Clinicopathologic factors predicting complete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer

Complete pathologic response in esophageal adenocarcinoma: does it make a difference?

Advancements in neoadjuvant regimens for esophageal adenocarcinoma have enabled some patients to achieve complete pathologic response at time of esophagectomy. There are currently limited data detailing this trend or the implications of complete pathologic response on survival. The National Cancer Database was used to identify 16,169 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma that received trimodal therapy including esophagectomy between 2006 and 2020. Of these, 11.4% had complete pathologic response at esophagectomy. Patient factors, staging characteristics, and survival trends were evaluated. In patients diagnosed between 2016 and 2020, the rate of complete pathologic response was 17.5%. Female sex (OR 1.295, 95% CI 1.134-1.481, p = 0.0001), Black race (OR 1.729, 95% CI 1.362-2.196, p = 0.0002), Hispanic ethnicity (OR 1.418, 95% CI 1.073-1.875, p = 0.0141), and later era of diagnosis (2016-2020 OR 2.898, 95% CI 2.508-3.349, p < 0.0001) were independent predictors of complete pathologic response. Clinical stage II disease was associated with an increased probability of complete pathologic response (OR 1.492, 95% CI 1.19-1.871) while clinical stage III disease had a decreased probability of complete pathologic response (OR 0.762, 95% CI 0.621-0.936, p < 0.0001). Complete pathologic response conveyed a strong survival benefit, with a median survival of 86.4 months (95% CI 73.9-102.1) versus 30.7 months (95% CI 29.8-31.7, p < 0.0001) in those without complete pathologic response. Four-year median survival was also higher in those with complete pathologic response (63.3%, 95% CI 60.8-66.0% vs. 39.2%, 95% CI 38.4-40.1%, p < 0.0001). In summary, complete pathologic response is associated with a profound survival advantage in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. Such knowledge carries implications for patient counseling, prognostication, and surveillance and demonstrates a need for improved identification of complete clinical response prior to esophagectomy.

MR radiomics predicts pathological complete response of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

More than 40% of patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) achieve pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), who have favorable prognosis and may benefit from an organ-preservation strategy. Our study aims to develop and validate a machine learning model based on MR radiomics to accurately predict the pCR of ESCC patients after nCRT.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter study, eligible patients with ESCC who underwent baseline MR (T2-weighted imaging) and nCRT plus surgery were enrolled between September 2014 and September 2022 at institution 1 (training set) and between December 2017 and August 2021 at institution 2 (testing set). Models were constructed using machine learning algorithms based on clinical factors and MR radiomics to predict pCR after nCRT. The area under the curve (AUC) and cutoff analysis were used to evaluate model performance.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients were enrolled in this study, 82 in the training set and 73 in the testing set. The radiomics model was constructed based on two radiomics features, achieving AUCs of 0.968 (95%CI 0.933-0.992) in the training set and 0.885 (95%CI 0.800-0.958) in the testing set. The cutoff analysis resulted in an accuracy of 82.2% (95%CI 72.6-90.4%), a sensitivity of 75.0% (95%CI 58.3-91.7%), and a specificity of 85.7% (95%CI 75.5-96.0%) in the testing set.

CONCLUSION

A machine learning model based on MR radiomics was developed and validated to accurately predict pCR after nCRT in patients with ESCC.

The role of surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy in management of localized squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus - What is the verdict?

The management of squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) of esophagus has significantly changed over last decade with the development of newer surgical techniques such as endoscopic submucosal dissection for early superficial esophageal cancer and refinement of existing surgical techniques (e.g., Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy) that has been associated with an improvement in patient outcomes. The data from the pivotal CROSS study has established neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as standard of care for patients with locally advanced disease progressing to esophagectomy Simultaneously, definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) has emerged as an effective therapeutic modality with an added advantage of organ preservation. The present review focuses on reviewing the management of localized esophageal SqCC and exploring the evidence regarding the efficacy and caveats of different therapeutic modalities. One of the key objectives is to identify any specific features which may influence choosing a particular modality (e.g. surgery cf. dCRT) and definition of an appropriate evidence-based algorithm for management of early (superficial) and locally advanced SqCC of esophagus.

