Martínez-Roda JA, Vilaseca M, Ondategui JC, Aguirre M, Pujol J. Effects of aging on optical quality and visual function.
Clin Exp Optom 2016;
99:518-525. [PMID:
27452417 DOI:
10.1111/cxo.12369]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2015] [Revised: 07/31/2015] [Accepted: 08/04/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
We assessed the effects of aging on visual function and optical quality in a healthy adult population and provide reference values for different age ranges.
METHODS
We conducted a prospective study with 198 healthy volunteers from 31 to 70 years of age. The visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) at 3, 6, 12 and 18 cycles per degree (cpd) frequencies were assessed, together with values of optical quality and intraocular scattering obtained with a double-pass system (Optical Quality Analysis System - OQAS), specifically the modulation transfer function cutoff frequency (MTFcutoff ), the Strehl ratio, the OQAS values (OV) at contrasts of 100, 20 and nine per cent and the objective scatter index (OSI). We studied the change of these variables with age and obtained standard values for optical quality and intraocular scattering parameters for four age groups: 31 to 40, 41 to 50, 51 to 60 and 61 to 70 years.
RESULTS
We found significant correlations between age and all variables analysed and significant differences among the age groups considered except for CS (3 cpd) (p = 0.067). Ageing particularly affected low-contrast parameters, such as the OV nine per cent and the OSI, which decreased to 37 and 50 per cent of their original values, respectively. The OSI was found to provide high sensitivity and specificity values, when healthy and caratactous eyes were considered. The results suggest that optical deficits are compensated until 50 years of age with sensory and perceptual factors, as smaller changes were found for visual function than for objective measurements of optical quality and intraocular scattering.
CONCLUSIONS
Measures of optical quality assessed by subjective psychophysical and objective techniques varied differently with age. Values obtained for each age group can be used to determine normal limits of optical quality and intraocular scattering for diagnosis of ocular conditions.
Collapse