Surgical management of gastroschisis in North Queensland from 1988 to 2007

Association between birth location and short-term outcomes for babies with gastroschisis, congenital diaphragmatic hernia and oesophageal fistula: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Neonatal care is commonly regionalised, meaning specialist services are only available at certain units. Consequently, infants with surgical conditions needing specialist care who are born in non-surgical centres require postnatal transfer. Best practice models advocate for colocated maternity and surgical services as the place of birth for infants with antenatally diagnosed congenital conditions to avoid postnatal transfers. We conducted a systematic review to explore the association between location of birth and short-term outcomes of babies with gastroschisis, congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and oesophageal atresia with or without tracheo-oesophageal fistula (TOF/OA).

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science and SCOPUS databases for studies from high income countries comparing outcomes for infants with gastroschisis, CDH or TOF/OA based on their place of delivery. Outcomes of interest included mortality, length of stay, age at first feed, comorbidities and duration of parenteral nutrition. We assessed study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We present a narrative synthesis of our findings.

RESULTS

Nineteen cohort studies compared outcomes of babies with one of gastroschisis, CDH or TOF/OA. Heterogeneity across the studies precluded meta-analysis. Eight studies carried out case-mix adjustments. Overall, we found conflicting evidence. There is limited evidence to suggest that birth in a maternity unit with a colocated surgical centre was associated with a reduction in mortality for CDH and decreased length of stay for gastroschisis.

CONCLUSIONS

There is little evidence to suggest that delivery in colocated maternity-surgical services may be associated with shortened length of stay and reduced mortality. Our findings are limited by significant heterogeneity, potential for bias and paucity of strong evidence. This supports the need for further research to investigate the impact of birth location on outcomes for babies with congenital surgical conditions and inform future design of neonatal care systems.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022329090.

Epidemiology and outcomes of gastroschisis in Tasmania

AIM

To describe the epidemiology and outcomes of gastroschisis in Tasmania.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all pregnancies complicated by gastroschisis in Tasmania from 1996 to 2015 was undertaken (epidemiology cohort), and the presentation, surgical management and outcomes (surgery cohort) were reviewed for the period between September 1990 and July 2015.

RESULTS

Gastroschisis was detected in 58 pregnancies during the 20-year epidemiology cohort period, giving an incidence of 4.4 per 10 000 live births for the 20-year period. Two of the four stillbirths occurred after 36 weeks' gestation. Of the 65 babies with gastroschisis treated at the Royal Hobart Hospital, 51 had a staged surgical repair (silo in 47, stoma formation in 4), and 14 had a primary closure. Staged repair was associated with a significantly longer duration of ventilation and stay in the neonatal intensive care unit. There were six post-natal deaths, all born in the first epoch. Death was significantly associated with the condition of the intestine at delivery (P = 0.02). There were no deaths in babies with simple gastroschisis. Complex gastroschisis was significantly associated with longer duration of total parenteral nutrition (P = 0.0002) and longer stay in hospital (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of gastroschisis in Tasmania is similar to that reported in other Australian regions and has not increased over the 20-year period of study. The high risk of stillbirth, and the significant association between mortality and the condition of the intestine at birth necessitates close fetal surveillance. Complex gastroschisis imposes a significant burden on hospital resources.

Safety and usefulness of plastic closure in infants with gastroschisis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Recently, plastic closure of abdominal defect in infants with gastroschisis has been used. Timing of gastroschisis closure can be mainly divided into two groups: primary closure and delayed closure after silo forming. Safety and usefulness of plastic closure in gastroschisis remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the current evidence for plastic closure in infants with gastroschisis.

METHODS

The analysis was done for primary closure as well as closure after silo. Outcomes were mortality, wound infection, duration of ventilation, time to feeding, and length of hospital stay (LOS). The quality of evidence was summarized using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

In the "primary" group, there was no significant difference in mortality, time to feeding initiation and LOS. In the "silo" group, wound infection was significantly lower in plastic closure (Odds ratio 0.24, 95%CI 0.09-0.69, p = 0.008). Duration of ventilation, time to feeding initiation and LOS were significantly shorter after plastic closure (Ventilation; mean difference (MD) - 5.76, p = 0.03. Feeding initiation; MD - 9.42, p < 0.0001. LOS; MD - 14.06, p = 0.002). Quality of evidence was very low for all outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Current results suggest that plastic closure may be beneficial for infants with gastroschisis requiring silo formation. However, this evidence is suboptimal and further studies are needed.

Improved outcomes for inborn babies with uncomplicated gastroschisis

INTRODUCTION

Gastroschisis (GS) is a common abdominal wall defect necessitating neonatal surgery and intensive care. We hypothesized that inborn patients had improved outcomes compared to patients born at an outside hospital (outborn) and transferred for definitive treatment.

