Current status of pharmacotherapy against metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Japan

Assessing improvements in metastatic renal cell carcinoma systemic treatments from the pre-cytokine to the immune checkpoint inhibitor eras: a retrospective analysis of real-world data

OBJECTIVE

Studies assessing outcome improvements over a long period according to systemic therapy strategies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma using real-world data, including the results of the recent era of immune checkpoint inhibitors, are limited. Herein, we retrospectively evaluated patients who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma over a 40-year span.

METHODS

Patients were classified into four groups based on when their metastases were diagnosed as follows: (i) the pre-cytokine era (1980-1986), (ii) the cytokine era (1987-2007), (iii) the molecular-targeted therapy (mTT) era (2008 to August 2016) and (iv) the immune checkpoint inhibitor era (September 2016 to 2018). The immune checkpoint inhibitor era consisted of second- or later-line nivolumab. Overall survival from the diagnoses of metastases was evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 576 patients were evaluated, including 22 (3.82%), 231 (40.1%), 253 (43.9%) and 70 (12.2%) patients from the pre-cytokine, cytokine, molecular-targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor eras, respectively. The overall survival significantly improved with each successive era (median: 13.1 vs. 24.5 vs. 44.4 months vs. not reached in pre-cytokine vs. cytokine vs. molecular-targeted therapy vs. immune checkpoint inhibitor eras, P < 0.0001). The implementation of molecular-targeted therapy improved overall survival compared with that of cytokine (cytokine vs. molecular-targeted therapy eras, P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the era was an independent factor for overall survival (P < 0.0001), together with histopathological type; metastasis status (i.e. synchronous or metachronous); systemic therapy status (i.e. absence or presence) and bone, liver or lymph node metastasis status (all, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study of real-world data indicated that metastatic renal cell carcinoma outcomes improved with successive systemic therapy paradigms.

Prognostic impact of metastasectomy in renal cell carcinoma in the postcytokine therapy era

OBJECTIVES

To explore the real-world data regarding survival following metastasectomy (MS) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the postcytokine therapy era.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) between January 2008 and December 2018 at our institutions were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were classified into three groups according to their MS status: (1) complete MS (cMS), (2) incomplete MS (icMS), and (3) without MS (nonMS). Factors for overall survival (OS) after diagnosis were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 314 patients were evaluated. During the follow-up period (median: 25.3 months), a total of 98 patients (31.2%) underwent at least one MS. The cMS group (n = 45, 14.3%) had a significantly longer OS (median: not reached [N.R.]) than the icMS (n = 53, 16.9%) (81.5 months, P= 0.0042) and nonMS groups (28.1 months, P< 0.0001). The icMS group had a significantly longer OS than the nonMS group did (P= 0.0010). Multivariate analysis showed that the MS status was an independent factor for OS (cMS vs. nonMS: P= 0.0004; icMS vs. nonMS: P= 0.0176), together with histopathological type, International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk, liver metastasis status, and prior nephrectomy status (all, P< 0.05). In addition, the OS was comparable throughout the eras of systemic therapy (early molecular-targeted therapy, late molecular-targeted therapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitor eras) in the MS group (median: 121.9 vs. N.R. vs. N.R. months, P= 0.948).

CONCLUSIONS

MS, especially cMS improved survival in selected patients with mRCC in the postcytokine therapy era. In addition, MS still plays a significant role in the current systemic therapy.

Survival of patients receiving systematic therapy for metachronous or synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective analysis

Background

The differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients according to treatment, type of metastasis, and Heng criteria risk are unclear. In this study, we compared survival according to various such parameters.

Methods

Between 2000 to 2014, 214 mRCC patients, of whom 171 (79.9%) were intermediate-risk and 43 (20.1%) were poor-risk, were retrospectively selected; 126 (58.9%) patients were treated with immunotherapy (IT) and 88 (41.1%) with targeted therapy (TT). Moreover, 144 patients had synchronous mRCCs (67.3%, SM) and 70 had metachronous mRCCs (32.7%, MM). The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and CSS.

