1
|
Drljevic-Nielsen A, Heilskov S, Deleuran MS, Vestergaard C. Immunosuppressive and immunomodulating therapy for atopic dermatitis in pregnancy: an appraisal of the literature. Ital J Dermatol Venerol 2024; 159:23-33. [PMID: 38226937 DOI: 10.23736/s2784-8671.23.07692-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common dermatological diagnosis during pregnancy. Treatment of AD during pregnancy can be challenging, due to the unpredictable course and the fact that the therapy needs to be safe for both the mother and the fetus. Here we present an up-to-date appraisal of the literature on the treatment options available for AD in patients planning pregnancy, during pregnancy, and during breastfeeding. All patients with AD are recommended to supplement any medical treatment with daily applications of emollients. The first step in the medical treatment for AD during pregnancy are topical corticosteroids, and/or topical tacrolimus. If required, UV-light therapy can also be considered. Treatment with systemic therapy during pregnancy should always rely on a careful risk-benefit assessment and be based on shared-decision making between the treating physician and patient. The first-line systemic treatment option is cyclosporine A, whereas azathioprine may be considered in patients already receiving this treatment prior to pregnancy. Systemic glucocorticoids may also be used. Treatment with systemic JAK inhibitors is not recommended, whereas treatment with mycophenolate mofetil and methotrexate is contraindicated. Targeted therapy with dupilumab is not generally recommended, due to lack of experience in human pregnancies, yet some case-reports on their use are emerging. These recommendations are based on the authors appraisal of existing literature and the current recommendation from the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. It is always the responsibility of the treating physician to stay updated on the newest guidelines and literature when treating patients with AD during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sofine Heilskov
- Department of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mette S Deleuran
- Department of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Habli M, Belal D, Sharma A, Halawa A. Infertility, pregnancy and breastfeeding in kidney transplantation recipients: Key issues. World J Meta-Anal 2023; 11:55-67. [DOI: 10.13105/wjma.v11.i3.55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially in advanced stages, is an important cause of infertility. In CKD patients, infertility has been linked to multiple factors. The pathophysiology of infertility related to CKD is complex and forked. Correction of modifiable factors can improve fertility in both genders. In males as well as females, successful kidney transplantation offers good chances of restoration of reproductive function. In female renal allograft recipients, recovery of reproductive functions in the post-transplant period will manifest as restoration of normal menses and ovulation. Owing to this improvement, there is a significant risk of unplanned pregnancy, hence the need to discuss methods of contraception before transplantation. In kidney transplant recipients, different contraceptive options for pregnancy planning, have been used. The selection of one contraception over another is based on preference and tolerability. Pregnancy, in renal transplanted females, is associated with physiologic changes that occur in pregnant women with native kidneys. Immunosuppressive medications during pregnancy, in a recipient with a single functioning kidney, expose the mother and fetus to unwanted complications. Some immunosuppressive drugs are contraindicated during pregnancy. Immunosuppressive medications should be discussed with renal transplant recipients who are planning to breastfeed their babies. In addition to antirejection drugs, other medications should be managed accordingly, whenever pregnancy is planned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad Habli
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Kingdom Hospital, Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dawlat Belal
- Kasr El-Ainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo 11562, Egypt
| | - Ajay Sharma
- Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool L7 8YE, United Kingdom
| | - Ahmed Halawa
- Department of Transplantation, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield S10 2JF, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pregnancy in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases-A Literature Review. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:life13020475. [PMID: 36836832 PMCID: PMC9961380 DOI: 10.3390/life13020475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, we have faced an increasing incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), especially among young people, affecting them during their reproductive years. The paucity of data and reduced knowledge regarding the evolution of the disease during pregnancy and the adverse effects of the therapy on the mother and infant increase voluntary childlessness in this group of patients. Depending on the type of IBD, severity and surgical or medical management, this can negatively affect the pregnancy. C-sections and the risk of low-birth-weight babies are higher in women with IBD, independent of active/inactive disease, while preterm birth, stillbirth and miscarriage are associated with disease activity. In the last period, medicinal therapy has evolved, and new molecules have been developed for better control of the lesions, but the effect on pregnancy and breastfeeding is still controversial. We conducted this review by studying the literature and recent research in order to have a better image of the practical management of IBD during pregnancy.
