Pattern of proteinuria in IgA nephropathy

Proteomic approach for identification of IgA nephropathy-related biomarkers in urine

Proteinuria is often used as a surrogate marker in monitoring and predicting outcome in patients with chronic kidney diseases, but it is non-specific. IgAN belongs to the most common primary glomerulonephritis worldwide with serious prognosis. The main aim of this work was to assess differences in urine proteins in patients with IgA nephropathy and to identify abnormal proteins as potential biomarkers of IgA nephropathy or the renal disease. In our pilot project, we selected 20 patients and compared them with 20 healthy volunteers. Protein quantification was performed using iTRAQ (isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation) labeling method. The peptides were separated by the isoelectric focusing method (IEF) and nano-LC with C18 column and identified by mass spectrometry using MALDI-TOF/TOF MS. Proteins´ lists obtained from IEF-LC-MS-MS/MS analysis were combined and contained 201 proteins. It was found out that 113 proteins were common in both experiments. 30 urinary proteins were significantly up- or down-regulated in patients with IgA nephropathy. We characterized potential biomarkers such as alpha-1-antitrypsin, apolipoprotein A-I, CD44 antigen or kininogen. Potential biomarkers of IgAN should be validated in further studies.

Urinary prognostic biomarkers and classification of IgA nephropathy by high resolution mass spectrometry coupled with liquid chromatography

IgA nephropathy is the most common cause of primary glomerulonephritis. There are different pathologic biopsy-based scoring systems in use, but there is no consensus among nephrologists yet regarding the best classification method. Our aim was to test urine proteomics as a non-invasive method for classification of IgA nephropathy. This aim was pursued by discovering novel prognostic protein biomarkers in urine, and linking them to pathogenesis of the disease through known signaling and metabolic pathways. 13 urine samples of the patients with biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy were analyzed via two proteomics approaches: nanoflow LC-MS/MS and GeLC-MS/MS. The results of label-free quantification were subjected to multivariate statistical analysis, which could classify patients into two groups, broadly corresponding to the primary and advance stages. The proteome classification correlated well with biopsy-based scoring systems, especially endocapillary hypercellularity score of the Oxford’s classification. Differentially excreted candidate proteins were found as potential prognostic biomarkers: afamin, leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein, ceruloplasmin, alpha-1-microgolbulin, hemopexin, apolipoprotein A-I, complement C3, vitamin D-binding protein, beta-2-microglobulin, and retinol-binding protein 4. Pathway analysis suggested impairment of Extra Cellular Matrix (ECM)-Receptor Interaction pathways as well as activation of complement and coagulation pathway in progression of IgA nephropathy.

3rd College of Physicians’ Lecture – Translational Research: From Bench to Bedside and From Bedside to Bench; Incorporating a Clinical Research Journey in IgA Nephritis (1976 to 2006)

Translational research (TR) can be defined as research where a discovery made in the laboratory (bench) can be applied in the diagnosis, treatment or prevention of a disease. Examples of medical discoveries contributing to translational medicine (TM) include the isolation of insulin by Banting (Nobel Laureate, 1923), the discovery of penicillin by Alexander Fleming (Nobel Laureate, 1945) and recently the discovery of the role of bacterium Helicobacter pylori in the causation of gastritis and peptic ulcer by Marshall and Warren (Nobel Laureates, 2005). Clinical research (CR) would be a more appropriate term for the bulk of research work undertaken by doctors. CR embraces both clinical based and laboratory-based research. The terminology “bedside to bench” applies more to CR as opposed to “bench to bedside” in the case of TR. But regardless of who does it, as long as the discovery can be translated to the bedside and results in improvement in patient care it can be considered a contribution to TM. Our work spans a 30-year period, involving laboratory-based research, clinical trials and genomics of IgA nephritis (Nx). This is a series of work to elucidate the pathogensis and therapy of IgANx. Plasma beta-thromboglobulin (BTG) an in-vivo index of platelet aggregation and anti-thrombin III increase due to a constant thrombogenecity resulting from platelet degranulation formed the basis for anti-platelet and low-dose warfarin therapy. A study of the natural history of IgANx revealed 2 courses, a slowly progressive course with end-stage renal failure (ESRF) at 7.7 years and a more rapid course at 3.3 years. Triple therapy (cyclophosphamide, persantin and low-dose warfarin) delayed progression to ESRF by about 8 years and for some patients up to 20 years. Documentation of abnormal suppressor T cell function provided the basis for immune therapy. Four patterns of proteinuria were present in IgANx and it is the quality and not so much the quantity of proteinuria which determined the prognosis. Low molecular weight proteinuria was a bad prognostic marker. A controlled therapeutic trial using ACEI/ATRA showed that therapy decreases proteinuria, improves renal function and converts non-selective to selective proteinuria. Subsequent work confirmed that it was the ATRA, not the ACEI which contributed to improved renal function. Individual anti proteinuria response to ATRA varies depending on ACE gene polymorphism. We found that the II genotype of the ACE gene was renoprotective and patients with this genotype had significantly reduced incidence of ESRF compared to those with the DD genotype. Patients responsive to ATRA therapy can retard progression to ESRF by up to 32 years. Mild renal failure can be reversed with possible regression of glomerulosclerosis because of glomerular remodelling by ATRA. Key words: Genomics, Glomerulonephritis, History, Therapy, Translational medicine

