Methylation status of the MGMT gene promoter fails to predict the clinical outcome of glioblastoma patients treated with ACNU plus cisplatin

Predominance of MGMT promoter methylation among Pakistani glioblastoma patients

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most prevalent subgroup of neuroepithelial tumors, is characterized by dismal overall survival (OS). Several studies have linked O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation to OS in GBM patients. However, MGMT methylation frequencies vary geographically and across ethnicities, with limited data for South Asian populations, including Pakistan. This study aimed to analyze MGMT promoter methylation in Pakistani GBM patients.

METHODS

Consecutive primary GBM patients diagnosed ≥ 18 years-of-age, with no prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy history, were retrospectively selected. DNA was isolated from formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded tissues. MGMT promoter methylation was analyzed using methylation-specific PCR. Clinical, pathological, and treatment data were assessed using Fisher's exact/Chi-squared tests. OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis in SPSS 27.0.1.

RESULTS

The study included 48 GBM patients, comprising 38 (79.2%) males and 10 (20.8%) females. The median diagnosis age was 49.5 years (range 18-70). MGMT methylation was observed in 87.5% (42/48) of all cases. Patients with MGMT methylation undergoing radiotherapy or radiotherapy plus chemotherapy exhibited significantly improved median OS of 7.2 months (95% CI, 3.7-10.7; P < 0.001) and 16.9 months (95% CI, 15.9-17.9; P < 0.001), respectively, compared to those undergoing surgical resection only (OS: 2.2 months, 95% CI, 0.8-3.6).

CONCLUSION

This is the first comprehensive study highlighting a predominance of MGMT methylation in Pakistani GBM patients. Furthermore, our findings underscore the association of MGMT methylation with improved OS across diverse treatment modalities. Larger studies are imperative to validate our findings for better management of Pakistani GBM patients.

Platinum-Based Nanoformulations for Glioblastoma Treatment: The Resurgence of Platinum Drugs?

Current therapies for treating Glioblastoma (GB), and brain tumours in general, are inefficient and represent numerous challenges. In addition to surgical resection, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are presently used as standards of care. However, treated patients still face a dismal prognosis with a median survival below 15-18 months. Temozolomide (TMZ) is the main chemotherapeutic agent administered; however, intrinsic or acquired resistance to TMZ contributes to the limited efficacy of this drug. To circumvent the current drawbacks in GB treatment, a large number of classical and non-classical platinum complexes have been prepared and tested for anticancer activity, especially platinum (IV)-based prodrugs. Platinum complexes, used as alkylating agents in the anticancer chemotherapy of some malignancies, are though often associated with severe systemic toxicity (i.e., neurotoxicity), especially after long-term treatments. The objective of the current developments is to produce novel nanoformulations with improved lipophilicity and passive diffusion, promoting intracellular accumulation, while reducing toxicity and optimizing the concomitant treatment of chemo-/radiotherapy. Moreover, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) prevents the access of the drugs to the brain and accumulation in tumour cells, so it represents a key challenge for GB management. The development of novel nanomedicines with the ability to (i) encapsulate Pt-based drugs and pro-drugs, (ii) cross the BBB, and (iii) specifically target cancer cells represents a promising approach to increase the therapeutic effect of the anticancer drugs and reduce undesired side effects. In this review, a critical discussion is presented concerning different families of nanoparticles able to encapsulate platinum anticancer drugs and their application for GB treatment, emphasizing their potential for increasing the effectiveness of platinum-based drugs.

The Impact of IDH1 Mutation and MGMT Promoter Methylation on Recurrence-Free Interval in Glioblastoma Patients Treated With Radiotherapy and Chemotherapeutic Agents