Collapse
|
4
|
Li W, Wang T. Breastfeeding Initiation, Duration, and Associated Factors in Mothers with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Breastfeed Med 2022; 17:958-963. [PMID: 36378821 DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2022.0142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To study breastfeeding initiation, duration, and associated factors in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a cross-sectional study comparing with SLE and non-SLE mothers was conducted. Methods: Thirty patients with SLE who had pregnancy outcomes from September 2018 to December 2020 and 120 non-SLE patients (excluding mothers with other immune system diseases) were included in the study. Data on sociodemographic, obstetric, and SLE clinical information were collected. Breastfeeding initiation, breastfeeding duration, and reasons for not initiating breastfeeding were investigated via telephone. Results: The rate in breastfeeding of SLE group was significantly lower than non-SLE group (36.7% versus 86.7%, respectively, p < 0.001; odds ratio 0.059; 95% confidence interval 0.015-0.241). Non-SLE mothers had a longer duration of breastfeeding than mothers with SLE (log-rank p = 0.001). Fearing of the adverse effects of drugs on babies is the main reason (68.4%) for not initiating breastfeeding in SLE group. Infants with high weight and Apgar scores, primipara women, and having a college degree were significantly associated with breastfeeding among patients with SLE. Conclusion: SLE women showed a lower breastfeeding rate and shorter breastfeeding duration. Postpartum medications are safe for lactation in most patients with SLE. Targeted intervention programs that enhance breastfeeding consultations are required for this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Li
- Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Tao Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li R, Zhang C, Wang H, An Y. Breastfeeding by a mother taking cyclosporine for nephrotic syndrome. Int Breastfeed J 2022; 17:72. [PMID: 36253832 PMCID: PMC9578242 DOI: 10.1186/s13006-022-00514-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cyclosporine is widely used for immunosuppressive treatment of various systematic and local autoimmune diseases. Breastfeeding is conventionally contraindicated when treating with cyclosporine due to its excretion into breast milk, which may cause immune suppression of exposed infants and affect infants` growth. A few cases have tested cyclosporine levels in random breast milk samples and concluded the infants exposed to safe cyclosporine levels during breastfeeding. Since infants do not maintain a fixed feeding schedule, we monitored cyclosporine levels in breast milk at different times of the day to assess the safety of breast milk for infants throughout the day. Case presentation A 32-year-old dichorionic twin-pregnancy woman had nephrotic syndrome with renal biopsy confirmed type V lupus nephritis for over five years. She was treated only with prednisone 10 mg a day before pregnancy and during early pregnancy. Cyclosporine was added in her regimen from 22 weeks gestation and was adjusted to 225 mg a day from 28 weeks gestation. After parturition, she partially breastfed her twin infants while being treated with cyclosporine 3 mg/kg a day as well as prednisone and hydroxychloroquine sulfate. The cyclosporine level in maternal blood was determined, and several breast milk samples were collected for consecutive 48 h beginning on the ninth day after parturition. The concentration of cyclosporine in breast milk was measured and ranged from 0.443 to 5.307 mcg/L. Both infants grew and developed normally at the three-month follow-up, with no adverse effects observed. The study was conducted at West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, started in September 2021, with the consent of the participant and the approval of the ethics committee. Conclusion In this case, cyclosporine levels in breast milk were low at all times of the day. The growth and development of both infants were normal at three months postpartum. Thus, breastfeeding may still be an option for mothers with nephrotic syndrome who are treated with cyclosporine. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13006-022-00514-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruizhe Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
| | - Chuan Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China.,Department of Pharmacology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hongjing Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
| | - Yunfei An
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Laube R, Paramsothy S, Leong RW. Use of medications during pregnancy and breastfeeding for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2021; 20:275-292. [PMID: 33412078 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1873948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: The peak age of diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) occurs during childbearing years, therefore management of IBD during pregnancy is a frequent occurrence. Maintenance of disease remission is crucial to optimize pregnancy outcomes, and potential maternal or fetal toxicity from medications must be balanced against the risks of untreated IBD.Areas covered: This review summarizes the literature on safety and use of medications for IBD during pregnancy and lactation.Expert opinion: 