AGR2 expression as a predictive biomarker for therapy response in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Despite multidisciplinary therapy, the prognosis is poor for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). In the locally advanced stage, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery could provide survival benefits to some patients. Here, we aimed to identify for tumor therapy response a biomarker based on RNA sequencing. We collected endoscopic biopsies of 32 ESCC patients, who were divided according to nCRT response, into two groups: the complete response group (n  =  13) and the non-complete response group (n  =  19). RNA-sequencing data showed that 464 genes were differentially expressed. Increased in non-complete response group, 4 genes increased expressions were AGR2 (anterior gradient 2), GADD45B (growth arrest and DNA damage inducible beta), PPP1R15A (protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 15A) and LRG1 (leucine rich alpha-2-glycoprotein 1). The areas under the curve (AUC) of the AGR2 gene was 0.671 according to read counts of RNA-seq and therapy response of nCRT. In vitro study showed that apoptosis cell was significantly increased in the AGR2-knockdown TE-2 cell line treated with cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), when compared with si-control. Results suggest that in ESCC, the AGR2 gene is a promising and predictive gene marker for the response to anti-tumor therapy.

Postoperative lymphatic recurrence distribution and delineation of the radiation field in lower thoracic squamous cell esophageal carcinomas: a real-world study

Background

To study lymphatic recurrence distribution after radical surgery in the real world and guide clinical tumor volume delineation for regional lymph nodes during postoperative radiotherapy for lower thoracic squamous cell esophageal carcinomas.

Methods

We enrolled patients who underwent radical esophagectomy, without radiation before or after surgery, at 3 cancer hospitals. Patients were classified into groups according to tumor locations. We included patients with tumors in the lower thoracic segment and analyzed the postoperative lymph node recurrence mode. A cutoff value of 10% was used to differentiate high-risk lymph node drainage areas from others.

Results

We enrolled 1905 patients in the whole study series, including 652 thoracic esophageal carcinomas that met our inclusion criteria; there were 241 cases of lower thoracic esophageal carcinomas. 1st, 2nd, 4th, 7th, 8th groups of lymph nodes, according to the 8th edition of the AJCC classification, displayed as high-risk recurrence areas, representing 17.8%, 23.9%, 11.7%, 10.9% and 12.2% of lymph node recurrence. Stage III-IV tumors located in the lower segment of the thoracic esophagus showed a tendency to recur in the left gastric nodes (7.9%) and celiac nodes (10.6%).

Conclusions

According to our results, we recommended including the 4th, 7th and 8th groups of lymph nodes in the radiation field, and for patients with stage III-IV disease, the 17th and 20th groups of nodes should be irradiated during postoperative treatment. Whether including 1st/2nd groups in preventive irradiation needed more proofs.

A Survival Prediction Nomogram for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery

Background

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) followed by surgery is a component of the standard treatment for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and the parameters for survival prediction are not clear yet. Our study aimed to construct a survival prediction nomogram for ESCC with NCRT followed by surgery.

Methods

We analyzed hematological parameters and related-derivative indexes from 122 ESCC patients treated with NCRT followed by surgery. Univariate and multivariate Cox survival analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors to establish a nomogram and predict overall survival (OS). The predictive value of the nomogram for OS was evaluated by the concordance index (C-index), decision curve analysis (DCA), the clinical impact curve (CIC), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).

Results

The pretreatment nutritional candidate, prognostic nutrition index, inflammation-related absolute monocyte count and TNM staging were entered into the nomogram for ESCC with NCRT followed by surgery. The C-index of the nomogram for OS was 0.790 (95% CI = 0.688–0.893), which was higher than that of TNM staging (0.681; 95% CI = 0.565–0.798, P = 0.026). The DCA, CIC, NRI, and IDI of the nomogram showed moderate improvement in predicting survival. Based on the cut point calculated according to the constructed nomogram, the high-risk group had poorer OS than that of the low-risk group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

A novel nomogram based on nutrition- and inflammation-related indicators might help predict the survival of ESCC treated with NCRT followed by surgery.