The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) mutation and O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation with recurrence-free interval in glioblastoma patients treated with chemoradiotherapies. Clinical data were collected from 82 patients with totally resected glioblastoma and treated with adjuvant therapies from 2014 to 2019. IDH1 mutation was assessed by immunohistochemistry and MGMT promoter methylation was assessed by different sequencing methods. IDH1 mutation was present in 32 cases and 50 cases were IDH1 wildtype; 54 and 28 patients had unmethylated and methylated MGMT promoter, respectively, Of the 82 patients, 62 patients received chemoradiotherapy while 20 patients only received radiation. Approximately, 61% of patients had a tumor recurrence after 1 year, and 39% showed a recurrence before 1 year of treatment. There was no significant relationship between IDH1 mutation and MGMT promoter methylation (p-value = 0.972). Patients with IDH1 mutation and their age <50 years showed a significant difference in recurrence-free interval (p-value = 0.014). Difference in recurrence-free interval was also statistically observed in patients with unmethylated MGMT promoter and treated with chemoradiotherapies (p-value = 0.031), by which they showed a late tumor recurrence (p-value = 0.016). This revealed that IDH1 mutation and MGMT methylation are independent prognostic factors in glioblastoma. Although IDH1-mutant glioblastomas showed late tumor recurrence in patients less than 50 years old, the type of treatment modalities may not show additional beneficial outcome. Patients with unmethylated MGMT and IDH1 mutation, treated with different chemoradiotherapies, showed a late tumor recurrence.

The prognostic role of IDH mutations in homogeneously treated patients with anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas

The detection of IDH mutations in patients with diffusely infiltrating malignant astrocytomas resulted in substantial modifications in the concept of WHO classification of these tumors. An important underlying observation was that patients with anaplastic astrocytomas (AA) without IDH mutation had a clinical course similar to that of patients with glioblastomas (GBM). The underlying observations of the German Glioma Network and NOA-04, however, were based on mixed patient cohorts. While most GBM patients received combined radiochemotherapy, patients with AA usually had radiotherapy or chemotherapy only. This intrinsic shortcoming of the study raised the question of whether patients with AA, IDH wildtype, WHO grade III, might have better prognosis if treated with combined radiochemotherapy than patients with GBM receiving the same combination therapy. Thus, the question remains whether the established histopathological grading criteria for malignant astrocytomas in the absence of an IDH mutation are still important if neither vascular proliferation nor necrosis are detectable. All patients in the cohort investigated here with the diagnosis of AA or GBM were subjected to a combined radiochemotherapy according to the Stupp protocol independently of the histopathological diagnosis. Thus, the analysis of these patients allows to clarify whether patients with AA, IDH wildtype, WHO grade III have a prognosis similar to that of GBM, IDH wildtype, WHO grade IV, even under equivalent therapeutic conditions. We determined the IDH1 and IDH2 status by sequencing, the MGMT status by pyrosequencing after bisulfite treatment and the EGFR status of the patients by FISH. In fact, the patients with the histopathological diagnosis of an AA IDH wild-type under similar aggressive therapy showed a comparable and therefore no better prognosis (median overall survival (mOS) 16 months) than patients with a GBM (mOS 13 months). Instead, patients with an AA and an IDH mutation receiving the same therapy had a mOS of 54 months. Thus, it can be concluded that in the absence of an IDH mutation, the established histopathological grading criteria 'necrosis' and 'vascular proliferation' actually lose their prognostic significance. If, on the other hand, patients with malignant astrocytomas and an IDH mutation are examined, there is still a difference between patients with necrosis and/or vascular proliferation and those whose tumors do not show such characteristics. Accordingly, in patients with malignant astrocytomas with IDH mutation it can be concluded that a histological differentiation between AA IDH mutated and GBM IDH mutated remains beneficial from a prognostic perspective.

Prognostic significance of O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation and isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH-1) mutation in glioblastoma multiforme patients: A single-center experience in the Middle East region

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence and prognostic value of MGMT promoter methylation and IDH1 mutation in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients from the Middle East.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Records of patients diagnosed between 2003 and 2015 were reviewed. MGMT promoter methylation was measured using methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction and IDH-1 mutation was reported. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 110 patients were included. The median age was 51 years and 71 patients (64.5%) were males. The median diameter of GBM was 4.6 cm and 29 patients (26.4%) had multifocal disease. Gross total resection was achieved in 38 patients (24.9%). All patients received adjuvant radiation therapy, and 96 patients (91.4%) received concomitant temozolomide. At a median follow up of 13.6 months, the median OS was 17.2 months, and the OS at 1 and 2 years were 71.6% and 34.8%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, age at diagnosis (HR 1.019; P = 0.044) and multifocality (HR 2.373; P = 0.001) were the only independent prognostic variables. MGMT promoter methylation was found in 28.2% of patients but did not significantly correlate with survival (HR 1.160; P = 0.635). IDH-1 mutation was found in 10% of patients was associated with a non-significant trend for survival improvement (HR 0.502; P = 0.151).