5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids and thiopurines are safe for use during pregnancy, while methotrexate and tofacitinib should only be used with extreme caution. Anti-TNF agents (except certolizumab), vedolizumab, ustekinumab and tofacitinib readily traverse the placenta via active transport, therefore theoretically may affect fetal development. Certolizumab only undergoes passive transfer across the placenta, thus has markedly lower cord blood levels making it likely the safest biologic agent for infants. There is reasonable evidence to support the safety of anti-TNF monotherapy and combination therapy during pregnancy and lactation. Vedolizumab and ustekinumab are also thought to be safe in pregnancy and lactation, while tofacitinib is generally avoided due to teratogenic effects in animal studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn Laube
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Gastroenterology, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sudarshan Paramsothy
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Gastroenterology, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rupert W Leong
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Gastroenterology, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Immunosuppressive and Immunomodulating Therapy for Atopic Dermatitis in Pregnancy: An Appraisal of the Literature. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2020; 10:1215-1228. [PMID: 33140290 PMCID: PMC7649192 DOI: 10.1007/s13555-020-00457-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this appraisal of the literature is to elucidate the effects of immunosuppressive and immunomodulating agents used to treat atopic dermatitis (AD) on risk factors for fertility, pregnancy, and breastfeeding. Negative side effects of the psychological and physical stresses associated to AD flairs and uncontrolled AD are discussed, in order to evaluate the consequences of abstaining from treatment. Research on pregnancies in Danish women suggests a tendency towards an increased use of topical steroids and ultraviolet light therapy during pregnancy, compared to before conception, confirming the need for these patients to receive treatment, as well as decreased use of systemic treatments, suggesting a tendency towards undertreatment in this patient population. It is important that effective treatment be provided to pregnant women with AD. Here we present an appraisal of current knowledge on treatments for AD and the risks of exposure for the fetus and breastfed infant. Since little is known about the association between AD, pregnancy, and systemic treatment, we generalize conclusions based on studies on treatments of pregnant women who have undergone organ transplantation and who have inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatic disease, and autoimmune disease. The majority of recommendations are therefore based on a low or very low quality of evidence according to the GRADE system. The selected studies reflect the authors’ assessment regarding originality and importance in the context of this appraisal. It is always the treating doctor’s responsibility to stay updated on current literature when treating patients, especially pregnant patients.
Collapse
|
8
|
Vestergaard C, Wollenberg A, Barbarot S, Christen-Zaech S, Deleuran M, Spuls P, Flohr C, Trzeciak M, von Kobyletzki L, Seneschal J, Paul C, Bieber T, Werfel T, Fölster-Holst R, Darsow U, Gieler U, Svensson Å, Cork M, Stalder JF, De Raeve L, Kunz B, Simon D, Chernyshov P, Hijnen D, Gelmetti C, Ring J, Taieb A, de Bruin-Weller M, Thyssen JP. European task force on atopic dermatitis position paper: treatment of parental atopic dermatitis during preconception, pregnancy and lactation period. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2019; 33:1644-1659. [PMID: 31231864 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.15709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease that affects both children and adults, including a large number of adults of reproductive age. Several guidelines for the treatment of AD exist, yet specific recommendations for the treatment of pregnant or lactating women and for adults planning to have a child are often lacking. This position paper from the European Task force on Atopic Dermatitis (ETFAD) is based on up-to-date scientific literature on treating pregnant and lactating women as wells as adults with AD planning to have a child. It is based on the expert opinions of members of the ETFAD and on existing safety data on the proposed treatments, many of which are derived from patients with other inflammatory diseases or from transplantation medicine. For treating future parents, as well as pregnant and lactating women with AD, the use of topical treatments including moisturizers, topical corticosteroids, tacrolimus, antiseptics such as chlorhexidine, octenidine, potassium permanganate and sodium hypochlorite (bleach) is deemed to be safe. Ultraviolet (UV) therapy may also be used. Systemic treatment should be prescribed only after careful consideration. According to the opinion of the ETFAD, treatment should be restricted to systemic corticosteroids and cyclosporine A, and, in selected cases, azathioprine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Vestergaard
- Department of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - A Wollenberg
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.,Hautklinik Thalkirchner Straße, Staedtisches Klinikum Muenchen, Muenchen, Germany
