Review: Pharmacodynamic monitoring of immunosuppression in kidney transplantation

Monitoring of blood immunosuppressant concentrations and lymphocyte activation for predicting viral infections following kidney transplantation: A pilot study

The current standard pharmacokinetic monitoring of immunosuppressive therapy does not consider inter- and intra-individual differences in the biological response to multidrug immunosuppressive therapy. The authors evaluated the blood levels of the immunosuppressive drugs IL-2 and IFN-γ in circulating lymphocytes as surrogate indicators of the development of viral infections after living kidney transplantation. This single-center prospective study included 20 kidney transplant recipients who underwent living-donor transplantation at the Mie University Hospital. All the study participants received tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid, methylprednisolone, and basiliximab. The area under the concentration curves (AUCs) of blood tacrolimus and serum mycophenolic acid were measured 1 day prior to transplantation and on post-transplantation days (PTD) for up to 5 months. IL-2 and IFN-γ levels in circulating lymphocytes were measured simultaneously. One recipient experienced an acute graft rejection. Although the AUC of tacrolimus at PTD 7 was significantly higher in the virus-infected group than that in the non-infected group, the AUC of mycophenolic acid did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The expression levels of IFN-γ+ NK, IFN-γ+ CD4+ T, and CD8+ T cells in the infected group also tended to be higher than those in the noninfected group. During the study period, there was a clear difference in the expression of IFN-γ+ CD8+ T cells, which increased significantly during or after infection. Circulating IFN-γ+ CD8+ T cell counts may serve as promising biomarkers for predicting opportunistic viral infections early after kidney transplantation.

Immunosuppressive potency of mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors in solid-organ transplantation

Mammalian target of rapamycin, also known as mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a protein kinase that belongs to the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway, which is involved in several fundamental cellular functions such as cell growth, proliferation, and survival. This protein and its associated pathway have been implicated in cancer development and the regulation of immune responses, including the rejection response generated following allograft transplantation. Inhibitors of mTOR (mTORi) such as rapamycin and its derivative everolimus are potent immunosuppressive drugs that both maintain similar rates of efficacy and could optimize the renal function and diminish the side effects compared with calcineurin inhibitors. These drugs are used in solid-organ transplantationtoinduceimmunosuppression while also promoting the expansion of CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ regulatory T-cells that could favor a scenery of immunological tolerance. In this review, we describe the mechanisms by which inhibitors of mTOR induce suppression by regulation of these pathways at different levels of the immune response. In addition, we particularly emphasize about the main methods that are used to assess the potency of immunosuppressive drugs, highlighting the studies carried out about immunosuppressive potency of inhibitors of mTOR.

T-Cell Surface Antigens and sCD30 as Biomarkers of the Risk of Rejection in Solid Organ Transplantation

T-cell activation is a characteristic of organ rejection. T cells, located in the draining lymph nodes of the transplant recipient, are faced with non-self-molecules presented by antigen presenting cells and become activated. Activated T cells are characterized by up-regulated surface antigens, such as costimulatory molecules, adhesion molecules, chemokine receptors, and major histocompatibility complex class II molecules. Surface antigen expression can be followed by flow cytometry using monoclonal antibodies in either cell function assays using donor-specific or nonspecific stimulation of isolated cells or whole blood and without stimulation on circulating lymphocytes. Molecules such as CD30 can be proteolytically cleaved off the surface of activated cells in vivo, and the determination of the soluble protein (sCD30) in serum or plasma is performed by immunoassays. As promising biomarkers for rejection and long-term transplant outcome, CD28 (costimulatory receptor for CD80 and CD86), CD154 (CD40 ligand), and sCD30 (tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 8) have been identified. Whereas cell function assays are time-consuming laboratory-developed tests which are difficult to standardize, commercial assays are frequently available for soluble proteins. Therefore, more data from clinical trials have been published for sCD30 compared with the surface antigens on activated T cells. This short review summarizes the association between selected surface antigens and immunosuppression, and rejection in solid organ transplantation.

CTLA4-Ig prevents alloantibody production and BMT rejection in response to platelet transfusions in mice

BACKGROUND

Platelet (PLT) transfusions can induce humoral and cellular alloimmunity. HLA antibodies can render patients refractory to subsequent transfusion, and both alloantibodies and cellular alloimmunity can contribute to subsequent bone marrow transplant (BMT) rejection. Currently, there are no approved therapeutic interventions to prevent alloimmunization to PLT transfusions other than leukoreduction. Targeted blockade of T-cell costimulation has shown great promise in inhibiting alloimmunity in the setting of transplantation, but has not been explored in the context of PLT transfusion.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We tested the hypothesis that the costimulatory blockade reagent CTLA4-Ig would prevent alloreactivity against major and minor alloantigens on transfused PLTs. BALB/c (H-2(d)) mice and C57BL/6 (H-2(b)) mice were used as PLT donors and transfusion recipients, respectively. Alloantibodies were measured by indirect immunofluorescence using BALB/c PLTs and splenocytes as targets. BMTs were carried out under reduced-intensity conditioning using BALB.B (H-2(b) ) donors and C57BL/6 (H-2(b)) recipients to model HLA-identical transplants. Experimental groups were given CTLA4-Ig (before or after PLT transfusion) with control groups receiving isotype-matched antibody.

RESULTS

CTLA4-Ig abrogated both humoral alloimmunization (H-2(d) antibodies) and transfusion-induced BMT rejection. Whereas a single dose of CTLA4-Ig at time of transfusion prevented alloimmunization to subsequent PLT transfusions, administration of CTLA4-Ig after initial PLT transfusion was ineffective. Delaying treatment until after PLT transfusion failed to prevent BMT rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate a novel strategy using an FDA-approved drug that has the potential to prevent the clinical sequelae of alloimmunization to PLT transfusions.

BK Virus in Kidney Transplant Recipients: The Influence of Immunosuppression

The incidence of BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients has increased over recent decades, coincident with the use of more potent immunosuppression. More importantly, posttransplant BK virus replication has emerged as an important cause of graft damage and subsequent graft loss. Immunosuppression has been accepted as a major risk for BK virus replication. However, the specific contribution of individual immunosuppressive medications to this risk has not been well established. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the recent literature on the influence of the various immunosuppressant drugs and drug combinations on posttransplant BK virus replication. Evidence supporting the various immunosuppression reduction strategies utilised in the management of BK virus will also be briefly discussed.