Clinical outcome of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in rectal cancer treatment

To determine the clinical and pathological outcome of locally advanced rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation (chemoradiotherapy [CRT]) followed by curative surgery and to identify predictive factors of pathological complete response (pCR).Locally advanced rectal cancer patients undergoing CRT followed by curative surgery from January 2012 to December 2017 were included. Patient's demographic data, pretreatment tumor characteristics, type of CRT regimens, type of surgery, postoperative complications, pathological reports and follow up records were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to identify predictive factors for pCR. Five-year disease free and overall survival were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared between pCR and non-pCR groups.A total of 85 patients were analyzed. Eighteen patients (21.1%) achieved pCR. The sphincter-saving surgery rate was 57.6%. After univariate analyses, tumor length >4 cm (P = .007) and positive lymph nodes (P = .040) were significantly associated with decreased rate of pCR. Complete clinical response was significantly associated with higher rate of pCR (P = .015). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that tumor length >4 cm (P = .010) was significantly associated with decreased rate of pCR. After a median follow-up of 65 months (IQR 34-79), the calculated 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 81.4% and 69.7%, respectively. Patients who achieved pCR tend to had longer 5-year disease-free survival (P = .355) and overall survival (P = .361) than those who did not.Tumor length >4 cm was associated with decreased rate of pCR in locally advanced rectal cancer who had CRT followed by surgery. Longer waiting time or more intense adjuvant treatment may be considered to improved pCR and oncological outcomes.

LINC00152 Knock-down Suppresses Esophageal Cancer by EGFR Signaling Pathway

Aim

This study aims to explain the role and mechanism of lncRNA LINC00152 in esophageal cancer.

Methods

The 30 pairs of esophageal cancer and adjacent normal tissues were collected and measuring the lncRNA LINC00152 expression by ISH and RT-qPCR assay. In the next cell experiment, Eca 109 and Kyse 150 cells were divided into 3 groups: NC group were treated with non-treatment; BL group were transfected with empty vector and lncRNA group were transfected with lncRNA LINC00152. The cells proliferation were measured by MTT assay; the cells apoptosis and cell cycle were evaluated by flow cytometry. The relative proteins expressions were measured by WB assay.

Results

Compared with NC groups, the cell proliferation rate of lncRNA groups were significantly suppressed (P<0.05, respectively); the cell apoptosis and G1 phase rates were significantly enhanced in the lncRNA groups (P<0.05, respectively). In the proteins expressions, the EGFR, PI3K and AKT proteins expressions of lncRNA group were significantly inhibited and the P21 proteins expressions were significantly stimulated in the lncRNA groups compared with those of NC groups in Eca 109 and Kyse 150 cells.

Conclusion

The lncRNA LINC00152 had anti-tumor effects on esophageal cancer in the Eca 109 and Kyse 150 cells, the mechanisms were relative with EGFR pathway.

PATHOLOGIC COMPLETE RESPONSE (YPT0 YPN0) AFTER CHEMOTHERAPY AND RADIOTHERAPY NEOADJUVANT FOLLOWED BY ESOPHAGECTOMY IN THE SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA OF THE ESOPHAGUS

Background:

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is an aggressive neoplasia that requires a multidisciplinary treatment in which survival and prognosis are still not satisfactory. The complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy is considered a good prognosis factor, and esophagectomy is indicated.

Aim:

Survival analysis of cases with pathologic complete response (ypT0 ypN0) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, submmitted to esophagectomy.

