Chemosensitivity of patients with recurrent esophageal cancer receiving perioperative chemotherapy

The treatment efficacy and prognosis of each treatment in early postoperative recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Various treatments are used for early postoperative recurrence of esophageal cancer, which has a poor prognosis. We evaluated the differences in outcomes and prognoses of each treatment modality between patients with early and late recurrence.

METHODS

Early and late recurrence were defined as recurrence within and after six postoperative months, respectively. Of the 351 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent R0 resection esophagectomy, 98 experienced postoperative recurrence (early recurrence, n = 41; late recurrence, n = 57). We evaluated the characteristics of patients with early and late recurrence and compared their treatment responses and prognoses.

RESULTS

Regarding treatment responses for chemotherapy or immunotherapy, the objective response rate was not significantly different between the early- and late-recurrence groups. For chemoradiotherapy, the objective response rate was significantly lower in the early-recurrence group than in the late-recurrence group. The overall survival was significantly worse in the early-recurrence group than in the late-recurrence group. An analysis by treatment type showed that the early-recurrence group had significantly worse overall survival for chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy than the late-recurrence group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with early recurrence had particularly poor prognoses with worse post recurrence treatment efficacy than those with late recurrence. The differences in the treatment efficacy and prognosis were particularly pronounced for local therapy.

Significance of chemotherapy-free interval and tumor regression grade in patients with recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving chemotherapy with fluorouracil and platinum after esophagectomy following preoperative chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

In Japan, standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) includes preoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus cisplatin followed by esophagectomy. However, its efficacy is unclear in patients with recurrent disease with < 6 months of chemotherapy-free interval (CFI) after preoperative chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy and in those with ≥ 6 months of CFI and poor pathological response to prior preoperative chemotherapy.

METHOD

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of fluorouracil plus platinum in patients with recurrent ESCC who received preoperative chemotherapy followed by curative esophagectomy.

RESULTS

Among 105 patients with recurrent ESCC after preoperative chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy, a total of 55 patients received fluorouracil plus platinum for recurrent disease. Patients with a CFI < 6 months (n = 20) had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) (median, 7.1 vs 14.5 months, P = 0.008) compared with those with a CFI ≥ 6 months (n = 35). Multivariate analysis showed that OS was worse in patients with a CFI < 6 months or a tumor regression grade (TRG) ≤ 1a. Furthermore, in patients with a CFI ≥ 6 months, TRG ≤ 1a was associated with significantly shorter OS (11.1 months vs. not reached, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Fluorouracil plus platinum was ineffective for recurrent ESCC in patients with a CFI < 6 months and in those with a CFI ≥ 6 months and a TRG ≤ 1a. Alternate regimens including nivolumab or pembrolizumab might be considered for the treatment for recurrence in these patients.

miRNA-181a-5p Enhances the Sensitivity of Cells to Cisplatin in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma by Targeting CBLB

Background

Cisplatin (CDDP) is extensively used for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) chemotherapy, while cisplatin resistance is getting worse. microRNA-181a-5p (miR-181a-5p) has been reported to play an important role in various human cancers. However, the effect and underlying mechanism of miR-181a-5p in cisplatin resistance of EAC remain unclear.

Methods

Cisplatin-resistant EAC cells OE19/CDDP and parental sensitive OE19 cells were applied for experiments in vitro. The expressions of miR-181a-5p and CBLB were measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) or Western blot. The cisplatin resistance of cells was expressed by cell viability, IC50 and apoptosis rate by using CCK-8 assay or flow cytometry. The interaction between miR-181a-5p and CBLB was evaluated by luciferase reporter assay and RIP assay. In vivo experiments were conducted via the murine xenograft model.

Results

miR-181a-5p was highly expressed while CBLB was lowly expressed in OE19 cell lines compared with OE19/CDDP cells. In cisplatin-resistant OE19/CDDP cells, miR-181a-5p up-regulation or CBLB knockdown inhibited cell viability and inducted apoptosis. In cisplatin-sensitive OE19 cells, miR-181a-5p inhibition or CBLB overexpression promoted cell viability and suppressed apoptosis. CBLB was confirmed to be a target of miR-181a-5p, and rescue assay showed CBLB overexpression reversed the suppression of OE19/CDDP cell viability induced by miR-181a-5p up-regulation, and its down-regulation attenuated miR-181a-5p-inhibition-mediated enhancement of OE19 cell viability. In addition, miR-181a-5p up-regulation enhanced the cytotoxicity of cisplatin in EAC in vivo.

