Evolution of non-operative management for blunt splenic trauma in children

Single centre analysis of factors influencing surgical treatment of splenic trauma in children

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate determinants impacting the surgical management of splenic trauma in paediatric patients by scrutinizing age distribution, etiological factors and concomitant injuries. The analysis seeks to establish a foundation for delineating optimal operative timing.

METHODS

A cohort of 262 paediatric cases presenting with splenic trauma at our institution from January 2011 to December 2021 underwent categorization into either the conservative or operative group.

RESULTS

Significantly disparate attributes between the two groups included age, time of presentation, blood pressure, haemoglobin levels, blood transfusion requirements, thermal absorption, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) classification and associated injuries. Logistic regression analysis revealed age, haemoglobin levels, AAST classification and blood transfusion as autonomous influencers of surgical intervention (OR = 1.024, 95% CI: 1.011-1.037; OR = 1.067, 95% CI: 1.01-1.127; OR = 0.2760, 95% CI: 0.087-0.875; OR = 7.873, 95% CI: 2.442-25.382; OR = 0.016, 95% CI: 0.002-0.153). The AAST type and age demonstrated areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.782 and 0.618, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Age, haemoglobin levels, AAST classification and blood transfusion independently influence the decision for surgical intervention in paediatric patients with splenic trauma. Age and AAST classification emerge as viable parameters for assessing and prognosticating the likelihood of surgical intervention in this patient cohort.

Very large haematoma following the nonoperative management of a blunt splenic injury in a patient with preexisting liver cirrhosis: a case report

The spleen is the most commonly injured organ after blunt abdominal trauma. Nonoperative management (NOM) is the standard treatment for blunt splenic injuries in haemodynamically stable patients without peritonitis. Complications of NOM include rebleeding, new pseudoaneurysm formation, splenic abscess, and symptomatic splenic infarction. These complications hinder the NOM of patients with blunt splenic injuries. We report a case in which a large haemorrhagic fluid collection that occurred after angio-embolisation was resolved by percutaneous drainage in a patient with liver cirrhosis who experienced a blunt spleen injury.

The management and outcome of paediatric splenic injuries in the Netherlands

Background

Non-operative management (NOM) is generally accepted as a treatment method of traumatic paediatric splenic rupture. However, considerable variations in management exist. This study analyses local trends in aetiology and management of paediatric splenic injuries and evaluates the implementation of the guidelines proposed by the American Paediatric Surgical Association (APSA) in a level 1 trauma centre.

Methods

The charts of paediatric patients with blunt splenic injury (BSI) who were admitted or transferred to a level 1 trauma centre between 2003 and 2020 were retrospectively assessed. Information pertaining to demographics, mechanism of injury, injury description, associated injuries, intervention and outcomes were analysed and compared to international literature.

Results

There were 130 patients with BSI identified (63.1% male), with a mean age of 11.3 ± 4.0 and a mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 21.6 ± 13.7. Bicycle accidents were the most common trauma mechanism (23.1%). Sixty-four percent were multi-trauma patients, 25% received blood transfusions, and 31% were haemodynamically unstable. Mean injury grade was 3.0, with 30% of patients having a high-grade injury. In total, 75% of patients underwent NOM with a 100% efficacy rate. Total splenectomy rate was 6.2%. Four patients died due to brain damage.

Patients with a high-grade BSI (grades IV–V) had a significantly higher ISS and longer bedrest and more often presented with an active blush on computed tomography (CT) scans than patients with a low-grade BSI (grades I–III). Non-operative management was mainly the choice of treatment in both groups (76.6% and 79.5%, respectively). Haemodynamic instability was a predictor for operative management (OM) (p = 0.001). Predictors for a longer length of stay (LOS) included concomitant injuries, haemodynamic instability and OM (all p < 0.02). Interobserver agreement in the grading of BSI is moderate, with a Cohens Kappa coefficient of 0.493.

Conclusion

Non-operative management has proven to be a realistic management approach in both low- and high-grade splenic injuries. Consideration for operative management should be based on haemodynamic instability. Compared to the anticipated length of bedrest and hospital stay outlined in the APSA guidelines, the Netherlands can reduce the length of bedrest and hospital stay through their non-operative management.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic study, level III

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13017-021-00353-4.

Predictors of splenectomy after failure of non-operative management: An analysis of the nation trauma database from 2013 to 2014

Introduction

There is practice variability in non-operative management (NOM) of blunt splenic trauma. This is particularly true for management decisions following failure of NOM, i.e. splenectomy versus angioembolization (AE). The objective of this study was to identify predictors of splenectomy versus AE in patients who failed NOM.