CONCLUSION

Patients with GBM from the Middle East have adequate survival outcomes when given the optimal treatment. In our patient population, MGMT promoter methylation did not seem to correlate with outcomes, but patients with IDH1 mutation had numerically higher survival outcomes.

Increased LGALS3 expression independently predicts shorter overall survival in patients with the proneural subtype of glioblastoma

In the current study, we tried to study the expression of LGALS3 and LGALS3BP, their potential as prognostic markers and the possible genetic/epigenetic mechanisms underlying their dysregulation in different subtypes of glioblastoma (GBM). An in silico retrospective study was performed using large online databases. Results showed that LGALS3 and LGALS3BP were upregulated at both RNA and protein levels in GBM tissue and were generally associated with shorter overall survival (OS) in GBM patients. However, in subgroup analysis, we only found the association in proneural subtype. The copy number alterations did not necessarily lead to LGALS3/LGALS3BP dysregulation. In the proneural subtype of GBM patients, hypermethylation of the two CpG sites (cg19099850 and cg17403875) was associated with significantly lower expression of LGALS3. In univariate and multivariate analysis, LGALS3 expression independently predicted shorter OS in the proneural subtype of GBM (HR: 1.487, 95% CI: 1.229‐1.798, P < 0.001), after adjustment of age, gender, IDH1 mutations, temozolomide chemotherapy, radiotherapy and LGALS3BP expression. In comparison, LGALS3BP lost the prognostic value in multivariate analysis. Based on these findings, we infer that LGALS3 expression serves as an independent biomarker of shorter OS in the proneural subtype of GBM, the expression of which might be regulated in an epigenetic manner.

The Clinical Significance of O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Promoter Methylation Status in Adult Patients With Glioblastoma: A Meta-analysis

Background and objective

Promoter status of O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) has been widely established as a clinically relevant factor in glioblastoma (GBM) patients. However, in addition to varied therapy schedule, the prognosis of GBM patients is also affected by variations of age, race, primary or recurrent tumor. This study comprehensively investigated the association between MGMT promoter status and prognosis in overall GBM patients and in different GBM subtype including new diagnosed patients, recurrent patients and elderly patients.

Methods

A comprehensive search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane databases to identify literatures (published from January 1, 2005 to April 1, 2017) that evaluated the associations between MGMT promoter methylation and prognosis of GBM patients.

Results

Totally, 66 studies including 7,886 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall GBM patients with a methylated status of MGMT receiving temozolomide (TMZ)-containing treatment had better overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) [OS: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.41–0.52, p < 0.001, Bon = 0.017; PFS: HR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.40–0.57, p < 0.001, Bon = 0.014], but no significant advantage on OS or PFS in GBM patients with TMZ-free treatment was observed (OS: HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.91–1.03, p = 0.08, Bon = 1; PFS: HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.57–1.02, p = 0.068, Bon = 0.748). These different impacts of MGMT status on OS were similar in newly diagnosed GBM patients, elderly GBM patients and recurrent GBM. Among patients receiving TMZ-free treatment, survival benefit in Asian patients was not observed anymore after Bonferroni correction (Asian OS: HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.64–0.95, p = 0.02, Bon = 0.24, I² = 0%; PFS: HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.50–0.94, p = 0.02, Bon = 0.24). No benefit was observed in Caucasian receiving TMZ-free therapy regardless of Bonferroni adjustment.

Conclusion

The meta-analysis highlights the universal predictive value of MGMT methylation in newly diagnosed GBM patients, elderly GBM patients and recurrent GBM patients. For elderly methylated GBM patients, TMZ alone therapy might be a more suitable option than radiotherapy alone therapy. Future clinical trials should be designed in order to optimize therapeutics in different GBM subpopulation.

[Prognostic and predictive factors in high-grade gliomas. Experience at our institution]

OBJECTIVE

To describe and analyse predictive and prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) in high-grade gliomas at our institution.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

All patients diagnosed with grade iii (GIII) or grade iv (GIV) gliomas (excluding oligodendrogliomas, oligoastrocytomas or infratentorial gliomas) were prospectively included from November 2010 to August 2014. All were treated with surgery followed by adjuvant radiochemotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for the statistical analysis, considering a P value ˂.05 to be significant.

