Endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of intra-abdominal lymph nodes with unknown primary in a tuberculosis endemic region

Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration in the Evaluation of Abdominal Lymphadenopathy of Unknown Etiology

Background/Aims

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a standard procedure for obtaining tissue from lesions near the gastrointestinal lumen. However, there is a scarcity of information on the diagnostic performance of EUS-FNA for abdominal lymphadenopathy of unknown causes. To assess the accuracy of EUS-FNA in diagnosing abdominal lymphadenopathy of unknown etiology.

Methods

The EUS records of patients with undiagnosed abdominal lymphadenopathy between 2010 and 2015 were reviewed.

Results

A total of 42 patients were included in this study. Adequate specimens were obtained from 40 patients (95%). The final diagnoses were metastatic cancer (n=16), lymphoma (n=9), tuberculosis (n=8), inflammatory changes (n=6), and amyloidosis (n=1). For diagnosing malignancy, EUS-FNA had a sensitivity of 84.6%, specificity of 95.7%, positive predictive value of 91.7%, negative predictive value of 91.7%, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.901. For the diagnosis of lymphoma, EUS-FNA was 100% accurate when combined with cytologic evaluation and immunohistochemical staining. The diagnostic sensitivity decreased to 75%, whereas the specificity remained 100%, for tuberculosis. The overall AUROC was 0.850. No procedure-related complications occurred.

Conclusions

EUS-FNA showed high diagnostic performance for abdominal lymphadenopathy of unknown causes, especially malignancy, lymphoma, and tuberculosis. Therefore, it is a crucial diagnostic tool for this patient population.

Disseminated tuberculosis mimicking abdominal metastatic carcinoma: A case report

RATIONALE

Extra-pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) has long been a diagnostic challenge for clinicians, often requiring extensive workup and invasive procedures, with the risk of significant complications. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a minimally invasive and highly accurate diagnostic modality for the evaluation of mediastinal and abdominal lymphadenopathy and masses. Several reports on the utility of EUS-FNA as a favorable method for diagnosing extrapulmonary TB have been published.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 54-year-old man complained of intermittent melena.

DIAGNOSES

18 fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography revealed suspected carcinoma metastasis. EUS-FNA did not reveal any evidence of malignancy.

INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES

Laparoscopy was performed, and frozen section pathology during surgery showed granulomas with focal necrosis. Mycobacterium tuberculosis polymerase chain reaction was positive, but acid-fast bacilli staining was negative. Anti-TB treatment was initiated, and the patient was advised to visit the local TB dispensary regularly.

LESSONS

The presence of atypical inflammation of inadequate material or non-representative samples of extra-pulmonary TB was observed on EUS-FNA cytology. Mycobacterium tuberculosis polymerase chain reaction and acid fast bacilli should be performed to diagnose TB because of its higher sensitivity.

Tuberculosis is still the most Common Cause of Mediastinal and Intra-abdominal Lymphadenopathy by EUS-FNA in India

Background Lymph nodal tuberculosis is reported to occur in 4% to 7% of all tuberculosis, and mediastinal lymphadenopathy accounts for 10% of lymph nodal tuberculosis but the diagnosis still remains a challenge due to inaccessibility to these sites. There is a scarcity of recent data from India about the etiology of intra-abdominal and mediastinal lymphadenopathy despite being frequently detected in cross-sectional imaging.

Methods A retrospective study was conducted after reviewing hospital records over a period of 3 years from December 2017 to December 2020 who underwent endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). A total of 126 patients with mediastinal and/or intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy detected by cross-sectional imaging were examined for clinical features, EUS, and histopathology records.

Results The mean age of patients was 53.12 ± 14.15 years. Seventy-one patients (56%) had intra-abdominal lymph nodes and 55 (44%) had mediastinal lymph nodes. The average number of needle passes was 2.35 ± 0.58 (range: 2–4). The majority of patients had tubercular etiology (53.2%) followed by metastatic (26.2%). Other etiologies were reactive (4.8%), lymphoma (4.8%), sarcoidosis (3.2%), and GIST (1.6%). No diagnosis could be ascertained in 6.3% of patients. The EUS features that favored tubercular etiology over metastatic were heterogeneous echotexture (72% vs. 30%), irregular shape (78% vs. 12%), indistinct borders (81% vs. 30%) and calcification (43% vs. 15%). Partial anechoic area and hyperechoic area were seen in 21% and 64% of tubercular patients, respectively. EUS only had sensitivity and specificity of 63% and 84%, respectively, and EUS FNA had a very high sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 100%, respectively.

