The origins of cerebral palsy. Australian and New Zealand Perinatal Societies

Antenatal risk factors for cerebral palsy

Two of every 1000 live-born children develop cerebral palsy (CP). The aetiology of CP is often unclear and because CP is a symptom complex rather than a disease, clinically defined at 4-5 years of age, it is not surprising that there are considerable problems associated with epidemiological studies of its aetiology. The only reason for the CP concept is that it emanates from an insult to a growing, developing brain and a dynamic clinical picture from static pathology. Evidence suggests that 70-80% of CP cases are due to prenatal factors and that birth asphyxia plays a relatively minor role (<10%). Some antenatal risk factors are repeatedly observed to be related to CP: low gestational age, male gender, multiple gestation, intrauterine viral infections and maternal thyroid abnormalities. Recently, intrauterine infection/inflammation with a maternal response (consisting of chorioamnionitis) and a fetal inflammatory response (consisting of funicitis or elevated interleukin-6 in fetal plasma) has been found to be related to white matter injury and CP. Some risk factors are associated with CP at all gestational ages whereas others mostly affect term or preterm infants, e.g. intrauterine growth restriction seems to be a risk factor in term infants. There also seems to be an association between autoimmune and coagulation disorders and CP.

The CTG and the timing and mechanism of fetal neurological injuries

Defining the relationship between the cardiotocograph (CTG) pattern and subsequent neurological injury is confounded by the requirement that certain clinical and biochemical perinatal findings are essential for relating intrapartum events to subsequent neurological injury. Similarly, the value of CTG analysis in these cases has been compromised by antiquated terminology focused on hypoxia but not neurological behavior. Strong evidence suggests that the evaluation of umbilical artery acidosis, low Apgar score and neonatal encephalopathy are limited in their ability to either include or exclude intrapartum injury. Proper evaluation of the CTG requires that trends and the rapidity of changes in patterns of decelerations are necessary to confidently define the normal-behaving fetus, the hypoxemic but uninjured fetus, the injured but non-hypoxic fetus, and finally to distinguish ischemic events from other forms of hypoxia. A newly defined CTG pattern, the 'conversion' pattern, appears to be a specific marker of ischemic injury and could help to redefine the role of CTG monitoring.