METHODS

A single center, retrospective chart review at a pediatric tertiary care center was performed from 2010 to 2015. All patients whose primary surgical treatment of GS was performed at this center were included. We compared patients delivered within our center (inborn) to patients delivered outside of our center and transferred for surgical care (outborn). Babies with complicated gastroschisis were excluded.

RESULTS

During the study period 79 patients with GS were identified. Of these, 53 were inborn and 26 were outborn. Sixteen patients were excluded for complicated GS. The rate of complicated GS was higher in the outborn group (32%) compared to the inborn population (11%) (p=0.03). Duration of stay, readmission rate and time on TPN were all significantly decreased for inborn patients, while time to definitive closure was similar. Mortality was 0% for both inborn and outborn patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients with uncomplicated GS seem to benefit from delivery with immediate pediatric surgical care available eliminating the need for transfer.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Variability of outcome reporting in Hirschsprung's Disease and gastroschisis: a systematic review

Heterogeneity in outcome reporting limits identification of gold-standard treatments for Hirschsprung’s Disease(HD) and gastroschisis. This review aimed to identify which outcomes are currently investigated in HD and gastroschisis research so as to counter this heterogeneity through informing development of a core outcome set(COS). Two systematic reviews were conducted. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they compared surgical interventions for primary treatment of HD in review one, and gastroschisis in review two. Studies available only as abstracts were excluded from analysis of reporting transparency. Thirty-five HD studies were eligible for inclusion in the review, and 74 unique outcomes were investigated. The most commonly investigated was faecal incontinence (32 studies, 91%). Seven of the 28 assessed studies (25%) met all criteria for transparent outcome reporting. Thirty gastroschisis studies were eligible for inclusion in the review, and 62 unique outcomes were investigated. The most commonly investigated was length of stay (24 studies, 80%). None of the assessed studies met all criteria for transparent outcome reporting. This review demonstrates that heterogeneity in outcome reporting and a significant risk of reporting bias exist in HD and gastroschisis research. Development of a COS could counter these problems, and the outcome lists developed from this review could be used in that process.

Flap versus fascial closure for gastroschisis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Flap closure represents an alternative to fascial closure for gastroschisis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes comparing these techniques.

METHODS

A registered systematic review (

PROSPERO

CRD42015016745) of comparative studies was performed, querying multiple databases without language or date restrictions. Gray literature was sought. Outcomes analyzed included: mortality, ventilation days, feeding parameters, length of stay (LOS), wound infection, resource utilization, and umbilical hernia incidence. Multiple reviewers independently assessed study eligibility and literature quality. Meta-analysis of outcomes was performed where appropriate (Revman 5.2).

RESULTS

Twelve studies met inclusion criteria, of which three were multi-institutional. Quality assessment revealed unbiased patient selection and exposure, but group comparability was suboptimal in four studies. Overall, 1124 patients were evaluated, of which 350 underwent flap closure (210 immediately; 140 post-silo). Meta-analysis revealed no significant differences in mortality, LOS, or feeding parameters between groups. Flap patients had less wound infections (OR 0.40 [95%CI 0.22-0.74], P=0.003). While flap patients had an increased risk of umbilical hernia, they were less likely to undergo repair (19% vs. 41%; P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Flap closure has equivalent or superior outcomes to fascial closure for patients with gastroschisis. Given potential advantages of bedside closure and reduced sedation requirements, flap closure may represent the preferred closure strategy.

Predictive factors at birth of the severity of gastroschisis

AIM: To establish children born with gastroschisis (GS).

METHODS: We performed a retrospective study covering the period from January 2000 to December 2007. The following variables were analyzed for each child: Weight, sex, apgar, perforations, atresia, volvulus, bowel lenght, subjective description of perivisceritis, duration of parenteral nutrition, first nasogastric milk feeding, total milk feeding, necrotizing enterocolitis, average period of hospitalization and mortality. For statistical analysis, descriptive data are reported as mean ± standard deviation and median (range). The non parametric test of Mann-Whitney was used. The threshold for statistical significance was P < 0.05 (Two-Tailed).

RESULTS: Sixty-eight cases of GS were studied. We found nine cases of perforations, eight of volvulus, 12 of atresia and 49 children with subjective description of perivisceritis (72%). The mortality rate was 12% (eight deaths). Average duration of total parenteral nutrition was 56.7 d (8-950; median: 22), with five cases of necrotizing enterocolitis. Average length of hospitalization for 60 of our patients was 54.7 d (2-370; median: 25.5). The presence of intestinal atresia was the only factor correlated with prolonged parenteral nutrition, delayed total oral milk feeding and longer hospitalization.

