Oral health: an important determinant of the health of children

The Efficacy of a Multi-Theory-Based Peer-Led Intervention on Oral Health Among Hong Kong Adolescents: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the effects of a peer-led oral health intervention based on the Health Belief Model and the Social Cognitive Theory on improving oral health among Hong Kong adolescents.

METHODS

The study adopted a cluster-randomized controlled trial design, and 1184 students in 12 schools were randomized to intervention or control groups. After baseline assessment, the intervention group received a peer-led theory-based oral health intervention, while the control group received booklets for oral health promotion. Self-reported brushing and flossing, Health Belief Model/Social Cognitive Theory constructs, and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) were measured at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months, and dental plaque accumulation and caries status were measured at baseline and 12 months. The trial was registered at https://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03694496).

RESULTS

Brushing, flossing, and OHRQoL improved more in the experimental group than in the control group at the 6-month follow-up compared with baseline (p < .001). The mean gain score difference was .81 for brushing, .47 for flossing, and -2.51 for OHRQoL. At the 12-month follow-up, the mean gain score of brushing frequency, plaque index, caries status, and OHRQoL were .18, -.28, -.32, and -2.79, respectively, which all sustained the significant difference (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggested that the Health Belief Model combined with Social Cognitive Theory in a peer-led intervention is effective to increase self-reported brushing frequency and improve oral hygiene status and OHRQoL among adolescents.

Development and validation of the Oral health behavior questionnaire for adolescents based on the health belief model (OHBQAHBM)

BACKGROUND

Oral health belief is a prerequisite of changing oral health behaviors especially during adolescence. However, there is a paucity of well-established questionnaire for use among adolescents. This study aimed to develop and validate an instrument to evaluate adolescents' beliefs about oral health behaviors using health belief model.

METHODS

A preliminary 43-item questionnaire was developed by an expert panel. Then the questionnaire was finalized by decreasing the number of items to 35 by analyzing the results from face validity and factor analysis from 421 Hong Kong secondary school students. The content validity were evaluated by a panel of 2 behavioral scientists, 2 dentists, 2 schoolteachers and 10 adolescents. The construct validity of the questionnaire was assessed by performing exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient, item-total correlation and intraclass coefficient were used to test its reliability. In addition, to confirm its applicability, multiple regression analysis and path analysis were used to evaluate the possibility of HBM as predictors for oral health behaviors and oral hygiene status.

RESULTS

The initial analysis extracted six factors that jointly accounted for 62.47% of the variance observed. Based on CFA, the final version of the questionnaire consisted of 35 items and the data of the final version fitted the model well. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the subscale (> 0.7), item-total correlations (0.47-0.91) and the intraclass coefficient (0.82-0.91) were all above acceptable thresholds. The results of multiple regression analysis and path analysis confirmed its ability to predict oral health behaviors and status.

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings indicate satisfactory validity, reliability and applicability of the proposed Oral Health Behavior Questionnaire for Adolescents based on the Health Belief Model (OHBQAHBM) for measuring oral health beliefs of adolescents. This questionnaire can be used as an instrument to measure oral health beliefs and predict oral health behavior and oral hygiene status of adolescents.

The effectiveness of behavioral interventions to improve oral health in adolescents at different periods of follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this review was to examine the effectiveness of behavioral interventions at different follow-up periods to improve adolescents' oral health.

METHODS

CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and other databases were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria were as follows: participants aged 10-19 years old, randomized controlled trials using behavioral interventions, outcome measurements including oral health knowledge, attitudes, practices, and oral health status. For each included study, behavior change techniques (BCT) were identified and the quality and risk of bias assessments obtained. PROSPERO reference: CRD42018090341.

RESULTS

After searching and screening, 17 clinical trials were included in the systematic review. The most commonly used BCTs were behavior health link, information on consequences, and social comparisons. A significant reduction of plaque index was detected (SMD:-0.46; 95 % CI:-0.82∼-0.10) for 3 months and (SMD:-0.71; 95 % CI:-1.08∼-0.33) for 6 months. The reduction of gingival index after 6 months was also significant (SMD:-0.90; 95 % CI:-1.33∼-0.47). Oral health knowledge and oral health-related behavior were also improved after behavioral interventions.

CONCLUSION

There is moderate evidence that behavioral interventions are effective in promoting oral health in adolescents. To establish more evidence-based conclusions, further research should focus on: quality control of interventions, full descriptions regarding the BCT, long-term follow-ups, and behavior change reinforcements.

PRACTICAL VALUE

Given the need of early prevention of oral diseases, well-designed oral health promotion programme are needed to improve behavior and outcome of adolescents' oral health.

A Systematic Review of Oral Health Behavior Research in American Adolescents

Despite improvements in prevention, oral diseases are a problem among adolescents, linked to poor health outcomes and poor school performance. Little is known about adolescent oral health behavior. This systematic review describes factors that influence oral health behavior in adolescents. Inclusion criteria for the literature search were American children aged 12–19 and research on oral health behavior. Articles ( n = 353) were retrieved, eight met the inclusion criteria, and of these, six were descriptive and two were experimental studies. The matrix method, critical appraisal, and content analysis produced themes across the studies. Participants were primarily African Americans and Hispanics of both genders, of lower socioeconomic status, aged 12–19. Findings suggest that ethnicity, race, and gender may influence oral health behavior in adolescents and that interventions have an effect. Research is needed to explore what other factors may influence oral health behavior in adolescents, long-term health outcomes, and school performance.