Conclusion

miR-181a-5p enhanced the sensitivity of cells to cisplatin in EAC by targeting CBLB, indicating a promising sensitizer of cisplatin therapy in clinical esophageal cancer.

RAC1 inhibition reverses cisplatin resistance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and induces downregulation of glycolytic enzymes

Development of chemoresistance remains a major challenge in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients despite treatment advances. However, the role of RAC1 in chemoresistance of ESCC and the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown. In this study, we found that higher levels of RAC1 expression were associated with poorer prognosis in ESCC patients. Enhanced RAC1 expression increased cell proliferation, migration, and chemoresistance in vitro. Combination therapy using RAC1 inhibitor EHop-016 and cisplatin significantly promoted cell viability inhibition, G2/M phase cycle arrest, and apoptosis when compared to each monotherapy. Mechanistically, glycolysis was significantly downregulated in the RAC1 inhibitor monotherapy group and the combination group via inhibiting AKT/FOXO3a signaling when compared to the control group. Moreover, the silencing of RAC1 inhibited AKT/FOXO3a signaling and cell glycolysis while the upregulation of RAC1 produced an opposite effect. In murine xenograft models, the tumor volume and the expression of glycolytic enzymes were significantly reduced in combination therapy when compared to each monotherapy group. Overall, our study demonstrates that targeting RAC1 with an inhibitor overcomes cisplatin resistance in ESCC by suppressing glycolytic enzymes, which provides a promising strategy for treatment of ESCC in clinical practice.

Efficacy of capecitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer with or without prior treatment with fluoropyrimidine: a retrospective study

Purpose

We conducted a retrospective study to assess the outcomes of capecitabine for advanced breast cancer (ABC) after perioperative fluoropyrimidines (FPs).

Methods

The charts of patients with ABC who received capecitabine between 2008 and 2016 at the National Cancer Center Hospital (Tokyo, Japan) were reviewed. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), tumor response, and adverse events (AEs) were compared between two groups: an FP group (prior perioperative FP use) and a non-FP group (no prior FP use).

Results

Overall, 288 patients (FP n = 105; non-FP n = 183) were analyzed. The two groups had similar patient characteristics. The FP group had significantly poorer PFS than the non-FP group (multivariate hazard ratio [HR] 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–1.73; p = 0.036), although the OS did not differ significantly between the groups (multivariate HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.67–1.50; p = 0.994). With different cut-off values (relapse-free interval [RFI] = 3, 4, and 5 years), multivariate HRs for PFS were 1.32–1.67 (short RFI), and 1.00–1.25 (long RFI). A trend for a larger HR in the FP group compared to the non-FP group with short RFI than in that with long RFI was also seen for OS. Response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR) did not differ significantly between the groups (RR in FP vs non-FP 13.8 vs 21.0%; p = 0.173; DCR 54.0 vs 59.9%; p = 0.418). No significant difference in AEs existed between the groups.

Conclusions

Extra caution is needed when capecitabine is considered for patients with ABC who used perioperative FP, especially those who had early recurrence.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00280-018-3617-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

MiR-218 increases sensitivity to cisplatin in esophageal cancer cells via targeting survivin expression

Objectives

Increasing evidence showed that microRNAs (miRNAs) were implicated in the chemical resistance of human cancers. We intended to investigate the role of miR-218 in cisplatin sensitivity of esophageal cancer cells.

Methods

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was carried out to analyze miR-218 expression in human esophageal cancer cell line Eca9706 and a cisplatin-resistant subline (ECa9706-CisR cells). The effects of miR-218 transfection on ECa9706 and ECa9706-CisR cell viability, including cell viability and apoptosis rate were confirmed using MTT assay, or flow cytometry, respectively. qRT-PCR was used to validate survivin as a direct target gene of miR-218 in our system.

Results

We found that miR-218 was significantly decreased in ECa9706-CisR cells compared with parent Eca9706 cells. Overexpression of miR-218 by mimics transfection would enhance cisplatin sensitivity evaluated by cell viability inhibition and apoptosis promotion. We validated here survivin as a direct target of miR-218 in ECa9706 cells, which might contribute to the chemoresistance of esophageal cancer cells to cisplatin.