ACEI/ATRA therapy decreases proteinuria by improving glomerular permselectivity in IgA nephritis

BACKGROUND

It has been postulated that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor antagonist (ACEI/ATRA) may decrease proteinuria in patients with glomerulonephritis by its action on the glomerular basement membrane. We therefore studied the relationship between the response of patients with IgA nephritis (IgAN) to ACEI/ATRA therapy by decreasing proteinuria and its effect on the selectivity index (SI) in these patients.

METHODS

Forty-one patients with biopsy-proven IgAN entered a control trial, with 21 in the treatment group and 20 in the control group. The entry criteria included proteinuria of 1 g or more and/or renal impairment. Patients in the treatment group received ACEI/ATRA or both with three monthly increases in dosage. In the control group, hypertension was treated with atenolol, hydrallazine, or methyldopa. The following tests were performed at three monthly intervals: serum creatinine, total urinary protein, SI, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and low molecular weight (LMW) proteinuria.

RESULTS

After a mean duration of therapy of 13 +/- 5 months, in the treatment group, there was no significant change in serum creatinine, proteinuria, or SI, but in the control group, serum creatinine deteriorated from 1.8 +/- 0.8 to 2.3 +/- 1.1 mg/dL (P < 0.05). Among the 21 patients in the treatment group, 10 responded to ACEI/ATRA therapy determined as a decrease in proteinuria by 30% (responders), and the other 11 did not respond (nonresponders). Among the responders, SI improved from a mean of 0.26 +/- 0.07 to 0.18 +/- 0. 07 (P < 0.001), indicating a tendency toward selective proteinuria. This was associated with an improvement in serum creatinine from mean 1.7 +/- 0.6 to 1.5 +/- 0.6 mg/dL (P < 0.02) and a decrease in proteinuria from a mean of 2.3 +/- 1.1 to 0.7 +/- 0.5 g/day (P < 0. 001). After treatment, proteinuria in the treatment group (1.8 +/- 1. 6 g/day) was significantly less than in the control group (2.9 +/- 1. 8 g/day, P < 0.05). The post-treatment SI in the responder group (0. 18 +/- 0.07) was better than that of the nonresponder group (0.33 +/- 0.11, P < 0.002). Eight out of 21 patients in the treatment group who had documented renal impairment had improved renal function compared with two in the control group (chi2 = 4.4, P < 0. 05). Of the eight patients in the treatment group who improved their renal function, three normalized their renal function compared with one from the control group.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that ACEI/ATRA therapy may be beneficial in patients with IgAN with renal impairment and nonselective proteinuria, as such patients may respond to therapy with improvement in protein selectivity, decrease in proteinuria, and improvement in renal function. ACEI/ATRA therapy probably modifies pore size distribution by reducing the radius of large unselective pores, causing the shunt pathway to become less pronounced, resulting in less leakage of protein into the urine.