Immunological Rapid Urease Test for Detecting Helicobacter pylori: Comparative Study of Biopsy Specimens and Gastric Mucus

Diagnostic accuracy of "sweeping" method compared to conventional sampling in rapid urease test for Helicobacter pylori detection in atrophic mucosa

Although the rapid urease test (RUT) is a simple method for detecting Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, it requires sufficient biopsy samples and its sensitivity varies depending on the site and condition of H. pylori infection. We compared the diagnostic performance of a “sweeping method” for H. pylori detection with the conventional biopsy sampling method in atrophic gastric conditions which can reduce RUT accuracy. This prospective study included 279 patients who underwent upper endoscopy to determine the presence of H. pylori infection. Gastric mucosa of both the antrum and the corpus were swabbed, and we named this method the “sweeping method”. Biopsy sampling for the conventional method, histologic evaluation, and polymerase chain reaction were performed at the same time. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the sweeping method were 0.941, 0.826, and 0.903, respectively, compared to 0.685, 0.859, and 0.742, respectively, for the conventional biopsy method. The area under the receiver operating curve for the sweeping method was 0.884 versus 0.772 for the conventional method (P < 0.001). The sweeping method had a faster detection time than the conventional method. Compared to conventional biopsy sampling, the sweeping method with the RUT provided higher sensitivity and accuracy for the detection of H. pylori, with a faster detection time.

Use of a combination of brushing technique and the loop-mediated isothermal amplification method as a novel, rapid, and safe system for detection of Helicobacter pylori

Gastric mucosal biopsy is widely used in the detection of Helicobacter pylori but is associated with a number of problems, including false-negative results due to sampling error and massive bleeding after biopsy. Given the extended period required to culture H. pylori, detection would be further improved by the use of rapid detection methods such as PCR. Here, we developed a rapid, safe, and convenient method for collecting H. pylori which combines endoscopic brushing with the loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method. The specificity and sensitivity of LAMP were examined using nine urease-generating non-H. pylori bacterial species, Escherichia coli, Clostridium perfringens, Campylobacter jejuni, Helicobacter hepaticus, and 51 H. pylori strains. Results showed that H. pylori-specific LAMP primers amplified H. pylori DNA only and that the lowest detection limit of the LAMP reaction was 10(2) CFU. Brushing and biopsy samples taken from 200 patients with peptic ulcer at Nagoya University Hospital and a regional health care center were subjected to both LAMP and culturing. No adverse effects such as severe bleeding or penetration occurred during the procedure. By LAMP assay, 123 patients were confirmed as H. pylori positive when brushing technique samples were assayed, whereas only 100 were positive when biopsy samples were assayed. Culture assay detected H. pylori in 117 patients when it was combined with the brushing technique and in 96 when it was combined with biopsy. Combination of the endoscopic brushing technique with LAMP is considered a useful and safe system for identifying H. pylori infection.

Immunological rapid urease test using monoclonal antibody for Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The current diagnostic methods for detecting Helicobacter pylori infection include rapid urease test (RUT), urea breath test (UBT), histology, culture, and serum antibody detection. The present study evaluated the efficacy of a novel highly specific test, an immunological RUT (IRUT), that uses a monoclonal antibody against H. pylori urease.

METHODS

The clinical evaluation of the IRUT was performed in 100 subjects. Each gastric mucus sample obtained during endoscopic examination was incubated for 15 min with a solid tip coated with monoclonal antibody for H. pylori urease, and then the tip was introduced into a pH-monitoring cell containing urea solution. The change in pH of the solution after the enzymatic reaction (delta pH) was measured. The performance of the IRUT was compared with culture, histology, RUT, and UBT.

RESULTS

Of the 47 H. pylori-positive subjects, 43 were IRUT positive (sensitivity, 91.5%), and of the 53 H. pylori-negative subjects, 52 were negative (specificity, 98.1%). Compared with the usual diagnostic methods, IRUT had high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of H. pylori and was no less efficient.

CONCLUSIONS

IRUT is a sensitive, specific and very rapid (within 20 min) method of detecting H. pylori infection.