RESULTS

89 patients were studied (18 GIII and 71 GIV). The average age was 60 years and 55% were men. The mean Karnofsky score was 80%. The most common location was the frontal lobe (38%). A total of 65% were partial resections. Complete chemotherapy was administered to 74% and complete RT to 83% of patients. Mean OS was 26.8±8.3 months for GIII and 12.5±1 month for GIV. 72 had died by the end of this study. A total of 40% of patients had MGMT methylation, 7% IDH1 mutation and 47% EGFR amplification. Statistically significant variables for OS were: GIII (P=.020), age ˂70 years (P=.040), ˂65 years (P=.013) and ˂60 years (P=.003), Karnofsky ≥70% (P=.029), complete radiotherapy (P=.000), complete resection (P=.001), MGMT methylation (P=.042), IDH1 mutation (P=.007) and EGFR non-amplification (P=.034). Additionally, GIII and GIV subgroups were independently analysed. In GIII, the only significant biomarker for OS was IDH1 mutation, while in GIV, MGMT methylation (P=.023) was significant. Age ≥70 years old was a significant factor in the GIII-subgroup (P=.040) but not for GIV (P=.166).

CONCLUSIONS

Data are in line with previous studies, with the exception of age, which does not appear to be significant in GIV.

Is the prognostic significance of O6-methylguanine- DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation equally important in glioblastomas of patients from different continents? A systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is an independent predictor of therapeutic response and potential prognosis in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). However, its significance of clinical prognosis in different continents still needs to be explored.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To explore the effects of MGMT promoter methylation on both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among GBM patients from different continents, a systematic review of published studies was conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 5103 patients from 53 studies were involved in the systematic review and the total percentage of MGMT promoter methylation was 45.53%. Of these studies, 16 studies performed univariate analyses and 17 performed multivariate analyses of MGMT promoter methylation on PFS. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) estimated for PFS was 0.55 (95% CI 0.50, 0.60) by univariate analysis and 0.43 (95% CI 0.38, 0.48) by multivariate analysis. The effect of MGMT promoter methylation on OS was explored in 30 studies by univariate analysis and in 30 studies by multivariate analysis. The combined HR was 0.48 (95% CI 0.44, 0.52) and 0.42 (95% CI 0.38, 0.45), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In each subgroup divided by areas, the prognostic significance still remained highly significant. The proportion of methylation in each group was in inverse proportion to the corresponding HR in the univariate and multivariate analyses of PFS. However, from the perspective of OS, compared with data from Europe and the US, higher methylation rates in Asia did not bring better returns.

The prognostic value of MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma: A meta-analysis of clinical trials

The DNA repair protein O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is suggested to be associated with resistance to alkylating agents such as Temozolomide which is being used in treatment of patients with glioblastoma (GBM). Therefore, we evaluated the associations between MGMT promoter methylation and prognosis of patients with glioblastoma (GBM). Data were extracted from publications in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. Data on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and MGMT methylation status were obtained and 4,097 subjects were enrolled. Data from 34 studies showed that MGMT methylated patients had better OS, compared to GBM unmethylated patients (pooled HRs, 0.494; 95%CI 0.412-0.591; p = 0.001). Meta-analysis of 10 eligible studies reporting on PFS, demonstrated that MGMT promoter methylation was not significantly associated with better PFS (pooled HRs, 0.653; 95%CI 0.414-1.030; p = 0.067). GBM patients with MGMT methylation were associated with longer overall survival, although this effect was not detected for PFS. Moreover, we performed further analysis in patients underwent a comprehensive imaging evaluation. This data showed a significant association with better OS and PFS, although further studies are warranted to assess the value of emerging marker in prospective setting in patients with glioblastoma as a risk stratification biomarker in clinical management of the patients.

¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose and ¹¹C-methionine positron emission tomography in relation to methyl-guanine methyltransferase promoter methylation in high-grade gliomas

INTRODUCTION

Methylation status of the methyl-guanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter is associated with a favorable response to a DNA alkylating agent in high-grade gliomas. We analyzed PET scans of patients with high-grade gliomas to determine whether the MGMT methylation status affects the tumor metabolic characteristics.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-three patients with high-grade glioma, who were initially examined with 11C-methionine (MET) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET, were retrospectively enrolled. MET and FDG PET images were coregistered to each other and quantitative uptake of MET or FDG was assessed using tumor-to-normal uptake ratio of the cortex (TNR). TNRs for MET and FDG PET were compared between the two groups classified by MGMT promoter methylation status.

RESULTS

Maximum TNR(FDG) of the MGMT methylated group was significantly higher than that of the MGMT unmethylated group (1.80±0.90 vs. 1.29±0.19; P=0.02). The MGMT methylated group also showed a trend for increased mean TNRFDG compared with the unmethylated group (0.85±0.21 vs. 0.72±0.11; P=0.10). There was no significant difference in TNR(MET) between the groups. In subgroup analyses with WHO grade 3 and 4, a trend for higher maximum TNR(FDG) was found in the MGMT methylated group compared with the unmethylated group.

CONCLUSION

The MGMT methylated group showed higher glucose metabolism compared with the unmethylated group, whereas MET uptake did not show a significant difference. This suggests that MGMT methylation in high-grade gliomas could affect the tumor glucose metabolism. Thus, MGMT methylation status can cause a discrepancy in the prognostic prediction of high-grade gliomas by FDG PET, especially in patients scheduled for DNA alkylating chemotherapeutics.

Correlation of high delta-like ligand 4 expression with peritumoral brain edema and its prediction of poor prognosis in patients with primary high-grade gliomas

OBJECT

Peritumoral brain edema (PTBE) is a common phenomenon associated with high-grade gliomas (HGGs). In this study, the authors investigated the expression of Notch delta-like ligand 4 (DLL4) and its correlation with PTBE and prognosis in patients with an HGG.

METHODS

Tumors from 99 patients with HGG were analyzed for DLL4 expression using immunohistochemistry. PTBE on preoperative MR images and the relationship between PTBE and DLL4 expression were evaluated. The effect of DLL4 on patient prognosis was assessed by using Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemistry results revealed that the expression of DLL4 was distributed primarily within the cytoplasm of tumor vascular endothelial cells and seldom detected in tumor cells. DLL4 expression was correlated positively with the degree of edema (r = 0.845 and p < 0.001, Spearman's test). In addition, DLL4 was an independent predictor of prognosis in patients with HGGs (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

DLL4 expression was correlated positively with the degree of PTBE and was an independent unfavorable prognostic indicator in patients with HGG.

ZNF695 methylation predicts a response of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma to definitive chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

Definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) is one of the standard treatments for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Patients with a response to dCRT have a better prognosis than those resistant to dCRT while survival benefits for patients with residual tumors are limited. Nevertheless, few molecular markers to predict the response to dCRT are currently available. Here, we aimed to establish a DNA methylation marker to predict the response to dCRT.

METHODS

A total of 104 patients were divided into screening (n = 43) and validation (n = 61) sets. A genome-wide DNA methylation analysis was performed using an Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip array. Methylation levels were measured by quantitative methylation-specific PCR and normalized by the fraction of cancer cells in a sample.

RESULTS

The genome-wide methylation analysis of seven responders and eight non-responders identified 18 genomic regions specifically (un)methylated in the responders. Among these, methylation of the promoter CpG island of ZNF695 was significantly associated with the response to dCRT in the screening set (P = 0.004), and a cutoff value was determined. In the validation set, the association was successfully validated (P = 0.021), and a high specificity (90 %) for the prediction of responders was obtained using the prefixed cutoff value. In addition, a multivariate analysis showed that ZNF695 methylation was an independent predictive factor for the response to dCRT (OR 7.55, 95 % CI 2.12-26.9, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

ZNF695 methylation was significantly associated with the response to dCRT and is a promising predictive marker for the response to dCRT.

