Should we think before we treat delirium?

[Opinions of physicians and nurses regarding the prevention, diagnosis and management of delirium]

To assess the current opinions of physicians and nurses regarding the prevention, diagnosis and management of delirium, survey administration was conducted to 2256 nurses and 982 physicians within the University Hospitals of Leuven (Belgium). Response rate was 26% with 819 respondents (600 nurses; 219 physicians) completing the questionnaire. 72% of the respondents considered delirium as a minor problem or no problem at all. Yet over half of respondents working on a palliative care unit (87%, n=15), traumatological ward (67%, n=18), cardio-thoracic surgery ward (58%, n=20), intensive care unit (55%, n=120) and geriatric ward (55%, n=42) reported it as a serious problem. Delirium was considered as an underdiagnosed (85%) but preventable (75%) syndrome. Yet patients at risk are rarely (34%) or never (52%) screened for delirium. In case of screening (48%), only 4% used a specific validated assessment tool. 97% of all respondents were convinced that delirium requires an active and immediate intervention of nurse and physician. 82% of the physicians preferred haldol to treat delirium, in case of alcohol withdrawal 69% chose tranxene. Physical restraints were considered important in the management of delirium by a greater proportion of nurses (49%) than physicians (28%). The severity of the problem is underestimated. While opinions regarding the treatment were quite correct, prevention and early detection of delirium deserve more attention.

Delirium as a disorder of consciousness

Delirium is a common clinical phenomenon, often described as a disorder of consciousness. Delirium is commonly under recognised. The usual response to under recognition is to exhort practitioners to do a better job, but perhaps under recognition should instead be seen as a daily pragmatic challenge to how delirium is conceptualised. Here we retain the view that delirium is a disorder of consciousness, but propose a more multidimensional approach to this key feature. We argue that delirium can be recognised through evaluating arousal, attention and temporal orientation. We suggest that this approach can be validated by testing whether it leads to better delirium identification, accounts for the characteristic clinical disturbances, explains why delirium is common in the extreme age groups and why in later life its boundaries often blend with dementia.

Delirium: The clinical concept

Delirium is a common syndrome complicating terminal illness. It is underrecognized partly because it is a difficult clinical concept. Consciousness, awareness, alertness, arousal, awakeness, vigilance, and attention are some of the terms used to describe the deficits occurring in delirium. Though interconnected, they are often loosely defined. Alertness is the primary impairment, and attentional deficits are objective clinical indices of the cognitive impairments of delirium. Simple bedside assessments of delirium are considered. The “deliriant” threshold and the symptomatic fluctuations of delirium are important concepts in the understanding of delirium. Jackson's conceptualization of the nervous system is relevant to delirium. Raising the deliriant threshold by multicomponent interventions is the intent of the palliative management of terminal delirium.

Multicomponent intervention strategies for managing delirium in hospitalized older people: systematic review

AIM

The aim of this systematic review was to determine the characteristics and efficacy of various multicomponent intervention strategies for delirium in hospitalized older people.

BACKGROUND

Delirium is a common accompaniment to acute illness in hospitalized older people and has greater costs of care concurrent as well as greater morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was undertaken involving all major databases (including the Cochrane Library, Medline, Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Invert) and reference lists of all relevant papers. Selection criteria were: evaluation of a multicomponent intervention for delirium, inclusion of an operational definition for delirium consistent with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-criteria, randomized controlled trials, studies with a quasi-experimental design and reporting on primary data. To generate a description of the characteristics of these multicomponent strategies, the components of these programmes were identified and categorized. Effects on incidence of delirium, cognitive functioning, duration and severity of delirium, functional status, hospital length of stay, and mortality were analysed.

FINDINGS

Three randomized controlled trials, three controlled studies and one before-after study were identified. Intervention strategies to prevent delirium proved to be the most efficacious in reducing its incidence, both with surgical and medical patients. Some additional positive effects of preventive strategies were found on the duration and severity of delirium, and functional status. Conversely, strategies to treat delirium were rather ineffective in older people admitted to medical services. In a population of older people admitted for surgery, however, a shorter duration and a diminished severity of delirium were demonstrated. None of intervention strategies produced beneficial effects on length of stay or mortality.

CONCLUSION

Multicomponent interventions to prevent delirium are the most effective and should be implemented through synergistic cooperation between the various healthcare disciplines. Nurses should play a pivotal role in prevention, early recognition and treatment.

Inter-Rater Reliability of Delirium Rating Scales

Delirium continues to be under-recognized despite use of rating scales with apparently high inter-rater reliability. We analyzed the inter-reliability data of published rating scales for delirium using a standard questionnaire to evaluate if the inter-rater reliability was assessed rigorously. Most studies employed a heterogeneous group of cognitively disordered elderly, however other aspects of inter-rater reliability estimation were less than rigorous. This suggests that the reported reliability may be spuriously high, which may have implications on the ability of clinicians to discriminate delirium from other causes of cognitive impairment in practice. The methodology of assessing inter-rater reliability of delirium scales needs to improve and reliability should be evaluated when the settings of administration change substantially.