| | - S Barbarot
- Department of Dermatology, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - S Christen-Zaech
- Pediatric Dermatology Unit, Departments of Dermatology and Pediatrics, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - M Deleuran
- Department of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - P Spuls
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Flohr
- St. Johns Institute of Dermatology, Kings College and Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Trzeciak
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | | | - J Seneschal
- Department of dermatology, INSERM, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - C Paul
- Department of Dermatology, Larrey Hospital, Toulouse University, Toulouse, France
| | - T Bieber
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, and Christine Kühne-Center for Allergy Research and Education, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - T Werfel
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - R Fölster-Holst
- Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - U Darsow
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology Biederstein, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - U Gieler
- Department of Dermatology, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany
| | - Å Svensson
- Department of Dermatology, Lund University, Malmoe, Sweden
| | - M Cork
- Sheffield Dermatology Research, Department of Infection, Immunity & Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - J-F Stalder
- Department of Dermatology, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - L De Raeve
- Department of Dermatology, UZ Brussel, Free University of Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - B Kunz
- Dermatologikum, Hamburg, Germany
| | - D Simon
- Department of Dermatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - P Chernyshov
- Department of Dermatology, National Medical University, Kiev, Ukraine
| | - D Hijnen
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Gelmetti
- Department of Pediatric Dermatology, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
| | - J Ring
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology Biederstein, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Christiane-Kühne Center for Allergy Research and Education (CK-Care), Davos, Switzerland
| | - A Taieb
- Department of dermatology, INSERM, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - M de Bruin-Weller
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J P Thyssen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Berth-Jones J, Exton LS, Ladoyanni E, Mohd Mustapa MF, Tebbs VM, Yesudian PD, Levell NJ. British Association of Dermatologists guidelines for the safe and effective prescribing of oral ciclosporin in dermatology 2018. Br J Dermatol 2019; 180:1312-1338. [PMID: 30653672 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.17587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/20/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- J Berth-Jones
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, CV2 2DX, U.K
| | - L S Exton
- British Association of Dermatologists, Willan House, London, W1T 5HQ, U.K
| | - E Ladoyanni
- Department of Dermatology, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, DY1 2HQ, U.K
| | - M F Mohd Mustapa
- British Association of Dermatologists, Willan House, London, W1T 5HQ, U.K
| | - V M Tebbs
- formerly of George Eliot Hospital, College Street, Nuneaton, CV10 7DJ, U.K
| | - P D Yesudian
- Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Croesnewydd Road, Wrexham, LL13 7TD, U.K
| | - N J Levell
- Dermatology Department, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, NR4 7UY, U.K
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Haseler E, Melhem N, Sinha MD. Renal disease in pregnancy: Fetal, neonatal and long-term outcomes. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2019; 57:60-76. [PMID: 30930143 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2018] [Revised: 12/19/2018] [Accepted: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Renal disease in women of childbearing age is estimated to be approximately 3%; consequently, renal disease is not an uncommon comorbidity in pregnancy. There has been considerable evidence published over the last 20 years to suggest that renal disease in pregnancy is associated with higher maternal, fetal, and offspring morbidity. Studies published are largely heterogeneous; include unmatched cohort studies; and focus on early neonatal outcomes such as prematurity, small for gestational age, and neonatal unit admission. There appears to be an inverse relationship between maternal renal function and likelihood of neonatal morbidity using these outcome measures. Overall though, data regarding medium-to long-term outcomes for children born to mothers with renal disease are scarce. However, in view of emerging epidemiological evidence regarding cardiovascular programming in intrauterine life in those born premature or small for gestational age, it is likely that this population of children remain at high risk of cardiovascular disease as adults. The scope of this review is to amalgamate and summarize existing evidence regarding the outcomes of infants born to mothers with renal disease. Focus will be given to pregnancy-related acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, dialysis, and transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Haseler