MGMT promoter methylation correlates with an overall survival benefit in Chinese high-grade glioblastoma patients treated with radiotherapy and alkylating agent-based chemotherapy: a single-institution study

Promoter methylation of the O(6)-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) gene has been considered a prognostic marker and has become more important in the treatment of glioblastoma. However, reports on the correlation between MGMT and clinical outcomes in Chinese glioblastoma patients are very scarce. In this study, quantitative methylation data were obtained by the pyrosequencing of tumor tissues from 128 GBM patients. The median overall survival (OS) was 13.1 months, with a 1-year survival of 45.3%. The pyrosequencing data were reproducible based on archived samples yielding data for all glioblastomas. MGMT promoter methylation was detected in 75/128 cases (58.6%), whereas 53/128 (41.4%) cases were unmethylated. Further survival analysis also revealed that methylation was an independent prognostic factor associated with prolonged OS but not with progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.029 and p = 0.112, respectively); the hazard radios were 0.63 (95% CI: 0.42-0.96) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.48-1.09), respectively. These data indicated that MGMT methylation has prognostic significance in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioblastoma undergoing alkylating agent-based chemotherapy after surgical resection.

Chemotherapy alleviates subacute recurrent glioma-associated refractory cerebral edema by downregulating vascular endothelial growth factor

To identify a novel treatment modality for postoperative, glioma-related refractory cerebral edema (RCE), eight patients with postoperative RCE received chemotherapy between January 2008 and July 2012 were enrolled. There were five males and three females aged between 24 and 65 years (mean 45.7 years). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels in the cerebrospinal fluid were measured by enzyme-linked immuno-sorbent assay pre- and postchemotherapy. After 3 days postchemotherapy, midline shift improved from 13.14 ± 0.65 to 7.21 ± 0.55 mm and compressed or effaced basilar cisterns disappeared based on cranial computed tomographic scans. Glascow Coma Scale scores in patients significantly improved from 11.13 ± 0.52 to 14.50 ± 0.27 after chemotherapy. Two patients developed grade 1 leukopenia after 3 weeks, and one patient had grade 1 thrombocytopenia 2 weeks after chemotherapy. No fatal complications occurred. The edematous volume reduced from 77,074 ± 6,813 to 27,874 ± 5,073 mm(3) (p < 0.001). VEGF levels were significantly downregulated after chemotherapy (from 543.8 ± 76.39 to 122.2 ± 59.30 pg/ml, p < 0.001). Chemotherapy may serve to alleviate glioma-related RCE by reducing VEGF levels, especially in patients who were insensitive to decompressive craniectomy.

The prognostic value of MGMT promoter methylation in Glioblastoma multiforme: a meta-analysis

The prognostic significance of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation on Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains controversial. A meta-analysis of published studies investigating the effects of MGMT promoter methylation on both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among GBM patients was performed. A total of 2,986 patients from 30 studies were included in the meta-analysis. In all, the frequency of MGMT promoter methylation was 44.27 %. Five studies undertook univariate analyses and nine undertook multivariate analyses of MGMT promoter methylation on PFS. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) estimate for PFS was 0.72 (95 % CI 0.55-0.95) by univariate analysis and 0.51 (95 % CI 0.38-0.69) by multivariate analysis. The effect of MGMT promoter methylation on OS was evaluated in 15 studies by univariate analysis and 14 studies by multivariate analysis. The combined HR was 0.67 (95 % CI 0.58-0.78) and 0.49 (95 % CI 0.38-0.64), respectively. For GBM patients treated with Alkylating agent, the meta-risk remained highly significant by both univariate (HR = 0.58; 95 % CI 0.42-0.79) and multivariate analysis (HR = 0.42; 95 % CI 0.29-0.60). This study showed that MGMT promoter methylation was associated with better PFS and OS in patients with GBM regardless of therapeutic intervention, and associated with longer OS in GBM patients treated with alkylating agents.

Differential molecular genetic analysis in glioblastoma multiforme of long- and short-term survivors: a clinical study in Chinese patients

This study was designed to find whether long-term survivors (LTSs) exhibit molecular genetic differences compared with short-term survivors (STSs) in patients with GBM. Tumors from 12 patients initially diagnosed with GBM and survived longer than 36 months (LTSs) were compared with 30 patients with GBM and STSs (survival <18 months) for detecting of MGMT promoter methylation, 1p/19q LOH and IDH1 mutation. IDH1 mutation and MGMT promoter methylation were significantly more frequent in the LTSs group (P = 0.039 and 0.017, respectively). The incidence of 1p/19q co-deletion was not significantly different (P = 1.0). IDH1 mutation and MGMT promoter methylation might be independent, significant, and favorable factors for LTSs with GBM.

