Therapeutic drug monitoring

Status and Quality of Guidelines for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Based on AGREE II Instrument

BACKGROUND

With the progress of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) technology and the development of evidence-based medicine, many guidelines were developed and implemented in recent decades.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to evaluate the current status of TDM guidelines and provide suggestions for their development and updates based on Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II.

METHODS

The TDM guidelines were systematically searched for among databases including PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and the Chinese biomedical literature service system and the official websites of TDM-related associations. The search period was from inception to 6 April 2023. Four researchers independently screened the literature and extracted data. Any disagreement was discussed and reconciled by another researcher. The quality of guidelines was assessed using the AGREE II instrument.

RESULTS

A total of 92 guidelines were included, including 57 technical guidelines, three management guidelines, and 32 comprehensive guidelines. The number of TDM guidelines has gradually increased since 1979. The United States published the most guidelines (20 guidelines), followed by China (15 guidelines) and the United Kingdom (ten guidelines), and 23 guidelines were developed by international organizations. Most guidelines are aimed at adult patients only, while 28 guidelines include special populations. With respect to formulation methods, there are 23 evidence-based guidelines. As for quality evaluation results based on AGREE II, comprehensive guidelines scored higher (58.16%) than technical guidelines (51.36%) and administrative guidelines (50.00%).

CONCLUSION

The number of TDM guidelines, especially technical and comprehensive ones, has significantly increased in recent years. Most guidelines are confronted with the problems of unclear methodology and low quality of evidence according to AGREE II. More evidence-based research on TDM and high-quality guideline development is recommended to promote individualized therapy.

Quality of therapeutic drug monitoring guidelines is suboptimal: an evaluation using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument

OBJECTIVES

Although therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) guidelines are available, systematic evaluations of their methodological quality are scarce. This study aimed to assess the quality of current TDM guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We performed a systematic search to identify the relevant TDM guidelines in PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI, Wan Fang Database, CBM, VIP, four main guideline databases (NICE, NGC, GIN, and WHO guideline databases), and official websites of the governments and societies associated with TDM from the inception date to May 2018. Four independent appraisers rated the quality of each TDM guideline using the AGREE II instrument, and the mean score of each AGREE II item was calculated. The overall agreement among the appraisers was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Twenty-eight TDM guidelines satisfied the eligibility criteria from among 12,235 references. The overall agreement among the appraisers was substantial (0.700-0.880). The mean scores for the six AGREE II domains were scope and purpose, 67.7% (95% CI, 64.0-71.4%); stakeholder involvement, 39.8% (95% CI, 33.3-46.3%); rigor of development, 36.0% (95% CI, 28.1-43.9%); clarity and presentation, 61.6% (95% CI, 55.7-67.4%); applicability, 30.6% (95% CI, 26.4-34.8%); and editorial independence, 49.2% (95% CI, 40.0-58.6%). The reviewers recommended only four guidelines, and most of the TDM guidelines were rated as "recommended with modifications."

CONCLUSION

Overall, the quality of TDM guidelines is suboptimal according to the evaluation using the AGREE II instrument. The domains of applicability, rigor of development, stakeholder involvement, and editorial independence of the guidelines need to be reported. In addition, guideline developers closely adhering to the AGREE II instrument and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation system are required to draft high-quality and reliable TDM guidelines.

Relationship between cyclosporine area-under-the curve and acute graft versus host disease in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant: A prospective, multicenter study

Traditionally in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), cyclosporine doses are individualized using cyclosporine trough concentrations (C₀) while area under the concentration vs time curve (AUC) is used in solid organ transplant. AUC potentially has an important relationship with the development of acute graft-versus-host-disease (aGVHD). We conducted a prospective study to describe the relationship between severe (grade III-IV) aGVHD and cyclosporine AUC in pediatric HSCT recipients. Pediatric patients who underwent allogeneic myeloablative HSCT and scheduled to receive cyclosporine for aGVHD prophylaxis participated in this multicenter study. Cyclosporine doses were adjusted based on C₀ according to each center's standard of care. Cyclosporine AUC was determined weekly until neutrophil engraftment or Day +42, whichever was later. Associations between severe aGVHD and cyclosporine AUC and other patient and treatment-related factors were evaluated. Of the 110 children enrolled, 97 were evaluable. Thirty-seven (38%) children developed aGVHD; 13 (13.4%) had severe aGVHD. On univariate analysis, there was no association between severe aGVHD and cyclosporine AUC at any time point before engraftment. Future research should focus on refinement of C₀ targets for cyclosporine therapeutic drug monitoring in HSCT.

Assessment of the Measurement Error in Cyclosporine Levels Drawn Between Peripheral and Central Sources

OBJECTIVES

Cyclosporine is often monitored by drug levels drawn through central venous catheters (CVCs), which may be falsely elevated due to reversible drug adsorption onto the catheter. Therefore, we assessed the correlation between cyclosporine levels drawn peripherally and through CVCs.

METHODS

Bone marrow transplantation patients had a weekly collection of both peripheral and CVC draws from dual-lumen catheters simultaneously to assess cyclosporine levels after research ethics approval. Our primary outcome was the proportion of paired samples that were incongruent-defined as the mean of the CVC level being greater than 2 standard deviations from the peripheral level mean.

RESULTS

After approaching 27 eligible patients, 20 patients (77.8%) provided samples. Of 53 paired samples, seven were incongruent (13.2%). Peripheral and CVC levels correlated (r = 0.91) and agreed well.

CONCLUSION

Despite potential for preanalytical error due to adsorption, cyclosporine infusion and monitoring via CVCs produce results similar to monitoring via peripheral blood draws.