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guys & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Nabil Melhem
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guys & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Manish D Sinha
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guys & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7EH, UK; Kings College London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Brown SM, Aljefri K, Waas R, Hampton P. Systemic medications used in treatment of common dermatological conditions: safety profile with respect to pregnancy, breast feeding and content in seminal fluid. J DERMATOL TREAT 2018; 30:2-18. [PMID: 28092212 DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2016.1202402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Prescribing for pregnant or lactating patients and male patients wishing to father children can be a difficult area for dermatologists. There is a lack of review articles of commonly used systemic medications in dermatology with respect to their effects on developing embryogenesis and their potential transfer across the placenta, in breast milk and in seminal fluid. This paper aims to provide an up to date summary of evidence to better equip dermatologists to inform patients about the effects of systemic medications commonly used in dermatology to treat conditions such as atopic dermatitis, psoriasis and acne, on current and future embryogenesis and fertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Khadija Aljefri
- a Dermatology Department , Royal Victoria Infirmary , Newcastle Upon Tyne , UK
| | - Rachel Waas
- a Dermatology Department , Royal Victoria Infirmary , Newcastle Upon Tyne , UK
| | - Philip Hampton
- a Dermatology Department , Royal Victoria Infirmary , Newcastle Upon Tyne , UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Yiu ZZN, Warren RB, Mrowietz U, Griffiths CEM. Safety of conventional systemic therapies for psoriasis on reproductive potential and outcomes. J DERMATOL TREAT 2015; 26:329-34. [PMID: 25424052 DOI: 10.3109/09546634.2014.991673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The effects of conventional systemic therapies for psoriasis on pregnancy outcomes, lactation, male fertility and mutagenicity are common concerns in the clinical setting. There is relatively little evidence to guide clinician and patient. In this study, we review the safety profile of the commonly used conventional systemic therapies used for psoriasis in individuals of reproductive potential. Safety data are derived from large-scale registries, adverse-event reporting databases, clinical trials and case reports. We assess the effect of each therapy on adverse pregnancy outcomes, including congenital malformations, and lactation with maternal administration. We also assess the effect of the therapies on male fertility and potential mutagenicity with paternal administration. We provide applicable guidance to inform clinician and patient before and after conception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zenas Z N Yiu
- The Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre , Manchester , UK and
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Constantinescu S, Pai A, Coscia LA, Davison JM, Moritz MJ, Armenti VT. Breast-feeding after transplantation. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 28:1163-73. [PMID: 25271063 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2014] [Revised: 09/04/2014] [Accepted: 09/05/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Transplantation affords recipients the potential for a full life and, for some, parenthood. Female transplant recipients must continue to take immunosuppression during pregnancy and breast-feeding. This article reviews case and series reports regarding breast-feeding in those taking transplant medications. Avoidance of breast-feeding has been the customary advice because of the potential adverse effects of immunosuppressive exposure on the infant. Subsequent studies have demonstrated that not all medication exposure translates to risk for the infant, that the exposure in utero is greater than via breast milk and that no lingering effects due to breast-feeding have been found to date in infants who were breast-fed while their mothers were taking prednisone, azathioprine, cyclosporine, and/or tacrolimus. Thus, except for those medications where clinical information is inadequate (mycophenolic acid products, sirolimus, everolimus, and belatacept), the recommendation for transplant recipients regarding breast-feeding has evolved into one that is cautiously optimistic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serban Constantinescu
- Temple University School of Medicine, Kresge West, 3440 N. Broad St., Suite 100, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
| | - Akshta Pai
- Temple University School of Medicine, Kresge West, 3440 N. Broad St., Suite 100, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
| | - Lisa A Coscia
- National Transplantation Pregnancy Registry (NTPR), Gift of Life Institute, 401 N. 3rd Street, Philadelphia, PA 19123, USA.
| | - John M Davison
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, 3rd Floor, Leech Building, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
| | - Michael J Moritz
- Lehigh Valley Hospital, 1250 S. Cedar Crest Blvd. Suite 210, Allentown, PA 18103, USA; University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.