Methods:

Between 1983-2014, 222 esophagectomies were performed, and 177 were conducted to neoadjuvant treatment. In 34 patients the pathologic response was considered complete. Medical records of the patients were retrospectively reviewed regarding type of chemotherapy applied, amount of radiotherapy, interval between the neoadjuvant therapy and the surgery, body mass index; postoperative complications; hospital admission time and survival.

Results:

The average age was 55.8 years. Twenty-five patients were subjected to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and nine to neoadjuvant radiotherapy. The total radiation dose ranged from 4400 until 5400 cGy. The chemotherapy was performed with 5FU, cisplatin, and carbotaxol, concomitantly with the radiotherapy. The esophagectomy was transmediastinal, followed by the cervical esophagogastroplasty performed on a average of 49.4 days after the neoadjuvant therapy. The hospital admission time was an average of 14.8 days. During the follow-up period, 52% of the patients submitted to radiotherapy and chemotherapy were disease-free, with 23.6% of them presenting more than five years survival.

Conclusions:

The neoadjuvant treatment followed by esophagectomy in patients with pathologic complete response is beneficial for the survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Development of a nomogram for the prediction of pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Nomograms incorporating multiple prognostic factors are useful for individualized estimation of survival in cancer patients. However, nomograms for the prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with esophageal cancer are scarce. Here, we describe the development of a nomogram for predicting pCR after nCRT in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We retrospectively reviewed the records of 392 ESCC patients who underwent nCRT followed by esophagectomy. Seventy percent of the participants (n = 274) were randomly assigned to a training cohort, whereas the remaining 30% were included in a validation cohort (n = 118). Data from the training cohort were subjected to multivariate logistic regression analyses for selecting variables to be included in the nomogram. The performance of the resulting nomogram was internally and externally validated by calculating the bias-corrected concordance statistic (c-statistic) and the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. After surgery, 25.77% of the study patients achieved pCR. The following variables were included in the nomogram: (i) age, (ii) pretreatment tumor length, (iii) history of head and neck cancer, (iv) post-nCRT albumin levels, and (v) post-nCRT endoscopic findings coupled with endoscopic biopsy results. The bias-corrected c-statistic and AUROC of the internal and external validation sets were 0.77 and 0.747, respectively. Our nomogram showed a good performance for predicting pCR after nCRT in ESCC patients.

The predictive value of 18F-FDG PET for pathological response of primary tumor in patients with esophageal cancer during or after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We want to review the value of 18-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography for response prediction of primary tumor in patients with esophageal cancer during or after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

Studies were searched in Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library with specific search strategy. The published articles were included according to the criteria established in advance. The included studies were divided into two groups according to the time of the repeat positron emission tomography: during (Group A) or after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (Group B). The studies that performed the repeat positron emission tomography after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were graded Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio were obtained for both groups on the basis of no-existing of threshold effect.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were included in the present study. The threshold effect did not exist in both groups. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio were 85%, 59%, 6.82 with 95% confidence interval 76-91%, 48-69%, 2.25-20.72 in Group A. The equivalent values were 67%, 69%, 6.34 with 95% confidence interval 60-73%, 63-74%, 2.08-19.34 in Group B. The pooled sensitivity was 90% in four studies that enrolled patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma merely in Group B.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the present data, positron emission tomography should not be used routinely to guide treatment strategy in esophageal cancer patients. We speculated that positron emission tomography could be used as a tool to predict treatment response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Pathologic Complete Response Is an Independent Predictor of Improved Survival Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Reports of improved survival in patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma is extrapolated from heterogeneous studies that include squamous cell histology. We sought to determine if pCR is associated with a survival advantage in a homogenous group of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

This is a single institution analysis of all patients with T2-T4 or node positive esophageal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy between 2004 and 2014. Patients were divided into two groups based on pathological response, pCR vs. incomplete pathological response (iPR). Survival outcomes were evaluated using standard Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 205 patients were included in the study: 38 (19 %) patients with pCR and 167 patients (81 %) with iPR. The two groups were similar with respect to clinical stage, age, gender, comorbid conditions, ECOG status, smoking, and alcohol use. Patients in the pCR group had a higher percentage of tumors located in middle third of esophagus (11 vs. 2 %, p = 0.04) while tumor grade was similar in both groups. Median follow-up was 50 months, range 2-109 months. The 3-year overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) for iPR was 48 and 39 %, respectively, vs. 86 and 80 % for pCR group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This analysis of a cohort of homogeneous patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma undergoing multimodality therapy showed that pCR is an independent predictor of improved RFS and OS. This data contributes to a growing body of evidence highlighting the benefits of neoadjuvant therapy specific to esophageal adenocarcinoma particularly when pCR is achieved.