Type-3 metabotropic glutamate receptors regulate chemoresistance in glioma stem cells, and their levels are inversely related to survival in patients with malignant gliomas

Drug treatment of malignant gliomas is limited by the intrinsic resistance of glioma stem cells (GSCs) to chemotherapy. GSCs isolated from human glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) expressed metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGlu3 receptors). The DNA-alkylating agent, temozolomide, killed GSCs only if mGlu3 receptors were knocked down or pharmacologically inhibited. In contrast, mGlu3 receptor blockade did not affect the action of paclitaxel, etoposide, cis-platinum, and irinotecan. mGlu3 receptor blockade enabled temozolomide toxicity by inhibiting a phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/nuclear factor-κB pathway that supports the expression of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), an enzyme that confers resistance against DNA-alkylating agents. In mice implanted with GSCs into the brain, temozolomide combined with mGlu3 receptor blockade substantially reduced tumor growth. Finally, 87 patients with GBM undergoing surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide survived for longer time if tumor cells expressed low levels of mGlu3 receptors. In addition, the methylation state of the MGMT gene promoter in tumor extracts influenced survival only in those patients with low expression of mGlu3 receptors in the tumor. These data encourage the use of mGlu3 receptor antagonists as add-on drugs in the treatment of GBM, and suggest that the transcript of mGlu3 receptors should be measured in tumor specimens for a correct prediction of patients' survival in response to temozolomide treatment.

IDH1 mutation of gliomas with long-term survival analysis

A recurrent mutation affecting codon 132 of the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) gene has been found in ~5% of primary glioblastomas (GBMs), but in >70% of secondary GBMs or oligodendroglial and astrocytic tumors. We investigated IDH1 mutations in a series of 134 brain tumors to determine the prevalence and prognostic impact of IDH1 mutations. We also examined the correlations among histology, p53 and PTEN immunoexpression, MGMT methylation status, 1p 19q co-deletion and EGFR gene amplification. The 134 brain tumors included 41 low-grade oligodendrogliomas (LOs), 47 anaplastic oligodendrogliomas (AOs) and 46 primary GBMs. Data showed that 53.7% (72/134) of cases showed mutations affecting codon 132 of IDH1, including 73.2% of LOs, 82.9% of AOs and three primary GBMs (6.5%). All IDH1 mutations were Arg132His. In a survival analysis, patients with IDH1 mutations had better survival compared to those with wild-type IDH1 (p<0.05) in LOs and AOs, but not in primary GBMs (p=0.587). In addition, in patients with both IDH1 mutation and MGMT methylation, p53 overexpression was a significant poor prognostic factor both in LOs and AOs. However, IDH1 mutation was not correlated with common genetic profiles that affect patient prognosis, including MGMT methylation, 1p 19q co-deletion, PTEN loss and EGFR amplification in LOs, AOs and GBMs. From our results, IDH1 mutation was an independent positive prognostic factor in LOs and AOs, especially in the absence of p53 overexpression.

MGMT promoter methylation in gliomas-assessment by pyrosequencing and quantitative methylation-specific PCR

BACKGROUND

Methylation of the O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter is a favorable prognostic factor in glioblastoma patients. However, reported methylation frequencies vary significantly partly due to lack of consensus in the choice of analytical method.

METHOD

We examined 35 low- and 99 high-grade gliomas using quantitative methylation specific PCR (qMSP) and pyrosequencing. Gene expression level of MGMT was analyzed by RT-PCR.

RESULTS

When examined by qMSP, 26% of low-grade and 37% of high-grade gliomas were found to be methylated, whereas 97% of low-grade and 55% of high-grade gliomas were found methylated by pyrosequencing. The average MGMT gene expression level was significantly lower in the group of patients with a methylated promoter independent of method used for methylation detection. Primary glioblastoma patients with a methylated MGMT promoter (as evaluated by both methylation detection methods) had approximately 5 months longer median survival compared to patients with an unmethylated promoter (log-rank test; pyrosequencing P = .02, qMSP P = .06). One third of the analyzed samples had conflicting methylation results when comparing the data from the qMSP and pyrosequencing. The overall survival analysis shows that these patients have an intermediate prognosis between the groups with concordant MGMT promoter methylation results when comparing the two methods.