Methods

We included adult patients from the National Trauma Data Bank for 2013–2014, who had a splenic injury and who were admitted to a Level I Trauma Center (L1TC). Patients undergoing splenectomy after 2 h of emergency department arrival were deemed to have failed NOM. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to identify independent predictors of intervention after failed NOM.

Results

There were 2284 patients admitted for splenic injury between 2013 and 2014 who failed NOM. A total of 1253 patients underwent AE and 1031 patients underwent splenectomy. Seven independent factors were identified that predicted failure of NOM: penetrating injury, community L1TC, hospital bed size, number of trauma surgeons on call, functional dependence, chronic steroid use, and cirrhosis.

Conclusions

Seven independent variables were identified that predicted failure of NOM. These results contribute to the body of data regarding management of blunt splenic injury. Knowing predictive factors could help personalize management of patients, minimize delay of care, efficient resource allocation, and inform future studies.

Comparison of outcomes before and after establishing a regional trauma center and following a protocol to treat blunt splenic injury in South Korea: A retrospective study

Background:

Nonoperative management for hemodynamically stable splenic injury has been accepted as appropriate treatment. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the changes in management and clinical outcomes of splenic injury by introducing a protocol for splenic injury at a newly established regional trauma center.

Methods:

From January 2005 to December 2016, we reviewed the outcomes of all 257 patients who sustained blunt trauma to the spleen at the first regional trauma center in South Korea. This 11-year period was divided into two intervals, before 1 January 2014 (period I, n = 189 patients) and after 1 January 2014 (period II, n = 68 patients), when the trauma center was established and a formal management protocol was followed for patients with blunt traumatic splenic injuries.

Results:

The proportion of emergency operations performed for patients with more serious (grades 3–5) splenic injuries was lower in period II than in period I (29% vs 22%, respectively, p < 0.001) whereas the rate of angioembolization was higher (89% vs 39.0%, respectively, p < 0.001). The time to intervention, irrespective of whether emergency operation or angioembolization was performed, was shorter in period II than in period I (312.8 min vs 129 min, respectively, p = 0.001). A greater proportion of patients was managed non-operatively in period II (78% vs 71%), and the non-operative management success rate was higher in period II than it was in period I (100% vs 83%; p = 0.014). Similarly, the splenic salvage rate was higher in period II (78% vs 59%, p = 0.03).

Conclusion:

After establishing a regional trauma center and introducing a protocol for the management of blunt splenic injuries, the rates of non-operative management and splenic salvage improved significantly. The reasons for this may be multifactorial, being related to the early involvement of a trauma surgeon, expansion of angiographic facilities and resources, and the introduction and application of a protocol for managing blunt splenic injury.

Splenic artery embolisation in children and adolescents--an 8 year experience

BACKGROUND

Non-operative management (NOM) is the treatment of choice in blunt splenic injuries in the paediatric population, with reported success rates exceeding 90%. Splenic artery embolisation (SAE) was added to our institutional treatment protocol for splenic injury in 2002. We wanted to review indications for SAE and the clinical outcome of splenic injury management in children admitted between August 1, 2002 and July 31, 2010.

METHODS

Patients aged <17 years with splenic injury were identified in the institutional trauma and medical code registries. Patient charts and computed tomographic (CT) scans were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of the 72 children and adolescents with splenic injury included during the 8 year study period, 66 patients (92%) were treated non-operatively and six underwent operative management. Severe splenic injury (OIS grade 3-5) was diagnosed in 67 patients (93%). SAE was performed in 22 of the NOM patients. Indications for SAE included - bleeding (n=8), pseudoaneurysms (n=2), contrast extravasation (n=2), high OIS injury grade (n=8) and prophylactic due to specific disease (n=2). NOM was successful in all but one case (98%). For the patients aged ≤ 14 years, extravasation on initial CT scan correlated to delayed bleeding (p<0.001). Two SAE procedure specific complications were registered, but resolved without significant sequelae.

CONCLUSION

After SAE was added to the institutional treatment protocol, 22 of 66 NOM paediatric patients underwent SAE. NOM was successful in 98% and a 90% splenic preservation rate was achieved. Contrast extravasation correlated to delayed splenic bleeding in children ≤ 14 years.

Trauma center variation in splenic artery embolization and spleen salvage: a multicenter analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate if variation in management of blunt splenic injury (BSI) among Level I trauma centers is associated with different outcomes related to the use of splenic artery embolization (SAE).