Local control may be the key in improving treatment outcomes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing concurrent chemoradiation

BACKGROUND/AIM

Little is known about the patterns of treatment failure following definitive chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), especially in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We evaluated definitive CCRT failure patterns and determined the predictive factors for treatment response in esophageal SCC.

METHODS

We evaluated 136 consecutive patients with esophageal SCC treated with definitive CCRT. We evaluated the factors associated with complete remission (CR) after CCRT and analyzed the pattern of treatment failure of recurred patients and incomplete remission patients. The failures were categorized as either within (locoregional failure) or outside the radiation field (out-field failure).

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients achieved CR after CCRT. Consolidation chemotherapy was significantly associated with CR. Only 4 (7.0%) patients had CR after CCRT in patients with M1a node (Celiac or subclavian lymph nodes involvement by 6th AJCC). During follow-up, 74 patients (54.4%) experienced locoregional failure, 26 (19.1%) out-field failure, and 35 (25.7%) no failure. Esophageal obstruction prior to CCRT, residual tumor according to the first follow-up endoscopy, and poor follow-up computed tomography responses were significantly associated with locoregional failure.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 70% of treatment failures were local failures. Future therapeutic strategies need to focus on improving local control to increase treatment outcomes of CCRT.

Locally advanced cancer of the esophagus, current treatment strategies, and future directions

For patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer no clear standard of care exists. Notwithstanding several negative phase III studies the data provide support for so-called trimodality treatment and this is probably the most common approach. Even the role of surgery has been questioned. These alternative approaches are set against a changing epidemiological background whereby adenocarcinoma has become the predominant tumor type, at least in the western world. In recent times an emphasis has been placed on the better selection of patients, predominantly based on data that shows a markedly improved survival in those who exhibit a response to neo-adjuvant therapy. In this article we review the major studies and discuss new approaches to the management of patients with locally advanced cancer of the esophagus.

Long-term outcomes following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with clinical T2N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

The optimal treatment for patients with local esophageal cancer (cT2N0 disease) has not yet been defined. We sought to determine whether neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) can improve prognosis compared with direct esophagectomy in this patient group. Between 1994 and 2005, patients with cT2N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent either neoadjuvant CRT or surgery as first-line treatment were retrospectively reviewed. We collected information on their demographic characteristics, staging modality, clinical and pathological stages, perioperative course, and survival. The study endpoints included tumor recurrence, disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival rate. Of the 71 eligible patients, 14 received an esophagectomy first, whereas the remaining 57 received neoadjuvant CRT first. Despite the high pathological complete response (pCR) rate of 37% after neoadjuvant CRT, routine neoadjuvant CRT did not translate into better survival compared to direct surgery (5-year DSS: 39% vs. 68%, P= 0.17). The dramatic survival difference between pCR and non-pCR patients (5-year DSS: 85% vs. 4%, P < 0.001) accounts for these unsatisfactory results. In our series, the administration of neoadjuvant CRT to patients with clinical stage T2N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma did not significantly improve outcomes compared with direct esophagectomy.

Prognosis of esophageal cancer patients with pathologic complete response after preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

To define failure patterns and predictive factors in esophageal cancer patients who had a pathologic complete response (pCR) after preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (PCRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 61 esophageal cancer patients who were enrolled in prospective studies and showed pCR after PCRT. All of the patients had squamous cell carcinoma. Of the patients, 40 were treated with hyperfractionated radiotherapy (4,560 cGy in 28 fractions) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin (FP), and 21 patients received conventional fractionation radiotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin (XP).