CONCLUSION: In our study, intestinal atresia was our predictive factor of the severity of GS.

Challenges of improving the evidence base in smaller surgical specialties, as highlighted by a systematic review of gastroschisis management

Objective

To identify methods of improving the evidence base in smaller surgical specialties, using a systematic review of gastroschisis management as an example.

Background

Operative primary fascial closure (OPFC), and silo placement with staged reduction and delayed closure (SR) are the most commonly used methods of gastroschisis closure. Relative merits of each are unclear.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed comparing outcomes following OPFC and SR in infants with simple gastroschisis. Primary outcomes of interest were mortality, length of hospitalization and time to full enteral feeding.

Results

751 unique articles were identified. Eight met the inclusion criteria. None were randomized controlled trials. 488 infants underwent OPFC and 316 underwent SR. Multiple studies were excluded because they included heterogeneous populations and mixed intervention groups. Length of stay was significantly longer in the SR group (mean difference 8.97 days, 95% CI 2.14–15.80 days), as was number of post-operative days to complete enteral feeding (mean difference 7.19 days, 95%CI 2.01–12.36 days). Mortality was not statistically significantly different, although the odds of death were raised in the SR group (OR 1.96, 95%CI 0.71–5.35).

Conclusions

Despite showing some benefit of OPFC over SR, our results are tempered by the low quality of the available studies, which were small and variably reported. Coordinating research through a National Paediatric Surgical Trials Unit could alleviate many of these problems. A similar national approach could be used in other smaller surgical specialties.

Improving gastroschisis outcomes: does birth place matter?

PURPOSE

Babies born in the hospital where they obtain definitive surgical care do not require transportation between institutions and may have shorter time to surgical intervention. Whether these differences result in meaningful improvement in outcomes has been debated. A multi-institutional retrospective study was performed comparing outcomes based on birthplace.

METHODS

Six institutions within the PedSRC reviewed infants born with gastroschisis from 2008 to 2013. Birthplace, perinatal, and postoperative data were collected. Based on the P-NSQIP definition, inborn was defined as birth at the pediatric hospital where repair occurred. The primary outcome was days to full enteral nutrition (FEN; 120kcal/kg/day).

RESULTS

528 patients with gastroschisis were identified: 286 inborn, 242 outborn. Days to FEN, time to bowel coverage and abdominal wall closure, primary closure rate, and length of stay significantly favored inborn patients. In multivariable analysis, birthplace was not a significant predictor of time to FEN. Gestational age, presence of atresia or necrosis, primary closure rate, and time to abdominal wall closure were significant predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Inborn patients had bowel coverage and definitive closure sooner with fewer days to full feeds and shorter length of stay. Birthplace appears to be important and should be considered in efforts to improve outcomes in patients with gastroschisis.

Primary fascial closure versus staged closure with silo in patients with gastroschisis: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Gastroschisis is the most common congenital abdominal wall defect. Despite advances in the surgical closure of gastroschisis, consensus is lacking as to which method results in the best patient outcomes. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare short-term outcomes associated with primary fascial closure and staged repair with a silo in patients with gastroschisis.

METHODS

We reviewed Medline citations, as well as the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, between January 1, 1996 and June 1, 2012. Articles were identified using the search term "gastroschisis" and [("treatment outcome" or "prognosis") or randomized controlled trials]. Case reports, reviews, letters, abstracts only, non-English abstracts, and studies that did not address at least one of the outcomes of interest were excluded from the meta-analysis. Two independent reviewers identified relevant articles for final inclusion. A standard data collection form created by the authors was used to extract study information, including study design, patient characteristics, and reported patient outcomes. The data were analyzed using standard meta-analytic techniques.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were included in the meta-analysis. In the five studies that selected closure method randomly or as a temporal shift in practice, silo was associated with better outcomes, with a significant reduction in ventilator days (p<0.0001), time to first feed (p=0.04), and infection rates (p=0.03). When all studies were included, primary closure was associated with improved outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Silo closure is associated with better clinical outcomes in the studies with the least selection bias. Larger prospective studies are needed to definitively determine the best closure technique.

Cholestasis and growth in neonates with gastroschisis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of cholestasis and the correlation between cholestasis and weight-for-age z scores in parenteral nutrition-dependent neonates with gastroschisis.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review of 59 infants born with gastroschisis from January 2000 to June 2007 was conducted. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed. Subjects were divided into cholestatic and noncholestatic groups. Statistical analyses included the Student t test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, Fisher exact test, and a general linear model.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine neonates with gastroschisis were identified, and 16 (28%) of 58 patients developed cholestasis. Younger gestational age and cholestasis were found to be independently associated with weight-for-age z score in 30 of 58 patients with available long-term follow-up data.