Results

During a median 4.2 (1.0–70.4) months of systemic treatment and 98.3 (4.8–147.6) months of follow-up, the median PFS and CSS were 4.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.8–5.5) and 13.8 (95% CI, 9.8–18.3) months, respectively. The PFS and CSS were significantly better in the MM (5.9 and 21.3 months) and intermediate-risk groups (5.2 and 18.3 months) than those in the SM (4.4 and 9.6 months) and poor-risk groups (2.7 and 5.8 months), respectively (p < 0.05). Further stratification showed that TT produced significantly better PFS than IT in intermediate-risk patients with SM and a treatment-free interval (TFI) < 1 year, and in those with MM with a TFI ≥1 year (p < 0.05). There were no differences in survival outcomes according to various other subgroup stratifications (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Dividing patients into specific subcategories helps to better predict therapeutic outcomes.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5900-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The Inverse Association between the Baseline Renal Function and Overall Survival in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Molecular-Targeted Agents

Background

The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of the baseline renal function in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with molecular-targeted agents.

Patients and Methods

This study included 408 consecutive mRCC patients receiving molecular-targeted therapy, consisting of 124 patients in group A and 284 patients in group B who had baseline estimated glomerular filtration rates ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m² and < 60 ml/min/1.73 m², respectively.

Results

Compared with group A, group B was significantly less likely to have poor prognostic factors, such as a high proportion of patients without nephrectomy. The median overall survivals (OSs) after the initiation of targeted therapy in groups A and B were 21.4 and 35.8 months, respectively, and there was a significant difference in the OS between the 2 groups. However, multivariate analysis showed a lack of independent impact of the baseline renal function on the OS. Furthermore, when patients without a nephrectomy were excluded, no significant difference was noted in the OS between the 2 groups.

Conclusion

These findings suggested that there was no adverse impact of an unfavorable baseline renal function on the efficacy of targeted agents against mRCC. Thus, molecular-targeted therapy should not be avoided in mRCC patients with an impaired baseline renal function.

Efficacy and safety of axitinib in elderly patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of age on clinical outcomes of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients receiving axitinib. This study included 144 consecutive mRCC patients who received axitinib for at least 12 weeks as second-line therapy in a routine clinical setting. The efficacy, safety and quality of life (QOL) were compared between patients aged <75 (n = 116) and ≥75 (n = 28) years. No significant differences in the clinicopathological characteristics were noted between younger and older patients. There was no significant difference in the response rate, clinical benefit rate or proportion of patients going on to receive third-line therapy between these two groups. In addition, the progression-free and overall survivals in older patients were similar to those in younger patients. There were no significant differences in the incidences of adverse events between these two groups, except for that of fatigue, which was significantly more frequent in older than younger patients. There was no significant difference in the incidence of the discontinuation of axitinib due to adverse events between the two groups. QOL assessment at 12 weeks after the introduction of axitinib using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form showed no significant differences in any of the eight scale scores between the two groups. Taken together, it might be possible to achieve clinical outcomes in older patients receiving axitinib comparable to those in younger patients, suggesting that advanced age should not be a contraindication to treatment with axitinib as a second-line setting in mRCC patients.

Pharmacotherapies for renal cell carcinoma in Japan

The standard treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma has changed dramatically in the past decade, from cytokine therapy to targeted therapy. Since sorafenib was approved in April 2008, four tyrosine kinase inhibitors and two mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors have become available in Japan. Most Japanese renal cell carcinoma patients are treated by urologists who are involved in not only kidney surgeries, but also targeted therapy using tyrosine kinase inhibitors, as well as mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors. Optimal treatment methods are selected from theoretically-based global recommendations, such as the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines; however, real-world clinical practice might be different from that in non-Asian countries. This might be because of different practical conditions; for example, different adverse events and efficacy profiles, different healthcare system, and so on. In the present review, we examine current pharmacotherapy for renal cell carcinoma from evidence-based global data, and compare the reality of Japanese clinical practice to explore the importance of individualized patient therapy.

Absence of Significant Correlation of Adverse Events Between First- and Second-Line Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Several adverse events (AEs) are known to be commonly observed during treatment with different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. However, no significant correlation appears present in the profiles of such AEs between first- and second-line TKI therapies. Therefore, a second-line targeted agent for patients with mRCC could be selected irrespective of the AE profile during first-line TKI therapy.

