Optimal irrigation pressures in operative choledochoscopy

Risk Factors for Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome After Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangioscopic Lithotripsy

Background

There is a lack of validated predictive models for the occurrence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) after percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotripsy (PTCSL) for the treatment of hepatolithiasis. This is the first study to estimate the incidence of SIRS after PTCSL.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 284 PTCSL sessions for the treatment of hepatolithiasis at our institution between January 2019 and January 2023 was performed. The development of SIRS after PTCSL was the primary study endpoint. Independent risk factors for SIRS after PTCSL were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. A nomogram prediction model was constructed using these independent risk factors, and the predictive value was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

The incidence of SIRS after PTCSL was 20.77%. According to multivariate analysis, the number of PTCSL sessions (odds ratio [OR]=0.399, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.202-0.786, p=0.008), stone location (OR=2.194, 95% CI=1.107-4.347, p=0.024), intraoperative use of norepinephrine (OR=0.301, 95% CI=0.131-0.689, p=0.004), intraoperative puncture (OR=3.476, 95% CI=1.749-6.906, P<0.001), preoperative gamma-glutamyltransferase (OR=1.002, 95% CI=1.001-1.004, p=0.009), and preoperative total lymphocyte count (OR=1.820, 95% CI=1.110-2.985, p=0.018) were found to be independent risk factors for the development of SIRS after PTCSL. These six independent risk factors were used to construct a nomogram prediction model, which showed satisfactory accuracy with an area under the ROC curve of 0.776 (95% CI: 0.702-0.850).

Conclusion

The number of PTCSL sessions, stone location, intraoperative use of norepinephrine, intraoperative puncture, preoperative gamma-glutamyltransferase, and preoperative total lymphocyte count may predict the occurrence of SIRS after PTCSL. This prediction model may help clinicians identify high-risk patients in advance.

The Endoscopy Patient as a Vector and Victim

Patient and procedural factors can increase the risk of infectious adverse events during endoscopy. Prophylactic antibiotic use must be judicious and individualized in the era of antibiotic resistance. New and emerging procedures require high-quality studies to elucidate appropriate risk profiles.

Complication Analysis with Percutaneous Postoperative Choledochoscopy in 826 Patients: A Single-Center Study

Background: Advances in choledochoscopy technology lead to an improvement in the treatment of hepatolithiasis. The aim of this study is to analyze the complications and efficacy of percutaneous postoperative choledochoscopy (PPOC) for residual stones. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent PPOC for residual stones. Main outcome measures included the rate of stone removal and postoperative complications. Results: Eight hundred twenty-six patients received PPOC. The average duration of choledochoscopy was 30 min (range, 14-42 min). Complications included basket incarceration, T-tube dislodgement, bleeding, bile leaks, and infection. Residual stone clearance rate was achieved in 97% of the cases. Conclusions: PPOC is a safe and effective approach for residual stones.

Percutaneous video choledochoscopic treatment of retained biliary stones via dilated T-tube tract

BACKGROUND

Retained biliary stones is a common clinical problem in patients after surgery for complicated gallstone disease. When postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic sphincterotomy are unsuccessful, several percutaneous procedures for stone removal can be applied as alternatives to relaparotomy. These procedures are performed either under fluoroscopic control or with the use of choledochoscopy, but it is also possible to combine these methods.

METHODS

Since 1994, we have used the percutaneous video choledochoscopic technique for the removal of difficult retained biliary stones via dilated T-tube tract in 17 patients, applying the technique of percutaneous stone extraction used in urology. While waiting for the T-tube tract to mature and after the removal of the T-tube, the dilatation of its tract was 26-30 Fr. Stone removal was carried out using a flexible video choledochoscope and a rigid renoscope under fluoroscopic control, with the aid of Dormia baskets, rigid forceps, and high-pressure irrigation.

RESULTS

We performed 23 operative procedures, and the clearance of the biliary ducts was successful in all cases. There were no major complications or deaths.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous video choledochoscopic-assisted removal of large retained biliary stones via the T-tube tract is a highly effective and safe procedure. Its advantages over other procedures include the ability to visualize the stones and noncalculous filling defects; it also guarantees that the stones can be removed under visual video endoscopic control. It has no problems related to tract or stone size.

Operative choledochoscopy in patients with acute cholangitis: a prospective, randomized study

A prospective, randomized evaluation of operative choledochoscopy was carried out during emergency surgery in patients with acute cholangitis or acute suppurative cholangitis when conservative management had failed. After common bile duct exploration, 79 patients were randomized to have choledochoscopy and 78 patients to the control group. Laboratory and clinical parameters showed that choledochoscopy did not increase the incidence of septicaemia, acute pancreatitis, persistent cholangitis, postoperative wound sepsis, intraperitoneal sepsis and hospital mortality. The incidence of retained common bile duct stones detected by T tube cholangiography performed in the second postoperative week was significantly reduced (P less than 0.01) after choledochoscopy. Choledochoscopy detected stones missed by conventional common bile duct exploration in ten patients. It is concluded that choledochoscopy is a safe and effective technique in patients with acute cholangitis and acute suppurative cholangitis.