Conclusions

In summary, our data suggest that miR-218 might represent as a promising sensitizer of cisplatin therapy in clinical esophageal cancer patients.

Combination chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin for gastric cancer that recurs after adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1: multi-institutional retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether S-1 plus cisplatin is effective for patients with recurrent gastric cancer after adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of S-1 plus cisplatin in patients whose gastric cancer recurred after adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy.

RESULTS

In the 52 patients evaluated, the median duration of adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy was 8.1 months, and the median recurrence-free interval (RFI) since the last administration of adjuvant S-1 was 6.4 months. Among the 36 patients with measurable lesions, 7 achieved a complete or partial response, and 13 were evaluated as having stable disease, for an overall response rate of 19.4% and a disease control rate of 55.6%. For all patients, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.8 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 12.2 months. Compared with patients with an RFI of <6 months (n = 25), patients with an RFI of ≥6 months (n = 27) had a significantly higher response rate (5.0 vs. 37.5%, respectively), longer PFS (2.3 vs. 6.2 months, respectively), and longer overall survival (7.3 vs. 16.6 months, respectively). According to a multivariate Cox model including performance status (PS) and reason for discontinuation of adjuvant S-1, an RFI of 6 months was still significantly associated with PFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

S-1 plus cisplatin is effective for patients with gastric cancer that recurs after adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy, especially for those with an RFI of ≥6 months.

A phase II study of paclitaxel by weekly 1-h infusion for advanced or recurrent esophageal cancer in patients who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel (Taxol(®)) in patients with advanced or recurrent esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients with recurrent or advanced esophageal cancer who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy were treated with paclitaxel 100 mg/m(2) once weekly by 1-h infusion on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36 of a 49-day cycle. Fifty-two patients were evaluable for efficacy and 53 for safety. Forty-one (77%) patients had recurrent, and 12 (23%) had advanced disease. Most patients (52/53) had squamous cell carcinoma, and one had adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

A median of 2 cycles was delivered (range 1-8). The overall response rate was 44.2% (23/52; 95% confidence interval (CI) 30.5, 58.7%), with 4 patients (7.7%) achieving complete response. The median duration of response was 4.8 months, and median overall survival was 10.4 months. The most common Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (52.8%), leukopenia (45.3%), anorexia (9.4%), and fatigue (9.4%). Adverse events resulted in treatment discontinuation in 34.0% of patients and dose reductions in 43.4%. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly paclitaxel demonstrated efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients with advanced or recurrent esophageal cancer and may be a treatment option for this population.

Recurrence after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery for esophageal cancer: does the pattern of recurrence differ for patients with complete response and those with partial or no response?

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that most relapses in patients with esophageal cancer having neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy would occur outside of the surgical and radiation fields.

METHODS

Recurrence patterns, time to recurrence, and median survival were examined in 267 patients who had esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy at Johns Hopkins over 19 years.

RESULTS

Of 267 patients, 82 (30.7%) showed complete response to neoadjuvant therapy, with 108 (40.4%) and 77 (28.8%) showing partial response or no response, respectively. Recurrence developed in 84 patients (patients with complete response 18/82, 21.4%; patients with partial response 39/108, 36.1%; patients with no response 27/77, 35.1%; P = .055, respectively). Most patients had recurrences at distant sites (65/84;77.4%) regardless of pathologic response, and subsequent survival was brief (median 8.37 months). Median disease-free survival was short (10 months) and did not differ based on recurrence site for patients with partial response or no response, but was longer for patients with complete response with distant recurrence, whose median disease-free survival was 27.3 months (P = .008). By multivariate analysis, no other factor except for pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy was associated with disease recurrence or death. Patients with partial response or no response were 1.97 and 2.23 times more likely to have recurrence than patients with complete response (P = .024 and P = .012, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Most esophageal cancer recurrences after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery are distant, and survival time after recurrence is short regardless of pathologic response. Fewer patients achieving complete response had recurrences, and distant recurrences in these patients manifest later than in patients showing partial response and those showing no response. Only pathologic response is significantly associated with disease recurrence, suggesting that tumor biology and chemosensitivity are critical in long-term patient outcome.