Conclusion Tuberculosis is still the most common cause of lymph nodes. EUS FNA had a very high sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 100%, respectively, for the diagnosis of mediastinal and intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy.

High Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration in Malignant Lymph Nodes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is increasingly being used for diagnosing lymphadenopathy. We aim to systematically review the accuracy of EUS-FNA in differentiating benign and malignant mediastinal and abdominal lymph nodes (LNs).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed on multiple electronic databases through February 2020. A random or fixed effect model generated the pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio (LR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of EUS-FNA. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were used to explore sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies involving 2753 patients with 2833 LNs were included. In the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant LNs, EUS-FNA had a pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive LR, and negative LR of 87% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86-90%), 100% (95% CI 99-100%), 68.98 (95% CI 42.10-113.02), and 0.14 (95% CI 0.11-0.17), respectively. The pooled rate of adverse events associated with EUS-FNA was 1.57% (95% CI 1.06-2.24%). The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9912. EUS-FNA performed in mediastinal LNs gained a sensitivity of 85% (95% CI 81-88%), while in abdominal LNs, it reached 87% (95% CI 82-91%). The sensitivity of the subgroup with rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) was 91% (95% CI 89-93%), while non-ROSE was 85% (95% CI 82-87%).

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-FNA is a sensitive, highly specific, and safe method for distinguishing benign and malignant mediastinal or abdominal LNs. However, the sensitivity of EUS-FNA still varies significantly among different centers.

Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound features of tubercular lymphadenopathy

There is lack of data on the contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound features of tubercular lymph node; our retrospective analysis of 37 patients with enlarged mediastinal and abdominal lymph nodes showed heterogeneous enhancement in the great majority (70%).

Abdominal tuberculosis in a tertiary care centre in Saudi Arabia

OBJECTIVES

Abdominal tuberculosis (ATB) is the second most common type of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. Though it does not usually pose a significant risk of infectivity, ATB can go unidentified and progress to disseminated infection. The aim of this study is to highlight the incidence and outcome of this infection in a tertiary care centre in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included all ATB patients admitted to our centre between January 1 ^st, 2010 and December 31, 2018. A total of 42 patients with a median age of 49 (range 18-83 years, 78.6% males) were identified.

RESULTS

The most common presentation was abdominal pain, weight loss, and abdominal distension. All the patients were HIV negative; however, 50% had a comorbid condition, mainly diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, and liver cirrhosis. Tuberculous peritonitis was the predominant type of ATB. Suspicious and potentially malignant abdominal masses appeared on the abdominal CT scans of six patients. This suggest that TB should be excluded in patients from endemic area presenting with abdominal masses. All patients received standard anti-tuberculous medication for an average duration of 7.4 months. The outcome was excellent with 88%% achieving complete response. Adjunctive corticosteroids were not used, and none of the patients had a surgical complication.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of ATB is challenging. It can mimic inflammatory bowel disease in young populations and malignancy in middle-aged and elderly population. For this reason, a high index of suspicion with prompt treatment is required to improve the prognosis and prevent complications.

Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: It is difficult to diagnose the cause of abdominal lymphadenopathy without determining the primary lesions. With the advent of curved ultrasound endoscopy, EUS-FNA can sample lymph nodes safely, accurately and conveniently. Due to the lack of formal quantitative and comprehensive literature review to determine the diagnostic value of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of enlarged intra-abdominal lymph nodes of unknown origin, we conducted this study to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA in the enlarged intra-abdominal lymph nodes.Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library to collect related studies and diagnostic performance data. We used a random-effects model to estimate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Heterogeneity was assessed by subgroup and meta-regression analysis.Results: Twelve eligible studies involved 774 patients were identified. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of all studies is 94% (95% CI: 91% to 96%) and 98% (95% CI: 96% to 99%), respectively. The pooled positive and negative likelihood ratios are 17.44 (95% CI, 6.50 to 46.79) and 0.09 (95% CI: 0.06 to 0.14). The pooled DOR is 277.82 (95% CI, 97.65 to 790.46).Conclusions: EUS-FNA is a safe and feasible technique with high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of abdominal lymph node enlargement. Considering the limitations and heterogeneity, high-quality studies are needed to further explore the diagnostic value of EUS-FNA.

Abdominal tuberculosis in Indians: Still very pertinent

Introduction

Tuberculosis is a disease that has been affecting mankind since time immemorial and it still continues to be a global health concern. Objective of the study was to evaluate the burden, clinical profile, diagnosis and diagnostic difficulties and outcome of abdominal tuberculosis (AbT) in non human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected adults in the department of gastroenterology at a tertiary care hospital over a period of two years.

Material & methods

It was an observational study and the study period was from January 2016 till January 2018. The patients who were sero positive for HIV virus were excluded from the study.

Results

The number of patients hospitalized during the period of 2016-2018 with abdominal tuberculosis was 58. The burden of tuberculosis of indoor patients was 1.3 cases per every 100 patients admitted. Presenting complaint of most of these patients [61%] was abdominal pain. Constitutional symptoms like fever; weight loss and loss of appetite were present in only 40% of the patients. Ascites was the presenting sign in around 45% of the patients. Peritoneum was the most common site of involvement [27 out of 58]. Almost all of these patients [25 out of 27] presented with abdominal pain and abdominal distension. Intestine was the second most common site. Ileocaecal involvement was present in fourteen patients, while other areas of colon were involved in five patients. All the 58 patients were given anti tubercular therapy. There was complete resolution of tuberculosis in 91% of cases [53 out of 58 patients]. Six patients developed drug induced liver injury. Death occurred in two patients who had disseminated tuberculosis.

Conclusion

Although the burden of the disease remains the same, availability of newer investigations has aided in its early diagnosis and availability of good drugs has reduced the mortality and morbidity.

Endoscopic ultrasound characteristics of tubercular lymphadenopathy in comparison to reactive lymph nodes

AIM

Tuberculosis is a common disease in India with significant morbidity and mortality. Limited data is available on the description of tubercular lymphadenopathy on endoscopic ultrasound.

METHODS

Retrospective data of 116 lymph nodes in 113 patients was evaluated at a tertiary care center. Lymphadenopathy in the mediastinum and abdomen were included. The study was aimed at identifying the endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) features of tubercular lymphadenopathy and comparing them with reactive lymphadenopathy in patients with pyrexia of unknown origin.

RESULTS

The following features were suggestive of tubercular lymphadenopathy (n = 55) as compared to reactive lymphadenopathy (n = 61): hypoechoic echotexture (94.5% vs. 75.4%, p 0.004), patchy anechoic/hypoechoic areas (30.2% vs. 0%, p = 0.000), calcification (24.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.000), sharply demarcated borders (34.5% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.001), pus like material on aspirate (18.2% vs. 0%, p 0.000), and conglomeration of lymph nodes (10.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.009). The tubercular lymph nodes were significantly larger than reactive nodes at long axis and short axis diameter (2.4 ± 1.1 vs. 1.6 ± 0.6 cm, p < 0.001 and 1.5 ± 0.7 vs. 0.9 ± 0.3 cm, p = 0.001 respectively). On cytopathological examination, presence of necrosis (92.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.000) and granulomas (78.1% vs. 0%, p = 0.000) favored tubercular as compared to reactive lymphadenopathy.

CONCLUSION

EUS features like hypoechoic echotexture, patchy anechoic/hypoechoic areas, calcification, sharply demarcated borders, conglomeration, purulent aspirate, larger size, and cytopathological presence of necrosis/granulomas are suggestive of tubercular as compared to reactive lymphadenopathy.