CONCLUSION

In our opinion, MGMT promoter methylation analysis gives sufficient prognostic information to merit its inclusion in the standard management of patients with high-grade gliomas, and in this study pyrosequencing came across as the better analytical method.

Prognostic significance of IDH-1 and MGMT in patients with glioblastoma: one step forward, and one step back?

A group of 160 patients with primary glioblastoma treated with radiotherapy and temozolomide was analyzed for the impact of O6-methly-guanly-methyl-transferase (MGMT)-promoter methylation as well as isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1-mutational status. Unexpectedly, overall survival or progression-free survival were not longer in the group with methylated MGMT-promoter as compared to patients without that methylation. IDH-1 mutations were significantly associated with increased overall survival.

Analysis of MGMT promoter methylation status on intraoperative fresh tissue section from frameless neuronavigation needle biopsy of 25 patients with brain tumor

Formalin fixation under conditions that adversely affected the quality of the DNA, or indeterminant assay, or extensive tumor necrosis can compromise the genetic analysis of a brain bioptic sample. The success of DNA extraction and Methyl Guanine Methyl Transferase (MGMT) promoter methylation testing could be improved by freezing of fresh tumor tissue at the moment of biopsy. To ensure an increased concentration of the DNA samples the withdrawal should be performed in an area with high probability of neoplastic cells. From May 2007 to January 2011 fifty-two frameless neuronavigation brain needle biopsy were performed at the Neurosurgery Unit of the "Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova" City Hospital of Reggio Emilia. The "image-guided" neuronavigated protocol sampling provided withdrawal specimens highly correlated with neuroimaging characteristics of the lesions. In this study the Authors report the genetic analysis on 24 cases of freezing fresh tissue from brain needle bioptic sample starting from July 2008. The molecular determination of MGMT promoter was assessed with the Nested-Methylation Specific-Polymerase Chain Reaction on fresh or cryopreserved needle bioptic tissue. The genetic characterization was feasible in all the bioptic samples. The MGMT promoter was methylated in eleven patients, including a brain infection. The diagnostic yield of brain biopsy could be increased by the neuronavigated trajectories and the intraoperative frozen sections. In the future the availability of the molecular-genetic characterization of a brain tumor before open surgery will provide important information for the optimal treatment. The MGMT promoter status analysis on needle bioptic fresh tissue could be available also for that patient not eligible for surgical remotion of the tumor.

Prognostic and predictive value of epigenetic silencing of MGMT in patients with high grade gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Epigenetic silencing of the O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene is associated with improved survival in patients with high-grade gliomas (HGG), with varying estimates of magnitude. The objective of this meta-analysis is to determine the prognostic value of MGMT silencing, and assess its predictive value by treatment type. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for studies relating to gliomas and MGMT. Studies reporting overall survival (OS) by MGMT status in patients with HGG were considered potentially eligible. We excluded studies that did not control for potential confounding variables. A meta-analysis of studies was performed via random-effects modelling. Subgroup meta-analyses by treatment were performed according to a priori hypotheses. Twenty studies were ultimately eligible, including 2,018 patients. In the pooled analysis, MGMT silencing was associated with improved OS (HR = 0.436; 95% CI: 0.333-0.571; P < 0.001). The prognostic utility of MGMT status varies significantly by treatment type (P = 0.001): the HR for OS for MGMT silenced tumors is 0.190 (0.047-0.770), 0.403 (0.282-0.576), 0.743 (0.579-0.954), and 1.070 (0.722-1.585) for studies using surgery plus the addition of either: chemotherapy (CT), chemoradiotherapy (CRT), radiotherapy (RT), and nothing (surgery alone), respectively. Epigenetic silencing of MGMT is associated with markedly improved survival in patients with HGG who receive adjuvant therapy. MGMT silencing serves as a predictive marker, with the largest benefit seen in patients receiving CT as a component of adjuvant treatment, an intermediate benefit in patients receiving adjuvant RT, and no evidence to support benefit in those receiving surgery alone.