BACKGROUND

Several adverse events (AEs) commonly observed during treatment with different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The objective of the present study was to investigate whether the appearance of such AEs during treatment with first-line TKIs significantly affects the occurrence of AEs during second-line TKI therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The present study included 154 consecutive patients with mRCC treated with second-line TKIs after the discontinuation of first-line TKIs. The association of AEs, including diarrhea, fatigue, hand-foot syndrome, hypertension, and hypothyroidism, between first- and second-line therapies was analyzed in these 154 patients.

RESULTS

For all 5 AEs assessed in the present study, the proportion of patients experiencing AEs or those grade ≥ 3 during second-line TKI therapy was not significantly different among the following 3 groups: patients without AEs, those with grade ≤ 2 AEs, and those with grade ≥ 3 AEs during first-line TKI therapy. Furthermore, no significant difference was seen in progression-free or overall survival after the introduction of second-line TKIs between patients with and without grade ≥ 3 AEs during treatment with first-line TKIs.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of AEs or grade ≥ 3 AEs during second-line TKI therapy are not dependent on the profiles of AEs during first-line TKI therapy in patients with mRCC. Therefore, AEs that occur during first-line TKI therapy should not affect the selection of second-line targeted agents for patients with mRCC.

Combination with third-generation bisphosphonate (YM529) and interferon-alpha can inhibit the progression of established bone renal cell carcinoma

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the third-generation nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate (YM529) can inhibit the progression of established bone renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and to elucidate its mechanism. Antiproliferative effect and apoptosis induction of RCC cells and mouse osteoclasts by YM529 and/or interferon-alpha (IFN-α) were evaluated in vitro using cell counting and in vivo using soft X-ray, the TUNEL method and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase stain. For the in vivo study, male athymic BALB/cA Jc1-nu nude mice bearing human RCC cell line RBM1-IT4 cells were treated with YM529 and/or IFN-α. The biological activity of osteoclasts was evaluated using the pit formation assay. The antiangiogenetic effect by YM529 and/or IFN-α was analyzed using micro-vessel density and in situ mRNA hybridization. Osteoclast number in bone tumors was decreased in YM529-treated mouse. YM529 also inhibited osteoclast activity and proliferation in vitro, whereas basic fibroblast growth factor expressions and micro-vessel density within tumors were inhibited by IFN-α. Neither YM529 nor IFN-α alone significantly inhibited the growth of established bone metastatic tumors. Combined treatment with YM529 and IFN-α may be beneficial in patients with human RCC bone metastasis. Their effects are mediated by osteoclast recruitment inhibition and inactivation by YM529 and antiangiogenesis by IFN-α.

Intravesical dual PI3K/mTOR complex 1/2 inhibitor NVP-BEZ235 therapy in an orthotopic bladder cancer model

NVP-BEZ235 is an inhibitor of both phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1/2 (mTORC1/2), and its antitumor activity is expected to be higher than that of mTORC1 inhibitors because it inhibits the upregulation of pAkt through mTORC2. We examined the efficacy of intravesical NVP-BEZ235 therapy in the treatment of bladder cancer using an orthotopic bladder cancer model. The cytotoxic effects of various concentrations of NVP-BEZ235 in MBT-2 cells were examined using a WST assay. The expression of pAkt, pS6 and p4EBP1 was evaluated in MBT-2 cells treated with NVP-BEZ235 using western blotting. Orthotopic models were established by implanting MBT-2 cells into the bladders of female C3H/He mice. We assigned C3H/He mice to 2 groups: a control group treated with vehicle control (n=15), and a group intravesically administered 40 µM (18.78 mg/l) of NVP-BEZ235 (n=15). NVP-BEZ235 inhibited the viability of MBT-2 cells in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, the expression of pAkt, pS6, and p4EBP1 was inhibited in NVP-BEZ235-treated MBT-2 cells. Bladder weights were significantly lower in the NVP-BEZ235-treated group than in the control group (P<0.05). An analysis of the tumor tissues revealed that the NVP-BEZ235 treatment strongly reduced pAkt, pS6 and p4EBP1 levels. An immunohistochemical analysis showed that NVP-BEZ235 significantly inhibited the expression of pS6. Intravesically administered NVP-BEZ235 exerted significant antitumor effects in the orthotopic bladder cancer model by inhibiting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. The intravesical instillation of a dual PI3K/mTORC1/2 inhibitor may represent a novel therapy for the treatment of bladder cancer.

