagitis without inhibiting gastric acid secretion. Note that neither lafutidine nor famotidine inhibited hexosamine output in gastric juice samples obtained 3 h after ligation. Additionally, the protective effect of lafutidine, but not of famotidine, was partly attenuated by the denervation of capsaicin-sensitive afferent nerves with a large dose of capsaicin.

CONCLUSION

The present results indicate that esophageal host-defense via capsaicin-sensitive afferent nerves may contribute to the therapeutic action of lafutidine.

Pathophysiological investigation of the gastric surface mucous gel layer of patients with Helicobacter pylori infection by using immunoassays for trefoil factor family 2 and gastric gland mucous cell-type mucin in gastric juice

BACKGROUND

The trefoil factor family (TFF) 2 protein is produced by gastric gland mucous cells (GMCs), and the secreted TFF2 shares a mucosal barrier function with GMC-type mucin. Recently, we presented an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method for measurement of GMC-type mucin in the gastric juice.

AIMS

We aimed to develop an ELISA for TFF2 and to assess pathophysiological changes in the gastric surface mucous gel layer (SMGL) of patients with Helicobacter pylori infection.

METHODS

The distribution of TFF2 and GMC-type mucin in the SMGL was immunohistochemically determined. The ELISA for TFF2 was based on a polyclonal goat antibody. Recombinant TFF2 was employed to prepare the calibrators. TFF2 and GMC-type mucin in the gastric juice in healthy individuals (n = 33) and patients with gastritis (n = 37), gastric ulcer (n = 16), and duodenal ulcer (n = 10) were assayed using ELISA.

RESULTS

TFF2 and GMC-type mucin were immunohistochemically co-localized in the gastric SMGL and GMCs. The TFF2 levels in the patients were significantly higher than those in the healthy individuals. Further, the TFF2 levels in the H. pylori-positive patients were significantly higher than those in the H. pylori-negative patients, and decreased after the eradication of the infection. GMC-type mucin levels showed a tendency similar to that of TFF2 levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The upregulation of TFF2 and GMC-type mucin secretion may reflect the response of the gastric mucosa to H. pylori-induced injuries. TFF2 and GMC-type mucin secreted into the SMGL may protect the gastric mucosa against H. pylori.

Lafutidine 10 mg versus Rabeprazole 20 mg in the Treatment of Patients with Heartburn-Dominant Uninvestigated Dyspepsia: A Randomized, Multicentric Trial

Background. Empirical therapy with antisecretory agents like PPIs and H2RAs has long been the traditional approach in the initial management of uninvestigated dyspepsia. Aim. The objective of the study was to examine relief of dyspepsia with lafutidine, a second-generation H(2)-RA, and rabeprazole and to compare their efficacy. Methods. This was a randomized, open, comparative trial in adult uninvestigated dyspeptic patients, who had at least moderate severity of symptoms, defined as a score of ≥4 on a 7-point global overall symptom (GOS) scale, and were randomized to receive once daily either lafutidine 10 mg or rabeprazole 20 mg for 4 weeks. Results. A total of 236 patients were enrolled, out of which 194 patients were included in the analysis. At the end of week 4, a significant difference was observed for symptom relief (lafutidine 89.90% versus rabeprazole 65.26%, P < .01) and symptom resolution (lafutidine 70.71% versus rabeprazole 25.26%, P < .01). Both the drugs were well tolerated. Conclusion. Both lafutidine and rabeprazole provide symptom relief in patients with heartburn-dominant uninvestigated dyspepsia. The present study confirms the appropriateness of lafutidine as an empiric treatment and superior efficacy for primary care practice patients with dyspepsia.

Vulnerable sites and changes in mucin in the rat small intestine after non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs administration

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The location of mucosal damage and changes in mucin content in the rat small intestine following administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have not been well elucidated.

METHODS

After subcutaneous administration of loxoprofen sodium (10-40 mg/kg), the small intestinal mucosa of male Wistar rats was evaluated macroscopically, histologically, and immunohistochemically by measuring the total mucin content and immunoreactivity for anti-mucin monoclonal antibody, HCM31, 1, 3, 7, and 14 days later. Changes in the number of enterobacteria invading the mucosa around the lesions were also determined.