CONCLUSIONS

Parenteral nutrition-dependent neonates with gastroschisis remain at considerable risk for the development of cholestasis. Both gestational age and cholestasis were found to be independent risk factors, predisposing these neonates to poor postnatal growth.

Developmental outcomes following major surgery: what does the literature say?

Relative to the wealth of information in the medical literature regarding developmental outcome for infants who have had cardiac surgery available, few studies specifically detail how those who have undergone major surgery grow and develop. The few published studies tend to be disease specific, making their results difficult to translate to a more general setting. As mortality for most infants who require surgery in infancy continues to decrease, the focus for researchers and clinicians should be on how these children will grow and develop. As parents realise that their infant will survive, this becomes their next major concern. The most common conditions requiring early major surgery have been reviewed in relation to data on infant developmental outcomes.

Hospital readmission among infants with gastroschisis

OBJECTIVE

Infants with gastroschisis have significant perinatal morbidity including long hospitalizations and feeding intolerance. Two thirds are premature and 20% are growth restricted. Despite these known risk factors for post-natal complications, little is known about readmission for infants with gastroschisis. Our objective was to determine the frequency and indication for hospital readmission after initial discharge among infants with gastroschisis.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study. All surviving infants treated for gastroschisis at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, born between January 2006 and December 2008 were included. Main outcome measures included the frequency and indication for readmission. Associated neonatal risk factors also were assessed.

RESULT

Fifty-eight patients were analyzed. Twenty-three (40%) subjects were readmitted (five with multiple readmissions); 65% of readmissions occurred in the first year and 70% involved complications directly related to gastroschisis. The most common reasons for readmission were bowel obstruction and abdominal distention/pain. Median time to readmission directly related to gastroschisis was 23 weeks (range 5 to 92). All three infants with home parenteral nutrition were readmitted. Readmission was not associated with gestational age, birth weight or length of initial hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Readmission after initial hospitalization is common in gastroschisis patients. Parental counseling should include education regarding the possibility of complications requiring readmission. Determinants of readmission require further study.

Perinatal demography of gastroschisis in North Queensland

AIM

To review the demography of gastroschisis in North Queensland.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of live born cases of gastroschisis originating in North Queensland from 1988 to 2007.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine cases were identified, giving an overall rate of 3.2 per 10,000 live births. In mothers <20 years old compared with 20-24 and 25-29 it was 12.1, 6.3 and 1.7. Overall, the rate was higher in Indigenous mothers (6.6 vs. 2.6, OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.4-4.5, P= 0.0018). Overall, the rate increased significantly from 0.7 per 10,000 live births in the first 5 years of the study to 4.8 in the last (trend test P= 0.0015), but it increased particularly in mothers <20 years old, from 2.40 in the first 5 years to 19.3 in the last (trend test P= 0.0177). It also rose from 0 to 3.6 in those aged 25-29 (P= 0.0337) but remained stable in other age groups. There was no difference in the outcomes of babies born to Indigenous or non-Indigenous mothers, or in outcomes of babies delivered vaginally or by Caesarean section, or in outcomes of babies from any particular location in North Queensland. There was no significant difference in the average age of Indigenous and non-Indigenous mothers.

CONCLUSION

Gastroschisis is increasing in North Queensland, especially in mothers <20. Overall, the rate in Indigenous mothers is two to three times higher.

Gastroschisis: an update

Gastroschisis (GS) continues to increase in frequency, with several studies now reported an incidence of between 4 and 5 per 10,000 live births. The main risk factor would seem to be young maternal age, and it is in this group that the greatest increase has occurred. Whilst various geographical regions confer a higher risk, the impact of several other putative risk factors, including smoking and illicit drug use, may be less important than when first identified in early epidemiological studies. Over 90% of cases of GS will now be diagnosed on antenatal ultrasound, but its value in determining the need for early delivery remains unclear. There would appear no clear evidence for either routine early delivery or elective caesarean section for infants with antenatally diagnosed GS. Delivery at a centre with paediatric surgical facilities reduces the risk of subsequent morbidity and should represent the standard of care. The relative roles of primary closure, staged closure and ward reduction, with or without general anaesthesia, appear less clear with considerable variation between centres in both the use of these techniques and subsequent surgical outcomes. Survival rates continue to improve, with rates well in excess of 90% now routine. The limited long-term developmental data available would suggest that normal or near-normal outcomes may be expected although there remains a need for further studies.