Gallstone pancreatitis: a proposed management strategy

Recurrent acute biliary pancreatitis: the protective role of cholecystectomy and endoscopic sphincterotomy

BACKGROUND

Recurrent attacks of acute biliary pancreatitis (RABP) are prevented by (laparoscopic) cholecystectomy. Since the introduction of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP), several series have described a similar reduction of RABP after endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). This report discusses the different treatment options for preventing RABP including conservative treatment, cholecystectomy, ES, and combinations of these options as well as their respective timing.

METHODS

A search in PubMed for observational studies and clinical (comparative) trials published in the English language was performed on the subject of recurrent acute biliary pancreatitis and other gallstone complications after an initial attack of acute pancreatitis.

RESULT

Cholecystectomy and ES both are superior to conservative treatment in reducing the incidence of RABP. Cholecystectomy provides additional protection for gallstone-related complications and mortality. Observational studies indicate that cholecystectomy combined with ES is the most effective treatment for reducing the incidence of RABP attacks.

CONCLUSION

From the literature data it can be concluded that ES is as effective in reducing RABP as cholecystectomy but inferior in reducing mortality and overall morbidity. The combination of ES and cholecystectomy seems superior to either of the treatment methods alone. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing ES plus cholecystectomy with cholecystectomy alone is needed.

Management of gallstone pancreatitis in Auckland: progress and compliance

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in the management of acute gallstone pancreatitis include the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy,defining the role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) and early cholecystectomy to prevent recurrent pancreatitis. The aim of the present study was to review the current management of gallstone pancreatitis in Auckland Hospital, compare findings with a similar study published a decade ago and to determine the extent to which the management is compliant with recently published consensus guidelines.

METHODS

A retrospective review of consecutive patients admitted with acute pancreatitis during a 39-month study period was undertaken. Data were recorded regarding demographics, diagnosis, predicted and actual severity of gallstone pancreatitis (index and recurrent attacks), the role of ERCP and computed tomography scanning, the timing of cholecystectomy (open and laparoscopic), intraoperative cholangiography, duration of hospital stay, complications and mortality.

RESULTS

: There were 216 patients admitted with acute pancreatitis,106 of whom had proven gallstones. An ERCP was performed in 62(59%) patients with gallstone pancreatitis but not more commonly in patients with severe pancreatitis, and common bile duct stones were identified in 26% of these patients. Of the 70 (66%)patients who had a cholecystectomy, 56 (80%) had it within 3 weeks of admission. Although the proportion of patients with gallstone pancreatitis who had a cholecystectomy is similar to the earlier study, there has been a significant increase in the proportion of patients having a cholecystectomy during the index admission (chi2 = 3.83; P = 0.05). This has resulted in a reduction in recurrent pancreatitis (P < 0.001). Although the overall mortality from gallstone pancreatitis has not significantly decreased, it has for patients with predicted severe gallstone pancreatitis (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

: There has been reasonable compliance with published guidelines and some progress in the management of gallstone pancreatitis,particularly in relation to performing timely laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a reduction in the incidence of recurrent pancreatitis. Concerns remain regarding the overuse of diagnostic ERCP in patients with mild pancreatitis.

Gallstone pancreatitis: does discharge and readmission for cholecystectomy affect outcome?

BACKGROUND

Conventional surgical wisdom is that a patient with gallstone pancreatitis should have the gallbladder removed during their initial hospitalization. However, patients are now often discharged to await operating room availability.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all cases of gallstone pancreatitis at the Foothills Hospital between 1992 and 1996 was undertaken. Patients with a first attack of mild gallstone pancreatitis were studied.

RESULTS

In all, 164 patients were identified: 90 patients were discharged for readmission cholecystectomy (discharged group), and 74 patients had the cholecystectomy before discharge (in-hospital group). Over the 5-year time period the proportion of patients discharged for readmission cholecystectomy increased from 27% to 67% (p<0.01). The total number of days waited for operation was greater in the discharged group versus in-hospital group: 40+/-69 days versus 8+/-10 days respectively (mean+/-SD). There was a trend towards an increased total number of days in hospital in the in-hospital group, 15.5+/-17 days versus 10.7+/-16 days. In the discharged group 20% (18 of 90) of patients experienced an adverse event requiring readmission while awaiting operation. Three had documented recurrent pancreatitis, 10 experienced recurrent pain, and 5 developed acute cholecystitis. There were no deaths in either group.

DISCUSSION

Twenty percent of patients with gallstone pancreatitis who are discharged to await operating room time (average wait 40 days) will require readmission for biliary symptoms.

Surgical interventions for bile duct stones

Based on our experience of 420 common bile duct procedures for stone disease and a literature review, it is evident that treatment of common duct stones today is based on a wide variety of non-operative and surgical methods which are still being developed. The mode of treatment is basically related to the time of diagnosis. Methods also differ depending on the localization of calculi, on inflammatory complications of stone disease, and whether combined or isolated cholecystocholedocholithiasis is present. At the moment, traditional operative methods as well as newly developed advanced techniques have to be evaluated. Selection of patients and their appropriate surgical and non-surgical treatment is an important issue to be further developed in the next few years. Therefore, therapeutic indications and definitive therapy present a much more demanding challenge for the surgeon than in the period when only open surgery was available.