Kidney transplantation in patients with neurovesical dysfunction

Favorable Outcomes of Renal Transplant in Children With Abnormal Lower Urinary Tract

OBJECTIVES

Chronic kidney disease caused by lower urinary tract abnormalities is a significant complication in pediatric care. Although there are conflicting reports about clinical outcomes in the past, favorable outcomes have been reported in recent years. Despite this, many centers still refrain from performing renal transplant in these patients. Here, we compared clinical outcomes of renal transplant recipients with and without lower urinary tract abnormalities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our study included 71 renal transplant recipients who were divided into 3 groups: 17 patients with abnormal lower urinary tracts having vesicoureteral reflux (group 1), 7 patients with abnormal lower urinary tracts having bladder dysfunction (group 2), and 47 patients with anatomically and functionally normal lower urinary tracts (group 3). We retrospectively compared demographic features, clinical course, graft survival, pre- and posttransplant incidence of urinary tract infections, and final graft function among the groups.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences among groups regarding median age at time of transplant, graft survival, median creatinine level, and median glomerular filtration rate (P > .05). Significant differences were shown in incidence of urinary tract infections between patients in groups 1 and 2 (abnormal lower urinary tracts) and group 3 (normal lower urinary tracts) before transplant (P < .05). Although frequency of urinary tract infections in groups 1 and 2 were moderately higher than shown in group 3 after transplant, this difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the children with abnormal lower urinary tracts had slightly higher incidence of urinary tract infections, there were no differences between patients with abnormal and normal lower urinary tracts regarding allograft survival and function. In addition, proper follow-up of patients before and after transplant, based on our experience, should include educating patients and their parents about potential complications after transplant for the best outcome of renal transplant.

Pediatric kidney transplantation is safe and available for patients with urological anomalies as well as those with primary renal diseases

The aim of the current study was to evaluate long-term outcomes of pediatric live kidney transplantation in patients with genitourinary anomalies relative to those with primary kidney diseases. The study included 35 pediatric patients who received a live kidney transplantation during the last 25 yr (28 males, six females). Median age at the time of transplantation was nine yr (range 1-15 yr), and the median follow-up period was 151 months (range 6-239 month). The patients were divided into two groups. The urological group (n = 14) included patients with primary obstructive/reflux nephropathy. The renal group (n = 20) included patients with primary renal disorders. Differences between groups in graft survival, clinical course, and final graft function were evaluated. Original diseases represented in the urological group included five cases with primary VUR and eight cases with secondary VUR. Diseases in the renal group included eight cases with bilateral hypo-dysplastic kidney, three cases with focal/segmental glomerular sclerosis, two cases with membranous proliferative glomerulonephritis, two cases with congenital nephrotic syndrome and five cases with other forms of chronic nephritis. Ten of 14 cases in the urological group, relative to six of 20 in the renal group, were preemptive. Median age at transplantation was 7.5 or 10 yr old, respectively, in the urological or renal group. Twelve kidney recipients in the urological group had also undergone other urinary surgeries, including upper urinary tract drainage, ureteroneocystostomy, augmentation cystoplasty, endoscopic incision of posterior-urethral valve, urethroplasty, etc. Cumulative post-operative complications occurred in nine or 16, respectively, in the urological or renal group. The acute rejection free and overall graft survival were similar in both groups. One patient in the urological group lost his graft while six patients in the renal group lost their grafts. Thus, the post-transplant clinical outcome of pediatric transplantation in patients with urological anomalies is comparable to that of recipients with primary renal disease. Appropriate urinary tract reconstruction and management is essential to reduce the risk of graft dysfunction because of urinary problems.

Urological evaluation prior to renal transplantation

Renal transplantation is the best available therapy for patients with end-stage renal failure. Urologists are often consulted regarding pretransplant evaluation and treatment of potential renal transplant recipients. Frequently the urologist is the primary surgeon in the transplant unit. This review highlights the importance of performing a comprehensive urological assessment before renal transplantation. A retrospective review of the urological and transplant literature using Medline was performed from 1976 to 2002, searching for renal transplantation and its association with urological cancers and urinary tract malformations. The pretransplant urological assessment aims to diagnose, treat, and optimize any preexisting urological disease. On occasion, certain urological diseases may not be obvious or may not have contributed to the progression to end-stage renal failure such as occult urinary tract neoplasms, urinary calculus disease, or benign prostatic hyperplasia. A thorough evaluation of the urinary tract prior to renal transplantation is mandatory to avoid unforeseen problems occurring posttransplant. If this assessment is consistently adhered to, only in very rare circumstances does a potential recipient have to be denied the opportunity of receiving an allograft based on a preexisting urological disease.

Pre-emptive renal transplantation in children

BACKGROUND

Renal transplantation is a definitive therapeutic modality in end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Most ESRD patients in Japan experience dialysis prior to renal transplantation. The present study was undertaken to examine the usefulness of pre-emptive renal transplantation (PET).

METHODS

Between 1987 and 1998, 255 renal transplantations were carried out by the authors. Among those consecutive cases, 10 were cases of PET. In nine pediatric cases, demographics, graft and patient survival, height growth and benefits from successful transplantation were studied and compared with age-matched dialyzed transplantation controls.

RESULTS

All transplantation was living-related. There was a disparity of causes of ESRD between the two groups. In PET, acquired renal deterioration due to a congenital lower urinary tract disorder was the major cause. Graft and patient prognosis was favorable in both groups. Growth retardation in PET patients under 15 years of age was significantly less apparent at the time of transplantation and after 3 years compared to the control. The benefits from transplantation were different in the two groups. Most PET patients felt an improvement of their physical condition; however, all of the control patients felt that the major boon was the freedom from the restriction of the daily diet and time for dialysis.

CONCLUSION

In pediatric renal transplantation, short-term preceding dialysis does not have a detrimental effect, but PET could benefit ESRD patients by maintaining their quality of life. Moreover, PET minimizes the production of renal dwarfism in prepubertal children. Thus, PET should be taken into consideration in the choice of renal replacement therapy.

Renal transplantation in patients with an augmentation cystoplasty

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively review our experience over a 10-year period of renal transplantation in patients with augmented bladders and thus assess the safety of this procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ten transplant recipients who had previously undergone augmentation cystoplasty were reviewed; a cadaveric kidney was transplant in each case. The donor ureter was anastomosed to the augment bladder in six patients, in three to the native ureter and in one the donor renal pelvis was anastomosed to the native ureter.

RESULTS

No patients died and nine of the 10 grafts were functioning at a mean follow-up of 27 months. The mean (SD) serum creatinine level at the follow-up was 100.8 (27.25) mmol/L. Four patients had 10 episodes of urosepsis requiring hospital admission, with only one graft lost.

CONCLUSION

Renal transplantation can be performed safely in patients with an augmentation cystoplasty.