Higher serum levels of soluble intracellular cell adhesion molecule-1 and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule predict peripheral artery disease in haemodialysis patients

Relationship between vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) and functional hemodynamic parameters of arteriovenous fistula

BACKGROUND

The preferred vascular access for hemodialysis is represented by arteriovenous fistula (AVF) due to fewer complications and more prolonged survival. Considerable efforts have been made to identify biomarkers associated with AVF dysfunction, but results are conflicting. Vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1) and advanced glycation end products are involved in atherogenesis, vascular calcification, peripheral artery disease, and neointimal hyperplasia in renal and non-renal patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether there is an association between VCAM-1, soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE), NcarboxymethylLysine (CML), and arteriovenous fistula dysfunction (AVF).

METHODS

VCAM-1, sRAGE, and CML were performed using the ELISA technique in 88 HD patients. Ultrasound assessment of AVF reports brachial artery blood flow (Qa), brachial resistivity index (RI), presence of calcification, and the diameter. AVF dysfunction was defined as a brachial artery Qa ⩽ 500 ml/min or RI ⩾ 0.5.

RESULTS

The median level of VCAM-1 [2676.5(2206.8-4203.9) versus 2613.2(1885.7-3161.8), p 0.026] was significantly higher in patients with AVF dysfunction compared to the rest of the patients. sRAGE and CML were higher in this group but without statistical significance. In patients with AVF dysfunction, significant positive correlations were found between VCAM-1and sRAGE (r = 0.417, p = 0.001), RI (r = 0.313, p = 0.046), dialysis vintage (r = 0.540, p < 0.001), AVF vintage (r = 0.336, p = 0.032), intima-media thickness (r = 0.423, p = 0.006) and C-reactive protein (r = 0.315, p = 0.045). VCAM-1 correlated inversely with cholesterol (r = -0.312, p = 0.047), triglycerides (r = -0.358, p = 0.021), body mass index (r = -0.388, p = 0.012). In multivariate regression analysis, VCAM-1 (p = 0.013) and sRAGE (p = 0.01) remained significant predictors of RI and Qa. Logistic regression disclosed calcification, VCAM-1, as risks factors for AVF dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

The results we obtained showed that patients with AVF dysfunction had a significantly higher level of VCAM-l. A positive correlation between VCAM-1 and sRAGE was identified in this group.

Factors related to peripheral arterial disease in patients undergoing hemodialysis: the potential role of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is substantially prevalent among patients in the end stage of renal disease (ESRD). We considered factors related to peripheral arterial disease in patients undergoing hemodialysis including the important role of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) serum concentrations. We studied 150 patients in on-line-predilution hemodiafiltration. Dialysis sufficiency was defined by Kt/V for urea. PAD was defined using clinical criteria, ankle-brachial index and Doppler ultrasound in the lower limbs. MCP-1 serum concentrations were measured using enzyme-linked immunoabsorbed assay (ΕLISA). We performed chi-square tests and logistic regression analysis to investigate risk factors for the prevalence of PAD in these patients including MCP-1 serum concentrations. The patients with manifested PAD had elevated MCP-1, higher BP, higher arterial stiffness markers, higher markers of malnutrition, uncontrolled metabolic acidosis, bone disease and lower obtained dialysis adequacy than the patients without PAD. The association between PAD manifestation and high MCP-1 was found significant (x² = 9.6, p = 0.001). The built logistic regression analysis showed that the high MCP-1 increased the risk for PAD 3.2 (95% C.I 1.3-8.2) folds after adjustment for confounders. PAD was also significantly associated with non-administration of vitamin D agents during dialysis (x² = 3.5, p = 0.04).Malnutrition, low-grade inflammation mainly defined by high MCP-1 serum concentrations, metabolic acidosis and bone disease were included in significant predictors for peripheral arterial disease in patients undergoing hemodiafiltration. The obtained dialysis sufficiency and the therapy during dialysis sessions seem to play an additional role in the demonstration of peripheral vascular disease in these patients.

A review of the pathophysiology and potential biomarkers for peripheral artery disease

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is due to the blockage of the arteries supplying blood to the lower limbs usually secondary to atherosclerosis. The most severe clinical manifestation of PAD is critical limb ischemia (CLI), which is associated with a risk of limb loss and mortality due to cardiovascular events. Currently CLI is mainly treated by surgical or endovascular revascularization, with few other treatments in routine clinical practice. There are a number of problems with current PAD management strategies, such as the difficulty in selecting the appropriate treatments for individual patients. Many patients undergo repeated attempts at revascularization surgery, but ultimately require an amputation. There is great interest in developing new methods to identify patients who are unlikely to benefit from revascularization and to improve management of patients unsuitable for surgery. Circulating biomarkers that predict the progression of PAD and the response to therapies could assist in the management of patients. This review provides an overview of the pathophysiology of PAD and examines the association between circulating biomarkers and PAD presence, severity and prognosis. While some currently identified circulating markers show promise, further larger studies focused on the clinical value of the biomarkers over existing risk predictors are needed.

Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines for atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the lower extremities: management of asymptomatic disease and claudication

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) continues to grow in global prevalence and consumes an increasing amount of resources in the United States health care system. Overall rates of intervention for PAD have been rising steadily in recent years. Changing demographics, evolution of technologies, and an expanding database of outcomes studies are primary forces influencing clinical decision making in PAD. The management of PAD is multidisciplinary, involving primary care physicians and vascular specialists with varying expertise in diagnostic and treatment modalities. PAD represents a broad spectrum of disease from asymptomatic through severe limb ischemia. The Society for Vascular Surgery Lower Extremity Practice Guidelines committee reviewed the evidence supporting clinical care in the treatment of asymptomatic PAD and intermittent claudication (IC). The committee made specific practice recommendations using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system. There are limited Level I data available for many of the critical questions in the field, demonstrating the urgent need for comparative effectiveness research in PAD. Emphasis is placed on risk factor modification, medical therapies, and broader use of exercise programs to improve cardiovascular health and functional performance. Screening for PAD appears of unproven benefit at present. Revascularization for IC is an appropriate therapy for selected patients with disabling symptoms, after a careful risk-benefit analysis. Treatment should be individualized based on comorbid conditions, degree of functional impairment, and anatomic factors. Invasive treatments for IC should provide predictable functional improvements with reasonable durability. A minimum threshold of a >50% likelihood of sustained efficacy for at least 2 years is suggested as a benchmark. Anatomic patency (freedom from restenosis) is considered a prerequisite for sustained efficacy of revascularization in IC. Endovascular approaches are favored for most candidates with aortoiliac disease and for selected patients with femoropopliteal disease in whom anatomic durability is expected to meet this minimum threshold. Conversely, caution is warranted in the use of interventions for IC in anatomic settings where durability is limited (extensive calcification, small-caliber arteries, diffuse infrainguinal disease, poor runoff). Surgical bypass may be a preferred strategy in good-risk patients with these disease patterns or in those with prior endovascular failures. Common femoral artery disease should be treated surgically, and saphenous vein is the preferred conduit for infrainguinal bypass grafting. Patients who undergo invasive treatments for IC should be monitored regularly in a surveillance program to record subjective improvements, assess risk factors, optimize compliance with cardioprotective medications, and monitor hemodynamic and patency status.