Benefits of fixed-dose combination therapy with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting bronchodilators as initial maintenance therapy in the management of asthma

The Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Single-Inhaler Triple versus Dual Therapy in Controller-Naïve and Symptomatic Adults with Asthma: A Preliminary Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose

The efficacy and safety of first-line triple and dual therapy remain unclear because the stepwise strategy is a worldwide standard in controller-naïve asthma. A preliminary retrospective cohort study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of first-line triple and dual therapy for managing controller-naïve and symptomatic adult patients with asthma.

Patients and Methods

Patients with asthma who received first-line single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) or dual therapy (SIDT) for at least 8 weeks were selected between December 1, 2020, and May 31, 2021, in Fujiki Medical and Surgical Clinic, Miyazaki, Japan. Data on daytime and nighttime visual analog scale (VAS) scores, lung function tests, fractional exhaled nitrogen oxide (F_ENO), and adverse events were compared between SITT and SIDT pre- and post-treatment.

Results

The SITT significantly improved the nighttime, but not daytime, VAS scores better than the SIDT 2 weeks post-treatment (P = 0.0026), whereas SITT and SIDT significantly improved daytime and nighttime VAS scores after treatment compared to baseline. Both therapies also significantly improved lung functions and F_ENO post-treatment. The proportion of patients achieving complete control in the nighttime VAS scores after SITT was significantly higher than that four (P = 0.0186) and 8 weeks (P = 0.0061) after SIDT. Only patients with SITT experienced dry mouth.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that first-line SITT and SIDT were effective, and SITT improved disease control faster than SIDT in controller-naïve and symptomatic adult patients with asthma. The first-line SITT may contribute to faster and better control levels in symptomatic patients with asthma.

Budget impact analysis of a fixed-dose combination of fluticasone propionate and formoterol fumarate (FP/FORM) in a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) for asthma

INTRODUCTION

The economic burden of asthma on the UK National Health Service (NHS) is the largest among allergic diseases. Current asthma guidelines recommend adding a long acting β2-agonist (LABA) to a low-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) in patients who are on ICS monotherapy and have uncontrolled asthma. The fixed-dose combination of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol xinafoate (FP/SAL), available in a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) device, is the most commonly prescribed ICS/LABA combination. An additional fixed-dose combination of fluticasone propionate and formoterol fumarate (FP/FORM) in pMDI is now available. In a 12-week non-inferiority study, FP/FORM demonstrated comparable efficacy to FP/SAL. The present analysis estimates the annual budget impact for the UK NHS using FP/FORM as an alternative to FP/SAL.

METHODS

Current pMDI prescribing data were from a real-world UK patient database (Cegedim Strategic Data). Annual costs to the NHS for drug acquisition, administration, and monitoring were estimated for FP/FORM and FP/SAL and used to assess the potential budget impact for the NHS for the use of FP/FORM instead of FP/SAL. Varying rates of uptake, adherence, adverse event-related costs, and resource use associated with switching treatment were assessed in scenario analyses.

RESULTS

Assuming similar levels of ICS use with both regimens, annual drug acquisition costs per person were lower with FP/FORM (£412) than with FP/SAL (£509). The difference in acquisition costs and otherwise comparable input costs between the treatments, results in potential annual savings of £15,110,279 to the NHS, assuming uptake of FP/FORM over FP/SAL in 50% of existing patients. The introduction of FP/FORM results in cost savings for the NHS in all of the assessed scenario analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The comparable efficacy and lower acquisition costs of FP/FORM compared with FP/SAL make it a cost-saving option for the UK NHS for the treatment of asthma patients requiring combination maintenance therapy using a pMDI.

Bridging strategies for drug combinations in pediatric indications

Concurrent prescription of different drugs is common and is often necessary in many pediatric indications. A randomized concentration-controlled trial (RCCT) is proposed for pediatric studies in which drug combinations are used. The aim of our investigation was to show the relevance of flexible designs for accurate dose selection in such cases. We used the combination of atovaquone (ATV) and proguanil (PGN) as a paradigm to illustrate our approach. Pharmacokinetic models were developed for ATV and PGN using data pertaining to adults. The median area under the curve (AUC) in adults was considered the target exposure for bridging purposes. A pediatric population was simulated according to scenarios in which clearance varied from 20 to 100% of the reference adult values or allometrically correlated with body weight (BW). Doses were subsequently adapted according to the individual AUC estimates. Our results show that adaptive protocols are critical for accurate dose selection when evaluating drug combinations in children, ensuring that target exposure is achieved with respect to both active moieties in each individual patient.

The addition of long-acting beta-agonists to inhaled corticosteroids in asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

although long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs) have been used for two decades, with many studies showing benefit versus increasing inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), controversy regarding safety has resulted in the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently mandating label changes restricting LABA use. This review addresses these safety concerns together with clinical studies and meta-analyses assessing the appropriate use of LABAs.

RECENT FINDINGS

effective use of LABAs requires sufficient ICS to control inflammation. Underuse of ICS, which is often manifest by exacerbations, may reflect undue emphasis on alleged steroid-sparing effects of LABAs. The FDA meta-analysis found that LABA with mandatory ICS was not associated with increased risks of serious adverse events. The role of LABA with ICS as initial therapy in steroid-naïve patients is debated, as is LABA use in children, with data indicating less benefit than in adults. The FDA recommendation that LABA be withdrawn once control is achieved remains problematic, as greater ICS reduction can be achieved when LABA is continued.

SUMMARY

the safe use of LABAs, which are clearly effective in many patients with moderate to severe asthma, requires high compliance with ICS therapy, which is best assured if ICS and LABA are provided in a single inhaler.