RESULTS

Loxoprofen sodium induced erosions and ulcers along the mesenteric margin of the distal jejunum. Early (≤6 h) mucosal lesions were small and round, located between the branches of the mesenteric arteries. In the jejunum, there was a transient increase in the total mucin content, and HCM31-positive mucin in the mucosa around the ulcers increased significantly on days 3 and 7, but in the ileum there were no marked changes and few ulcers. Bacterial translocation following loxoprofen sodium administration significantly increased, according to the site of the intestinal lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Vascularly compromised sites along the jejunal mesenteric margin are vulnerable to NSAIDs-induced damage and show increased numbers of enterobacteria in the NSAIDs-treated mucosa. Increased sialomucin content in the mucus around the lesions may play an important role in the healing of NSAIDs-induced intestinal lesions.

Lafutidine prevents low-dose aspirin and loxoprofen induced gastric injury: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo controlled study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The concomitant use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is a risk factor for low-dose aspirin (LDA)-associated upper gastrointestinal toxicity. Lafutidine is an H2-receptor antagonist with gastroprotective activity, produced by acting on capsaicin-sensitive afferent neurons. To evaluate the preventive effect of lafutidine on gastric damage caused by LDA alone and by the combination of both LDA and loxoprofen, we conducted a clinical study using healthy volunteers.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study was carried out. Sixteen healthy volunteers without Helicobacter pylori infection were randomly assigned to two groups. Both groups received 81 mg of aspirin once daily for 14 days (on days 1 to 14) and 60 mg of loxoprofen three times daily for the last 7 days (on days 8 to 14). Placebo or 10 mg of lafutidine was administered twice daily for 14 days in each group. After a 2-week washout period, placebo and lafutidine were crossed over. Endoscopic findings of gastric mucosal damage were evaluated according to the modified Lanza score.

RESULTS

The mean modified Lanza score was 2.19 ± 1.06 (SD) for aspirin plus placebo as compared with 0.50 ± 0.77 for aspirin plus lafutidine (P < 0.001), and 3.00 ± 1.56 for aspirin plus loxoprofen and placebo as compared with 1.25 ± 1.37 for aspirin plus loxoprofen and lafutidine (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of loxoprofen to LDA increases gastric mucosal damage. Standard-dose lafutidine significantly prevents gastric mucosal damage induced by LDA alone or LDA plus loxoprofen in H. pylori-negative volunteers. Larger controlled studies are needed to strengthen these findings.

A prospective randomized trial of lafutidine vs rabeprazole on post-ESD gastric ulcers

AIM: To compare the effects of rabeprazole and lafutidine on post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) gastric ulcers.

METHODS: Patients with gastric tumors indicated for ESD were prospectively studied. After ESD, all patients were treated with intravenous omeprazole for the first 3 d. Patients were then randomly assigned to oral lafutidine or rabeprazole. Ulcer size, ulcer size reduction rate, and ulcer stage were evaluated 4 wk later. Occurrence of complication was monitored throughout the 4-wk period.

RESULTS: Sixty five patients were enrolled in the study, and 60 patients were subjected to the final analysis. In the lafutidine group (30 lesions in 29 patients), initial and 4-wk post-ESD ulcer sizes were 33.3 ± 9.2 and 10.5 ± 4.8 mm, respectively. In the rabeprazole group (34 lesions in 31 patients), the values were 34.7 ± 11.3 and 11.8 ± 6.7 mm, respectively. Ulcer size reduction rates in lafutidine and rabeprazole groups were 32.3% and 33.5%, respectively (P = 0.974). Ulcer stage 4 wk post-ESD did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.868). Two cases in the rabeprazole group and no cases in the lafutidine group developed ulcer bleeding during the oral dose period, although the difference of bleeding rate between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.157).

CONCLUSION: Lafutidine and rabeprazole have equivalent therapeutic effects on post-ESD gastric ulcers.

