NARROW BAND IMAGING IN THE DETECTION OF COLORECTAL POLYP: KOREAN EXPERIENCE

Two-stage optical system for colorectal polyp assessments

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Macroscopic real-time evaluations of the histopathology and degree of invasion of colorectal polyps help to select the most suitable endoscopic treatment method. Dual-focus (DF) narrow-band imaging (NBI) is a new imaging enhancement system that uses digital and optical methods to enhance the view of blood vessels on mucosal surfaces. However, the superiority of this technique over standard imaging techniques has not been previously reported. The aim of this study was to determine whether the two-stage optical systems in a new generation of endoscopes will increase the diagnostic accuracy of colorectal polyp recognition.

METHODS

The study included 270 patients, and 386 colorectal polyps were diagnosed and removed. The polyps were assessed with white light and NBI using one- and two-stage optical systems, respectively. After being classified according to the Kudo pit pattern schemes, the polyps were removed and histopathologically verified.

RESULTS

Regarding non-neoplastic lesions (Kudo I and II), no difference was observed in the recognition of polyps when using the NBI-DF function. We observed improved accuracy in the preliminary diagnoses of Kudo IIIL lesions (from 87.16 to 90.09%, p < 0.05) and Kudo IIIS lesions (from 87.29 to 92.79%, p < 0.01). NBI-DF also increased the accuracy of preliminary diagnoses of Kudo IV lesions (from 88.24 to 94.12%, p < 0.01). The Kudo V pit patterns were also more distinct with NBI-DF imaging, increasing the diagnostic accuracy from 91.67 to 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a two-stage optical system with electronic colorization of the mucosa increased diagnostic accuracy for differentiating colorectal polyps with neoplastic potential.

Narrow band imaging versus conventional white light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that narrow band imaging colonoscopy (NBI) might be better for detection of colorectal polyps than white light colonoscopy (WLC).

OBJECTIVES

To compare standard or high definition white light colonoscopy with narrow band imaging colonoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE to August 2011. We scanned bibliographies of relevant publications and wrote to experts for additional trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Two authors (NA and GB) independently applied the inclusion criteria and extracted the data to all potential studies without blinding.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Authors extracted data independently. Trials with adequate randomisation, allocation concealment, and complete outcome data reporting, as well as without selective outcome reporting or other bias were classified as having a lowest risk of bias. Random-effects and fixed-effect meta-analyses were conducted.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 11 randomised trials comparing WLC with NBI for detection of colorectal polyps. In total eight randomised trials with 3673 participants provided data for our analyses. There was no statistically significant difference between WLC (standard definition and high definition pooled) and NBI for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps (6 trials, n = 2832, RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.04), patients with colorectal adenomas (8 trials, n = 3673, RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.02), or patients with colorectal hyperplastic polyps (2 trials, n = 645, RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.00). Number of patients with at least one colorectal adenoma was not significantly different between WLC and NBI group irrespective of adenoma size (< 5 mm:RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.08, I(2) = 56%; 6 to 9 mm: RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.39, I(2) = 0%; ≥ 10 mm: RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.45, I(2) = 0%). Number of patients with at least one colorectal polyp, or colorectal adenoma was significantly lower in the standard definition WLC group compared to NBI group in fixed-effect meta-analysis (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.97, I(2) = 78%; RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.99, I(2) = 0%, respectively), but not significantly different in random-effects meta-analysis (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.10, I(2) = 78%). There was no statistically significant difference between high definition WLC and NBI in the number of patiens with at least one colorectal polyp or colorectal adenoma (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.28; RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.99, I(2) = 0%, respectively).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We could not find convincing evidence that NBI is significantly better than high definition WLC for the detection of patients with colorectal polyps, or colorectal adenomas. We found evidence that NBI might be better than standard definition WLC and equal to high definition WLC for detection the patients with colorectal polyps, or colorectal adenomas.