METHODS

All adult patients admitted for BSI from 2008 to 2010 at 4 Level I trauma centers were reviewed. Use of SAE was determined, and outcomes of spleen salvage and nonoperative management (NOM) failure were evaluated. A priori, a 10% SAE rate was used to group centers into high- or low-use groups.

RESULTS

There were 1,275 BSI patients. There were intercenter differences in age, injury severity, and grade of spleen injury (Spleen Injury Scale [SIS]). Mortality was similar by center; however, BSI treatment varied significantly by center. Overall, SAE use was highest at center A compared with B, C, and D (19%, 11%, 1%, and 4%, respectively; p < 0.01). High SAE use centers had significantly higher spleen salvage rates and fewer NOM failures. Differences in the use of SAE (25% vs. 2%, p < 0.01) and salvage rate (67% vs. 56%, p = 0.03) were most dramatic between high- and low-use SAE centers for Grade 3 and 4 injured spleens. In patients who received initial NOM, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that SAE was an independent predictor of spleen salvage (odds ratio, 5; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-13.5; p < 0.01) as were lower age, lower SIS, and Injury Severity Score (ISS). Patients treated at high SAE use centers were more likely to leave the hospital with their spleen in situ (odds ratio, 3; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-6.3; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Significant practice variation exists in the use of SAE in treating BSI at Level I trauma centers. Centers with higher rates of SAE use have higher spleen salvage and less NOM failure. SAE was shown to be an independent predictor of spleen salvage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level IV.

Meta-analysis of predictive factors and outcomes for failure of non-operative management of blunt splenic trauma

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to analyse predictive factors and outcomes of failure of non-operative management (NOM) following blunt splenic trauma.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed for studies comparing failed NOM (fNOM) to successful NOM (sNOM) in adults (≥ 16 years). The main endpoints were fNOM and associated mortality. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed. Meta-analysis of high quality studies, identified using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, was performed using fixed or random models.

RESULTS

Four prospective and 21 retrospective studies were included. From 24,615 unselected patients, 3025 experienced fNOM (12%, range 4-52%). Meta-analysis of the high quality studies revealed that mortality was significantly higher with fNOM in unselected age groups (odds ratio 1.93, 95% confidence interval 1.04-3.57, p = 0.04, I(2) = 0%), in those <55 years old (OR 3.42, 95% CI 1.73-6.77, p = 0.02, I(2) = 0%) and in those ≥ 55 years old (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.20-5.82, p = 0.02, I(2) = 0%). There was a significant improvement in sNOM following introduction of angioembolisation protocols (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.13-0.53, p<0.002, I(2) = 51%), although these five studies were non-randomised. American Association for the Surgery of Trauma injury grades 4-5, the presence of moderate or large haemoperitoneum, increasing injury severity score and increasing age were all significantly associated with increased risk of fNOM. fNOM led to significantly longer intensive care unit and overall lengths of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

fNOM leads to increased resource use and increased mortality. Methods of preventing fNOM, such as angioembolisation, warrant further assessment. Patients with increasing age, AAST scores and moderate or large haemoperitoneums may benefit from closer monitoring.

Non-operative management and immune function after splenic injury

BACKGROUND

There is still considerable controversy about the importance and method of preserving splenic function after trauma. Recognition of the immune function of the spleen and the risk of overwhelming postsplenectomy infection led to the development of spleen-preserving surgery and non-operative management. More recently angiographic embolization has been used to try to reduce failure of conservative management and preserve splenic function.

METHODS

A literature review was performed of the changing treatment of splenic injury over the last century, focusing on whether and how to maintain splenic immune function.

RESULTS

Non-operative management continues to be reported as a successful approach in haemodynamically stable patients without other indications for laparotomy, achieving high success rates in both children and adults. Except for haemodynamic instability, reported predictors of failure of conservative treatment should not be seen as absolute contraindications to this approach. Angiographic embolization is generally reported to increase success rates of non-operative management, currently approaching 95 per cent. However, the optimal use of angioembolization is still debated. Splenic immunocompetence after angioembolization remains questionable, although existing studies seem to indicate preserved splenic function.

CONCLUSION

Non-operative management has become the treatment of choice to preserve splenic immune function. Current knowledge suggests that immunization is unnecessary after angiographic embolization for splenic injury. Identifying a diagnostic test of splenic function will be important for future studies. Most importantly, in efforts to preserve splenic function, care must be taken not to jeopardize patients at risk of bleeding who require early surgery and splenectomy.