Polymerase chain reaction amplifying mycobacterial DNA from aspirates obtained by endoscopic ultrasound allows accurate diagnosis of mycobacterial disease in HIV-positive patients with abdominal lymphadenopathy

Abdominal lymphadenopathy in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection remains a diagnostic challenge. We performed a prospective cohort study by recruiting 31 symptomatic HIV + patients with abdominal lymphadenopathy and assessing the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). Mean age was 38 years; 52% were female; and mean CD4 count and viral load were 124 cells/μL and 4 log, respectively. EUS confirmed additional mediastinal nodes in 26%. The porta hepatis was the most common abdominal site. Aspirates obtained by EUS-FNA were subjected to cytology, culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. Mycobacterial infections were confirmed in 67.7%, and 31% had reactive lymphadenopathy. Cytology and culture had low sensitivity, whereas PCR identified 90% of mycobacterial infections. By combining the appearance of aspirates obtained by EUS-FNA and cytologic specimens, we developed a diagnostic algorithm to indicate when analysis with PCR would be useful. PCR performed on material obtained by EUS-FNA was highly accurate in confirming mycobacterial disease and determining genotypic drug resistance.

The yield of EUS-FNA in undiagnosed upper abdominal adenopathy is very high

PURPOSE

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) allows sampling of abdominal adenopathy easily and safely from locations that were previously deemed too risky and inaccessible. The efficacy of EUS-FNA in a large cohort of patients with abdominal adenopathy has not been previously described in the literature.

METHODS

We conducted a large retrospective study at a tertiary referral center. Two hundred twenty-five consecutive patients undergoing EUS-FNA for only abdominal adenopathy between 2004 through August 2009 were included in our study. Patient demographics, indications, EUS findings, and final cytologic diagnoses were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 230 lymph nodes were biopsied in 225 patients. Common locations of nodes included peripancreatic (19%), porta hepatis (18%), and celiac axis (18%). Adequate specimens were obtained in 200/230 nodes (87%) and the most common diagnoses based on cytology were: benign/reactive (50%), adenocarcinoma (20%), lymphoma (8%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy were 71%, 99%, 99%, 78%, and 85%, respectively, for EUS-FNA. Based on EUS imaging alone, malignant nodes were more likely to be larger in diameter (17 mm versus 26 mm, p < 0.001), have a round shape (p = 0.002), well-defined borders (p = 0.04), and hypoechic echotexture (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-FNA allows for excellent tissue acquisition in abdominal lymphadenopathy. Our study supports the use of traditional EUS imaging criteria to identify suspected malignant adenopathy. The results from our large cohort of patients show that EUS-FNA should be considered as a first-line diagnostic modality for ascertaining the etiology of abdominal lymphadenopathy.

Clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of mediastinal and intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has proven to be helpful in obtaining tissue samples from enlarged mediastinal and intra-abdominal lymph nodes. This is especially beneficial in the diagnosis and staging of malignancy. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical utility of this method at a tertiary care cancer hospital in Pakistan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The medical records of 183 consecutive patients referred to the gastroenterology service from August 2008 to March 2012 were reviewed in this retrospective study. The mean age of the patients at presentation was 46.7 years (range 6-87; 62% males); 119 patients had mediastinal and 64 had intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy. Major indications for referral were diagnosis of lymphadenopathy of unknown origin detected on CT scan or PET-CT, to exclude lymph node metastasis in patients with a known primary tumor and to rule out relapse of lymphoma following treatment or during follow-up. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) was performed in all patients to confirm the adequacy of sampling, followed by definitive cytopathological evaluation.

RESULTS

EUS-FNA with ROSE obtained adequate tissue for cytology in 97.3% of the patients in this cohort. These results were further confirmed on final cytopathological analysis in 96.2% of patients. Two patients (1.1%) had inadequate specimens for final interpretation (97.3 vs. 96.2; p = 0.001). Clinical utility was 95% for mediastinal lymphadenopathy and 98.4% for intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy. Only 1 patient had a serious complication requiring hospitalization and this was successfully managed conservatively.

CONCLUSION

EUS-FNA is safe and has a high clinical utility in diagnosing unexplained mediastinal and intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy.