Prognostic factors for fatal outcomes prior to receiving liver transplantation in patients with non-acetaminophen-related fulminant hepatic failure

Changing etiology of liver failure in 3,916 patients from northern China: a 10-year survey

PURPOSE

To investigate the etiological characteristics of patients with liver failure in the past 10 years.

METHODS

Clinical and investigational data in hospitalized patients with liver failure admitted from 2002 to 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Standard definitions and criteria were used to assess disease etiology.

RESULTS

Of these 3,916 patients, 3,429 (87.6 %) had acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), 114 (2.9 %) acute liver failure (ALF), and 373 (9.5 %) subacute liver failure. Viral infection was the most common cause of liver failure in the 3,295 patients (84.1 %). Hepatitis of unknown etiology was deemed responsible for 371 cases of liver failure (9.5 %). Drug-induced liver injury, alcoholic hepatitis, and autoimmune hepatitis led to 120 cases (3.1 %), 109 cases (2.8 %), and 19 cases (0.5 %), respectively. The most common cause of ACLF was HBV infection (87.3 %), while the main causes of acute and subacute liver failure were hepatitis of unknown etiology (39.4 %), viral infection (36.6 %), and drug-induced liver injury (19.3 %). Our data showed that the incidence of liver failure caused by HBV gradually decreased from 86.5 % in 2002 to 69.2 % in 2011. However, the incidence of hepatitis of unknown etiology, drug-induced liver injury, and alcoholic hepatitis was increased.

CONCLUSIONS

HBV infection is the main cause of liver failure in China. However, the incidence of HBV-related liver failure has gradually decreased in the past 10 years. Hepatitis of unknown etiology has replaced HBV infection as the most common apparent cause of acute liver failure.

Systematic review: acute liver failure - one disease, more than 40 definitions

BACKGROUND

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a clinical syndrome with very high mortality estimates ranging between 60% and 80%.

AIM

To investigate the explicitness and extent of variability in the used ALF definitions in the ALF prognostic literature.

METHODS

All studies that pertain to the prognosis of patients with ALF were electronically searched in MEDLINE (1950-2012) and EMBASE (1950-2012). Identified titles and abstracts were independently screened by three reviewers to determine eligibility for additional review. We included English articles that reported original data from clinical trials or observational studies on ALF patients.

RESULTS

A total of 103 studies were included. Of these studies 87 used 41 different ALF definitions and the remaining 16 studies did not report any explicit ALF definition. Four components underlying ALF definitions accounted for the differences: presence and/or grading of hepatic encephalopathy (HE); the interval between onset of disease and occurrence of HE; presence of coagulopathy and pre-existing liver disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The diversity in acute liver failure definitions hinders comparability and quantitative analysis among studies. There is room for improvement in the reporting of acute liver failure definitions in prognostic studies. The result of this review may be useful as a starting point to create a uniform acute liver failure definition.

Epidemiology of liver failure

The etiology of fulminant hepatitis varies in different countries and at different times. The main causes of fulminant hepatitis are viruses, paracetamol, drugs (other than paracetamol), poisons and 15-30% remained of undetermined origin. The prevalence of these etiologies varies according to the geographic region and has changed over the past 10 years. Paracetamol has now overtaken viruses (particularly hepatitis B virus) as the leading cause of fulminant hepatitis. Establishing the cause of fulminant hepatitis is an important step in the management of acute liver failure, so that specific therapy can be initiated and any contraindications to liver transplantation be eliminated.

Predictors of bacteraemia and mortality in patients with acute liver failure

PURPOSE

To determine what physiological and biochemical factors predict development of bacteraemia and mortality in patients with acute liver failure (ALF).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 206 ALF patients admitted to a specialist liver intensive therapy unit (LITU) from January 2003 to July 2005 (data collected prospectively).