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 45.2 months (range, 6.5-162.3 months). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival rates (DFS) were 60.2% and 80.4%, respectively. In univariate analysis, age and lymph node (LN) metastasis were poor prognostic factors for OS, and pretreatment weight loss (>2 kg) was a poor prognostic factor for DFS. In multivariate analysis, lymph node metastasis and pretreatment weight loss were independent prognostic factors for OS and DFS. Nine patients (15%) had disease recurrence. Of the nine patients, 5 patients had locoregional failure, 1 patients had distant metastasis, and 3 patients had distant and locoregional failure. In-field failure occurred in 5 patients; out-of-field failure occurred in 1 patient; both in-field and out-of-field failure occurred in 2 patients; and both marginal and out-of-field failure occurred in 1 patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Even in pCR patients, the most common failure site was within the radiation field, which suggests that more efficient local treatment is needed. Tumor recurrence was more common in patients with older age and with pretreatment weight loss.

Esofagectomia trans-hiatal versus transtorácica: experiência do Instituto Nacional do Câncer (INCA)

OBJETIVO: Analisar comparativamente a morbimortalidade e sobrevida após esofagectomia trans-hiatal (TH) ou transtorácica (TT). METODOS: Estudo retrospectivo não randomizado de 68 pacientes com neoplasia de esôfago operados no INCA entre 1997 e 2005, divididos em dois grupos: 1 - TH (33 pacientes); e 2 - TT (35 pacientes). RESULTADOS: A idade média foi 40,7 anos (25 - 74 anos), sendo 73,5% homens. Tumores do 1/3 médio predominaram no Grupo 2 (48,6% versus 21,2%, p = 0,02). A média de linfonodos dissecados foi maior no Grupo 2 (21,6 versus 17,8 linfonodos, p = 0,04), porém sem diferença no número de linfonodos metastáticos (4,1 versus 3,9 linfonodos, p = 0,85). O tempo cirúrgico médio foi maior no Grupo 2 (410 versus 270 minutos, p = 0,001). O tempo médio de internação também foi maior no Grupo 2 (19 versus 14 dias, p = 0,001). A morbidade operatória foi 50%, sem diferença significativa (42,4% versus 57,1%, p = 0,23). Fístula esofágica ocorreu em 13,2%, sem diferença significativa (9,1% versus 17,1%, p = 0,23). A mortalidade foi 5,8% (04 pacientes), sem diferença significativa (1,4% versus 4,4%, p = 0,83). CONCLUSÃO: Neste estudo, a morbimortalidade não apresentou diferença em relação à via de acesso para a esofagectomia, apesar do maior tempo cirúrgico e de permanência hospitalar na via TT. A sobrevida global em 3 e 5 anos também foi maior na TT, possivelmente devido a maior freqüência de estágios iniciais em pacientes submetidos à transtorácica.

Pretreatment T3-4 stage is an adverse prognostic factor in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who achieve pathological complete response following preoperative chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by esophagectomy is becoming one of the standard treatment strategies for esophageal cancer. Pathologic complete response (pCR) after CRT is the best predictor of survival in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus. Although no adjuvant treatment is recommended for individuals who achieve pCR, approximately 30% of these patients develop recurrence. Herein we sought to retrospectively investigate the independent predictors of tumor recurrence in this patient group.