| | - Vincent T Armenti
- National Transplantation Pregnancy Registry (NTPR), Gift of Life Institute, 401 N. 3rd Street, Philadelphia, PA 19123, USA; University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Paziana K, Del Monaco M, Cardonick E, Moritz M, Keller M, Smith B, Coscia L, Armenti V. Ciclosporin use during pregnancy. Drug Saf 2014; 36:279-94. [PMID: 23516008 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-013-0034-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Ciclosporin (cyclosporine) is an immunosuppressive drug first approved for use in organ transplantation to prevent rejection. Ciclosporin is also known to be used for the treatment of psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus and inflammatory bowel disease, among other indications. While it is recommended that all medications that are not absolutely necessary should be avoided during pregnancy, this may not be an option for many women whose quality of life is significantly impacted without treatment, or for those who must continue immunosuppressive therapy to avoid organ rejection. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive report from the literature of ciclosporin exposure during pregnancy. PubMed, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for English-language articles published from 1970 to 2012 that included reports of pregnant women treated at any time during pregnancy with ciclosporin. On an initial search, it was evident that much of the available information is limited to pregnancy after transplant, which suggests that ciclosporin use during pregnancy appears to be associated with premature delivery and low birthweight infants. Comorbidities such as hypertension, pre-eclampsia and gestational diabetes mellitus are also reported at higher incidences than the general population. Medical literature concerning women with autoimmune disorders exposed to ciclosporin during pregnancy are currently limited to case reports and registry data, and, as such, it is difficult to determine if any risks associated with ciclosporin therapy during pregnancy are due to exposure to the drug alone or to pre-existing maternal comorbidities. The literature suggests that ciclosporin therapy during pregnancy should be carefully considered by the treating physician, but may be a safe alternative for patients with autoimmune disease refractory to conventional treatment. Continued monitoring of this patient population remains a key component to understanding the risk factors associated with ciclosporin exposure during pregnancy.
Collapse
|
15
|
Thiagarajan KMF, Arakali SR, Mealey KJ, Cardonick EH, Gaughan WJ, Davison JM, Moritz MJ, Armenti VT. Safety considerations: breastfeeding after transplant. Prog Transplant 2013; 23:137-46. [PMID: 23782661 DOI: 10.7182/pit2013803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Organ transplant is an effective treatment for end-stage organ failure. For women, restoration of organ function can restore fertility and the ability to successfully carry a pregnancy. Posttransplant pregnancies have been reported among recipients of all types of solid organ transplants via case and center reports plus registry data. Stable graft function is dependent on prevention of rejection, currently accomplished by using maintenance immunosuppressant medications, to which the fetus is exposed in utero. Common among neonatal outcomes in transplant recipients are preterm and low-birth-weight infants. Emotional, nutritional, and immunologic benefits of breastfeeding have been well-documented and could be valuable for these newborns. Concern must be directed at the effects of the child's exposure to immunosuppressive agents excreted into the breast milk. Breastfeeding could be considered in transplant recipients if it can be shown that the level of exposure does not result in risks to the newborn, immediately and throughout childhood. Despite concerns of health care professionals, some recipients have chosen to breastfeed. Breastfeeding after transplant must be approached with consideration of many issues, and the potential risks require further study. This review focuses on benefits of breastfeeding, common immunosuppressive agents used in organ transplant recipients, a summary of the reports of women who have breastfed their infants while on immunosuppressive therapy and the published studies on breastfeeding and immunosuppressive agents. Recommendations are provided to guide health care professionals to help mothers receiving immunosuppressive agents to make informed choices about breastfeeding their infants.
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
More women are reporting pregnancy following heart transplantation. Although successful outcomes have been reported for the mother, transplanted heart, and newborn, such pregnancies should be considered high risk. Hypertension, preeclampsia, and infection should be treated. Vaginal delivery is recommended unless cesarean section is obstetrically necessary. Most outcomes are live births, and long-term follow-up of children show most are healthy and developing well. Maternal survival, independent of pregnancy-related events, should be part of prepregnancy counseling.
Collapse
|