Management of the traumatized liver: an appraisal of 63 cases

Systematic Review of the Management of Retro-Hepatic Inferior Vena Cava Injuries

Background

Retro-hepatic inferior vena cava (RHIVC) injuries resulting from blunt or penetrating abdominal trauma are rare but devastating events that remain a considerable challenge to even the most experienced doctors, which continue to carry a considerable mortality.

Aim

To establish a better understanding of the management of RHIVC injuries and to identify any adjuncts or operative methods that were associated with an increased survival.

Methods

A systematic review of the MEDLINE database was conducted using Medical Search Headings and exploded keywords and phrases. Studies were screened and subjected to inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data were extracted in a methodical manner collecting population demographics, morbidity, mortality and operative intervention, where provided. Operative strategies were compared and discussed.

Results

An initial search identified 483 articles. Following duplicate removal and abstract screening, 85 full-text articles were assessed with 25 meeting the desired criteria and were, therefore, included in the systematic review. Key operative strategies and complications were identified and discussed.

Conclusion

The wide variety of operative interventions in the management of RHIVC liver injuries described attest to the increased efforts to improve outcomes. The overall improvement in mortality can be noted since the earlier descriptions reported mortality approaching 100% compared to the 52% reported in this review. An algorithm has been proposed based on these findings and our experiences for the management of RHIVC injuries.

Review of liver trauma management in Tasmania: an analysis of risk factors for mortality and morbidity

A review of liver trauma treated by the major trauma care facilities of Tasmania in the 5 year period between 1989 and 1993 is presented. The aim of this retrospective review was to provide an audit of the management of liver trauma in the island of Tasmania and to analyse the risk factors contributing to mortality and major morbidity. Thirty-seven patients were treated with a median Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 14 (range 9-34). The overall mortality rate of this series was 5.8%. Age, mechanism of injury (blunt or penetrating), delay prior to hospital presentation and modality of treatment (operative or non-operative) were not significant risk factors for mortality and morbidity; however, transfusion requirement of over 10 units of blood (P < 0.005), ISS score of over 20 (P < 0.0005), haemodynamic instability at presentation (P < 0.05) and a Hepatic Injury Score (HIS) grade of 3 or more (P < 0.05) were statistically significant risk factors.

Successful repair of major retrohepatic vascular injuries without the use of shunt or sternotomy

Injury to the retrohepatic veins and vena cava secondary to blunt abdominal trauma is often fatal. The purpose of this report is to describe the successful isolation and repair of retrohepatic vascular injuries without the use of median sternotomy or vena caval shunt. Two children with both hepatic vein and retrohepatic caval injuries from blunt trauma were treated by the following surgical approach: (1) bilateral subcostal incision with vertical midline extension; (2) packing of the liver and volume resuscitation with the Rapid Infusion System prior to vascular isolation; (3) isolation of the intrapericardial vena cava through a transdiaphragmatic pericardial window; (4) control of the suprarenal vena cava and porta hepatis; and (5) repair of vein lacerations with vascular occlusion and continuous saline irrigation for improved visualization despite continued venous bleeding. This approach was tolerated and allowed successful repair without shunting in these patients despite an average weight of 14 kg and the loss of 3 L and 23 L of blood, respectively. We attribute the success of this technique to rapid control of hemorrhage and volume resuscitation. This success suggests that the routine use of shunt or sternotomy is not necessary in these devastating injuries.

The role of hepatic resection in the management of blunt liver trauma

Forty-two (14%) of 306 patients with liver injuries presenting to Westmead Hospital over a 10-year period required hepatic resection as their definitive treatment. Two types of resection were performed: Resectional debridement utilized the plane of injury as the line of resection while anatomical resection utilized anatomical planes. Resectional debridement was used in 35 patients. In 29, the major technical problem was bleeding and 21 of these patients had associated hepatic vein injuries. In 5, the major problem was devitalized parenchyma, and, in 1, it was an intrahepatic bile duct injury. Anatomical resection was performed in 7 patients: 3 with bleeding, 2 with devitalized parenchyma, and 2 with intrahepatic bile duct injuries. Overall, 15 patients died (36%). The most common cause of death was bleeding in 9 of the 15 patients. Survivors spent a median of 32 days in hospital (range: 11-162 days) and sustained a median of 2 complications (range: 0-6). The most common complications were respiratory infection and/or failure, coagulopathy, and sepsis. Resection successfully addressed bleeding, devitalized parenchyma, and intrahepatic bile duct injuries with an acceptable mortality in critically ill patients who would otherwise have died.