METHODS

Between 1995 and 2004, we investigated seventy patients (69 males and 1 female; mean age: 56.1 years) with esophageal SCC who achieved pCR following preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Study end points included tumor recurrence, disease-specific survival (DSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors for the study end points.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up time for patients who survived was 65.8 months. At the time of analysis, 18 patients (25.7%) died of the disease and 22 patients (31.4%) developed recurrence. Multivariate analysis showed that pretherapy T3-4 disease was the most important adverse factor for tumor recurrence (P = 0.007), DFS (P = 0.005), and DSS (P = 0.026). The 5-year DFS was 45% for patients with clinical T3-4 disease and 85% for those with clinical T1-2 disease (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown that up to 31.4% of patients with esophageal SCC who achieve pCR develop tumor recurrence thereafter. Pretherapy T3-4 disease was a strong and independent adverse risk factor for 5-year tumor recurrence, DSS and DFS. High-risk patients with T3-4 disease should be followed with a strict surveillance protocol.

Histological type of esophageal cancer might affect response to neo-adjuvant radiochemotherapy and subsequent prognosis

BACKGROUND

This study investigates response and prognosis after neo-adjuvant chemoradiation (CTx/RTx) in patients with advanced esophageal carcinoma, according to histological type.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with uT3 carcinoma of the esophagus treated with curative-intention esophagectomy from 1997 until 2006 were included in this retrospective analysis. Patients receiving preoperative CTx/RTx (5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, 36 Gy) were compared with those with primary surgery for pT3 tumors. Therapy response after CTx/RTx was evaluated using 'Cologne Regression Grade' (minor response: >or=10% vital residual tumor cells (VRTCs), major response: <10% VRTC or pathologic complete response). Prognosis was evaluated for adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

RESULTS

Of 297 patients, 52% were SCC and 48% AC. In all, 192 patients underwent CTx/RTx, 100 (65%) SCC and 92 (64%) AC (nonsignificant). In SCC group 51% and in AC group 29% achieved major response (P < 0.01). Patients with major response had a 2-year survival rate (2y-SR) of 78% versus those with minor response or without CTx/RTx, with a 2y-SR of 45% (P = 0.001). Examining patients with major response exclusively, the prognosis of AC (2y-SR 85%) is better than that of SCC (2y-SR 54%) (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study concludes that in esophageal tumors, response to and prognosis after neo-adjuvant CTx/RTx vary according to histology.

Oxford experience with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection for esophageal adenocarcinomas and squamous cell tumors

The Medical Research Council trial for oesophageal cancer (OEO2) trial demonstrated a clear survival benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable esophageal carcinoma. Since February 2000 it has been our practice to offer this chemotherapy regime to patients with T2 and T3 or T1N1 tumors. We analyzed prospectively collected data of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to esophageal resection under the care of a single surgeon. Complications of treatment and overall outcomes were evaluated. A total of 194 patients had cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil prior to esophageal resection. Six patients (5.7%) had progressive disease and were inoperable (discovered in four at surgery). During chemotherapy one patient died and one perforated (operated immediately). Complications including severe neutropenia, coronary artery spasm, renal impairment and pulmonary edema led to the premature cessation of chemotherapy in 12 patients (6.2%). A total of 182 patients with a median age of 63 (range 30-80), 41 squamous and 141 adenocarcinomas underwent surgery. Operations were 91 left thoracoabdominal (50%), 45 radical transhiatal (25%), 40 Ivor-Lewis (22%) and six stage three (3%), and 78.6% had microscopically complete (R0) resections. Median survival was 28 months with 77.3% surviving for 1 year and 57.7% for 2 year. In hospital mortality was 5.5% and anastomotic leak rate 7.7%. A radical surgical approach to the primary tumor in combination with OEO2 neoadjuvant chemotherapy has led to a high R0 resection rate and good survival with acceptable morbidity and mortality.

Multimodality therapy for pancreatic cancer

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy can be administered safely to patients with pancreatic cancer. Complete pathologic responses are rare, however, and the benefits of this approach compared with standard adjuvant therapy are uncertain. The only way to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is a prospective trial involving a uniform patient population comparing the results of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy and a cohort receiving surgery alone. Such a study can be designed in an ethically sound manner but requires the collaboration of numerous institutions and careful coordination to achieve statistically conclusive results. The future of pancreatic cancer research rests on the availability and rapid transfer of new therapies from the laboratory to clinical research.