The significance of pseudoaneurysms in the nonoperative management of pediatric blunt splenic trauma

PURPOSE

Nonoperative management is the standard of care for hemodynamically stable pediatric and adult blunt splenic injuries. In adults, most centers follow a well-defined protocol involving repeated imaging at 24 to 48 hours, with embolization of splenic pseudoaneurysms (SAPs). In children, the significance of radiologically detected SAP has yet to be clarified.

METHODS

A systematic review of the medical literature was conducted to analyze the outcomes of documented posttraumatic SAP in the pediatric population.

RESULTS

Sixteen articles, including 1 prospective study, 4 retrospective reviews, and 11 case reports were reviewed. Forty-five SAPs were reported. Ninety-six percent of children were reported as stable. Yet, 82% underwent splenectomy, splenorrhaphy, or embolization. The fear of delayed complications owing to SAP was often cited as the reason for intervention in otherwise stable children. Only one child with a documented pseudoaneurysm experienced a delayed splenic rupture while under observation. No deaths were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence to support or dispute the routine use of follow-up imaging and embolization of posttraumatic SAP in the pediatric population. At present, the decision to treat SAP in stable children is at the discretion of the treating physician. A prospective study is needed to clarify this issue.

Pathological rupture of the spleen in malaria: analysis of 55 cases (1958-2008)

BACKGROUND

Splenic rupture during acute malaria is rare but underreported. Because splenic rupture occurs mostly in non-immune adults, ongoing malaria elimination efforts may paradoxically increase the proportion of Plasmodium-infected patients suffering from this life-threatening complication. The pathogenesis and optimal patient management are still debated.

METHOD

We collected and analysed reports of pathological rupture of the spleen associated with malaria published over the last 50 years in five languages.

RESULTS

Fifty-five cases were reported, due to Plasmodium falciparum (n=26), Plasmodium vivax (n=23), Plasmodium ovale (n=2), Plasmodium malariae (n=2), or P. vivax-falciparum (n=2), and occurred in travellers (n=24), locals (n=21), expatriates (n=6) or migrants (n=4). Median age was 31.5 years and sex ratio M/F 3.2. Splenic rupture was complete with hemoperitoneum (n=50), or partial (n=5). Death occurred in 12 patients (22%), 8 of whom from early irreversible collapse (n=7) or unexpected death (n=1). Death rate was higher among travellers than in other patients (9/24, 38%, versus 3/31, 10%, p=0.01). Clinical features of P. falciparum- or P. vivax-associated splenic rupture were strikingly similar. Treatment included in-hospital medical observation without surgery (conservative management, n=14), immediate splenectomy (n=29), delayed splenectomy (n=4), or none (patients dying at admission, n=8). The type of treatment, conservative or not, had no influence on prognosis. The median duration of malaria symptoms before diagnosis was longer in our review (5-6 days) than in previous reports on imported malaria (3-4 days), suggesting that early diagnosis and therapy of malaria may reduce the incidence of splenic rupture.

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominal pain, collapse, or fainting is warning symptoms. Fourteen published observations support conservative management in carefully selected patients. Spleen preservation likely reduces the risk of future severe malaria attacks in patients with potential further exposition to Plasmodium sp., and also that of overwhelming sepsis in all.

Failure of nonoperative management of abdominal solid organ injuries

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Nonoperative management of the spleen has been the conventional approach for dealing with blunt splenic injury in children for 25 years. Following acceptance in the field of pediatric surgery, nonoperative management of blunt injury to the liver and spleen became the template in adult trauma surgery. It has proven to be of unequivocal benefit to the majority of hemodynamically stable pediatric and adult patients who have suffered blunt liver or splenic trauma. Offsetting these gains, has been the presence of failures.

RECENT FINDINGS

The recent literature has focused on factors which may impact the nonoperative management success or failure rate. These factors include initiation of guidelines, risk of overwhelming postsplenectomy infection, character of clinical judgment, role of computed tomography in detecting associated intraabdominal injuries, the presence of more than one solid organ injury, risk of associated hollow viscus injury, and the drawbacks of angioembolization.

SUMMARY

Despite the failures of nonoperative management outlined in this review, the approach has been generally successful. Efforts at improving organ salvage rates and diminishing failures with this approach continue. Notwithstanding our enthusiasm to advance this method of patient care, we must avoid imperiling a subpopulation of patients in our attempt to improve nonoperative management success rates.