Isolated extraocular muscle involvement as the ophthalmic manifestation of leukaemia: an alternative explanation

Orbital Muscle Enlargement: What if It’s Not Graves’ Disease?

Purpose of Review

To provide the radiologist with tools to recognize findings atypical for Graves’ ophthalmopathy and differentiate between the most important and common alternative causes of extraocular muscle enlargement on CT and MR imaging.

Recent findings

We introduce five ‘red flags’ representing features that are atypical for Graves’ ophthalmopathy: unilateral disease, atypical pattern of muscle involvement, adjacent structure involvement, restricted diffusion, and absence of pain.

Summary

About 95% of the cases with extraocular enlargement are due to Graves’ ophthalmopathy, other causes are less well known and recognized. The ‘red flags’ may aid in recognizing and suggesting alternative diagnoses.

Metastasis to the extraocular muscles: a case report, literature review and pooled data analysis

Metastasis to the extraocular muscles (EOM) is rare. The existing literature comprises only of isolated case reports therefore a summative description of these lesions is lacking. This study presents a case of bilateral rectus muscle metastasis from malignant melanoma. Furthermore a literature review and pooled data analysis is undertaken with 43 articles encompassing 77 patients and 101 eyes. Mean age was 53 years, 54% were male, 66% had unilateral involvement and 34% had bilateral involvement. The primary malignancies were melanoma (n = 17, 22%), breast (n = 15, 15%) and carcinoid (n = 11, 14%). A single muscle was involved in 56 eyes (67%) and multiple muscles in 27 eyes (33%). Lateral rectus was most commonly affected (n = 44, 53%). Presenting symptoms included restricted eye movements (n = 48, 62%), proptosis (n = 45, 58%), diplopia (n = 27, 35%) and pain (n = 18, 23%). Scattered case reports have previously made it difficult to characterise this phenomenon thus a pooled data analysis is presented.