RESULTS

A total of 206 patients were defined with ALF: 72 (35%) suffered bacteraemia (BAClf) and 134 (65%) did not (NBAClf). Gram positive organisms were observed in 44% of isolates, gram negatives in 52% and fungaemia in 4%. Median time to first bacteraemia was 10 (7-16) days. On admission, BAClf patients had higher SIRS scores and degrees of hepatic encephalopathy (HE). During their LITU course, BAClf patients had significantly increased requirements for renal replacement therapy (RRT), mechanical ventilation, and longer median LITU stay. Multivariate analysis (logistical regression) demonstrated significant predictors of bacteraemia on admission were HE grade >2 (Odds Ratio 1.6) and SIRS score >1 (OR 2.7). In all patients, independent predictors of mortality (logistical) were age (OR 1.41), maximum HE grade pre-intubation (1.76), Lactate (1.14) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (APACHEII) (1.09), but not bacteraemia. Transplantation was protective (OR 0.20).

CONCLUSION

In this study, severity of hepatic encephalopathy and SIRS score >1 were predictive of bacteraemia. APACHEII was independently predictive of mortality in all ALF patients but not bacteraemia.

Etiology and prognosis of fulminant hepatitis in adults

1. Establishing the cause of fulminant hepatitis is an important step in the management of acute liver failure, so that specific therapy can be initiated and any contraindications to liver transplantation can be eliminated. 2. The etiology of fulminant hepatitis varies in different countries and at different times. A viral etiology (in particular hepatitis B virus) is now less frequent, and paracetamol-induced fulminant hepatic failure is more common. 3. Many patients have miscellaneous causes of fulminant hepatitis. It is important to establish the main clinical and biological characteristics for specific management. 4. Assessment of the prognosis of fulminant hepatitis is important for distinguishing patients requiring liver transplantation from those whose will improve spontaneously. Prognosis depends on several factors, including the gold standard, the King's College Hospital criteria and Clichy's criteria.

Lamivudine treatment improves the prognosis of fulminant hepatitis B

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of lamivudine for fulminant hepatitis B has been reported in Europe and West Asia. However, in these reports, the main infection genotype is D. Furthermore, if lamivudine improves survival, prognostic factors for fulminant hepatitis B may differ from those reported previously. The aim of this study was to clarify the prognostic factors and the efficacy of lamivudine for fulminant hepatitis B in Japan, where the main infection genotype is B.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective cohort study. We selected 37 consecutive patients with fulminant hepatitis due to acute hepatitis B virus infection. As 4 of them had received liver transplantation, the data of 33 patients with a median age of 45 (range, 20-74) years were analyzed.

RESULTS

Lamivudine was administered to 10 patients. There were no differences in clinical features at the time of the diagnosis of fulminant hepatitis B between patients treated with and without lamivudine. Survival rates of patients treated with and without lamivudine were 70% and 26%, respectively. Age (> or =45 years), systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and non-administration of lamivudine were associated with fatal outcomes. The survival rates of patients treated with and without lamivudine, who were in a state of systemic inflammatory response syndrome, were 50% and 9%, and in patients aged > or =45 years, 50% and 8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests the efficacy of lamivudine for fulminant hepatitis B in the area where the main infection genotype is B. We consider that lamivudine is worth administering to patients with fulminant hepatitis B.

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome strongly affects the prognosis of patients with fulminant hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus infection is the most frequent cause of fulminant hepatic failure. Recently, systemic inflammatory response syndrome has been reported to be important in patients with fulminant hepatic failure. However, prognostic factors for fulminant hepatitis B have not been fully examined. In this study, we analyzed prognostic factors for fulminant hepatitis B in order to accurately identify patients with fatal outcomes.

METHODS

Of 110 consecutive patients with fulminant hepatic failure, 36 (33%) were diagnosed with fulminant hepatitis B. Five of the 36 patients received liver transplants, and we analyzed prognostic factors associated with fatal outcomes in the other 31 patients, who consisted of 15 men and 16 women with a median age of 45 (range, 20-74) years.

RESULTS

Eleven patients (35%) survived without liver transplantation, and the remaining 20 (65%) died. Nonsurvivors were older and had a higher prevalence ratio of systemic inflammatory response syndrome than survivors. Treatments were similar between survivors and nonsurvivors. Using a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, age (>45 years), systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and ratio of total to direct bilirubin (>2.0) were associated with fatal outcomes. In particular, 1-week and overall survival rates of patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome at the time of diagnosis were 39% and 8%, respectively, while those of patients without systemic inflammatory response syndrome were 94% and 56%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome strongly affects the short-term prognosis of patients with fulminant hepatitis B, and patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome might need urgent liver transplantation.