Lafutidine, a protective H₂ receptor antagonist, enhances mucosal defense in rat esophagus

BACKGROUND

Luminal acid or CO₂ induces a hyperemic response in the esophagus, via activation of acid sensors on capsaicin-sensitive afferent nerves (CSAN). Since disruption of the hyperemic response to luminal CO₂ acidifies the interstitium of the esophageal mucosa, the hyperemic response may maintain interstitial pH (pH(int)). We hypothesized that acid-related hyperemia maintains pH(int), preventing acid-induced injury in the esophageal mucosa.

METHODS

We examined the effects of capsaicin (Cap) or lafutidine (Laf), a mucosal protective H₂ antagonist, on the regulation of pH(int) and blood flow in rat esophagus using ratiometric microimaging and laser-Doppler measurements of the lower esophageal mucosa of living rats. The esophagus was topically superfused with pH 7.0 buffer, or a pH 1.0 or pH 1.0 + pepsin (1 mg/ml) solution with or without Laf.

RESULTS

Cap (30 or 100 µM) or Laf (0.1 or 1 mM) dose-dependently increased blood flow, accompanied by increased pH(int). The pH 1.0 solution increased blood flow without pH(int) change, whereas Laf (1 mM) increased blood flow and pH(int) during acid exposure. The effects of Laf were abolished by ablation of CSAN. Perfusion of the acidified pepsin solution gradually decreased pH(int), inhibited by Laf perfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Activation of CSAN by Laf with or without acid, accompanied by hyperemia, increased pH(int), preventing acidified pepsin-induced interstitial acidification. Stimulation of the capsaicin pathway with compounds such as Laf enhances mucosal protection from acid-related injury in the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Effects of combination treatment with famotidine and methylmethionine sulfonium chloride on the mucus barrier of rat gastric mucosa

BACKGROUND AND AIM

In Japan, peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is treated clinically with a combination of a mucosal protectant and acid suppressants, but there is scant information regarding the effects of these drugs on normal gastric mucus cells. In the present study, the effects of co-administration of methylmethionine sulfonium chloride (MMSC) and famotidine on rat gastric mucus cells were investigated using both biochemical and histological methods.

METHODS

Rats were divided into four groups: controls were given carboxymethylcellulose orally once daily for 7 days and the second, third and fourth groups were treated similarly with famotidine (famotidine group), MMSC (MMSC group) or famotidine plus MMSC (combination group). After killing the rats on the 8th day, the stomachs were removed and the biosynthesis and amount of mucin in different areas of the gastric mucosa were compared among groups. Using anti-mucin monoclonal antibodies, the mucin content and immunoreactivity were also compared.

RESULTS

Both the biosynthesis and accumulation of mucin were significantly decreased in the famotidine group, but increased in the MMSC and combination groups. The amount and immunoreactivity of surface mucus cell-derived mucin were both reduced in the famotidine group, and increased in the MMSC and combination groups. There was no difference among the groups in the content and immunoreactivity of gland mucus cell-derived mucin.

CONCLUSION

Famotidine-induced suppression of gastric surface mucus cell function is prevented by combined treatment with MMSC, raising the possibility of a more effective cure of PUD.

Effects of tea catechins on the gastrointestinal mucosa in rats

Although tea catechins are known to exert a potent antiulcer effect on the alimentary tract, there is scant information concerning their effects on normal mucus cell functions. Using original anti-mucin monoclonal antibodies, we studied the influences of long-term administration of catechins on the quantity and quality of mucin in rat gastrointestinal mucosa. Administration of 0.5% tea catechins significantly increased the mucin content of the ileum, but not the stomach. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) showed no remarkable qualitative changes in gastric mucin, but a selective increase and decrease in sulfo- and sialomucins, respectively, in the ileum of rats administered catechins. The ELISA results were consistent with both the immunohistochemical findings and the high-iron diamine-alcian blue staining pattern. These findings indicate that tea catechins modulate ileal mucin metabolism in the ileal mucosa, suggesting that further studies focusing on the ileal epithelium will assist in further elucidation of the mechanism of catechin effects.