C5aR is frequently expressed in metastatic renal cell carcinoma and plays a crucial role in cell invasion via the ERK and PI3 kinase pathways

The anaphylatoxin C5a is a chemoattractant for leukocyte migration via the C5a receptor (C5aR). We recently reported that C5aR was aberrantly expressed in a wide variety of human related cancers, while it also promotes cancer cell invasion by C5a stimulation. However, the biological significance of C5aR expression in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has not yet been clarified. In the present study, we aimed to elucidate the biological role of C5aR in RCC progression. Clinical RCC specimens were analyzed for C5aR expression and its relationship with baseline demographic data and clinicopathological parameters was analyzed. Moreover, renal carcinoma Renca cells stably expressing C5aR were generated and used to assess the effects of C5a-C5aR axis activation on various cellular phenomena in culture. Immunohistochemistry revealed that 96.7% of the metastatic RCCs (mRCCs) showed C5aR expression, whereas only 50.5% of the non-metastatic RCCs expressed C5aR (P<0.001). Although C5a stimulation did not significantly alter anoikis of C5aR‑expressing Renca cells, C5a elicited cell morphological change and scattering of those cells accompanied with dynamic actin rearrangement, which was not observed in the Renca cells harboring the empty vector only. Moreover, C5a triggered ERK and PI3K‑dependent invasion of the C5aR-expressing renal carcinoma cells. These results are consistent with the idea that the C5a-C5aR axis plays a crucial role in renal carcinoma cell invasion, which may be one of the key steps for RCC metastasis. The present study provides proof‑of‑concept that the C5a-C5aR axis may be a useful therapeutic target for preventing RCC progression.

More than 10 years survival with sequential therapy in a patient with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a case report

Although radical nephrectomy alone is widely accepted as the standard of care in localized treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), it is not sufficient for the treatment of metastatic RCC (mRCC), which invariably leads to an unfavorable outcome despite the use of multiple therapies. Currently, sequential targeted agents are recommended for the management of mRCC, but the optimal drug sequence is still debated. This case was a 57-year-old man with clear-cell mRCC who received multiple therapies following his first operation in 2003 and has survived for over 10 years with a satisfactory quality of life. The treatments given included several surgeries, immunotherapy, and sequentially administered sorafenib, sunitinib, and everolimus regimens. In the course of mRCC treatment, well-planned surgeries, effective sequential targeted therapies and close follow-up are all of great importance for optimal management and a satisfactory outcome.

A randomized multicenter phase II trial on the efficacy of a hydrocolloid dressing containing ceramide with a low-friction external surface for hand-foot skin reaction caused by sorafenib in patients with renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the usefulness of a hydrocolloid dressing containing ceramide for hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) on the soles of the feet in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients treated with sorafenib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with grade 1 HFSR on the soles of the feet were randomly assigned in to two groups. One group received a hydrocolloid dressing containing ceramide (arm A) and the other received 10% urea cream (arm B). Patients in both groups applied treatment to the affected sites on the soles of the feet, but not to the hands. The primary end point was the incidence of grade 2 or 3 HFSR on the soles of the feet in the first 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were assessed (17 in arm A and 16 in arm B), and there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. During the observation period of this study, grade 2 or 3 HFSR on the soles of the feet was found in 29% of patients in arm A and was significantly less than the 69% in arm B (P=0.03). The incidence of HFSR on the hands, however, was similar in both arms. The median time to grade 2 or 3 HFSR on the soles of the feet was also significantly longer in arm A than in arm B (P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that a hydrocolloid dressing containing ceramide prevented the worsening of HFSR caused by sorafenib in metastatic RCC patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000002016.